I have written some code that takes a string of html and cleans away any ugly HTML from it using jQuery (see an early prototype in this SO question). It works pretty well, but I stumbled on an issue:
When using .append() to wrap the html in a div, all script elements in the code are evaluated and run (see this SO answer for an explanation why this happens). I don't want this, I really just want them to be removed, but I can handle that later myself as long as they are not run.
I am using this code:
var wrapper = $('<div/>').append($(html));
I tried to do it this way instead:
var wrapper = $('<div>' + html + '</div>');
But that just brings forth the "Access denied" error in IE that the append() function fixes (see the answer I referenced above).
I think I might be able to rewrite my code to not require a wrapper around the html, but I am not sure, and I'd like to know if it is possible to append html without running scripts in it, anyway.
My questions:
How do I wrap a piece of unknown html
without running scripts inside it,
preferably removing them altogether?
Should I throw jQuery out the window
and do this with plain JavaScript and
DOM manipulation instead? Would that help?
What I am not trying to do:
I am not trying to put some kind of security layer on the client side. I am very much aware that it would be pointless.
Update: James' suggestion
James suggested that I should filter out the script elements, but look at these two examples (the original first and the James' suggestion):
jQuery("<p/>").append("<br/>hello<script type='text/javascript'>console.log('gnu!'); </script>there")
keeps the text nodes but writes gnu!
jQuery("<p/>").append(jQuery("<br/>hello<script type='text/javascript'>console.log('gnu!'); </script>there").not('script'))`
Doesn't write gnu!, but also loses the text nodes.
Update 2:
James has updated his answer and I have accepted it. See my latest comment to his answer, though.
How about removing the scripts first?
var wrapper = $('<div/>').append($(html).not('script'));
Create the div container
Use plain JS to put html into div
Remove all script elements in the div
Assuming script elements in the html are not nested in other elements:
var wrapper = document.createElement('div');
wrapper.innerHTML = html;
$(wrapper).children().remove('script');
var wrapper = document.createElement('div');
wrapper.innerHTML = html;
$(wrapper).find('script').remove();
This works for the case where html is just text and where html has text outside any elements.
You should remove the script elements:
var wrapper = $('<div/>').append($(html).remove("script"));
Second attempt:
node-validator can be used in the browser:
https://github.com/chriso/node-validator
var str = sanitize(large_input_str).xss();
Alternatively, PHPJS has a strip_tags function (regex/evil based):
http://phpjs.org/functions/strip_tags:535
The scripts in the html kept executing for me with all the simple methods mentioned here, then I remembered jquery has a tool for this (since 1.8), jQuery.parseHTML. There's still a catch, according to the documentation events inside attributes(i.e. <img onerror>) will still run.
This is what I'm using:
var $dom = $($.parseHTML(d));
$dom will be a jquery object with the elements found
Related
I'm trying to write some JavaScript that once the page has finished loading will create a div in the place where the is placed.
Here is a stripped-back version of the code...
window.addEventListener('load', function () {
var content = document.createElement('div');
content.id = 'div-ID';
document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0].appendChild(content);
});
It works outside of the addEventListener(), however, when inside the event listener it always puts the created div below the rest of the page content not in the place the <script> tag is placed.
I'm certain the issue is to do with this line...
document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0].appendChild(content);
I need an alternative version to this which doesn't appendChild() but my JS isn't that good and everything I've tried hasn't worked.
Its most likely simple to achieve, I've tried searching Google and Stack Overflow but my search terms don't seem to be producing the desired results.
Any help on this would be much appreciated
You could do it with Node.insertBefore
As such, your code would be something like:
document.body.insertBefore( content, document.body.childNodes[0] );
The second parameter is the referenceNode, that has following comment:
referenceNode is not an optional parameter -- you must explicitly pass a Node or null. Failing to provide it or passing invalid values may behave differently in different browser versions.
In tutorials I've learnt to use document.write. Now I understand that by many this is frowned upon. I've tried print(), but then it literally sends it to the printer.
So what are alternatives I should use, and why shouldn't I use document.write? Both w3schools and MDN use document.write.
The reason that your HTML is replaced is because of an evil JavaScript function: document.write().
It is most definitely "bad form." It only works with webpages if you use it on the page load; and if you use it during runtime, it will replace your entire document with the input. And if you're applying it as strict XHTML structure it's not even valid code.
the problem:
document.write writes to the document stream. Calling document.write on a closed (or loaded) document automatically calls document.open which will clear the document.
-- quote from the MDN
document.write() has two henchmen, document.open(), and document.close(). When the HTML document is loading, the document is "open". When the document has finished loading, the document has "closed". Using document.write() at this point will erase your entire (closed) HTML document and replace it with a new (open) document. This means your webpage has erased itself and started writing a new page - from scratch.
I believe document.write() causes the browser to have a performance decrease as well (correct me if I am wrong).
an example:
This example writes output to the HTML document after the page has loaded. Watch document.write()'s evil powers clear the entire document when you press the "exterminate" button:
I am an ordinary HTML page. I am innocent, and purely for informational purposes. Please do not <input type="button" onclick="document.write('This HTML page has been succesfully exterminated.')" value="exterminate"/>
me!
the alternatives:
.innerHTML This is a wonderful alternative, but this attribute has to be attached to the element where you want to put the text.
Example: document.getElementById('output1').innerHTML = 'Some text!';
.createTextNode() is the alternative recommended by the W3C.
Example: var para = document.createElement('p');
para.appendChild(document.createTextNode('Hello, '));
NOTE: This is known to have some performance decreases (slower than .innerHTML). I recommend using .innerHTML instead.
the example with the .innerHTML alternative:
I am an ordinary HTML page.
I am innocent, and purely for informational purposes.
Please do not
<input type="button" onclick="document.getElementById('output1').innerHTML = 'There was an error exterminating this page. Please replace <code>.innerHTML</code> with <code>document.write()</code> to complete extermination.';" value="exterminate"/>
me!
<p id="output1"></p>
Here is code that should replace document.write in-place:
document.write=function(s){
var scripts = document.getElementsByTagName('script');
var lastScript = scripts[scripts.length-1];
lastScript.insertAdjacentHTML("beforebegin", s);
}
You can combine insertAdjacentHTML method and document.currentScript property.
The insertAdjacentHTML() method of the Element interface parses the specified text as HTML or XML and inserts the resulting nodes into the DOM tree at a specified position:
'beforebegin': Before the element itself.
'afterbegin': Just inside the element, before its first child.
'beforeend': Just inside the element, after its last child.
'afterend': After the element itself.
The document.currentScript property returns the <script> element whose script is currently being processed. Best position will be beforebegin — new HTML will be inserted before <script> itself. To match document.write's native behavior, one would position the text afterend, but then the nodes from consecutive calls to the function aren't placed in the same order as you called them (like document.write does), but in reverse. The order in which your HTML appears is probably more important than where they're place relative to the <script> tag, hence the use of beforebegin.
document.currentScript.insertAdjacentHTML(
'beforebegin',
'This is a document.write alternative'
)
As a recommended alternative to document.write you could use DOM manipulation to directly query and add node elements to the DOM.
Just dropping a note here to say that, although using document.write is highly frowned upon due to performance concerns (synchronous DOM injection and evaluation), there is also no actual 1:1 alternative if you are using document.write to inject script tags on demand.
There are a lot of great ways to avoid having to do this (e.g. script loaders like RequireJS that manage your dependency chains) but they are more invasive and so are best used throughout the site/application.
I fail to see the problem with document.write. If you are using it before the onload event fires, as you presumably are, to build elements from structured data for instance, it is the appropriate tool to use. There is no performance advantage to using insertAdjacentHTML or explicitly adding nodes to the DOM after it has been built. I just tested it three different ways with an old script I once used to schedule incoming modem calls for a 24/7 service on a bank of 4 modems.
By the time it is finished this script creates over 3000 DOM nodes, mostly table cells. On a 7 year old PC running Firefox on Vista, this little exercise takes less than 2 seconds using document.write from a local 12kb source file and three 1px GIFs which are re-used about 2000 times. The page just pops into existence fully formed, ready to handle events.
Using insertAdjacentHTML is not a direct substitute as the browser closes tags which the script requires remain open, and takes twice as long to ultimately create a mangled page. Writing all the pieces to a string and then passing it to insertAdjacentHTML takes even longer, but at least you get the page as designed. Other options (like manually re-building the DOM one node at a time) are so ridiculous that I'm not even going there.
Sometimes document.write is the thing to use. The fact that it is one of the oldest methods in JavaScript is not a point against it, but a point in its favor - it is highly optimized code which does exactly what it was intended to do and has been doing since its inception.
It's nice to know that there are alternative post-load methods available, but it must be understood that these are intended for a different purpose entirely; namely modifying the DOM after it has been created and memory allocated to it. It is inherently more resource-intensive to use these methods if your script is intended to write the HTML from which the browser creates the DOM in the first place.
Just write it and let the browser and interpreter do the work. That's what they are there for.
PS: I just tested using an onload param in the body tag and even at this point the document is still open and document.write() functions as intended. Also, there is no perceivable performance difference between the various methods in the latest version of Firefox. Of course there is a ton of caching probably going on somewhere in the hardware/software stack, but that's the point really - let the machine do the work. It may make a difference on a cheap smartphone though. Cheers!
The question depends on what you are actually trying to do.
Usually, instead of doing document.write you can use someElement.innerHTML or better, document.createElement with an someElement.appendChild.
You can also consider using a library like jQuery and using the modification functions in there: http://api.jquery.com/category/manipulation/
This is probably the most correct, direct replacement: insertAdjacentHTML.
Try to use getElementById() or getElementsByName() to access a specific element and then to use innerHTML property:
<html>
<body>
<div id="myDiv1"></div>
<div id="myDiv2"></div>
</body>
<script type="text/javascript">
var myDiv1 = document.getElementById("myDiv1");
var myDiv2 = document.getElementById("myDiv2");
myDiv1.innerHTML = "<b>Content of 1st DIV</b>";
myDiv2.innerHTML = "<i>Content of second DIV element</i>";
</script>
</html>
Use
var documentwrite =(value, method="", display="")=>{
switch(display) {
case "block":
var x = document.createElement("p");
break;
case "inline":
var x = document.createElement("span");
break;
default:
var x = document.createElement("p");
}
var t = document.createTextNode(value);
x.appendChild(t);
if(method==""){
document.body.appendChild(x);
}
else{
document.querySelector(method).appendChild(x);
}
}
and call the function based on your requirement as below
documentwrite("My sample text"); //print value inside body
documentwrite("My sample text inside id", "#demoid", "block"); // print value inside id and display block
documentwrite("My sample text inside class", ".democlass","inline"); // print value inside class and and display inline
I'm not sure if this will work exactly, but I thought of
var docwrite = function(doc) {
document.write(doc);
};
This solved the problem with the error messages for me.
In tutorials I've learnt to use document.write. Now I understand that by many this is frowned upon. I've tried print(), but then it literally sends it to the printer.
So what are alternatives I should use, and why shouldn't I use document.write? Both w3schools and MDN use document.write.
The reason that your HTML is replaced is because of an evil JavaScript function: document.write().
It is most definitely "bad form." It only works with webpages if you use it on the page load; and if you use it during runtime, it will replace your entire document with the input. And if you're applying it as strict XHTML structure it's not even valid code.
the problem:
document.write writes to the document stream. Calling document.write on a closed (or loaded) document automatically calls document.open which will clear the document.
-- quote from the MDN
document.write() has two henchmen, document.open(), and document.close(). When the HTML document is loading, the document is "open". When the document has finished loading, the document has "closed". Using document.write() at this point will erase your entire (closed) HTML document and replace it with a new (open) document. This means your webpage has erased itself and started writing a new page - from scratch.
I believe document.write() causes the browser to have a performance decrease as well (correct me if I am wrong).
an example:
This example writes output to the HTML document after the page has loaded. Watch document.write()'s evil powers clear the entire document when you press the "exterminate" button:
I am an ordinary HTML page. I am innocent, and purely for informational purposes. Please do not <input type="button" onclick="document.write('This HTML page has been succesfully exterminated.')" value="exterminate"/>
me!
the alternatives:
.innerHTML This is a wonderful alternative, but this attribute has to be attached to the element where you want to put the text.
Example: document.getElementById('output1').innerHTML = 'Some text!';
.createTextNode() is the alternative recommended by the W3C.
Example: var para = document.createElement('p');
para.appendChild(document.createTextNode('Hello, '));
NOTE: This is known to have some performance decreases (slower than .innerHTML). I recommend using .innerHTML instead.
the example with the .innerHTML alternative:
I am an ordinary HTML page.
I am innocent, and purely for informational purposes.
Please do not
<input type="button" onclick="document.getElementById('output1').innerHTML = 'There was an error exterminating this page. Please replace <code>.innerHTML</code> with <code>document.write()</code> to complete extermination.';" value="exterminate"/>
me!
<p id="output1"></p>
Here is code that should replace document.write in-place:
document.write=function(s){
var scripts = document.getElementsByTagName('script');
var lastScript = scripts[scripts.length-1];
lastScript.insertAdjacentHTML("beforebegin", s);
}
You can combine insertAdjacentHTML method and document.currentScript property.
The insertAdjacentHTML() method of the Element interface parses the specified text as HTML or XML and inserts the resulting nodes into the DOM tree at a specified position:
'beforebegin': Before the element itself.
'afterbegin': Just inside the element, before its first child.
'beforeend': Just inside the element, after its last child.
'afterend': After the element itself.
The document.currentScript property returns the <script> element whose script is currently being processed. Best position will be beforebegin — new HTML will be inserted before <script> itself. To match document.write's native behavior, one would position the text afterend, but then the nodes from consecutive calls to the function aren't placed in the same order as you called them (like document.write does), but in reverse. The order in which your HTML appears is probably more important than where they're place relative to the <script> tag, hence the use of beforebegin.
document.currentScript.insertAdjacentHTML(
'beforebegin',
'This is a document.write alternative'
)
As a recommended alternative to document.write you could use DOM manipulation to directly query and add node elements to the DOM.
Just dropping a note here to say that, although using document.write is highly frowned upon due to performance concerns (synchronous DOM injection and evaluation), there is also no actual 1:1 alternative if you are using document.write to inject script tags on demand.
There are a lot of great ways to avoid having to do this (e.g. script loaders like RequireJS that manage your dependency chains) but they are more invasive and so are best used throughout the site/application.
I fail to see the problem with document.write. If you are using it before the onload event fires, as you presumably are, to build elements from structured data for instance, it is the appropriate tool to use. There is no performance advantage to using insertAdjacentHTML or explicitly adding nodes to the DOM after it has been built. I just tested it three different ways with an old script I once used to schedule incoming modem calls for a 24/7 service on a bank of 4 modems.
By the time it is finished this script creates over 3000 DOM nodes, mostly table cells. On a 7 year old PC running Firefox on Vista, this little exercise takes less than 2 seconds using document.write from a local 12kb source file and three 1px GIFs which are re-used about 2000 times. The page just pops into existence fully formed, ready to handle events.
Using insertAdjacentHTML is not a direct substitute as the browser closes tags which the script requires remain open, and takes twice as long to ultimately create a mangled page. Writing all the pieces to a string and then passing it to insertAdjacentHTML takes even longer, but at least you get the page as designed. Other options (like manually re-building the DOM one node at a time) are so ridiculous that I'm not even going there.
Sometimes document.write is the thing to use. The fact that it is one of the oldest methods in JavaScript is not a point against it, but a point in its favor - it is highly optimized code which does exactly what it was intended to do and has been doing since its inception.
It's nice to know that there are alternative post-load methods available, but it must be understood that these are intended for a different purpose entirely; namely modifying the DOM after it has been created and memory allocated to it. It is inherently more resource-intensive to use these methods if your script is intended to write the HTML from which the browser creates the DOM in the first place.
Just write it and let the browser and interpreter do the work. That's what they are there for.
PS: I just tested using an onload param in the body tag and even at this point the document is still open and document.write() functions as intended. Also, there is no perceivable performance difference between the various methods in the latest version of Firefox. Of course there is a ton of caching probably going on somewhere in the hardware/software stack, but that's the point really - let the machine do the work. It may make a difference on a cheap smartphone though. Cheers!
The question depends on what you are actually trying to do.
Usually, instead of doing document.write you can use someElement.innerHTML or better, document.createElement with an someElement.appendChild.
You can also consider using a library like jQuery and using the modification functions in there: http://api.jquery.com/category/manipulation/
This is probably the most correct, direct replacement: insertAdjacentHTML.
Try to use getElementById() or getElementsByName() to access a specific element and then to use innerHTML property:
<html>
<body>
<div id="myDiv1"></div>
<div id="myDiv2"></div>
</body>
<script type="text/javascript">
var myDiv1 = document.getElementById("myDiv1");
var myDiv2 = document.getElementById("myDiv2");
myDiv1.innerHTML = "<b>Content of 1st DIV</b>";
myDiv2.innerHTML = "<i>Content of second DIV element</i>";
</script>
</html>
Use
var documentwrite =(value, method="", display="")=>{
switch(display) {
case "block":
var x = document.createElement("p");
break;
case "inline":
var x = document.createElement("span");
break;
default:
var x = document.createElement("p");
}
var t = document.createTextNode(value);
x.appendChild(t);
if(method==""){
document.body.appendChild(x);
}
else{
document.querySelector(method).appendChild(x);
}
}
and call the function based on your requirement as below
documentwrite("My sample text"); //print value inside body
documentwrite("My sample text inside id", "#demoid", "block"); // print value inside id and display block
documentwrite("My sample text inside class", ".democlass","inline"); // print value inside class and and display inline
I'm not sure if this will work exactly, but I thought of
var docwrite = function(doc) {
document.write(doc);
};
This solved the problem with the error messages for me.
I am writing a script that needs to add DOM elements to the page, at the place where the script is located (widget-like approach).
What is the best way to do this?
Here are the techniques I am considering:
Include an element with an id="Locator" right above the script. Issues:
I don't like the extra markup
If I reuse the widget in the page, several elements will have the same "Locator" id. I was thinking about adding a line in the script to remove the id once used, but still...
Add an id to the script. Issues:
even though it seems to work, the id attribute is not valid for the script element
same issue as above, several elements will have the same id if I reuse the script in the page.
Use getElementsByTagName("script") and pick the last element. This has worked for me so far, it just seems a little heavy and I am not sure if it is reliable (thinking about deferred scripts)
document.write: not elegant, but seems to do the job.
[Edit] Based on the reply from idealmachine, I am thinking about one more option:
Include in the script tag an attribute, for example goal="tabify".
Use getElementsByTagName("script") to get all the scripts.
Loop through the scripts and check the goal="tabify" attribute to find my script.
Remove the goal attribute in case there's another widget in the page.
[Edit] Another idea, also inspired by the replies so far:
Use getElementsByTagName("script") to get all the scripts.
Loop through the scripts and check innerHTML to find my script.
At the end of the script, remove the script tag in case there's another widget in the page.
Out of the box : document.currentScript (not supported by IE)
I've worked for OnlyWire which provides, as their main service, a widget to put on your site.
We use the var scripts = document.getElementsByTagName("script"); var thisScript = scripts[scripts.length - 1]; trick and it seems to work pretty well. Then we use thisScript.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, thisScript); to insert whatever we want before it, in the DOM tree.
I'm not sure I understand why you consider this a "heavy" solution... it doesn't involve iteration, it's a pure cross-browser solution which integrates perfectly.
This works with multiple copies of same code on page as well as with dynamically inserted code:
<script type="text/javascript" class="to-run">
(function(self){
if (self == window) {
var script = document.querySelector('script.to-run');
script.className = '';
Function(script.innerHTML).call(script);
} else {
// Do real stuff here. self refers to current script element.
console.log(1, self);
}
})(this);
</script>
Either document.write or picking the last script element will work for synchronously loaded scripts in the majority of web pages. However, there are some options I can think of that you did not consider to allow for async loading:
Adding a div with class="Locator" before the script. HTML classes has the advantage that duplicates are not invalid. Of course, to handle the multiple widget case, you will want to change the element's class name when done adding the HTML elements so you do not add them twice. (Note that it is also possible for an element to be a member of multiple classes; it is a space-separated list.)
Checking the src of each script element can ensure that tracking code (e.g. Google Analytics legacy tracking code) and other scripts loaded at the very end of the page will not prevent your script from working properly when async loading is used. Again, to handle the multiple widget case, you may need to remove the script elements when done with them (i.e. when the desired code has been added to the page).
One final comment I will make (although you may already be aware of this) is that when coding a widget, you need to declare all your variables using var and enclose all your code within: (JSLint can help check this)
(function(){
...
})();
This has been called a "self-executing function" and will ensure that variables used in your script do not interfere with the rest of the Web page.
Whether you drop a <script> tag in or a <div class="mywidget">, you're adding something to the markup. Personally, I prefer the latter as the script itself is only added once. Too many scripts in the page body can slow down the page load time.
But if you need to add the script tag where the widget is going to be, I don't see what's wrong with using document.write() to place a div.
I just found another method that seems to answer my question:
How to access parent Iframe from javascript
Embedding the script in an iframe allows to locate it anytime, as the script always keeps a reference to its own window.
I vote this the best approach, as it'll always work no matter how many times you add the script to the page (think widget). You're welcome to comment.
What pushed me to consider iframes in the first place was an experiment I did to build a Google gadget.
In many cases this work well (hud.js is the name of the scipt):
var jsscript = document.getElementsByTagName("script");
for (var i = 0; i < jsscript.length; i++) {
var pattern = /hud.js/i;
if ( pattern.test( jsscript[i].getAttribute("src") ) )
{
var parser = document.createElement('a');
parser.href = jsscript[i].getAttribute("src");
host = parser.host;
}
}
Also you can add individual script's name inside them.
either inside some js-script
dataset['my_prefix_name'] = 'someScriptName'
or inside HTML - in the <script> tag
data-my_prefix_name='someScriptName'
and next search appropriate one by looping over document.scripts array:
... function(){
for (var i = 0, n = document.scripts.length; i < n; i++) {
var prefix = document.scripts[i].dataset['my_prefix_name']
if (prefix == 'whatYouNeed')
return prefix
}
}
I haven't had access to internet explorer since forever, but this should work pretty much everywhere:
<script src="script.js"
data-count="30"
data-headline="My headline"
onload="uniqueFunctionName(this)"
defer
></script>
and inside script.js:
window.uniqueFunctionName = function (currentScript) {
var dataset = currentScript.dataset
console.log(dataset['count'])
console.log(dataset['headline'])
}
I am currently loading a lightbox style popup that loads it's HTML from an XHR call. This content is then displayed in a 'modal' popup using element.innerHTML = content This works like a charm.
In another section of this website I use a Flickr 'badge' (http://www.elliotswan.com/2006/08/06/custom-flickr-badge-api-documentation/) to load flickr images dynamically. This is done including a script tag that loads a flickr javascript, which in turn does some document.write statments.
Both of them work perfectly when included in the HTML. Only when loading the flickr badge code inside the lightbox, no content is rendered at all. It seems that using innerHTML to write document.write statements is taking it a step too far, but I cannot find any clue in the javascript implementations (FF2&3, IE6&7) of this behavior.
Can anyone clarify if this should or shouldn't work? Thanks.
In general, script tags aren't executed when using innerHTML. In your case, this is good, because the document.write call would wipe out everything that's already in the page. However, that leaves you without whatever HTML document.write was supposed to add.
jQuery's HTML manipulation methods will execute scripts in HTML for you, the trick is then capturing the calls to document.write and getting the HTML in the proper place. If it's simple enough, then something like this will do:
var content = '';
document.write = function(s) {
content += s;
};
// execute the script
$('#foo').html(markupWithScriptInIt);
$('#foo .whereverTheDocumentWriteContentGoes').html(content);
It gets complicated though. If the script is on another domain, it will be loaded asynchronously, so you'll have to wait until it's done to get the content. Also, what if it just writes the HTML into the middle of the fragment without a wrapper element that you can easily select? writeCapture.js (full disclosure: I wrote it) handles all of these problems. I'd recommend just using it, but at the very least you can look at the code to see how it handles everything.
EDIT: Here is a page demonstrating what sounds like the effect you want.
I created a simple test page that illustrates the problem:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Document Write Testcase</title>
</head>
<body>
<div id="container">
</div>
<div id="container2">
</div>
<script>
// This doesn't work!
var container = document.getElementById('container');
container.innerHTML = "<script type='text/javascript'>alert('foo');document.write('bar');<\/script>";
// This does!
var container2 = document.getElementById('container2');
var script = document.createElement("script");
script.type = 'text/javascript';
script.innerHTML = "alert('bar');document.write('foo');";
container.appendChild(script);
</script>
</body>
</html>
This page alerts 'bar' and prints 'foo', while I expected it to also alert 'foo' and print 'bar'. But, unfortunately, since the script tag is part of a larger HTML page, I cannot single out that tag and append it like the example above. Well, I can, but that would require scanning innerHTML content for script tags, and replacing them in the string by placeholders, and then inserting them using the DOM. Sounds not that trivial.
Use document.writeln(content); instead of document.write(content).
However, the better method is using the concatenation of innerHTML, like this:
element.innerHTML += content;
The element.innerHTML = content; method will replace the old content with the new one, which will overwrite your element's innerHTML!
Whereas using the the += operator in element.innerHTML += content will append your text after the old content. (similar to what document.write does.)
document.write is about as deprecated as they come. Thanks to the wonders of JavaScript, though, you can just assign your own function to the write method of the document object which uses innerHTML on an element of your choosing to append the supplied content.
Can I get some clarification first to make sure I get the problem?
document.write calls will add content to the markup at the point in the markup at which they occur. For example if you include document.write calls in a function but call the function elsewhere, the document.write output will happen at the point in the markup the function is defined not where it is called.
Therefore for this to work at all the Flickr document.write statements will need to be part of the content in element.innerHTML = content. Is this definitely the case?
You might quickly test if this should work at all by adding a single and simple document.write call in the content that is set as the innerHTML and see what this does:
<script>
var content = "<p>1st para</p><script>document.write('<p>2nd para</p>');</script>"
element.innerHTML = content;
</script>
If that works, the concept of document.write working in content set as the innerHTML of an element might just work.
My gut feeling is that it won't work, but it should be pretty straightforward to test the concept.
So you're using a DOM method to create a script element and append that to an existing element and this then causes the content of the appended script element to execute? That sounds good.
You say that the script tag is part of a larger HTML page and therefore cannot be singled out. Can you not give the script tag an ID and target it? I'm probably missing something obvious here.
In theory, yes, I can single out a script tag that way. The problem is that we potentially have dozens of situations where this occurs, so I am trying to find some cause or documentation of this behavior.
Also, the script tag does not seem to be a part of the DOM anymore after it gets loaded. In our environment, my container div remains empty, so I cannot fetch the script tag. It should work, though, because in my example above the script does not get executed, but is still part of the DOM.