I've written a small userscript for Google Chrome. It works pretty fine, until I call a function initTimer() There is no such a function in my script, but it is in a script in the page on which my userscript runs, but anyway there's an error initTimer() is not defined. I've tried to write window.initTimer(), but it says Object [object DOMWindow] has no method 'initTimer'. So how can I make it work?
Thanks in advance
Because userscripts are typically sandboxed from the rest of the browser environment, userscripts cannot interact with the scripts running on the page itself, nor can scripts running on the page interact with userscripts, for security reasons.
You'll have to do script injection for this, by creating a script element in the page itself containing the code you want to execute.
var s = document.createElement('script');
s.innerHTML = 'initTimer();';
document.body.appendChild(s);
The problem with this, which may or may not break your script, is that the injected code will have no way of communicating directly with the code in the sandbox, so you'd either have to inject all of your code, or use an alternative method to communicate if you need to.
Related
I'm having a really weird issue, I've developped a webextension that uses messaging between content script and background script (using chrome.runtime.connect) and nativemessaging.
The issue i'm facing is that when I install the extension (manually from the store beforehand and then connect to my website, everything works as expected, the chrome.runtime.connect works and returns a valid port to the background script.
But when i do an inline install of the extension from my website to get around the fact to have to navigate to have the content script in the webpage, i manually inject the content script into my page using
function injectContentScript() {
var s = document.createElement("script");
s.setAttribute("src", "chrome-extension://<extensionid>/content.js");
document.head.appendChild(s);
}
and the exact same content script but manually injected doesn't behave the same. chrome.runtime.connect returns a null object and chrome.runtime.lastError gives me
Could not establish connection. Receiving end does not exist.
I'm calling on the sender side (content.js - manually injected content script) chrome.runtime.connect(extensionID) where extension id is the id of the extension generated by the chrome webstore. And on the receiving side (background.js - extension background script) chrome.runtime.onConnect.addListener(onPortConnected);
I'm not really sure how to debug this issue, maybe it's a timing issue?
The background script is well executed even with the inline install (i've added logs and debugged it through the background.html in chrome extension manager)
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
You have two scenarios.
Your content script content.js is executed as normal upon navigation, as a content script defined in the manifest.
In this case, it executes in a special JS context attached to the page and reserved for your content scripts. See Execution Environment docs section for explanation. It is isolated from the webpage and is considered part of the extension (albeit with lower privileges).
When you connect from a content script, chrome.runtime.connect() is treated as internal communication between parts of the extension. So while you can provide the extension ID, it is not needed.
More importantly, the event raised in this case is chrome.runtime.onConnect.
Your supposed "inject content script immediately" code called from the webpage does something completely different.
Instead of creating a new execution context, the code is instead added directly to the page; it is not considered part of the extension and has no access to extension API.
Normally, a call to chrome.runtime.connect() would simply fail, as this is not a function exposed to webpages; however, you also declared externally_connectable, so it is exposed specifically to your webpage.
In this case, passing the extension ID is mandatory for the connect. You were doing this already, so the call was succeeding.
However, and that's what made it fail: the corresponding event is no longer onConnect, but onConnectExternal!
What you should be doing is:
Not mixing code that is run in very different contexts.
If you need communication from the webpage to background, always do it from the webpage, not sometimes-from-content-sometimes-from-page.
That way you only have to listen to onConnectExternal and it cuts out the need for a content script (if it was its only function).
See the docs as well: Sending messages from web pages.
You don't have to source the code from chrome-extension://<extensionid>/; you can directly add this to your website's code and potentially avoid web_accessible_resources.
And if you actually want to inject content scripts on first run, see for example this answer.
Related reading: How to properly handle chrome extension updates from content scripts
i am trying to write my first firefox add-on. the main problem seem s to be that i am also new to javascript. at the moment i have:
require('sdk/page-mod').PageMod({
include: ["*"],
contentScript: 'window.addEventListener("click", function(e) { alert("blub"); }, false);',
attachTo: ["existing", "top"]
});
(thx to the answer here.)
now i want to use a declared function instead of an anonymous one, but i cant get it to work:
require('sdk/page-mod').PageMod({
include: ["*"],
contentScript: 'window.addEventListener("click", function(e) { alert("blub"); }, false);',
attachTo: ["existing", "top"]
});
getImgData function (e) {
alert("blubber3");
}
the first problem is i get syntax error by just adding the function "missing ; before statement". But cfx doesn't tell me the wrong line. (Is there any useful tool for js editing with good syntax check/ content assist?)
So how to declare a function and use ist somewhere else in the script. At the end the function needs to get the target of click and parse it.
(i read the tutorials but thy all use anonymous functions :-P)
thx in advance
It's important to realize the separation between chrome scripts and content scripts. Chrome scripts are those that run with the same security privileges as Firefox - they have full access to Firefox and your computer. Content scripts are those that run with the same privileges as web pages. They can mess around with that web page, but are severely restricted otherwise. To maintain security, the way these two types of scripts can communicate is limited. You wouldn't want a web page to be able to call any function it wants in your extension's internal code!
Your main JS file (the one that includes require('sdk/page-mod')) is a chrome script. What you're injecting (contentScript) is (obviously) a content script. They can't communicate through a direct function call as you're doing.
If your getImgData function is something that can be done with normal web page privileges, you can move your definition of it to within the content script. If it requires additional privileges, you must have your content script communicate with your chrome script via the emit and on functions as described in the link above.
If you are going to make your content script any longer, I would recommend you separate it into its own file to make your life easier.
I'm trying to make a Google Chrome extension that pauses/plays the payer in DEEZER (www.deezer.com). I i manually run the code "playercontrol.doAction('next')" in the Google chrome JavaScript console, I can manipulate the deezer player, so i looked at the possibility of injecting the code into the Deezer web page with an extension but I haven't managed to do so successfully.
Is it possible to run JavaScript code in Deezer web page as if it were coming from the console in Google Chrome?
If so how?
The problems that you are facing here are the following:
You need to use content_scripts instead of running code from the background page.
Code run from the background page and code run as content scripts are "Sandboxed". This means that your code doesn't have access to the global variables created by the page. Your extension doesn't have access to it. THE GOOD NEWS IS that you can still do it. You have to be clever, though.
In your extension, you have to inject a new Script tag into the "head" of the page. You have to create a new script tag and append it to the head of the page. Before you append it, you need to set the "innerHTML" of the script tag to be the JavaScript that you want to run. Here is the gist of what you need to do.
var myJavaScript = "alert('hey guys');"; //You need to put your JS here.
var scriptTag = document.createElement("script");
scriptTag.innerHTML = myJavaScript;
document.head.appendChild(scriptTag);
This will put the new script tag into the head, which bypasses the security of the Chrome Extension. This will give the new script access to the regular global variables on the page, ie: you will have access to the 'playercontrol' object.
This feature has been deprecated by Chrome's security policy.
I have created a Chrome extension that uses the hotkeys [Alt]+[0...9] only to discover facebook uses the same hotkeys. Is there any way possible my extension could disable facebook's hotkeys so that mine fire alone? I'm fairly certain I have identified the code facebook uses to implement their [Alt]+[0...9] hotkeys:
document.documentElement.onkeydown=function(a){a=a||window.event;var b=a.target||a.srcElement;var c=a.keyCode==13&&!a.altKey&&!a.ctrlKey&&!a.metaKey&&!a.shiftKey&&CSS.hasClass...
This is in a script called from the head of the root document. I have tried the following to disable them:
//contents script:
$().ready( function() {
document.documentElement.onkeydown = '';
});
and even
$().ready( function() {
document.documentElement.onkeydown = function(e){};
});
I am guessing further that the reason neither of these attempts work is because although Chrome extension content scripts share a DOM with any webpage on which they run, perhaps they do not share coding environments? Any insight would be appreciated!
Chrome's Content scripts are executed in a Sandboxed environment [source]. There is no direct way to communicate with the global (window) object.
Another common pitfall is that the developer forgets how/when the script is injected.
By default, the script is injected at a point called "document_idle". At this point, the document is not busy (DOMContentLoaded has fired, window.onload may or may not have fired).
As a result, the functions in the script may be overwritten immediately after declaration.
To inject a small script, I recommend to add the code directly to the Content Script:
var actualCode = '/* Code here (see below for inspiration) */';
var script = document.createElement('script');
script.appendChild(document.createTextNode(actualCode));
(document.head || document.documentElement).appendChild(script);
script.parentNode.removeChild(script);
If you want to make sure that the method is not going to be overwritten, you can use Object.defineProperty, to define an immutable property:
Object.defineProperty(document.documentElement, 'onkeydown', {
value: function() {},
writable: false, /* Cannot be overwritten, default false */
configurable: false, /* Cannot be deleted, or modified */
enumerable: true /* Does not really matter. If true, it's visible in
a for-loop. If false, it's not*/
});
The previously mentioned method is supported in Firefox 4+ and at least Chrome 5+. If you want to also support Firefox 2+ and Chrome 1+, you can play with the __defineSetter__, to prevent onkeydown from being defined:
document.documentElement.__defineSetter__('onkeydown', function(){});
Your intuition is correct, the JavaScript that runs from a content script as part of a Chrome Extension is run in a sandbox that does not have access to the JavaScript that is executed in the containing page.
Per the Chrome doc on Content Scripts:
However, content scripts have some limitations. They cannot:
* Use chrome.* APIs (except for parts of chrome.extension)
* Use variables or functions defined by their extension's pages
* Use variables or functions defined by web pages or by other content scripts
First off, I would recommend that you consider different shortcut keys. Overriding the functionality of existing shortcut keys for your own extension could provide a jarring user experience for someone that is expecting the Facebook shortcut key. Imagine if an extension overrode the ctrl-c and ctrl-p shortcuts that are a part of the desktop OS for copy and paste - I think you would have some upset users that would probably remove the thing that changed the behavior they learned prior.
However, if you are insistent, then here is a workaround to loading JavaScript that will execute in the context of the containing page:
Edit: Updated per comment to reference JS file in a plugin instead of one hosted on the web
First, you will need to create a JavaScript file in your chrome plugin: override-fb-hotkeys.js.
First, you will need to host a JavaScript file somewhere on the web that contains the script that you want to execute in the page, let us say you host it at: http://example.com/override-fb-hotkeys.js.
Then, from your content script, you can insert a script tag into the DOM that references your JavaScript file, something like this:
var script = document.createElement('script');
script.setAttribute("type", "text/javascript");
script.setAttribute("async", true);
script.setAttribute("src", chrome.extension.getURL("override-fb-hotkeys.js")); //Assuming your host supports both http and https
var head = document.head || document.getElementsByTagName( "head" )[0] || document.documentElement;
head.insertBefore(script, head.firstChild)
The JavaScript will then be fetched and executed in the context of the containing page, not the sandboxed code from the Chrome plugin.
This is how you can do it using jQuery
Remove all shortcuts for any webpage:
$('[accessKey]').attr('accessKey','')
I'm writing a Chrome userscript to locally auto-save content in a CKEditor. I'm using this CKEditor auto-save plugin as inspiration.
I have written a function that fires every half second (via an interval) to register the CKEditor event handler:
var intervalId = window.setInterval(function() {
if (CKEDITOR) {
window.clearInterval(intervalId);
CKEDITOR.plugins.add("user-script-auto-save", {
init : function(editor) {
editor.on('key', startTimer);
}
});
}
}, 500);
However, it never properly completes, and complains that "CKEDITOR is undefined" on the if (CKEDITOR) statement.
Meanwhile, if I drop into Chrome's console and type CKEDITOR, the console prints out the expected object.
What am I missing? The editor is embedded within an iframe; might that have an impact on scoping? Or am I fighting against Chrome's sandboxing here? And if so, is there some other way I can dig into CKEditor to pull out the content every second or something to do the auto-saves?
I have not yet tried the script in Firefox; that's next on my list.
Worth noting: I'm a long-time JavaScript novice. So I could easily be doing something dumb with scoping or something like that.
According to this little tutorial video on YouTube, all the 3 "devices" are separated from each other in order to prevent XSS attacks from the user script to the browser / website and vice versa. Although the user scripts / content scripts are running in the website's context, they are still kept separated from the actual website script context. You can easily acknowledge this by simply trying to access for example jQuery from a content script. Just as the CKEditor, it will not be available.
So what I've come up with in order to deal with this is using the content script to include external JavaScripts in the head tag. AFAIK, this is not possible for files directly in the extension's root directory, so I've taken a remote server to host my files.
I'm not sure if this is the best approach and I think it is an ugly bypass, possibly way to powerfull and disabled by the Chromium Project some time.
(Edited by OP, so I can select this answer and route karma appropriately)
This answer, combined with some of the suggestions and links in the comments, ended up getting me to where I needed to be.
I ended up with the following function:
var insertScriptIntoDocument = function(scriptUrl, doc) {
// inspired by http://blog.afterthedeadline.com/2010/05/14/how-to-jump-through-hoops-and-make-a-chrome-extension/
var scriptText = doc.createTextNode(
'(function(loc) { \
var embeddedScript = document.createElement("script"); \
embeddedScript.type = "text/javascript"; \
embeddedScript.src = loc; \
document.getElementsByTagName("head")[0].appendChild(embeddedScript); \
})("' + scriptUrl + '");');
var injectorElement = doc.createElement('script');
injectorElement.appendChild(scriptText);
doc.body.appendChild(injectorElement);
};
Usage looks like so:
var embeddedScriptUrl = chrome.extension.getURL("embedded-script.js");
insertScriptIntoDocument(embeddedScriptUrl, document);
For now, I'm executing this from within a Chrome extension, but I suspect that the pattern might work in a GreaseMonkey script deployed via the Chrome TamperMonkey extension provided that the URL of the script to be embedded was hosted somewhere reachable.
FTR, as it turns out, I did not actually need to get to the iframe -- the CKEDITOR variable was defined in the top-level document, but was simply not visible because of the rules of the Chrome sandbox