How do I check if a number evaluates to infinity?

How do I check if a number evaluates to infinity? - javascript

I have a series of Javascript calculations that (only under IE) show Infinity depending on user choices.
How does one stop the word Infinity appearing and for example, show 0.0 instead?

if (result == Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY || result == Number.NEGATIVE_INFINITY)
{
// ...
}
You could possibly use the isFinite function instead, depending on how you want to treat NaN. isFinite returns false if your number is POSITIVE_INFINITY, NEGATIVE_INFINITY or NaN.
if (isFinite(result))
{
// ...
}

In ES6, The Number.isFinite() method determines whether the passed value is a finite number.
Number.isFinite(Infinity); // false
Number.isFinite(NaN); // false
Number.isFinite(-Infinity); // false
Number.isFinite(0); // true
Number.isFinite(2e64); // true

A simple n === n+1 or n === n/0 works:
function isInfinite(n) {
return n === n/0;
}
Be aware that the native isFinite() coerces inputs to numbers. isFinite([]) and isFinite(null) are both true for example.

Perform the plain ol’ comparison:
(number === Infinity || number === -Infinity)
or to save several characters:
Math.abs(number) === Infinity
Why to use this
!(Number.isFinite(number)) breaks on NaN inputs.
Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY and Number.NEGATIVE_INFINITY can be redefined; they are configurable.
Infinity and -Infinity are read-only in the strict mode.
It is the shortest solution.

Actually n === n + 1 will work for numbers bigger than 51 bit, e.g.
1e16 + 1 === 1e16; // true
1e16 === Infinity; // false

I like to use Lodash for a variety of defensive coding reasons as well as readability. ES6 Number.isFinite is great and does not have issues with non-numeric values, but if ES6 isn't possible, you already have lodash, or want briefer code: _.isFinite
_.isFinite(Infinity); // false
_.isFinite(NaN); // false
_.isFinite(-Infinity); // false
_.isFinite(null); // false
_.isFinite(3); // true
_.isFinite('3'); // true

I've ran into a scenario that required me to check if the value is of the NaN or Infinity type but pass strings as valid results. Because many text strings will produce false-positive NaN, I've made a simple solution to circumvent that:
const testInput = input => input + "" === "NaN" || input + "" === "Infinity";
The above code converts values to strings and checks whether they are strictly equal to NaN or Infinity (you'll need to add another case for negative infinity).
So:
testInput(1/0); // true
testInput(parseInt("String")); // true
testInput("String"); // false

You can use isFinite in window, isFinite(123):
You can write a function like:
function isInfinite(num) {
return !isFinite(num);
}
And use like:
isInfinite(null); //false
isInfinite(1); //false
isInfinite(0); //false
isInfinite(0.00); //false
isInfinite(NaN); //true
isInfinite(-1.797693134862316E+308); //true
isInfinite(Infinity); //true
isInfinite(-Infinity); //true
isInfinite(+Infinity); //true
isInfinite(undefined); //true
You can also Number.isFinite which also check if the value is Number too and is more accurate for checking undefined and null etc...
Or you can polyfill it like this:
Number.isFinite = Number.isFinite || function(value) {
return typeof value === 'number' && isFinite(value);
}

Related

How to detect that the parseFloat() stopped on "other" character? [duplicate]

I'm hoping there's something in the same conceptual space as the old VB6 IsNumeric() function?

2nd October 2020: note that many bare-bones approaches are fraught with subtle bugs (eg. whitespace, implicit partial parsing, radix, coercion of arrays etc.) that many of the answers here fail to take into account. The following implementation might work for you, but note that it does not cater for number separators other than the decimal point ".":
function isNumeric(str) {
if (typeof str != "string") return false // we only process strings!
return !isNaN(str) && // use type coercion to parse the _entirety_ of the string (`parseFloat` alone does not do this)...
!isNaN(parseFloat(str)) // ...and ensure strings of whitespace fail
}
To check if a variable (including a string) is a number, check if it is not a number:
This works regardless of whether the variable content is a string or number.
isNaN(num) // returns true if the variable does NOT contain a valid number
Examples
isNaN(123) // false
isNaN('123') // false
isNaN('1e10000') // false (This translates to Infinity, which is a number)
isNaN('foo') // true
isNaN('10px') // true
isNaN('') // false
isNaN(' ') // false
isNaN(false) // false
Of course, you can negate this if you need to. For example, to implement the IsNumeric example you gave:
function isNumeric(num){
return !isNaN(num)
}
To convert a string containing a number into a number:
Only works if the string only contains numeric characters, else it returns NaN.
+num // returns the numeric value of the string, or NaN
// if the string isn't purely numeric characters
Examples
+'12' // 12
+'12.' // 12
+'12..' // NaN
+'.12' // 0.12
+'..12' // NaN
+'foo' // NaN
+'12px' // NaN
To convert a string loosely to a number
Useful for converting '12px' to 12, for example:
parseInt(num) // extracts a numeric value from the
// start of the string, or NaN.
Examples
parseInt('12') // 12
parseInt('aaa') // NaN
parseInt('12px') // 12
parseInt('foo2') // NaN These last three may
parseInt('12a5') // 12 be different from what
parseInt('0x10') // 16 you expected to see.
Floats
Bear in mind that, unlike +num, parseInt (as the name suggests) will convert a float into an integer by chopping off everything following the decimal point (if you want to use parseInt() because of this behaviour, you're probably better off using another method instead):
+'12.345' // 12.345
parseInt(12.345) // 12
parseInt('12.345') // 12
Empty strings
Empty strings may be a little counter-intuitive. +num converts empty strings or strings with spaces to zero, and isNaN() assumes the same:
+'' // 0
+' ' // 0
isNaN('') // false
isNaN(' ') // false
But parseInt() does not agree:
parseInt('') // NaN
parseInt(' ') // NaN

If you're just trying to check if a string is a whole number (no decimal places), regex is a good way to go. Other methods such as isNaN are too complicated for something so simple.
function isNumeric(value) {
return /^-?\d+$/.test(value);
}
console.log(isNumeric('abcd')); // false
console.log(isNumeric('123a')); // false
console.log(isNumeric('1')); // true
console.log(isNumeric('1234567890')); // true
console.log(isNumeric('-23')); // true
console.log(isNumeric(1234)); // true
console.log(isNumeric(1234n)); // true
console.log(isNumeric('123.4')); // false
console.log(isNumeric('')); // false
console.log(isNumeric(undefined)); // false
console.log(isNumeric(null)); // false
To only allow positive whole numbers use this:
function isNumeric(value) {
return /^\d+$/.test(value);
}
console.log(isNumeric('123')); // true
console.log(isNumeric('-23')); // false

The accepted answer for this question has quite a few flaws (as highlighted by couple of other users). This is one of the easiest & proven way to approach it in javascript:
function isNumeric(n) {
return !isNaN(parseFloat(n)) && isFinite(n);
}
Below are some good test cases:
console.log(isNumeric(12345678912345678912)); // true
console.log(isNumeric('2 ')); // true
console.log(isNumeric('-32.2 ')); // true
console.log(isNumeric(-32.2)); // true
console.log(isNumeric(undefined)); // false
// the accepted answer fails at these tests:
console.log(isNumeric('')); // false
console.log(isNumeric(null)); // false
console.log(isNumeric([])); // false

And you could go the RegExp-way:
var num = "987238";
if(num.match(/^-?\d+$/)){
//valid integer (positive or negative)
}else if(num.match(/^\d+\.\d+$/)){
//valid float
}else{
//not valid number
}

If you really want to make sure that a string contains only a number, any number (integer or floating point), and exactly a number, you cannot use parseInt()/ parseFloat(), Number(), or !isNaN() by themselves. Note that !isNaN() is actually returning true when Number() would return a number, and false when it would return NaN, so I will exclude it from the rest of the discussion.
The problem with parseFloat() is that it will return a number if the string contains any number, even if the string doesn't contain only and exactly a number:
parseFloat("2016-12-31") // returns 2016
parseFloat("1-1") // return 1
parseFloat("1.2.3") // returns 1.2
The problem with Number() is that it will return a number in cases where the passed value is not a number at all!
Number("") // returns 0
Number(" ") // returns 0
Number(" \u00A0 \t\n\r") // returns 0
The problem with rolling your own regex is that unless you create the exact regex for matching a floating point number as Javascript recognizes it you are going to miss cases or recognize cases where you shouldn't. And even if you can roll your own regex, why? There are simpler built-in ways to do it.
However, it turns out that Number() (and isNaN()) does the right thing for every case where parseFloat() returns a number when it shouldn't, and vice versa. So to find out if a string is really exactly and only a number, call both functions and see if they both return true:
function isNumber(str) {
if (typeof str != "string") return false // we only process strings!
// could also coerce to string: str = ""+str
return !isNaN(str) && !isNaN(parseFloat(str))
}

Try the isNan function:
The isNaN() function determines whether a value is an illegal number (Not-a-Number).
This function returns true if the value equates to NaN. Otherwise it returns false.
This function is different from the Number specific Number.isNaN() method.
The global isNaN() function, converts the tested value to a Number, then tests it.
Number.isNan() does not convert the values to a Number, and will not return true for any value that is not of the type Number...

2019: Including ES3, ES6 and TypeScript Examples
Maybe this has been rehashed too many times, however I fought with this one today too and wanted to post my answer, as I didn't see any other answer that does it as simply or thoroughly:
ES3
var isNumeric = function(num){
return (typeof(num) === 'number' || typeof(num) === "string" && num.trim() !== '') && !isNaN(num);
}
ES6
const isNumeric = (num) => (typeof(num) === 'number' || typeof(num) === "string" && num.trim() !== '') && !isNaN(num);
Typescript
const isNumeric = (num: any) => (typeof(num) === 'number' || typeof(num) === "string" && num.trim() !== '') && !isNaN(num as number);
This seems quite simple and covers all the bases I saw on the many other posts and thought up myself:
// Positive Cases
console.log(0, isNumeric(0) === true);
console.log(1, isNumeric(1) === true);
console.log(1234567890, isNumeric(1234567890) === true);
console.log('1234567890', isNumeric('1234567890') === true);
console.log('0', isNumeric('0') === true);
console.log('1', isNumeric('1') === true);
console.log('1.1', isNumeric('1.1') === true);
console.log('-1', isNumeric('-1') === true);
console.log('-1.2354', isNumeric('-1.2354') === true);
console.log('-1234567890', isNumeric('-1234567890') === true);
console.log(-1, isNumeric(-1) === true);
console.log(-32.1, isNumeric(-32.1) === true);
console.log('0x1', isNumeric('0x1') === true); // Valid number in hex
// Negative Cases
console.log(true, isNumeric(true) === false);
console.log(false, isNumeric(false) === false);
console.log('1..1', isNumeric('1..1') === false);
console.log('1,1', isNumeric('1,1') === false);
console.log('-32.1.12', isNumeric('-32.1.12') === false);
console.log('[blank]', isNumeric('') === false);
console.log('[spaces]', isNumeric(' ') === false);
console.log('null', isNumeric(null) === false);
console.log('undefined', isNumeric(undefined) === false);
console.log([], isNumeric([]) === false);
console.log('NaN', isNumeric(NaN) === false);
You can also try your own isNumeric function and just past in these use cases and scan for "true" for all of them.
Or, to see the values that each return:

Old question, but there are several points missing in the given answers.
Scientific notation.
!isNaN('1e+30') is true, however in most of the cases when people ask for numbers, they do not want to match things like 1e+30.
Large floating numbers may behave weird
Observe (using Node.js):
> var s = Array(16 + 1).join('9')
undefined
> s.length
16
> s
'9999999999999999'
> !isNaN(s)
true
> Number(s)
10000000000000000
> String(Number(s)) === s
false
>
On the other hand:
> var s = Array(16 + 1).join('1')
undefined
> String(Number(s)) === s
true
> var s = Array(15 + 1).join('9')
undefined
> String(Number(s)) === s
true
>
So, if one expects String(Number(s)) === s, then better limit your strings to 15 digits at most (after omitting leading zeros).
Infinity
> typeof Infinity
'number'
> !isNaN('Infinity')
true
> isFinite('Infinity')
false
>
Given all that, checking that the given string is a number satisfying all of the following:
non scientific notation
predictable conversion to Number and back to String
finite
is not such an easy task. Here is a simple version:
function isNonScientificNumberString(o) {
if (!o || typeof o !== 'string') {
// Should not be given anything but strings.
return false;
}
return o.length <= 15 && o.indexOf('e+') < 0 && o.indexOf('E+') < 0 && !isNaN(o) && isFinite(o);
}
However, even this one is far from complete. Leading zeros are not handled here, but they do screw the length test.

I have tested and Michael's solution is best. Vote for his answer above (search this page for "If you really want to make sure that a string" to find it). In essence, his answer is this:
function isNumeric(num){
num = "" + num; //coerce num to be a string
return !isNaN(num) && !isNaN(parseFloat(num));
}
It works for every test case, which I documented here:
https://jsfiddle.net/wggehvp9/5/
Many of the other solutions fail for these edge cases:
' ', null, "", true, and [].
In theory, you could use them, with proper error handling, for example:
return !isNaN(num);
or
return (+num === +num);
with special handling for
/\s/, null, "", true, false, [] (and others?)

TL;DR
It depends largely on what you want to parse as a number.
Comparison Between Built-in Functions
As none of the existing sources satisfied my soul, I tried to figure out what actually was happening with these functions.
Three immediate answers to this question felt like:
!isNaN(input) (which gives the same output as +input === +input)
!isNaN(parseFloat(input))
isFinite(input)
But are any of them correct in every scenario?
I tested these functions in several cases, and generated output as markdown. This is what it looks like:
input
!isNaN(input) or +input===+input
!isNaN(parseFloat(input))
isFinite(input)
Comment
123
✔️
✔️
✔️
-
'123'
✔️
✔️
✔️
-
12.3
✔️
✔️
✔️
-
'12.3'
✔️
✔️
✔️
-
'   12.3   '
✔️
✔️
✔️
Empty whitespace trimmed, as expected.
1_000_000
✔️
✔️
✔️
Numeric separator understood, also expected.
'1_000_000'
❌
✔️
❌
Surprise! JS just won't parse numeric separator inside a string. For details, check this issue. (Why then parsing as float worked though? Well, it didn't. 😉)
'0b11111111'
✔️
✔️
✔️
Binary form understood, as it should've.
'0o377'
✔️
✔️
✔️
Octal form understood too.
'0xFF'
✔️
✔️
✔️
Of course hex is understood. Did anybody think otherwise? 😒
''
✔️
❌
✔️
Should empty string be a number?
'    '
✔️
❌
✔️
Should a whitespace-only string be a number?
'abc'
❌
❌
❌
Everybody agrees, not a number.
'12.34Ab!##$'
❌
✔️
❌
Ah! Now it's quite understandable what parseFloat() does. Not impressive to me, but may come handy in certain cases.
'10e100'
✔️
✔️
✔️
10100 is a number indeed. But caution! It's way more larger than the maximum safe integer value 253 (about 9×1015). Read this for details.
'10e1000'
✔️
✔️
❌
Say with me, help! Though not as crazy as it may seem. In JavaScript, a value larger than ~10308 is rounded to infinity, that's why. Look here for details. And yes, isNaN() considers infinity as a number, and parseFloat() parses infinity as infinity.
null
✔️
❌
✔️
Now this is awkward. In JS, when a conversion is needed, null becomes zero, and we get a finite number. Then why parseFloat(null) should return a NaN here? Someone please explain this design concept to me.
undefined
❌
❌
❌
As expected.
Infinity
✔️
✔️
❌
As explained before, isNaN() considers infinity as a number, and parseFloat() parses infinity as infinity.
So...which of them is "correct"?
Should be clear by now, it depends largely on what we need. For example, we may want to consider a null input as 0. In that case isFinite() will work fine.
Again, perhaps we will take a little help from isNaN() when 1010000000000 is needed to be considered a valid number (although the question remains—why would it be, and how would we handle that)!
Of course, we can manually exclude any of the scenarios.
Like in my case, I needed exactly the outputs of isFinite(), except for the null case, the empty string case, and the whitespace-only string case. Also I had no headache about really huge numbers. So my code looked like this:
/**
* My necessity was met by the following code.
*/
if (input === null) {
// Null input
} else if (input.trim() === '') {
// Empty or whitespace-only string
} else if (isFinite(input)) {
// Input is a number
} else {
// Not a number
}
And also, this was my JavaScript to generate the table:
/**
* Note: JavaScript does not print numeric separator inside a number.
* In that single case, the markdown output was manually corrected.
* Also, the comments were manually added later, of course.
*/
let inputs = [
123, '123', 12.3, '12.3', ' 12.3 ',
1_000_000, '1_000_000',
'0b11111111', '0o377', '0xFF',
'', ' ',
'abc', '12.34Ab!##$',
'10e100', '10e1000',
null, undefined, Infinity];
let markdownOutput = `| \`input\` | \`!isNaN(input)\` or <br>\`+input === +input\` | \`!isNaN(parseFloat(input))\` | \`isFinite(input)\` | Comment |
| :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :--- |\n`;
for (let input of inputs) {
let outputs = [];
outputs.push(!isNaN(input));
outputs.push(!isNaN(parseFloat(input)));
outputs.push(isFinite(input));
if (typeof input === 'string') {
// Output with quotations
console.log(`'${input}'`);
markdownOutput += `| '${input}'`;
} else {
// Output without quotes
console.log(input);
markdownOutput += `| ${input}`;
}
for (let output of outputs) {
console.log('\t' + output);
if (output === true) {
markdownOutput += ` | <div style="color:limegreen">true</div>`;
// markdownOutput += ` | ✔️`; // for stackoverflow
} else {
markdownOutput += ` | <div style="color:orangered">false</div>`;
// markdownOutput += ` | ❌`; // for stackoverflow
}
}
markdownOutput += ` ||\n`;
}
// Replace two or more whitespaces with $nbsp;
markdownOutput = markdownOutput.replaceAll(` `, ` `);
// Print markdown to console
console.log(markdownOutput);

The JavaScript global isFinite() checks if a value is a valid (finite) number.
See MDN for the difference between Number.isFinite() and global isFinite().
let a = isFinite('abc') // false
let b = isFinite('123') // true
let c = isFinite('12a') // false
let d = isFinite(null) // true
console.log(a, b, c, d)

Someone may also benefit from a regex based answer. Here it is:
One liner isInteger:
const isInteger = num => /^-?[0-9]+$/.test(num+'');
One liner isNumeric: Accepts integers and decimals
const isNumeric = num => /^-?[0-9]+(?:\.[0-9]+)?$/.test(num+'');

You can use the result of Number when passing an argument to its constructor.
If the argument (a string) cannot be converted into a number, it returns NaN, so you can determinate if the string provided was a valid number or not.
Notes: Note when passing empty string or '\t\t' and '\n\t' as Number will return 0; Passing true will return 1 and false returns 0.
Number('34.00') // 34
Number('-34') // -34
Number('123e5') // 12300000
Number('123e-5') // 0.00123
Number('999999999999') // 999999999999
Number('9999999999999999') // 10000000000000000 (integer accuracy up to 15 digit)
Number('0xFF') // 255
Number('Infinity') // Infinity
Number('34px') // NaN
Number('xyz') // NaN
Number('true') // NaN
Number('false') // NaN
// cavets
Number(' ') // 0
Number('\t\t') // 0
Number('\n\t') // 0

Maybe there are one or two people coming across this question who need a much stricter check than usual (like I did). In that case, this might be useful:
if(str === String(Number(str))) {
// it's a "perfectly formatted" number
}
Beware! This will reject strings like .1, 40.000, 080, 00.1. It's very picky - the string must match the "most minimal perfect form" of the number for this test to pass.
It uses the String and Number constructor to cast the string to a number and back again and thus checks if the JavaScript engine's "perfect minimal form" (the one it got converted to with the initial Number constructor) matches the original string.

Why is jQuery's implementation not good enough?
function isNumeric(a) {
var b = a && a.toString();
return !$.isArray(a) && b - parseFloat(b) + 1 >= 0;
};
Michael suggested something like this (although I've stolen "user1691651 - John"'s altered version here):
function isNumeric(num){
num = "" + num; //coerce num to be a string
return !isNaN(num) && !isNaN(parseFloat(num));
}
The following is a solution with most likely bad performance, but solid results. It is a contraption made from the jQuery 1.12.4 implementation and Michael's answer, with an extra check for leading/trailing spaces (because Michael's version returns true for numerics with leading/trailing spaces):
function isNumeric(a) {
var str = a + "";
var b = a && a.toString();
return !$.isArray(a) && b - parseFloat(b) + 1 >= 0 &&
!/^\s+|\s+$/g.test(str) &&
!isNaN(str) && !isNaN(parseFloat(str));
};
The latter version has two new variables, though. One could get around one of those, by doing:
function isNumeric(a) {
if ($.isArray(a)) return false;
var b = a && a.toString();
a = a + "";
return b - parseFloat(b) + 1 >= 0 &&
!/^\s+|\s+$/g.test(a) &&
!isNaN(a) && !isNaN(parseFloat(a));
};
I haven't tested any of these very much, by other means than manually testing the few use-cases I'll be hitting with my current predicament, which is all very standard stuff. This is a "standing-on-the-shoulders-of-giants" situation.

2019: Practical and tight numerical validity check
Often, a 'valid number' means a Javascript number excluding NaN and Infinity, ie a 'finite number'.
To check the numerical validity of a value (from an external source for example), you can define in ESlint Airbnb style :
/**
* Returns true if 'candidate' is a finite number or a string referring (not just 'including') a finite number
* To keep in mind:
* Number(true) = 1
* Number('') = 0
* Number(" 10 ") = 10
* !isNaN(true) = true
* parseFloat('10 a') = 10
*
* #param {?} candidate
* #return {boolean}
*/
function isReferringFiniteNumber(candidate) {
if (typeof (candidate) === 'number') return Number.isFinite(candidate);
if (typeof (candidate) === 'string') {
return (candidate.trim() !== '') && Number.isFinite(Number(candidate));
}
return false;
}
and use it this way:
if (isReferringFiniteNumber(theirValue)) {
myCheckedValue = Number(theirValue);
} else {
console.warn('The provided value doesn\'t refer to a finite number');
}

It is not valid for TypeScript as:
declare function isNaN(number: number): boolean;
For TypeScript you can use:
/^\d+$/.test(key)

I like the simplicity of this.
Number.isNaN(Number(value))
The above is regular Javascript, but I'm using this in conjunction with a typescript typeguard for smart type checking. This is very useful for the typescript compiler to give you correct intellisense, and no type errors.
Typescript typeguards
Warning: See Jeremy's comment below. This has some issues with certain values and I don't have time to fix it now, but the idea of using a typescript typeguard is useful so I won't delete this section.
isNotNumber(value: string | number): value is string {
return Number.isNaN(Number(this.smartImageWidth));
}
isNumber(value: string | number): value is number {
return Number.isNaN(Number(this.smartImageWidth)) === false;
}
Let's say you have a property width which is number | string. You may want to do logic based on whether or not it's a string.
var width: number|string;
width = "100vw";
if (isNotNumber(width))
{
// the compiler knows that width here must be a string
if (width.endsWith('vw'))
{
// we have a 'width' such as 100vw
}
}
else
{
// the compiler is smart and knows width here must be number
var doubleWidth = width * 2;
}
The typeguard is smart enough to constrain the type of width within the if statement to be ONLY string. This permits the compiler to allow width.endsWith(...) which it wouldn't allow if the type was string | number.
You can call the typeguard whatever you want isNotNumber, isNumber, isString, isNotString but I think isString is kind of ambiguous and harder to read.

parseInt(), but be aware that this function is a bit different in the sense that it for example returns 100 for parseInt("100px").

When guarding against empty strings and null
// Base cases that are handled properly
Number.isNaN(Number('1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('1.1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('-1.1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('asdf')); // => true
Number.isNaN(Number(undefined)); // => true
// Special notation cases that are handled properly
Number.isNaN(Number('1e1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('1e-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('-1e1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('-1e-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('0b1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('0o1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('0xa')); // => false
// Edge cases that will FAIL if not guarded against
Number.isNaN(Number('')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number(' ')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number(null)); // => false
// Edge cases that are debatable
Number.isNaN(Number('-0b1')); // => true
Number.isNaN(Number('-0o1')); // => true
Number.isNaN(Number('-0xa')); // => true
Number.isNaN(Number('Infinity')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('INFINITY')); // => true
Number.isNaN(Number('-Infinity')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('-INFINITY')); // => true
When NOT guarding against empty strings and null
Using parseInt:
// Base cases that are handled properly
Number.isNaN(parseInt('1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('1.1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-1.1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('asdf')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseInt(undefined)); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseInt('')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseInt(' ')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseInt(null)); // => true
// Special notation cases that are handled properly
Number.isNaN(parseInt('1e1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('1e-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-1e1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-1e-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('0b1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('0o1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('0xa')); // => false
// Edge cases that are debatable
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-0b1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-0o1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-0xa')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('Infinity')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseInt('INFINITY')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-Infinity')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-INFINITY')); // => true
Using parseFloat:
// Base cases that are handled properly
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('1.1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-1.1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('asdf')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseFloat(undefined)); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseFloat(' ')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseFloat(null)); // => true
// Special notation cases that are handled properly
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('1e1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('1e-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-1e1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-1e-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('0b1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('0o1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('0xa')); // => false
// Edge cases that are debatable
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-0b1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-0o1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-0xa')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('Infinity')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('INFINITY')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-Infinity')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-INFINITY')); // => true
Notes:
Only string, empty, and uninitialized values are considered in keeping with addressing the original question. Additional edge cases exist if arrays and objects are the values being considered.
Characters in binary, octal, hexadecimal, and exponential notation are not case-sensitive (ie: '0xFF', '0XFF', '0xfF' etc. will all yield the same result in the test cases shown above).
Unlike with Infinity (case-sensitive) in some cases, constants from the Number and Math objects passed as test cases in string format to any of the methods above will be determined to not be numbers.
See here for an explanation of how arguments are converted to a Number and why the edge cases for null and empty strings exist.

Quote:
isNaN(num) // returns true if the variable does NOT contain a valid number
is not entirely true if you need to check for leading/trailing spaces - for example when a certain quantity of digits is required, and you need to get, say, '1111' and not ' 111' or '111 ' for perhaps a PIN input.
Better to use:
var num = /^\d+$/.test(num)

This is built on some of the previous answers and comments. The following covers all the edge cases and fairly concise as well:
const isNumRegEx = /^-?(\d*\.)?\d+$/;
function isNumeric(n, allowScientificNotation = false) {
return allowScientificNotation ?
!Number.isNaN(parseFloat(n)) && Number.isFinite(n) :
isNumRegEx.test(n);
}

If anyone ever gets this far down, I spent some time hacking on this trying to patch moment.js (https://github.com/moment/moment). Here's something that I took away from it:
function isNumeric(val) {
var _val = +val;
return (val !== val + 1) //infinity check
&& (_val === +val) //Cute coercion check
&& (typeof val !== 'object') //Array/object check
}
Handles the following cases:
True! :
isNumeric("1"))
isNumeric(1e10))
isNumeric(1E10))
isNumeric(+"6e4"))
isNumeric("1.2222"))
isNumeric("-1.2222"))
isNumeric("-1.222200000000000000"))
isNumeric("1.222200000000000000"))
isNumeric(1))
isNumeric(0))
isNumeric(-0))
isNumeric(1010010293029))
isNumeric(1.100393830000))
isNumeric(Math.LN2))
isNumeric(Math.PI))
isNumeric(5e10))
False! :
isNumeric(NaN))
isNumeric(Infinity))
isNumeric(-Infinity))
isNumeric())
isNumeric(undefined))
isNumeric('[1,2,3]'))
isNumeric({a:1,b:2}))
isNumeric(null))
isNumeric([1]))
isNumeric(new Date()))
Ironically, the one I am struggling with the most:
isNumeric(new Number(1)) => false
Any suggestions welcome. :]

I recently wrote an article about ways to ensure a variable is a valid number: https://github.com/jehugaleahsa/artifacts/blob/master/2018/typescript_num_hack.md The article explains how to ensure floating point or integer, if that's important (+x vs ~~x).
The article assumes the variable is a string or a number to begin with and trim is available/polyfilled. It wouldn't be hard to extend it to handle other types, as well. Here's the meat of it:
// Check for a valid float
if (x == null
|| ("" + x).trim() === ""
|| isNaN(+x)) {
return false; // not a float
}
// Check for a valid integer
if (x == null
|| ("" + x).trim() === ""
|| ~~x !== +x) {
return false; // not an integer
}

function isNumberCandidate(s) {
const str = (''+ s).trim();
if (str.length === 0) return false;
return !isNaN(+str);
}
console.log(isNumberCandidate('1')); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate('a')); // false
console.log(isNumberCandidate('000')); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate('1a')); // false
console.log(isNumberCandidate('1e')); // false
console.log(isNumberCandidate('1e-1')); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate('123.3')); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate('')); // false
console.log(isNumberCandidate(' ')); // false
console.log(isNumberCandidate(1)); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate(0)); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate(NaN)); // false
console.log(isNumberCandidate(undefined)); // false
console.log(isNumberCandidate(null)); // false
console.log(isNumberCandidate(-1)); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate('-1')); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate('-1.2')); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate(0.0000001)); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate('0.0000001')); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate(Infinity)); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate(-Infinity)); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate('Infinity')); // true
if (isNumberCandidate(s)) {
// use +s as a number
+s ...
}

Well, I'm using this one I made...
It's been working so far:
function checkNumber(value) {
return value % 1 == 0;
}
If you spot any problem with it, tell me, please.

Checking the number in JS:
Best way for check if it's a number:
isFinite(20)
//True
Read a value out of a string. CSS *:
parseInt('2.5rem')
//2
parseFloat('2.5rem')
//2.5
For an integer:
isInteger(23 / 0)
//False
If value is NaN:
isNaN(20)
//False

This way it works for me.
function isNumeric(num){
let value1 = num.toString();
let value2 = parseFloat(num).toString();
return (value1 === value2);
}
console.log(
isNumeric(123), //true
isNumeric(-123), //true
isNumeric('123'), //true
isNumeric('-123'), //true
isNumeric(12.2), //true
isNumeric(-12.2), //true
isNumeric('12.2'), //true
isNumeric('-12.2'), //true
isNumeric('a123'), //false
isNumeric('123a'), //false
isNumeric(' 123'), //false
isNumeric('123 '), //false
isNumeric('a12.2'), //false
isNumeric('12.2a'), //false
isNumeric(' 12.2'), //false
isNumeric('12.2 '), //false
)

PFB the working solution:
function(check){
check = check + "";
var isNumber = check.trim().length>0? !isNaN(check):false;
return isNumber;
}

Save yourself the headache of trying to find a "built-in" solution.
There isn't a good answer, and the hugely upvoted answer in this thread is wrong.
npm install is-number
In JavaScript, it's not always as straightforward as it should be to reliably check if a value is a number. It's common for devs to use +, -, or Number() to cast a string value to a number (for example, when values are returned from user input, regex matches, parsers, etc). But there are many non-intuitive edge cases that yield unexpected results:
console.log(+[]); //=> 0
console.log(+''); //=> 0
console.log(+' '); //=> 0
console.log(typeof NaN); //=> 'number'

Javascript Optimal way of checking false statement except zero

In javascript we use shortand notation if(input){} to check for empty or null input. We will get false for Null, Undefined, false, 0, NAN, "". My requirements is that I want to get true for any number including zero so I have created a method as follows
function checkFalseExceptZero(value){
if( value !== undefined && value !== null && value !== false && value !== "" && value.length !== 0 ) return true;
else return false;
}
I have added all possible checks in the above method to get the desired result. I am curious if there is any quick, sweet, short or more robust approach to achieve the same?

A simple to understand answer. The three equal signs in JS will not convert type to check if the values equal unlike the two equal signs.
0 == false //true
0 === false //false, because 0 is a number and false is a boolean
Therefore, the answer, if you want to put it inside a function:
JS:
function isNumber(v) {
return typeof v === "number"
}
The function will check the type of the variable. So it is not actually comparing the value to determine the result. The function will only return true if the type of the variable is called number.
Test runs:
isNumber(0) //true
isNumber(false) //false
isNumber("0") //false
isNumber(undefined) //false
In case you want to know, typeof variable will return a string.

My requirements is that I want to get true for any number including
zero so I have created a method as follows
function checkFalseExceptZero(value){
if ( variable.constructor === Array) return !!value.length;
return value === 0 || !!value;
}
This a shorter version of your function. This returns true only when value is 0 or a trully value.
So :
checkFalseExceptZero(null) ==> false;
checkFalseExceptZero(undefined) ==> false;
checkFalseExceptZero(false) ==> false;
checkFalseExceptZero("") ==> false;
checkFalseExceptZero(0) ==> true;
checkFalseExceptZero([]) ==> false;
checkFalseExcpetZero([1]) ==> true;

For any valid number, including 0, JavaScript already exposes the isFinite function. This returns false for all non-numbers, as well as for infinite and NaN
Examples (excerpt from the linked mdn page):
isFinite(Infinity); // false
isFinite(NaN); // false
isFinite(-Infinity); // false
isFinite(0); // true
isFinite(2e64); // true
isFinite("0"); // true, would've been false with the
// more robust Number.isFinite("0")

equality in javascript [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Which equals operator (== vs ===) should be used in JavaScript comparisons?
(48 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
When working within javascript can someone provide me a good reference or explanation over testing for equality/inequality and type coercion?
From what I have been reading I see where there are two principles of thought on using eqeq (==) vs. eqeqeq (===) some feel that you should not use eqeq and always as use eqeqeq as it is safer to use.
I have been playing around with some basic samples and I am having trouble discerning the difference or when best to use one over the other:
For example: here is some basic script I was writing out. When I test using eqeq or eqeqeq I get the same result. I have not seen an example yet where I would get a different results (ie. using eqeq returns true where eqeqeq returns false).
function write(message){
document.getElementById('message').innerHTML += message +'<br/>';
}
var tim = { name: "tim" };
var tim2 = { name: "tim" };
//objects are equal to themselves ( == vs ==== eqeq or eqeqeq)
write("tim eq tim: " + (tim == tim)); //returns true
//objects are only equal to themselves regardless of containing value got that
write("tim eq tim2: " + (tim === tim2)); //returns false
//access the primative type to test true or false
write("tim value eq tim2 value: " + (tim.name === tim2.name)); //returns true
//how does this differ in efficency over the eqeq operator? is one safer to use over the other?
//write("tim value eq tim2 value: " + (tim.name == tim2.name)); //also returns true
//testing primatives
write("apple eqeqeq apple: " + ("apple" === "apple")); //true
write("apple eqeqeq apple: " + ("apple" == "apple")); //true
Can someone provide an explanation or reference I can read that helps clarify this a bit more.
cheers,

The difference between == and === is fairly simple: == is a comparison of value. === is a comparison of value and type. Using === will prevent JavaScript from dynamically determining type and compares values exactly as they are.
5 == "5" //true - JS compares the number 5 to a string of "5" and determines the contents are the same
5 === "5" //false - A character is not a number, they can't be the same.
0 == false //true - false is a bool, 0 is numerical, but JS determines that 0 evaluates to false
0 === false //false - numeric is not boolean, they can't be exactly the same thing
5 == 5.0 //true - need I say more?
5 === 5.0 //true - one is a float and one is an int, but JS treats them all as numerical
I find it's critical for tests with functions that can return both false (for failure) and 0 (as a legitimate result).
JS has a total of 5 primitive types = numerical, string, boolean, null and undefined. === requires both arguments to be of the same type and equal value to return true. There are no float, int, long, short, etc - any type of number is lumped together as numerical.

It is simple.
== performs a type conversion and then compares converted values to your desired value
=== doesnt perform type conversion and directly compares your values.
Obviously === is better in terms of performance and accuracy but == is also convinient in some cases so you can use them both if they suit your needs.
comparisons
Cheers!

Below is a very complete list of things that you won't expect when using equality operators
All of the following are true:
0 == ""
0 == " "
0 == []
false == ""
false == " "
false == []
[] == ""
null == undefined
"str" == ["str"]
"1" == true
"0" == false
"null" != null
"false" != false
"true" != true
"undefined" != undefined
"NaN" != NaN
NaN != NaN //exception: NO exception
{} != {} //exception: same reference
[] != [] //exception: same reference
--------------------------------------
new Number(10) !== 10
new String("str") !== "str"
NaN !== NaN //exception: NO exception
{} !== {} //exception: same reference
[] !== [] //exception: same reference
(Some of them came from this source)
In conclusion, never use ==. Not even when you want to:
"It is highly recommended to only use the strict equality operator. In
cases where types need to be coerced, it should be done explicitly and
not left to the language's complicated coercion rules."
(source)

=== is the strict equality operator which returns true only if the variables have the same type and value.
a = 1;
b = "1";
a == b will return true, a === b will return false

The rule of == is not easy to remember, can you get all the right answer of below examples?
"" == "0" // false
0 == "" // true
0 == "0" // true
false == "false" // false
false == "0" // true
false == undefined // false
false == null // false
null == undefined // true
" \t\r\n" == 0 // true
So it is better only use ===, and never use ==.

You must have heard someone that javascript is very loosely typed language.
So as surreal said above
The (==) operator is used when you only want to compare the values of the arguments and do not care about their type
like 5=="5" will return true. This is the case when you want to see (for instance what key the user pressed and you don't care about the the type of it may be a string, a char or an integer).
But there me be a case when the type of arguments also matters. In such cases you want to compare the types of the operators. So in those cases you use the triple equality operator.
For example if you are performing some addition or multiplication operations then you want to make sure that the operands are of the compatible type. So you use the triple (===) operator.

Comparing NaN values for equality in Javascript

I need to compare two numeric values for equality in Javascript. The values may be NaN as well.
I've come up with this code:
if (val1 == val2 || isNaN(val1) && isNaN(val2)) ...
which is working fine, but it looks bloated to me. I would like to make it more concise. Any ideas?

if(val1 == val2 || (isNaN(val1) && isNaN(val2)))
Nothing to improve. Just add the parentheses to make it clear to everyone.

Avoid isNaN. Its behaviour is misleading:
isNaN(undefined) // true
_.isNaN (from Underscore.js) is an elegant function which behaves as expected:
// Is the given value `NaN`?
//
// `NaN` is the only value for which `===` is not reflexive.
_.isNaN = function(obj) {
return obj !== obj;
};
_.isNaN(undefined) // false
_.isNaN(0/0) // true

Try using Object.is(), it determines whether two values are the same value. Two values are the same if one of the following holds:
both undefined
both null
both true or both false
both strings of the same length with the same characters in the same order
both the same object
both numbers and
both +0
both -0
both NaN
or both non-zero and both not NaN and both have the same value
e.g. Object.is(NaN, NaN) => true
Refer to https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object/is

if ( val1 === val2 )
If either one or both are NaN it will evaluate to false.
Also, NaN !== NaN

As long as you know these two variables are numeric, you can try:
if (val1 + '' == val2 + '')
It turns the two values into strings. A funny answer, but it should work. :)

NaN is never equal to itself no matter the comparison method, so the only more concise solution for your problem that I can think of would be to create a function call with a descriptive name for doing this rather special comparison and use that comparison function in your code instead.
That would also have the advantage of localizing changes to the algorithm the day you decide that undefined should be equal to undefined too.

And what's about the function Number.isNaN() ? I believe this must be used whenever is possible.
> NaN === NaN
false
> Number.isNaN
ƒ isNaN() { [native code] }
> Number.isNaN() === Number.isNaN()
true
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/isNaN

For Numeric cases the solution is fine but to extend it to work for other data-types as well my suggestion would be as follows:
if(val1 === val2 || (val1 !== val1 && val2 !== val2))
Reason being global isNaN is erroneous. It will give you wrong results in scenarios like
isNaN(undefined); // true
isNaN({}); // true
isNaN("lorem ipsum"); // true
I have posted a comprehensive answer here which covers the NaN comparison for equality as well.
How to test if a JavaScript variable is NaN

Why not an if statement like this?
if (isNaN(x) == true){
alert("This is not a number.");
}

Equality comparison with NaN always results in False.
We can go for the javascript function isNaN() for checking equality with NaN.
Example:
1. isNaN(123) //false
2. var array = [3, NaN];
for(var i = 0 ; i< array.length; i++){
if(isNaN(array[i])){
console.log("True ---- Values of " + i);
} else {
console.log("false ---- Values of " + i);
}
}
Results:
false ---- Values of 0
True ---- Values of 1

Found another way using Array.prototype.includes MDN link. Apparently, [NaN].includes(NaN) returns true for NaN.
function IsActuallyNaN(obj) {
return [obj].includes(NaN);
}
Or we can go with davidchambers' solution which is much simpler.
function IsActuallyNaN2(obj) {
return obj !== obj;
}

How can I check if a string is a valid number?

I'm hoping there's something in the same conceptual space as the old VB6 IsNumeric() function?

2nd October 2020: note that many bare-bones approaches are fraught with subtle bugs (eg. whitespace, implicit partial parsing, radix, coercion of arrays etc.) that many of the answers here fail to take into account. The following implementation might work for you, but note that it does not cater for number separators other than the decimal point ".":
function isNumeric(str) {
if (typeof str != "string") return false // we only process strings!
return !isNaN(str) && // use type coercion to parse the _entirety_ of the string (`parseFloat` alone does not do this)...
!isNaN(parseFloat(str)) // ...and ensure strings of whitespace fail
}
To check if a variable (including a string) is a number, check if it is not a number:
This works regardless of whether the variable content is a string or number.
isNaN(num) // returns true if the variable does NOT contain a valid number
Examples
isNaN(123) // false
isNaN('123') // false
isNaN('1e10000') // false (This translates to Infinity, which is a number)
isNaN('foo') // true
isNaN('10px') // true
isNaN('') // false
isNaN(' ') // false
isNaN(false) // false
Of course, you can negate this if you need to. For example, to implement the IsNumeric example you gave:
function isNumeric(num){
return !isNaN(num)
}
To convert a string containing a number into a number:
Only works if the string only contains numeric characters, else it returns NaN.
+num // returns the numeric value of the string, or NaN
// if the string isn't purely numeric characters
Examples
+'12' // 12
+'12.' // 12
+'12..' // NaN
+'.12' // 0.12
+'..12' // NaN
+'foo' // NaN
+'12px' // NaN
To convert a string loosely to a number
Useful for converting '12px' to 12, for example:
parseInt(num) // extracts a numeric value from the
// start of the string, or NaN.
Examples
parseInt('12') // 12
parseInt('aaa') // NaN
parseInt('12px') // 12
parseInt('foo2') // NaN These last three may
parseInt('12a5') // 12 be different from what
parseInt('0x10') // 16 you expected to see.
Floats
Bear in mind that, unlike +num, parseInt (as the name suggests) will convert a float into an integer by chopping off everything following the decimal point (if you want to use parseInt() because of this behaviour, you're probably better off using another method instead):
+'12.345' // 12.345
parseInt(12.345) // 12
parseInt('12.345') // 12
Empty strings
Empty strings may be a little counter-intuitive. +num converts empty strings or strings with spaces to zero, and isNaN() assumes the same:
+'' // 0
+' ' // 0
isNaN('') // false
isNaN(' ') // false
But parseInt() does not agree:
parseInt('') // NaN
parseInt(' ') // NaN

If you're just trying to check if a string is a whole number (no decimal places), regex is a good way to go. Other methods such as isNaN are too complicated for something so simple.
function isNumeric(value) {
return /^-?\d+$/.test(value);
}
console.log(isNumeric('abcd')); // false
console.log(isNumeric('123a')); // false
console.log(isNumeric('1')); // true
console.log(isNumeric('1234567890')); // true
console.log(isNumeric('-23')); // true
console.log(isNumeric(1234)); // true
console.log(isNumeric(1234n)); // true
console.log(isNumeric('123.4')); // false
console.log(isNumeric('')); // false
console.log(isNumeric(undefined)); // false
console.log(isNumeric(null)); // false
To only allow positive whole numbers use this:
function isNumeric(value) {
return /^\d+$/.test(value);
}
console.log(isNumeric('123')); // true
console.log(isNumeric('-23')); // false

The accepted answer for this question has quite a few flaws (as highlighted by couple of other users). This is one of the easiest & proven way to approach it in javascript:
function isNumeric(n) {
return !isNaN(parseFloat(n)) && isFinite(n);
}
Below are some good test cases:
console.log(isNumeric(12345678912345678912)); // true
console.log(isNumeric('2 ')); // true
console.log(isNumeric('-32.2 ')); // true
console.log(isNumeric(-32.2)); // true
console.log(isNumeric(undefined)); // false
// the accepted answer fails at these tests:
console.log(isNumeric('')); // false
console.log(isNumeric(null)); // false
console.log(isNumeric([])); // false

And you could go the RegExp-way:
var num = "987238";
if(num.match(/^-?\d+$/)){
//valid integer (positive or negative)
}else if(num.match(/^\d+\.\d+$/)){
//valid float
}else{
//not valid number
}

If you really want to make sure that a string contains only a number, any number (integer or floating point), and exactly a number, you cannot use parseInt()/ parseFloat(), Number(), or !isNaN() by themselves. Note that !isNaN() is actually returning true when Number() would return a number, and false when it would return NaN, so I will exclude it from the rest of the discussion.
The problem with parseFloat() is that it will return a number if the string contains any number, even if the string doesn't contain only and exactly a number:
parseFloat("2016-12-31") // returns 2016
parseFloat("1-1") // return 1
parseFloat("1.2.3") // returns 1.2
The problem with Number() is that it will return a number in cases where the passed value is not a number at all!
Number("") // returns 0
Number(" ") // returns 0
Number(" \u00A0 \t\n\r") // returns 0
The problem with rolling your own regex is that unless you create the exact regex for matching a floating point number as Javascript recognizes it you are going to miss cases or recognize cases where you shouldn't. And even if you can roll your own regex, why? There are simpler built-in ways to do it.
However, it turns out that Number() (and isNaN()) does the right thing for every case where parseFloat() returns a number when it shouldn't, and vice versa. So to find out if a string is really exactly and only a number, call both functions and see if they both return true:
function isNumber(str) {
if (typeof str != "string") return false // we only process strings!
// could also coerce to string: str = ""+str
return !isNaN(str) && !isNaN(parseFloat(str))
}

Try the isNan function:
The isNaN() function determines whether a value is an illegal number (Not-a-Number).
This function returns true if the value equates to NaN. Otherwise it returns false.
This function is different from the Number specific Number.isNaN() method.
The global isNaN() function, converts the tested value to a Number, then tests it.
Number.isNan() does not convert the values to a Number, and will not return true for any value that is not of the type Number...

2019: Including ES3, ES6 and TypeScript Examples
Maybe this has been rehashed too many times, however I fought with this one today too and wanted to post my answer, as I didn't see any other answer that does it as simply or thoroughly:
ES3
var isNumeric = function(num){
return (typeof(num) === 'number' || typeof(num) === "string" && num.trim() !== '') && !isNaN(num);
}
ES6
const isNumeric = (num) => (typeof(num) === 'number' || typeof(num) === "string" && num.trim() !== '') && !isNaN(num);
Typescript
const isNumeric = (num: any) => (typeof(num) === 'number' || typeof(num) === "string" && num.trim() !== '') && !isNaN(num as number);
This seems quite simple and covers all the bases I saw on the many other posts and thought up myself:
// Positive Cases
console.log(0, isNumeric(0) === true);
console.log(1, isNumeric(1) === true);
console.log(1234567890, isNumeric(1234567890) === true);
console.log('1234567890', isNumeric('1234567890') === true);
console.log('0', isNumeric('0') === true);
console.log('1', isNumeric('1') === true);
console.log('1.1', isNumeric('1.1') === true);
console.log('-1', isNumeric('-1') === true);
console.log('-1.2354', isNumeric('-1.2354') === true);
console.log('-1234567890', isNumeric('-1234567890') === true);
console.log(-1, isNumeric(-1) === true);
console.log(-32.1, isNumeric(-32.1) === true);
console.log('0x1', isNumeric('0x1') === true); // Valid number in hex
// Negative Cases
console.log(true, isNumeric(true) === false);
console.log(false, isNumeric(false) === false);
console.log('1..1', isNumeric('1..1') === false);
console.log('1,1', isNumeric('1,1') === false);
console.log('-32.1.12', isNumeric('-32.1.12') === false);
console.log('[blank]', isNumeric('') === false);
console.log('[spaces]', isNumeric(' ') === false);
console.log('null', isNumeric(null) === false);
console.log('undefined', isNumeric(undefined) === false);
console.log([], isNumeric([]) === false);
console.log('NaN', isNumeric(NaN) === false);
You can also try your own isNumeric function and just past in these use cases and scan for "true" for all of them.
Or, to see the values that each return:

Old question, but there are several points missing in the given answers.
Scientific notation.
!isNaN('1e+30') is true, however in most of the cases when people ask for numbers, they do not want to match things like 1e+30.
Large floating numbers may behave weird
Observe (using Node.js):
> var s = Array(16 + 1).join('9')
undefined
> s.length
16
> s
'9999999999999999'
> !isNaN(s)
true
> Number(s)
10000000000000000
> String(Number(s)) === s
false
>
On the other hand:
> var s = Array(16 + 1).join('1')
undefined
> String(Number(s)) === s
true
> var s = Array(15 + 1).join('9')
undefined
> String(Number(s)) === s
true
>
So, if one expects String(Number(s)) === s, then better limit your strings to 15 digits at most (after omitting leading zeros).
Infinity
> typeof Infinity
'number'
> !isNaN('Infinity')
true
> isFinite('Infinity')
false
>
Given all that, checking that the given string is a number satisfying all of the following:
non scientific notation
predictable conversion to Number and back to String
finite
is not such an easy task. Here is a simple version:
function isNonScientificNumberString(o) {
if (!o || typeof o !== 'string') {
// Should not be given anything but strings.
return false;
}
return o.length <= 15 && o.indexOf('e+') < 0 && o.indexOf('E+') < 0 && !isNaN(o) && isFinite(o);
}
However, even this one is far from complete. Leading zeros are not handled here, but they do screw the length test.

The JavaScript global isFinite() checks if a value is a valid (finite) number.
See MDN for the difference between Number.isFinite() and global isFinite().
let a = isFinite('abc') // false
let b = isFinite('123') // true
let c = isFinite('12a') // false
let d = isFinite(null) // true
console.log(a, b, c, d)

I have tested and Michael's solution is best. Vote for his answer above (search this page for "If you really want to make sure that a string" to find it). In essence, his answer is this:
function isNumeric(num){
num = "" + num; //coerce num to be a string
return !isNaN(num) && !isNaN(parseFloat(num));
}
It works for every test case, which I documented here:
https://jsfiddle.net/wggehvp9/5/
Many of the other solutions fail for these edge cases:
' ', null, "", true, and [].
In theory, you could use them, with proper error handling, for example:
return !isNaN(num);
or
return (+num === +num);
with special handling for
/\s/, null, "", true, false, [] (and others?)

TL;DR
It depends largely on what you want to parse as a number.
Comparison Between Built-in Functions
As none of the existing sources satisfied my soul, I tried to figure out what actually was happening with these functions.
Three immediate answers to this question felt like:
!isNaN(input) (which gives the same output as +input === +input)
!isNaN(parseFloat(input))
isFinite(input)
But are any of them correct in every scenario?
I tested these functions in several cases, and generated output as markdown. This is what it looks like:
input
!isNaN(input) or +input===+input
!isNaN(parseFloat(input))
isFinite(input)
Comment
123
✔️
✔️
✔️
-
'123'
✔️
✔️
✔️
-
12.3
✔️
✔️
✔️
-
'12.3'
✔️
✔️
✔️
-
'   12.3   '
✔️
✔️
✔️
Empty whitespace trimmed, as expected.
1_000_000
✔️
✔️
✔️
Numeric separator understood, also expected.
'1_000_000'
❌
✔️
❌
Surprise! JS just won't parse numeric separator inside a string. For details, check this issue. (Why then parsing as float worked though? Well, it didn't. 😉)
'0b11111111'
✔️
✔️
✔️
Binary form understood, as it should've.
'0o377'
✔️
✔️
✔️
Octal form understood too.
'0xFF'
✔️
✔️
✔️
Of course hex is understood. Did anybody think otherwise? 😒
''
✔️
❌
✔️
Should empty string be a number?
'    '
✔️
❌
✔️
Should a whitespace-only string be a number?
'abc'
❌
❌
❌
Everybody agrees, not a number.
'12.34Ab!##$'
❌
✔️
❌
Ah! Now it's quite understandable what parseFloat() does. Not impressive to me, but may come handy in certain cases.
'10e100'
✔️
✔️
✔️
10100 is a number indeed. But caution! It's way more larger than the maximum safe integer value 253 (about 9×1015). Read this for details.
'10e1000'
✔️
✔️
❌
Say with me, help! Though not as crazy as it may seem. In JavaScript, a value larger than ~10308 is rounded to infinity, that's why. Look here for details. And yes, isNaN() considers infinity as a number, and parseFloat() parses infinity as infinity.
null
✔️
❌
✔️
Now this is awkward. In JS, when a conversion is needed, null becomes zero, and we get a finite number. Then why parseFloat(null) should return a NaN here? Someone please explain this design concept to me.
undefined
❌
❌
❌
As expected.
Infinity
✔️
✔️
❌
As explained before, isNaN() considers infinity as a number, and parseFloat() parses infinity as infinity.
So...which of them is "correct"?
Should be clear by now, it depends largely on what we need. For example, we may want to consider a null input as 0. In that case isFinite() will work fine.
Again, perhaps we will take a little help from isNaN() when 1010000000000 is needed to be considered a valid number (although the question remains—why would it be, and how would we handle that)!
Of course, we can manually exclude any of the scenarios.
Like in my case, I needed exactly the outputs of isFinite(), except for the null case, the empty string case, and the whitespace-only string case. Also I had no headache about really huge numbers. So my code looked like this:
/**
* My necessity was met by the following code.
*/
if (input === null) {
// Null input
} else if (input.trim() === '') {
// Empty or whitespace-only string
} else if (isFinite(input)) {
// Input is a number
} else {
// Not a number
}
And also, this was my JavaScript to generate the table:
/**
* Note: JavaScript does not print numeric separator inside a number.
* In that single case, the markdown output was manually corrected.
* Also, the comments were manually added later, of course.
*/
let inputs = [
123, '123', 12.3, '12.3', ' 12.3 ',
1_000_000, '1_000_000',
'0b11111111', '0o377', '0xFF',
'', ' ',
'abc', '12.34Ab!##$',
'10e100', '10e1000',
null, undefined, Infinity];
let markdownOutput = `| \`input\` | \`!isNaN(input)\` or <br>\`+input === +input\` | \`!isNaN(parseFloat(input))\` | \`isFinite(input)\` | Comment |
| :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :--- |\n`;
for (let input of inputs) {
let outputs = [];
outputs.push(!isNaN(input));
outputs.push(!isNaN(parseFloat(input)));
outputs.push(isFinite(input));
if (typeof input === 'string') {
// Output with quotations
console.log(`'${input}'`);
markdownOutput += `| '${input}'`;
} else {
// Output without quotes
console.log(input);
markdownOutput += `| ${input}`;
}
for (let output of outputs) {
console.log('\t' + output);
if (output === true) {
markdownOutput += ` | <div style="color:limegreen">true</div>`;
// markdownOutput += ` | ✔️`; // for stackoverflow
} else {
markdownOutput += ` | <div style="color:orangered">false</div>`;
// markdownOutput += ` | ❌`; // for stackoverflow
}
}
markdownOutput += ` ||\n`;
}
// Replace two or more whitespaces with $nbsp;
markdownOutput = markdownOutput.replaceAll(` `, ` `);
// Print markdown to console
console.log(markdownOutput);

Someone may also benefit from a regex based answer. Here it is:
One liner isInteger:
const isInteger = num => /^-?[0-9]+$/.test(num+'');
One liner isNumeric: Accepts integers and decimals
const isNumeric = num => /^-?[0-9]+(?:\.[0-9]+)?$/.test(num+'');

You can use the result of Number when passing an argument to its constructor.
If the argument (a string) cannot be converted into a number, it returns NaN, so you can determinate if the string provided was a valid number or not.
Notes: Note when passing empty string or '\t\t' and '\n\t' as Number will return 0; Passing true will return 1 and false returns 0.
Number('34.00') // 34
Number('-34') // -34
Number('123e5') // 12300000
Number('123e-5') // 0.00123
Number('999999999999') // 999999999999
Number('9999999999999999') // 10000000000000000 (integer accuracy up to 15 digit)
Number('0xFF') // 255
Number('Infinity') // Infinity
Number('34px') // NaN
Number('xyz') // NaN
Number('true') // NaN
Number('false') // NaN
// cavets
Number(' ') // 0
Number('\t\t') // 0
Number('\n\t') // 0

Maybe there are one or two people coming across this question who need a much stricter check than usual (like I did). In that case, this might be useful:
if(str === String(Number(str))) {
// it's a "perfectly formatted" number
}
Beware! This will reject strings like .1, 40.000, 080, 00.1. It's very picky - the string must match the "most minimal perfect form" of the number for this test to pass.
It uses the String and Number constructor to cast the string to a number and back again and thus checks if the JavaScript engine's "perfect minimal form" (the one it got converted to with the initial Number constructor) matches the original string.

Why is jQuery's implementation not good enough?
function isNumeric(a) {
var b = a && a.toString();
return !$.isArray(a) && b - parseFloat(b) + 1 >= 0;
};
Michael suggested something like this (although I've stolen "user1691651 - John"'s altered version here):
function isNumeric(num){
num = "" + num; //coerce num to be a string
return !isNaN(num) && !isNaN(parseFloat(num));
}
The following is a solution with most likely bad performance, but solid results. It is a contraption made from the jQuery 1.12.4 implementation and Michael's answer, with an extra check for leading/trailing spaces (because Michael's version returns true for numerics with leading/trailing spaces):
function isNumeric(a) {
var str = a + "";
var b = a && a.toString();
return !$.isArray(a) && b - parseFloat(b) + 1 >= 0 &&
!/^\s+|\s+$/g.test(str) &&
!isNaN(str) && !isNaN(parseFloat(str));
};
The latter version has two new variables, though. One could get around one of those, by doing:
function isNumeric(a) {
if ($.isArray(a)) return false;
var b = a && a.toString();
a = a + "";
return b - parseFloat(b) + 1 >= 0 &&
!/^\s+|\s+$/g.test(a) &&
!isNaN(a) && !isNaN(parseFloat(a));
};
I haven't tested any of these very much, by other means than manually testing the few use-cases I'll be hitting with my current predicament, which is all very standard stuff. This is a "standing-on-the-shoulders-of-giants" situation.

2019: Practical and tight numerical validity check
Often, a 'valid number' means a Javascript number excluding NaN and Infinity, ie a 'finite number'.
To check the numerical validity of a value (from an external source for example), you can define in ESlint Airbnb style :
/**
* Returns true if 'candidate' is a finite number or a string referring (not just 'including') a finite number
* To keep in mind:
* Number(true) = 1
* Number('') = 0
* Number(" 10 ") = 10
* !isNaN(true) = true
* parseFloat('10 a') = 10
*
* #param {?} candidate
* #return {boolean}
*/
function isReferringFiniteNumber(candidate) {
if (typeof (candidate) === 'number') return Number.isFinite(candidate);
if (typeof (candidate) === 'string') {
return (candidate.trim() !== '') && Number.isFinite(Number(candidate));
}
return false;
}
and use it this way:
if (isReferringFiniteNumber(theirValue)) {
myCheckedValue = Number(theirValue);
} else {
console.warn('The provided value doesn\'t refer to a finite number');
}

It is not valid for TypeScript as:
declare function isNaN(number: number): boolean;
For TypeScript you can use:
/^\d+$/.test(key)

I like the simplicity of this.
Number.isNaN(Number(value))
The above is regular Javascript, but I'm using this in conjunction with a typescript typeguard for smart type checking. This is very useful for the typescript compiler to give you correct intellisense, and no type errors.
Typescript typeguards
Warning: See Jeremy's comment below. This has some issues with certain values and I don't have time to fix it now, but the idea of using a typescript typeguard is useful so I won't delete this section.
isNotNumber(value: string | number): value is string {
return Number.isNaN(Number(this.smartImageWidth));
}
isNumber(value: string | number): value is number {
return Number.isNaN(Number(this.smartImageWidth)) === false;
}
Let's say you have a property width which is number | string. You may want to do logic based on whether or not it's a string.
var width: number|string;
width = "100vw";
if (isNotNumber(width))
{
// the compiler knows that width here must be a string
if (width.endsWith('vw'))
{
// we have a 'width' such as 100vw
}
}
else
{
// the compiler is smart and knows width here must be number
var doubleWidth = width * 2;
}
The typeguard is smart enough to constrain the type of width within the if statement to be ONLY string. This permits the compiler to allow width.endsWith(...) which it wouldn't allow if the type was string | number.
You can call the typeguard whatever you want isNotNumber, isNumber, isString, isNotString but I think isString is kind of ambiguous and harder to read.

parseInt(), but be aware that this function is a bit different in the sense that it for example returns 100 for parseInt("100px").

When guarding against empty strings and null
// Base cases that are handled properly
Number.isNaN(Number('1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('1.1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('-1.1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('asdf')); // => true
Number.isNaN(Number(undefined)); // => true
// Special notation cases that are handled properly
Number.isNaN(Number('1e1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('1e-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('-1e1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('-1e-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('0b1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('0o1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('0xa')); // => false
// Edge cases that will FAIL if not guarded against
Number.isNaN(Number('')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number(' ')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number(null)); // => false
// Edge cases that are debatable
Number.isNaN(Number('-0b1')); // => true
Number.isNaN(Number('-0o1')); // => true
Number.isNaN(Number('-0xa')); // => true
Number.isNaN(Number('Infinity')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('INFINITY')); // => true
Number.isNaN(Number('-Infinity')); // => false
Number.isNaN(Number('-INFINITY')); // => true
When NOT guarding against empty strings and null
Using parseInt:
// Base cases that are handled properly
Number.isNaN(parseInt('1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('1.1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-1.1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('asdf')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseInt(undefined)); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseInt('')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseInt(' ')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseInt(null)); // => true
// Special notation cases that are handled properly
Number.isNaN(parseInt('1e1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('1e-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-1e1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-1e-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('0b1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('0o1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('0xa')); // => false
// Edge cases that are debatable
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-0b1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-0o1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-0xa')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseInt('Infinity')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseInt('INFINITY')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-Infinity')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseInt('-INFINITY')); // => true
Using parseFloat:
// Base cases that are handled properly
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('1.1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-1.1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('asdf')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseFloat(undefined)); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseFloat(' ')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseFloat(null)); // => true
// Special notation cases that are handled properly
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('1e1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('1e-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-1e1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-1e-1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('0b1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('0o1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('0xa')); // => false
// Edge cases that are debatable
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-0b1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-0o1')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-0xa')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('Infinity')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('INFINITY')); // => true
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-Infinity')); // => false
Number.isNaN(parseFloat('-INFINITY')); // => true
Notes:
Only string, empty, and uninitialized values are considered in keeping with addressing the original question. Additional edge cases exist if arrays and objects are the values being considered.
Characters in binary, octal, hexadecimal, and exponential notation are not case-sensitive (ie: '0xFF', '0XFF', '0xfF' etc. will all yield the same result in the test cases shown above).
Unlike with Infinity (case-sensitive) in some cases, constants from the Number and Math objects passed as test cases in string format to any of the methods above will be determined to not be numbers.
See here for an explanation of how arguments are converted to a Number and why the edge cases for null and empty strings exist.

Quote:
isNaN(num) // returns true if the variable does NOT contain a valid number
is not entirely true if you need to check for leading/trailing spaces - for example when a certain quantity of digits is required, and you need to get, say, '1111' and not ' 111' or '111 ' for perhaps a PIN input.
Better to use:
var num = /^\d+$/.test(num)

This is built on some of the previous answers and comments. It covers all the edge cases and also handles scientific notation optionally:
const NUMBER_REG_EXP = /^-?\d+(?:\.\d+)?$/;
const SCIENTIFIC_NOTATION_REG_EXP = /^-?\d+(?:\.\d+)?(?:[eE]\d+)?$/;
const isNumeric = (n, allowScientificNotation = false) => (
(typeof n === 'number' && !Number.isNaN(n)) ||
(typeof n === 'string' && (allowScientificNotation ?
SCIENTIFIC_NOTATION_REG_EXP : NUMBER_REG_EXP).test(n))
);

If anyone ever gets this far down, I spent some time hacking on this trying to patch moment.js (https://github.com/moment/moment). Here's something that I took away from it:
function isNumeric(val) {
var _val = +val;
return (val !== val + 1) //infinity check
&& (_val === +val) //Cute coercion check
&& (typeof val !== 'object') //Array/object check
}
Handles the following cases:
True! :
isNumeric("1"))
isNumeric(1e10))
isNumeric(1E10))
isNumeric(+"6e4"))
isNumeric("1.2222"))
isNumeric("-1.2222"))
isNumeric("-1.222200000000000000"))
isNumeric("1.222200000000000000"))
isNumeric(1))
isNumeric(0))
isNumeric(-0))
isNumeric(1010010293029))
isNumeric(1.100393830000))
isNumeric(Math.LN2))
isNumeric(Math.PI))
isNumeric(5e10))
False! :
isNumeric(NaN))
isNumeric(Infinity))
isNumeric(-Infinity))
isNumeric())
isNumeric(undefined))
isNumeric('[1,2,3]'))
isNumeric({a:1,b:2}))
isNumeric(null))
isNumeric([1]))
isNumeric(new Date()))
Ironically, the one I am struggling with the most:
isNumeric(new Number(1)) => false
Any suggestions welcome. :]

I recently wrote an article about ways to ensure a variable is a valid number: https://github.com/jehugaleahsa/artifacts/blob/master/2018/typescript_num_hack.md The article explains how to ensure floating point or integer, if that's important (+x vs ~~x).
The article assumes the variable is a string or a number to begin with and trim is available/polyfilled. It wouldn't be hard to extend it to handle other types, as well. Here's the meat of it:
// Check for a valid float
if (x == null
|| ("" + x).trim() === ""
|| isNaN(+x)) {
return false; // not a float
}
// Check for a valid integer
if (x == null
|| ("" + x).trim() === ""
|| ~~x !== +x) {
return false; // not an integer
}

function isNumberCandidate(s) {
const str = (''+ s).trim();
if (str.length === 0) return false;
return !isNaN(+str);
}
console.log(isNumberCandidate('1')); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate('a')); // false
console.log(isNumberCandidate('000')); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate('1a')); // false
console.log(isNumberCandidate('1e')); // false
console.log(isNumberCandidate('1e-1')); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate('123.3')); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate('')); // false
console.log(isNumberCandidate(' ')); // false
console.log(isNumberCandidate(1)); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate(0)); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate(NaN)); // false
console.log(isNumberCandidate(undefined)); // false
console.log(isNumberCandidate(null)); // false
console.log(isNumberCandidate(-1)); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate('-1')); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate('-1.2')); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate(0.0000001)); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate('0.0000001')); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate(Infinity)); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate(-Infinity)); // true
console.log(isNumberCandidate('Infinity')); // true
if (isNumberCandidate(s)) {
// use +s as a number
+s ...
}

Well, I'm using this one I made...
It's been working so far:
function checkNumber(value) {
return value % 1 == 0;
}
If you spot any problem with it, tell me, please.

Checking the number in JS:
Best way for check if it's a number:
isFinite(20)
//True
Read a value out of a string. CSS *:
parseInt('2.5rem')
//2
parseFloat('2.5rem')
//2.5
For an integer:
isInteger(23 / 0)
//False
If value is NaN:
isNaN(20)
//False

This way it works for me.
function isNumeric(num){
let value1 = num.toString();
let value2 = parseFloat(num).toString();
return (value1 === value2);
}
console.log(
isNumeric(123), //true
isNumeric(-123), //true
isNumeric('123'), //true
isNumeric('-123'), //true
isNumeric(12.2), //true
isNumeric(-12.2), //true
isNumeric('12.2'), //true
isNumeric('-12.2'), //true
isNumeric('a123'), //false
isNumeric('123a'), //false
isNumeric(' 123'), //false
isNumeric('123 '), //false
isNumeric('a12.2'), //false
isNumeric('12.2a'), //false
isNumeric(' 12.2'), //false
isNumeric('12.2 '), //false
)

PFB the working solution:
function(check){
check = check + "";
var isNumber = check.trim().length>0? !isNaN(check):false;
return isNumber;
}

Save yourself the headache of trying to find a "built-in" solution.
There isn't a good answer, and the hugely upvoted answer in this thread is wrong.
npm install is-number
In JavaScript, it's not always as straightforward as it should be to reliably check if a value is a number. It's common for devs to use +, -, or Number() to cast a string value to a number (for example, when values are returned from user input, regex matches, parsers, etc). But there are many non-intuitive edge cases that yield unexpected results:
console.log(+[]); //=> 0
console.log(+''); //=> 0
console.log(+' '); //=> 0
console.log(typeof NaN); //=> 'number'

Develop Reference

JavaScript is the programming language of the Web.

How do I check if a number evaluates to infinity? - javascript

I have a series of Javascript calculations that (only under IE) show Infinity depending on user choices. How does one stop the word Infinity appearing and for example, show 0.0 instead?

In ES6, The Number.isFinite() method determines whether the passed value is a finite number. Number.isFinite(Infinity); // false Number.isFinite(NaN); // false Number.isFinite(-Infinity); // false Number.isFinite(0); // true Number.isFinite(2e64); // true

A simple n === n+1 or n === n/0 works: function isInfinite(n) { return n === n/0; } Be aware that the native isFinite() coerces inputs to numbers. isFinite([]) and isFinite(null) are both true for example.

Actually n === n + 1 will work for numbers bigger than 51 bit, e.g. 1e16 + 1 === 1e16; // true 1e16 === Infinity; // false

Related

How to detect that the parseFloat() stopped on "other" character? [duplicate]

Javascript Optimal way of checking false statement except zero

equality in javascript [duplicate]

Comparing NaN values for equality in Javascript

How can I check if a string is a valid number?

Categories

Resources