I need help with writing some code that will create a random number from an array of 12 numbers and print it 9 times without dupes. This has been tough for me to accomplish. Any ideas?
var nums = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12];
var gen_nums = [];
function in_array(array, el) {
for(var i = 0 ; i < array.length; i++)
if(array[i] == el) return true;
return false;
}
function get_rand(array) {
var rand = array[Math.floor(Math.random()*array.length)];
if(!in_array(gen_nums, rand)) {
gen_nums.push(rand);
return rand;
}
return get_rand(array);
}
for(var i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
console.log(get_rand(nums));
}
The most effective and efficient way to do this is to shuffle your numbers then print the first nine of them. Use a good shuffle algorithm.What Thilo suggested will give you poor results. See here.
Edit
Here's a brief Knuth Shuffle algorithm example:
void shuffle(vector<int> nums)
{
for (int i = nums.size()-1; i >= 0; i--)
{
// this line is really shorthand, but gets the point across, I hope.
swap(nums[i],nums[rand()%i]);
}
}
Try this once:
//Here o is the array;
var testArr = [6, 7, 12, 15, 17, 20, 21];
shuffle = function(o){ //v1.0
for(var j, x, i = o.length; i; j = parseInt(Math.random() * i), x = o[--i], o[i] = o[j], o[j] = x);
return o;
};
shuffle(testArr);
This is relatively simple to do, the theory behind it is creating another array which keeps track of which elements of the array you have used.
var tempArray = new Array(12),i,r;
for (i=0;i<9;i++)
{
r = Math.floor(Math.random()*12); // Get a random index
if (tempArray[r] === undefined) // If the index hasn't been used yet
{
document.write(numberArray[r]); // Display it
tempArray[r] = true; // Flag it as have been used
}
else // Otherwise
{
i--; // Try again
}
}
Other methods include shuffling the array, removing used elements from the array, or moving used elements to the end of the array.
If I understand you correctly, you want to shuffle your array.
Loop a couple of times (length of array should do), and in every iteration, get two random array indexes and swap the two elements there. (Update: if you are really serious about this, this may not be the best algorithm).
You can then print the first nine array elements, which will be in random order and not repeat.
Here is a generic way of getting random numbers between min and max without duplicates:
function inArray(arr, el) {
for(var i = 0 ; i < arr.length; i++)
if(arr[i] == el) return true;
return false;
}
function getRandomIntNoDuplicates(min, max, DuplicateArr) {
var RandomInt = Math.floor(Math.random() * (max - min + 1)) + min;
if (DuplicateArr.length > (max-min) ) return false; // break endless recursion
if(!inArray(DuplicateArr, RandomInt)) {
DuplicateArr.push(RandomInt);
return RandomInt;
}
return getRandomIntNoDuplicates(min, max, DuplicateArr); //recurse
}
call with:
var duplicates =[];
for (var i = 1; i <= 6 ; i++) {
console.log(getRandomIntNoDuplicates(1,10,duplicates));
}
const nums = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12];
for(var i = 1 ; i < 10; i++){
result = nums[Math.floor(Math.random()*nums.length)];
const index = nums.indexOf(result);
nums.splice(index, 1);
console.log(i+' - '+result);
}
I am trying to create a function that builds an array up to a number set by the function parameter, with an if condition on being included based on whether the remainder is zero. The last number in the array should be no higher than the parameter. Here's what I came up with so far --
function justThreesUpTo(num) {
var array = [];
array.length = num;
for (i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {
if(i % 3 === 0){
array.push(i);
}
else i;
}
array.splice(0, num);
return array;
}
When I console log this, with justThreesUpTo(20), I get --
// [ 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42 ]
I see the issue being setting the limiter at array.length, which maxes out the number of items that can be in the array, but I can't figure out what else to call to make sure the last number in the array goes no higher than the "num" parameter specified by the function call. Any ideas?
Setting an array's length to something before the array is populated isn't a great idea - better to just iterate over the num itself. For example
for (var i = 1; i < num; i++) {
// push to array if i % 3 === 0
Your else i won't do anything - you can just leave it off completely.
You could make your code a whole lot shorter and cleaner if you wanted:
function justThreesUpTo(num) {
const length = Math.floor(num / 3);
return Array.from({ length }, (_, i) => (i + 1) * 3);
}
console.log(justThreesUpTo(20));
Modifying an array while looping over it (or its indices, which is what you’re doing with i < array.length) is a recipe for confusion. Start with an empty array and compare with num instead:
function justThreesUpTo(num) {
var array = [];
for (var i = 1; i < num; i++) {
if (i % 3 === 0) {
array.push(i);
}
}
return array;
}
Now you can optimize the check out of that entirely by moving up the appropriate amount each time.
function justThreesUpTo(num) {
var array = [];
for (var i = 3; i < num; i += 3) {
array.push(i);
}
return array;
}
(In your original code, the entire first num holes created by array.length = num; are unused and get spliced off, and else i does nothing.)
You can try with a simple while loop
function justThreesUpTo(num) {
var array = [];
var i = 0;
while (i < num) {
if(i % 3 === 0){
array.push(i);
}
i++;
}
return array;
}
console.log(justThreesUpTo(20));
You can use map method and spread syntax in order to write a clean solution.
function justThreesUpTo(num) {
return [ ...Array(Math.floor(num/3)).keys() ].map((_,i)=> (i+1) * 3);
}
console.log(justThreesUpTo(20));
Hmm. Looks like it was a pretty simple solution. Changed the limiter from "array.length" to "num", and it worked fine.
function justThreesUpTo(num) {
var array = [];
array.length = num;
for (i = 1; i < num; i++) {
if(i % 3 === 0){
array.push(i);
}
else i;
}
array.splice(0, num);
return array;
}
Never mind!
Use while with i+=3; inside the while loop:
function justThreesUpTo(num) {
var array = [];
var i = 0;
while(i<num){
array.push(i);
i+=3;
}
return array;
}
console.log(justThreesUpTo(20));
I want to reverse an array without using reverse() function like this:
function reverse(array){
var output = [];
for (var i = 0; i<= array.length; i++){
output.push(array.pop());
}
return output;
}
console.log(reverse([1,2,3,4,5,6,7]));
However, the it shows [7, 6, 5, 4] Can someone tell me, why my reverse function is wrong? Thanks in advance!
array.pop() removes the popped element from the array, reducing its size by one. Once you're at i === 4, your break condition no longer evaluates to true and the loop ends.
One possible solution:
function reverse(array) {
var output = [];
while (array.length) {
output.push(array.pop());
}
return output;
}
console.log(reverse([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]));
You can make use of Array.prototype.reduceright and reverse it
check the following snippet
var arr = ([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]).reduceRight(function(previous, current) {
previous.push(current);
return previous;
}, []);
console.log(arr);
In ES6 this could be written as
reverse = (array) => array.map(array.pop, [... array]);
No need to pop anything... Just iterate through the existing array in reverse order to make your new one.
function reverse(array){
var output = [];
for (var i = array.length - 1; i> -1; i--){
output.push(array[i]);
}
return output;
}
console.log(reverse([1,2,3,4,5,6,7]));
Edit after answer got accepted.
A link in a comment on your opening post made me test my way VS the accepted answer's way. I was pleased to see that my way, at least in my case, turned out to be faster every single time. By a small margin but, faster non the less.
Here's the copy/paste of what I used to test it (tested from Firefox developer scratch pad):
function reverseMyWay(array){
var output = [];
for (var i = array.length - 1; i> -1; i--){
output.push(array[i]);
}
return output;
}
function reverseTheirWay(array) {
var output = [];
while (array.length) {
output.push(array.pop());
}
return output;
}
function JustDoIt(){
console.log("their way starts")
var startOf = new Date().getTime();
for(var p = 0; p < 10000; p++)
{
console.log(reverseTheirWay([7,6,5,4,3,2,1]))
}
var endOf = new Date().getTime();
console.log("ran for " + (endOf - startOf) + " ms");
console.log("their way ends")
}
function JustDoIMyWay(){
console.log("my way starts")
var startOf = new Date().getTime();
for(var p = 0; p < 10000; p++)
{
console.log(reverseMyWay([7,6,5,4,3,2,1]))
}
var endOf = new Date().getTime();
console.log("ran for " + (endOf - startOf) + " ms");
console.log("my way ends")
}
JustDoIt();
JustDoIMyWay();
Solution to reverse an array without using built-in function and extra space.
let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7];
let n = arr.length-1;
for(let i=0; i<=n/2; i++) {
let temp = arr[i];
arr[i] = arr[n-i];
arr[n-i] = temp;
}
console.log(arr);
Do it in a reverse way, Because when you do .pop() every time the array's length got affected.
function reverse(array){
var output = [];
for (var i = array.length; i > 0; i--){
output.push(array.pop());
}
return output;
}
console.log(reverse([1,2,3,4,5,6,7]));
Or you could cache the length of the array in a variable before popping out from the array,
function reverse(array){
var output = [];
for (var i = 0, len= array.length; i< len; i++){
output.push(array.pop());
}
return output;
}
console.log(reverse([1,2,3,4,5,6,7]));
You are modifying the existing array with your reverse function, which is affecting array.length.
Don't pop off the array, just access the item in the array and unshift the item on the new array so that the first element of the existing array becomes the last element of the new array:
function reverse(array){
var output = [],
i;
for (i = 0; i < array.length; i++){
output.unshift(array[i]);
}
return output;
}
console.log(reverse([1,2,3,4,5,6,7]));
If you'd like to modify the array in-place similar to how Array.prototype.reverse does (it's generally inadvisable to cause side-effects), you can splice the array, and unshift the item back on at the beginning:
function reverse(array) {
var i,
tmp;
for (i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {
tmp = array.splice(i, 1)[0];
array.unshift(tmp);
}
return array;
}
var a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
console.log('reverse result', reverse(a));
console.log('a', a);
This piece allows to reverse the array in place, without pop, splice, or push.
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
function reverseArrayInPlace(arr2) {
var half = Math.floor(arr2.length / 2);
for (var i = 0; i < half; i++) {
var temp = arr2[arr2.length - 1 - i];
arr2[arr2.length - 1 - i] = arr2[i];
arr2[i] = temp;
}
return arr2;
}
As you pop items off the first array, it's length changes and your loop count is shortened. You need to cache the original length of the original array so that the loop will run the correct amount of times.
function reverse(array){
var output = [];
var len = array.length;
for (var i = 0; i< len; i++){
output.push(array.pop());
}
return output;
}
console.log(reverse([1,2,3,4,5,6,7]));
You're modifying the original array and changing it's size. instead of a for loop you could use a while
function reverse(array){
var output = [];
while(array.length){
//this removes the last element making the length smaller
output.push(array.pop());
}
return output;
}
console.log(reverse([1,2,3,4,5,6,7]));
function rvrc(arr) {
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length / 2; i++) {
const buffer = arr[i];
arr[i] = arr[arr.length - 1 - i];
arr[arr.length - 1 - i] = buffer;
}
};
const reverse = (array)=>{
var output = [];
for(let i=array.length; i>0; i--){
output.push(array.pop());
}
console.log(output);
}
reverse([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]);
This happens because every time you do array.pop(), whilst it does return the last index in the array, it also removes it from the array. The loop recalculates the length of the array at each iteration. Because the array gets 1 index shorter at each iteration, you get a much shorter array returned from the function.
This piece of code will work without using a second array. It is using the built in method splice.
function reverse(array){
for (let i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
array.splice(i, 0, array.splice(array.length - 1)[0]);
}
return array;
}
Here, let's define the function
function rev(arr) {
const na = [];
for (let i=0; i<arr.length; i++) {
na.push(arr[arr.length-i])
}
return na;
}
Let's say your array is defined as 'abca' and contains ['a','b','c','d','e','foo','bar']
We would do:
var reva = rev(abca)
This would make 'reva' return ['bar','foo','e','d','c','b','a'].
I hope I helped!
You can use .map as it is perfect for this situation and is only 1 line:
const reverse = a =>{ i=a.length; return a.map(_=>a[i-=1]) }
This will take the array, and for each index, change it to the length of the array - index, or the opposite side of the array.
with reverse for loop
let array = ["ahmet", "mehmet", "aslı"]
length = array.length
newArray = [];
for (let i = length-1; i >-1; i--) {
newArray.push(array[i])
}
console.log(newArray)
And this one:
function reverseArray(arr) {
let top = arr.length - 1;
let bottom = 0;
let swap = 0;
while (top - bottom >= 1) {
swap = arr[bottom];
arr[bottom] = arr[top];
arr[top] = swap;
bottom++;
top--;
}
}
function reverse(arr) {
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length - 1; i++) {
arr.splice(i, 0, arr.pop())
}
return arr;
}
console.log(reverse([1, 2, 3, 4, 5]))
//without another array
reverse=a=>a.map((x,y)=>a[a.length-1-y])
reverse=a=>a.map((x,y)=>a[a.length-1-y])
console.log(reverse(["Works","It","One","Line"]))
One of shortest:
let reverse = arr = arr.map(arr.pop, [...arr])
This is an old question, but someone may find this helpful.
There are two main ways to do it:
First, out of place, you basically push the last element to a new array, and use the new array:
function arrReverse(arr) {
let newArr = [];
for(let i = 0; i<arr.length; i++){
newArr.push(arr.length -1 -i);
}
return newArr;
}
arrReverse([0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]);
Then there's in place. This is a bit tricky, but the way I think of it is like having four objects in front of you. You need to hold the first in your hand, then move the last item to the first place, and then place the item in your hand in the last place.
Afterwards, you increase the leftmost side by one and decrease the rightmost side by one:
function reverseArr(arr) {
let lh;
for(let i = 0; i<arr.length/2; i++){
lh = arr[i];
arr[i] = arr[arr.length -i -1];
arr[arr.length -i -1] = lh;
}
return arr;
}
reverseArr([0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]);
Like so. I even named my variable lh for "left hand" to help the idea along.
Understanding arrays is massively important, and figuring out how they work will not only save you from unnecessarily long and tedious ways of solving this, but will also help you grasp certain data concepts way better!
I found a way of reversing the array this way:
function reverse(arr){
for (let i = arr.length-1; i >= 0; i--){
arr.splice(i, 0, arr.shift());
}
return arr;
}
Without Using any Pre-define function
const reverseArray = (array) => {
for (let i = 0; i < Math.floor(array.length / 2); i++) {
[array[i], array[array.length - i - 1]] = [
array[array.length - i - 1],
array[i]
];
}
return array;
};
let array = [1,2,3,4,5,6];
const reverse = (array) => {
let reversed = [];
for(let i = array.length - 1; i >= 0; i--){
reversed[array.length - i] = array[i];
}
return reversed;
}
console.log(reverse(array))
you can use the two pointers approach
example
function reverseArrayTwoPointers(arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]) {
let p1 = 0;
let p2 = arr.length - 1;
while (p2 > p1) {
const temp = arr[p1];
arr[p1] = arr[p2];
arr[p2] = temp;
p1++;
p2--;
}
return arr;
}
to return [5,4,3,2,1]
example on vscode
let checkValue = ["h","a","p","p","y"]
let reverseValue = [];
checkValue.map((data, i) => {
x = checkValue.length - (i + 1);
reverseValue[x] = data;
})
function reverse(str1) {
let newstr = [];
let count = 0;
for (let i = str1.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
newstr[count] = str1[i];
count++;
}
return newstr;
}
reverse(['x','y','z']);
Array=[2,3,4,5]
for(var i=0;i<Array.length/2;i++){
var temp =Array[i];
Array[i]=Array[Array.length-i-1]
Array[Array.length-i-1]=temp
}
console.log(Array) //[5,4,3,2]
I have a comma separated string, out of which I need to create a new string which contains a random order of the items in the original string, while making sure there are no recurrences.
For example:
Running 1,2,3,1,3 will give 2,3,1 and another time 3,1,2, and so on.
I have a code which picks a random item in the original string, and then iterates over the new string to see if it does not exist already. If it does not exist - the item is inserted.
However, I have a feeling this can be improved (in C# I would have used a hashtable, instead of iterating every time on the new array). One improvement can be removing the item we inserted from the original array, in order to prevent cases where the random number will give us the same result, for example.
I'd be happy if you could suggest improvements to the code below.
originalArray = originalList.split(',');
for (var j = 0; j < originalArray.length; j++) {
var iPlaceInOriginalArray = Math.round(Math.random() * (originalArray.length - 1));
var bAlreadyExists = false;
for (var i = 0; i < newArray.length; i++) {
if (newArray[i].toString() == originalArray[iPlaceInOriginalArray].toString()) {
bAlreadyExists = true;
break;
}
}
if (!bAlreadyExists)
newArray.push(originalArray[iPlaceInOriginalArray]);
}
Thanks!
You can still use a 'hash' in javascript to remove duplicates. Only in JS they're called objects:
function removeDuplicates(arr) {
var hash = {};
for (var i=0,l=arr.length;i<l;i++) {
hash[arr[i]] = 1;
}
// now extract hash keys... ahem...
// I mean object members:
arr = [];
for (var n in hash) {
arr.push(n);
}
return arr;
}
Oh, and the select random from an array thing. If it's ok to destroy the original array (which in your case it is) then use splice:
function randInt (n) {return Math.floor(Math.random()*n)}
function shuffle (arr) {
var out = [];
while (arr.length) {
out.push(
arr.splice(
randInt(arr.length),1 ));
}
return out;
}
// So:
newArray = shuffle(
removeDuplicates(
string.split(',') ));
// If you sort the first array, it is quicker to skip duplicates, and you can splice each unique item into its random position as you build the new array.
var s= 'Function,String,Object,String,Array,Date,Error,String,String,'+
'Math,Number,RegExp,Group,Collection,Timelog,Color,String';
var A1= s.split(',').sort(), A2= [], tem;
while(A1.length){
tem= A1.shift();
while(A1[0]== tem) tem= A1.shift();
if(tem) A2.splice(Math.floor(Math.random()*A2.length), 0, tem);
}
alert(A2.join(', '))
With your solution, you are not guaranteed not to pick same number several times, thus leaving some others of them never being picked. If the number of elements is not big (up to 100), deleting items from the source array will give the best result.
Edit
originalArray = originalList.split(',');
for (var j = 0; j < originalArray.length; j++) {
var iPlaceInOriginalArray = Math.round(Math.random() * (originalArray.length - 1 - j));
var bAlreadyExists = false;
for (var i = 0; i < newArray.length; i++) {
if (newArray[i].toString() == originalArray[iPlaceInOriginalArray].toString()) {
bAlreadyExists = true;
break;
}
}
var tmp = originalArray[originalArray.length - 1 - j];
originalArray[originalArray.Length - 1 - j] = originalArray[iPlaceInOriginalArray];
originalArray[iPlaceInOriginalArray] = tmp;
if (!bAlreadyExists)
newArray.push(originalArray[iPlaceInOriginalArray]);
}