I have a page that when loaded I would like it to run a perl script. Is this possible to do with javascript? I have never ran a perl script on the web before and the only way I have seen to do it is link to it.
There are 3 ways:
If it's a dynamic page (CGI or other), as long as your script backing the page is an executable Perl script returning valid HTTP response, you're good. If you need to execute a separate Perl script, you can do it using the usual system() call (ideally, the functionality should be a Perl library call so your script can then execute it without spawning a system call). This approach of course works with ANY language that the back-end script is written in, e.g. if it's a Java Servlet, or any other code, it can also execute a system call to your Perl script.
If it's a static HTML page, you can have an "onload" JavaScript event (or just a JS function call inside a <script> tag) which executes an AJAX call to a different dynamic page (say http://yourserver/scripts/run_script_X ) running the script as per previous bullet point.
Just to be clear, the script will be running on the web server and not in a browser/client system; so you need some sort of mechanism for allowing the results of the script to affect your web page if you wish to have such an effect.
$.ajax({url: 'http://yourserver/scripts/run_script_X'}); // jQuery example
As an oldie variation on the last approach, you can also have your page have a <IFRAME> whose URL points to http://yourserver/scripts/run_script_X (make the iframe small/invisible if you don't care about the results of running the script as per your comment).
<!-- The rest of your HTML code -->
<IFRAME
SRC="http://yourserver/scripts/run_script_X"
style="display: none;"
/>
Irelevant comment made prior to the comments on this answer:
Without a lot more context on what you want the page to be (CGI script, static HTML, etc...) and what you want the script to do and how you want the results of running the script to affect your page, it's hard to suggest anything more precise.
Related
I am trying to analyze some JavaScript code for which I make use of function rewriting so that calls to a JavaScript library go through my JavaScript code. My JavaScript code is part of a Chrome Extension. From a Chrome extension content script, I install/inject the code into the target page's DOM.
This works fine for functions that are induced after the load of page. The library calls go through my function. But, there's JavaScript code that runs while the page is actually loading (probably while the DOM is being rendered). This happens before my custom script is injected. This way, the function calls before the custom script is injected are lost to me, or those JavaScript calls do not go through my function.
I make use of Content Script to actually inject other JavaScript by appending to the DOM as mentioned in the following Stack Exchange question:
Insert code into the page context using a content script
I know I can cause the loading time of Content Script to be at the start/end of the DOM but this is another script file that I append to the DOM of the target page. I do not seem to understand how to control it.
The problem explained in Is it possible to run a script in context of a webpage, before any of the webpage's scripts run, using a chrome extension?
is exactly the same, but the solution does not seem to work. My intention is to make the injected script execute before any JavaScript code executes from the webpage. By specifying document_start in manifest.json, content script execution can be made to run before the webpage, but not the script that I inject through the content script (injecting script as explained in first link). This injected script is not running in any specific manner with respect to the webpage
Manifest.json:
Manifest file has the content script content.js added at document_start, so content.js is run before the target webpage (underlying page) runs.
"content_scripts":[
{
"matches":["<all_urls>"],
"js":["content.js"],
"run_at":"document_start",
"all_frames":false
}
],
content.js:
content.js has the below code with which I add the main.js to the DOM, so that I am actually able to interact with the JavaScript that is in the target page's environment. I do this from a different file and attach it to the DOM because I cannot interact with the target page's JavaScript through the Content Scripts, since they both do not interfere with each other.
To explain further, main.js has some JavaScript that intercepts JavaScript calls during the execution of JavaScript in target page. JavaScript in target page makes calls to a library and I intend just to write a wrapper on those library functions.
var u = document.createElement('script');
u.src = chrome.extension.getURL('main.js');
(document.head||document.documentElement).appendChild(u);
u.onload = function() {
u.parentNode.removeChild(u);
};
I expect that main.js is available in the target page's domain and any of the scripts in the target page, since I inject it through the content script that is run at document_start.
Assume I have a call to some JavaScript function like this in my target page HTML, someJSCall() is defined by the target page's domain.
<html onLoad="someJSCall( )">
In this scenario, main.js (code injected through my Chrome extension) is already available. So calls to the JavaScript library from someJSCall() function go through main.js wrapper functions.
This works fine.
The problem is when there are IIFE (immediately invoked function expressions) defined in the target page's JavaScript. If these IIFE calls make library calls, this does not go through my main.js interceptions. If I look at the files loaded in the browser through Chrome Dev Tools, I see that main.js is still not loaded while IIFE calls are executing.
I hope I have explained the problem in detail.
Based on the additional information you added to the question about 2.5 weeks after I answered, you are adding code to the page context by including a "main.js", which is a separate file in your extension, using a <script> that looks something like:
<script src="URL_to_file_in_extension/main.js"/>
However, when you do that you introduce an asynchronous delay between when the <script> is inserted into the page and when the "main.js" is fetched from the extension and executed in the page context. You will not be able to control how long this delay is and it may, or may not, result in your code running prior to any particular code in the page. It will probably run prior to code that has to be fetched from external URLs, but may not.
In order to guarantee that your code runs synchronously, you must insert it in a <script> tag as actual code, not using the src attribute to pull in another file. That means the code which you want to execute in the page must exist within the content script file you are loading into the page.
Needing to execute code in the page context is a fairly common requirement. I've needed to do so in browser extensions (e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Edge, etc.) and in userscripts. I've also wanted to be able to pass data to such code, so I wrote a function called executeInPage(), which will take a function defined in the current context, convert it to text, insert it into the page context and execute it while passing any arguments you have for it (of most types). If interested, you can find executeInPage() in my answer to Calling webpage JavaScript methods from browser extension and my answer to How to use cloneInto in a Firefox web extension?
The following is my original answer based on the original version of the question, which did not show when the content script was being executed, or explain that the code being added to the page was in a separate file, not in the actual content script.
You state in your question that you "can handle the loading time of Content Script to be at the start/end of the DOM", but you don't make clear why you are unable to resolve your issue by executing your content script at document_start.
You can have your script injected prior to the page you are injecting into being built by specifying document_start for the run_at property in your manifest.json content_scripts entry, or for the runAt option passed to chrome.tabs.executeScript(). If you do this, then your script will start running when document.head and document.body are both null. You can then control what gets added to the page.
For chrome.tabs.executeScript() exactly when your script runs depends on when you execute chrome.tabs.executeScript() in relation to the process of loading the page. Due to the asynchronous nature of the processing (your background script is usually running in a different process), it is difficult to get your script consistently injected when document.head and document.body are both null. The best I've accomplished is to have the script injected sometimes when that is the case, and sometimes after the page is populated, but prior to any other resources being fetched. This timing will work for most things, but if you really need to have your script run prior to the page existing, then you should use a manifest.json content_scripts entry.
With your content script running prior to the existence of the head and body, you can control what gets inserted first. Thus, you can insert your <script> prior to anything else on the page. This should make your script execute prior to any other script in the page context.
Here's the scenario, not sure what I'm missing.
Page A.htm makes an ajax request for page B.htm, and inserts the response into the page.
Page B.htm contains links to several other JS files, many of which contain a document.ready() function to initialize them.
This works fine when A.htm and B.htm are on the same server but not when they are on different servers.
What I think I'm seeing here, is that when page A and B are on different servers (cross domain ajax), the external resources are being returned asynchronously, or at least out of order, so scripts are executing expecting JQuery.UI to be loaded already, when it is not.
Appreciate any pointers or advice. Apologies for the poor explanation.
You are injecting HTML + script tags via jQuery. In this case *:
HTML content except scripts are injected in the document
Then all scripts are executed one by one
If a script is external then it is downloaded and executed asynchronously
Therefore an external or inline script that depends on jQuery UI might execute before jQuery UI.
One possible solution is to change the way your pages work:
Get rid of external scripts in pageb.html but keep inline scripts
Load the required scripts in pagea.html
Load pageb.html
Another solution is to roll your own jQuery function that will:
Strip all <script src> elements from HTML
Download and execute those scripts in order
Inject the remaining HTML
* The exact behavior is not documented. I had to look into the source code to infer the details.
you are correct in your impression that the issue is a difference in how the requests are handled cross-domain.
Here is a link to get you on the right track : How to make synchronous JSONP crossdomain call
However, you will have to actually re-achitect your solution somewhat to check if the resource has been loaded before moving on. There are many solutions (see the link)
You can set a timer interval and check for something in the dom, or another reasonable solution (despite it's lack of efficiency) is to create a "proxy" serverside (eg php) file on your server and have that file do the cross-domain request, then spit out the result.
Note that since jquery UI is a rather large file, it's conceivable that the cross-domain request finishes first, and executes immediately, even though jqueryUI is not loaded yet. In any case, you're going to have to start thinking about having your app react rather than follow a sequence.
I have a Java Web Application, and I'm wondering if the javascript files are downloaded with the HTML-body, or if the html body is loaded first, then the browser request all the JavaScript files.
The reason for this question is that I want to know if importing files with jQuery.getScript() would result in poorer performance. I want to import all files using that JQuery function to avoid duplication of JavaScript-imports.
The body of the html document is retrieved first. After it's been downloaded, the browser checks what resources need to be retrieved and gets those.
You can actually see this happen if you open Chrome Dev Console, go to network tab (make sure caching is disabled and logs preserved) and just refresh a page.
That first green bar is the page loading and the second chunk are the scripts, a stylesheet, and some image resources
The HTML document is downloaded first, and only when the browser has finished downloading the HTML document can it find out which scripts to fetch
That said, heavy scripts that don't influence the appearance of the HTML body directly should be loaded at the end of the body and not in the head, so that they do not block the rendering unless necessary
I'm wondering if the javascript are downloaded with the html body during a request
If it's part of that body then yes. If it's in a separate resource then no.
For example, suppose your HTML file has this:
<script type="text/javascript">
$(function () {
// some code here
});
</script>
That code, being part of the HTML file, is included in the HTML resource. The web server doesn't differentiate between what kind of code is in the file, it just serves the response regardless of what's there.
On the other hand, if you have this:
<script type="text/javascript" src="someFile.js"></script>
In that case the code isn't in the same file. The HTML is just referencing a separate resource (someFile.js) which contains the code. In that case the browser would make a separate request for that resource. Resulting in two requests total.
The HTML document is downloaded first, or at least it starts to download first. While it is parsed, any script includes that the browser finds are downloaded. That means that some scripts may finish loading before the document is completely loaded.
While the document is being downloaded, the browser parses it and displays as much as it can. When the parsing comes to a script include, the parsing stops and the browser will suspend it until the script has been loaded and executed, then the parsing continues. That means that
If you put a call to getScript instead of a script include, the behaviour will change. The method makes an asynchronous request, so the browser will continue parsing the rest of the page while the script loads.
This has some important effects:
The parsing of the page will be completed earlier.
Scripts will no longer run in a specific order, they run in the order that the loading completes.
If one script is depending on another, you have to check yourself that the first script has actually loaded before using it in the other script.
You can use a combination of script includes and getScript calls to get the best effect. You can use regular scripts includes for scripts that other scripts depend on, and getScript for scripts that are not affected by the effects of that method.
I have a few scripts that are common among all html pages for my application. Call this file commonfunctions.js. Each html page will load it as you move around the application along with appending the last modification date for this js file (that's gotten from the server). Firebug is adding the file every time to the list of loaded scripts as well as an eval/seq/# (where # is the number of times this file has been loaded starting at 7 for some reason). For example, if I have 3 pages called one.html, two.html, and three.html each with this line of code:
<script type="text/javascript" src="commonfunctions.js?mod=11/33/2012"></script>
If I were to go from one.html->two.html->one.html->three.html, Firebug would list the scripts loaded as:
commonfunctions.js?mod=11/33/2012
commonfunctions.js?mod=11/33/2012/eval/seq/7
commonfunctions.js?mod=11/33/2012/eval/seq/8
commonfunctions.js?mod=11/33/2012/eval/seq/9
and so on as I visit the three pages more.
Why is this happening and is there a way to stop it? I read that it could be that firebug will make its own url if it doesn't know the url due to an eval() or event attribute; however, these scripts are being loaded via regular tags.
I'm concerned because I'm not sure if this means the browser has now compiled and is executing or storing multiple copies of the same script--very wasteful in both conditions.
The script may have been loaded via script tag, but somewhere within commonfunctions.js a call to eval()has been made. Or three, obviously.
I have a script that sends emails (subscriptions). Processing takes long enough. The script outputs a log (of what is successfully sent to the moment) to browser.
I would like it to show progress bar also. How do I do that? There is no AJAX calls, page loads synchronously. I thought may be I should just output <script>...</script> tags every X email sendings to move progress bar, but I'm not sure it's cross-browser compliant. Is that a standard, that browser should execute Javascript as soon as it encounters some in the page body?
Yes, your idea is used very often and should work in most browsers - the standard is that javascript must be executed synchronously, unless specifically told not to by the async attribute.
So you can just put in a script tag every now and again to update the status bar. Gmail uses the same technique, as far as I know.