could one use overflow:hidden for both sides?
cause i want the row to be centered.
EDIT: ive got a row of link elements. i want it to be like: http://jqueryfordesigners.com/coda-popup-bubbles/
the row will stick out both to the left and right. not just on the right side. with other words: i want to center a very long row within a div which is styled with overflow:hidden and white-space: nowrap.
here is my code:
http://jsbin.com/afuni/edit
if the row is too long the right elements wont be shown. i want the left elements to not be shown too so that the center link will always be in center.
overflow: hidden will hide content that doesn't fit inside it's box model. Based on the question asked, I believe there is a different CSS solution for you. Can you post the HTML/CSS and your objective?
edit: to center a row that may extend outside its boundaries, I would use z-index: 100, position: relative, and text-align: center. I need to check your markup, however. Hope that helps!
Nope, you can't make the text clip from both edges using overflow: hidden, you need additional markup with negative margins etc. Not worth the trouble I think.
Related
As part of my site there is a search field which features a suggestion/autocomplete box when the user types in current keywords. image
The problem is in order to make a scroll bar appear if the user types in too much i have to set overflow-x to auto and overflow-y to hidden. This then results in the suggestion box not showing/being cutoff by the overflow-y.
image
You can find a demo of the issue here:
http://testing.server-lists.com/minecraft/
A codepen simplified example can be found hereAs stackoverflow limited me to 3000 characters.
Even though the suggestions box has absolute positioning and a 1000 z index it is not appearing, does anyone know how to fix this?
I have checked the demo site you referred to and just removed the style attributes:
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;
From the div with class="bootstrap-tagsinput" and remove white-space:no-wrap;
as it is almost impossible to show any thing if it is wrapped in a container has an overflow hidden.
Can you try it please and tell me if this works?
Sorry, my english is not good :)
When resize the width of the window. How width of dm2 is dependent on the to-n sorted column?
dm1,dm2 is no fixed width in css.
I tried to use text-align for dm1. display: inline for dm2. It works fine, but I found it at fault. I do not know no other way handle it?
Demo Here: https://jsfiddle.net/bindo1995/m4vajbqw/2/
Default
Use text-align for dm1, display:inline; for dm2
How ?
Thanks for helping me !
The problem is that using float or display: inline-block; to-n blocks will always try to fit horizontally on one row when there is enough space for each block and when there is no space for a block it will be on the second row and there will be gap in dm2. If you want them to be 3 on first row and 2 on the second and to fit 100% in dm2 you have to make 2 rows of to-n blocks.
My situation is the following: I have page that shows an image but sometimes it's too small, so I need to get the it bigger. I used CSS Transform to do that and works fine.
The problem is that the parent DIV's size does not increase, and there is space in the page for it to do so!
Using overflow on the parent does not help me because it crops the image or add a scroll bar. I need it to grow.
So, I managed to replicate a little what I am talking about here: http://jsfiddle.net/viniciuspaiva/7jJXQ/
When you click in the "Zoom" button, I want the div to grow and the pager below to get down. But I also want the page to load as it is, with the pager on top. Hope it's clear.
As you can see, I use bootstrap on my page. And the zoom button just adds a class to the image:
javascript:var img = $('img.center'); img.addClass('zoom');
Thanks!
Try doing it the other way. Have the image fit to the div, and resize the div instead.
Add this style to the image (assuming .myimg is the class).
.myimg {
display: block;
width: 100%;
}
Try placing this inside of your current div at the end of it before you close your current div. It will force the div to expand to contents.
<div style="clear: both;"></div>
So your div opens, the contents inside, then add the code above, then close the div.
Here's an example of Joseph the Dreamer's implementation. Check it out here. It only relies on setting display: block; and width: 100%;.
I'm kinda stuck here and I'm looking for some ideas. I have a breadcrumb system which uses :before and :after tags for the arrows.
The maximum width for all the breadcrumbs put together is 735px as that is the size of the container element.
Now; I need to restrict the length of each breadcrumb to stop them overflowing and to ensure that they all stay on one line. To do this, I will need to set a maximum width on the breadcrumb. However the max-width will depend on the number of breadcrumbs which are currently visible.
I know that the easiest way would be to count the number of breadcrumbs present and set a fixed position by dividing the container width by the number of breadcrumbs, but this is not what I want - It would mean that breadcrumbs with a shorter title have a large gap, like below.
So I need to specify a max-width, but the max-width will depend on the width of the other breadcrumbs.
For example, if all the breadcrumbs have a fairly long title, the max-width will need to be small enough to allow all breadcrumbs to fit in the container.
But if, say, five of the breadcrumbs have very short titles (ie 4 characters) and the fifth one has a longer title, I would want the max-width to allow all the text on the last breadcrumb to be displayed, but still ensuring that the breadcrumbs still fit inside the container.
Sorry if this is too confusing. Here's a jsFiddle of my breadcrumbs so you can understand how they're structured. If you need any more information please let me know.
http://jsfiddle.net/5CLYt/
The second example in the jsFiddle shows how the max-width needs to be dependant on the width of the other breadcrumbs, and not just the number of the breadcrumbs displayed.
Beside the answer of #JAYBEkster, you could consider using flexbox.
Here is a great resource: http://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/
I've updated your fidle: http://jsfiddle.net/NicoO/5CLYt/1/
/*
COPIED FROM: http://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/
*/
#container {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-around;
list-style: none outside none;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
I know this is not what you want, since the space between the items is growing and not the items it self. But maybe it' the right direction.
Maybe keep this question updated.
Update 2: flexbox is awesome.
It works with firefox: http://jsfiddle.net/NicoO/5CLYt/3/
All you needed to do was:
.breadcrumbButton
{
flex: 1 1 auto;
}
You should add display:table for your container; add display:table-cell for each child and remove floating;
I have two div banners that have corresponding CSS arrows. When the banners are clicked, the javascript toggles between revealing and hiding the text underneath. Likewise, the respective arrows rotate down when the text is revealed and back up when the text is hidden.
Now, I want my first div banner to be revealed automatically when the page first loads. However, when I drew my CSS arrows, due to the padding of the div, I can't get the arrow in the first div to be the same as the arrow in the subsequent div(s) and line up properly.
http://jsfiddle.net/nVuQ2/1/
I've tried messing with the placement of the arrow:
.tri0 {
margin-left: 20px;
margin-top: 5px;
}
but the best I can do is push the tri0 arrow up to the padding of the h3 tag and it won't go any farther.
Is there a way that I can set a toggle flag in the toggleClass to make it say that the first div banner is already toggled and subsequent clicks make it un-toggle?
Your issue happens because of the border of your tris elements. You are displaying different borders in each one of your elements, this will make them appear in different ways.
So basically I set them with the same borders values, the same rotation, and when your page first load it toggles your div and show your first message.
Note that is not necessary to have two different classes to toggle your element state, once that they are equal.
Check in the Fiddle.
Not sure if this is the solution that you wanted. But I hope that helps you.
Thanks.
Try using absolute positioning instead of floating, this way you can ensure the arrows are always aligned in the middle. You'd set parent div to position:relative, and arrows to position:absolute;
The code will look like this -
.slide0, .slide1 {
position:relative;
}
.tri0, .tri1 {
position:absolute;
top:0;
bottom:0;
margin:auto 0;
}
.tri0 {
right:5px;
}
.tri1 {
right:10px;
}
EDIT: Whoops, I realised I didn't compensate for the rotated arrow. Because the 10px border makes it effectively 10px wide, position .tri1 with right:10px instead. Updated code above, and update fiddle here.
Updated Fiddle