Can you alter a Javascript function after declaring it? - javascript

Let's say I have var a = function() { return 1; }. Is it possible to alter a so that a() returns 2? Perhaps by editing a property of the a object, since every function is an object?
Update: Wow, thanks for all the responses. However, I'm afraid I wasn't looking to simply reassign a variable but actually edit an existing function. I am thinking along the lines of how you can combine partial functions in Scala to create a new PartialFunction. I am interested in writing something similar in Javascript and was thinking that the existing function could perhaps be updated, rather than creating an entirely new Function object.

You can do all kinds of fun stuff with javascript, including redefining functions:
let a = function() { return 1; }
console.log(a()); // 1
// keep a reference
let old = a;
// redefine
a = function() {
// call the original function with any arguments specified, storing the result
const originalResult = old.apply(old, arguments);
// add one
return originalResult + 1;
};
console.log(a()); // 2
Voila.
Edit: Updated to show this in a crazier scenario:
let test = new String("123");
console.log(test.toString()); // logs 123
console.log(test.substring(0)); // logs 123
String.prototype.substring = function(){ return "hahanope"; }
console.log(test.substring(0)); // logs hahanope
You can see here that even though "test" is defined first, and we redefine substring() afterwards, the change still applies.
Side note: you really should reconsider your architecture if you're doing this...you're going to confuse the crap out of some poor developer 5 years down the road when s/he's looking at a function definition that's supposed to return 1, but seems to always return 2....

So you want to modify the code of a function directly, in place, and not just reassign a different function to an existing variable.
I hate to say it, but as far as I have been able to figure it out - and I have tried -, it can't be done. True, a function is an object, and as such it has methods and properties which can be tweaked and overwritten on the object itself. Unfortunately, the function body is not one of them. It is not assigned to a public property.
The documentation on MDN lists the properties and methods of the function object. None of them gives us the opportunity to manipulate the function body from the outside.
That's because according to the spec, the function body is stored in the internal [[Code]] property of the function object, which can't be accessed directly.

I used something like this to modify an existing function whose declaration was not accessible to me:
// declare function foo
var foo = function (a) { alert(a); };
// modify function foo
foo = new Function (
"a",
foo.toSource()
.replace("alert(a)", "alert('function modified - ' + a)")
.replace(/^function[^{]+{/i,"") // remove everything up to and including the first curly bracket
.replace(/}[^}]*$/i, "") // remove last curly bracket and everything after<br>
);
Instead of toSource() you could probably use toString() to get a string containing the function's declaration. Some calls to replace() to prepare the string for use with the Function Constructor and to modify the function's source.

let a = function() { return 1; }
console.log(a()) // 1
a = function() { return 2; }
console.log(a()) // 2
technically, you're losing one function definition and replacing it with another.

How about this, without having to redefine the function:
var a = function() { return arguments.callee.value || 1; };
alert(a()); // => 1
a.value = 2;
alert(a()); // => 2

I am sticking to jvenema's solution, in which I don't like the global variable "old". It seems better to keep the old function inside of the new one:
function a() { return 1; }
// redefine
a = (function(){
var _a = a;
return function() {
// You may reuse the original function ...
// Typical case: Conditionally use old/new behaviour
var originalResult = _a.apply(this, arguments);
// ... and modify the logic in any way
return originalResult + 1;
}
})();
a() // --> gives 2

All feasible solutions stick to a "function wrapping approach".
The most reliable amongst them seems to be the one of rplantiko.
Such function wrapping easily can be abstracted away. The concept / pattern itself might be called "Method Modification". Its implementation definitely belongs to Function.prototype. It would be nice to be backed
one day by standard prototypal method modifiers like before, after, around, afterThrowing and afterFinally.
As for the aforementioned example by rplantiko ...
function a () { return 1; }
// redefine
a = (function () {
var _a = a;
return function () {
// You may reuse the original function ...
// Typical case: Conditionally use old/new behaviour
var originalResult = _a.apply(this, arguments);
// ... and modify the logic in any way
return originalResult + 1;
};
})();
console.log('a() ...', a()); // --> gives 2
.as-console-wrapper { min-height: 100%!important; top: 0; }
... and making use of around, the code would transform to ...
function a () { return 1; }
console.log('original a ...', a);
console.log('a() ...', a()); // 1
a = a.around(function (proceed, handler, args) {
return (proceed() + 1);
});
console.log('\nmodified a ...', a);
console.log('a() ...', a()); // 2
.as-console-wrapper { min-height: 100%!important; top: 0; }
<script>
(function(d){function f(a){return typeof a==e&&typeof a.call==e&&typeof a.apply==e}function g(a,b){b=null!=b&&b||null;var c=this;return f(a)&&f(c)&&function(){return a.call(b||null!=this&&this||null,c,a,arguments)}||c}var e=typeof d;Object.defineProperty(d.prototype,"around",{configurable:!0,writable:!0,value:g});Object.defineProperty(d,"around",{configurable:!0,writable:!0,value:function(a,b,c){return g.call(a,b,c)}})})(Function);
</script>

This is a Clear Example based on a control timepicker eworld.ui
www.eworldui.net
Having a TimePicker eworld.ui where JavaScript is unreachable from outside, you can't find any js related to those controls. So how can you add a onchange event to the timepicker ?
There is a js function called when you Select a time between all the options that the control offer you. This function is: TimePicker_Up_SelectTime
First you have to copy the code inside this function.
Evaluate...quikwatch...TimePicker_Up_SelectTime.toString()
function TimePicker_Up_SelectTime(tbName, lblName, divName, selTime, enableHide, postbackFunc, customFunc) {
document.getElementById(tbName).value = selTime;
if(lblName != '')
document.getElementById(lblName).innerHTML = selTime;
document.getElementById(divName).style.visibility = 'hidden';
if(enableHide)
TimePicker_Up_ShowHideDDL('visible');
if(customFunc != "")
eval(customFunc + "('" + selTime + "', '" + tbName + "');");
eval(postbackFunc + "();");
}
Now
Using the code that you have saved before reassign the same source code but add whatever you want..
TimePicker_Up_SelectTime = function (tbName, lblName, divName, selTime, enableHide, postbackFunc, customFunc) {
document.getElementById(tbName).value = selTime;
if (lblName != '')
document.getElementById(lblName).innerHTML = selTime;
document.getElementById(divName).style.visibility = 'hidden';
if (enableHide)
TimePicker_Up_ShowHideDDL('visible');
if (customFunc != "")
eval(customFunc + "('" + selTime + "', '" + tbName + "');");
eval(postbackFunc + "();");
>>>>>>> My function >>>>> RaiseChange(tbName);
}
I've added My Function to the function so now I can simulate an onchange event when I select a time.
RaiseChange(...) could be whatever you want.

If you're debugging javascript and want to see how changes to the code affects the page, you can use this Firefox extension to view/alter javascripts:
Execute JS firefox extension:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1729

You can change functions like other objects
var a1 = function(){return 1;}
var b1 = a1;
a1 = function(){
return b1() + 1;
};
console.log(a1()); // return 2
// OR:
function a2(){return 1;}
var b2 = a2;
a2 = function(){
return b2() + 1;
};
console.log(a2()); // return 2

Can you not just define it again later on? When you want the change try just redefining it as:
a = function() { return 2; }

const createFunction = function (defaultRealization) {
let realization = defaultRealization;
const youFunction = function (...args) {
return realization(...args);
};
youFunction.alterRealization = function (fn) {
realization = fn;
};
return youFunction;
}
const myFunction = createFunction(function () { return 1; });
console.log(myFunction()); // 1
myFunction.alterRealization(function () { return 2; });
console.log(myFunction()); // 2

Related

How to write code to check if the value of a variable has changed in real time (JavaScript) [duplicate]

Is it possible to have an event in JS that fires when the value of a certain variable changes? JQuery is accepted.
This question was originally posted in 2009 and most of the existing answers are either outdated, ineffective, or require the inclusion of large bloated libraries:
Object.watch and Object.observe are both deprecated and should not be used.
onPropertyChange is a DOM element event handler that only works in some versions of IE.
Object.defineProperty allows you to make an object property immutable, which would allow you to detect attempted changes, but it would also block any changes.
Defining setters and getters works, but it requires a lot of setup code and it does not work well when you need to delete or create new properties.
As of 2018, you can now use the Proxy object to monitor (and intercept) changes made to an object. It is purpose built for what the OP is trying to do. Here's a basic example:
var targetObj = {};
var targetProxy = new Proxy(targetObj, {
set: function (target, key, value) {
console.log(`${key} set to ${value}`);
target[key] = value;
return true;
}
});
targetProxy.hello_world = "test"; // console: 'hello_world set to test'
The only drawbacks of the Proxy object are:
The Proxy object is not available in older browsers (such as IE11) and the polyfill cannot fully replicate Proxy functionality.
Proxy objects do not always behave as expected with special objects (e.g., Date) -- the Proxy object is best paired with plain Objects or Arrays.
If you need to observe changes made to a nested object, then you need to use a specialized library such as Observable Slim (which I have published). It works like this:
var test = {testing:{}};
var p = ObservableSlim.create(test, true, function(changes) {
console.log(JSON.stringify(changes));
});
p.testing.blah = 42; // console: [{"type":"add","target":{"blah":42},"property":"blah","newValue":42,"currentPath":"testing.blah",jsonPointer:"/testing/blah","proxy":{"blah":42}}]
Yes, this is now completely possible!
I know this is an old thread but now this effect is possible using accessors (getters and setters): https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Guide/Working_with_Objects#Defining_getters_and_setters
You can define an object like this, in which aInternal represents the field a:
x = {
aInternal: 10,
aListener: function(val) {},
set a(val) {
this.aInternal = val;
this.aListener(val);
},
get a() {
return this.aInternal;
},
registerListener: function(listener) {
this.aListener = listener;
}
}
Then you can register a listener using the following:
x.registerListener(function(val) {
alert("Someone changed the value of x.a to " + val);
});
So whenever anything changes the value of x.a, the listener function will be fired. Running the following line will bring the alert popup:
x.a = 42;
See an example here: https://jsfiddle.net/5o1wf1bn/1/
You can also user an array of listeners instead of a single listener slot, but I wanted to give you the simplest possible example.
Using Prototype: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object/defineProperty
// Console
function print(t) {
var c = document.getElementById('console');
c.innerHTML = c.innerHTML + '<br />' + t;
}
// Demo
var myVar = 123;
Object.defineProperty(this, 'varWatch', {
get: function () { return myVar; },
set: function (v) {
myVar = v;
print('Value changed! New value: ' + v);
}
});
print(varWatch);
varWatch = 456;
print(varWatch);
<pre id="console">
</pre>
Other example
// Console
function print(t) {
var c = document.getElementById('console');
c.innerHTML = c.innerHTML + '<br />' + t;
}
// Demo
var varw = (function (context) {
/**
* Declare a new variable.
*
* #param {string} Variable name.
* #param {any | undefined} varValue Default/Initial value.
* You can use an object reference for example.
*/
return function (varName, varValue) {
var value = varValue;
Object.defineProperty(context, varName, {
get: function () { return value; },
set: function (v) {
value = v;
print('Value changed! New value: ' + value);
}
});
};
})(window);
varw('varWatch'); // Declare without initial value
print(varWatch);
varWatch = 456;
print(varWatch);
print('---');
varw('otherVarWatch', 123); // Declare with initial value
print(otherVarWatch);
otherVarWatch = 789;
print(otherVarWatch);
<pre id="console">
</pre>
No.
But, if it's really that important, you have 2 options (first is tested, second isn't):
First, use setters and getters, like so:
var myobj = {a : 1};
function create_gets_sets(obj) { // make this a framework/global function
var proxy = {}
for ( var i in obj ) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
var k = i;
proxy["set_"+i] = function (val) { this[k] = val; };
proxy["get_"+i] = function () { return this[k]; };
}
}
for (var i in proxy) {
if (proxy.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
obj[i] = proxy[i];
}
}
}
create_gets_sets(myobj);
then you can do something like:
function listen_to(obj, prop, handler) {
var current_setter = obj["set_" + prop];
var old_val = obj["get_" + prop]();
obj["set_" + prop] = function(val) { current_setter.apply(obj, [old_val, val]); handler(val));
}
then set the listener like:
listen_to(myobj, "a", function(oldval, newval) {
alert("old : " + oldval + " new : " + newval);
}
Second, you could put a watch on the value:
Given myobj above, with 'a' on it:
function watch(obj, prop, handler) { // make this a framework/global function
var currval = obj[prop];
function callback() {
if (obj[prop] != currval) {
var temp = currval;
currval = obj[prop];
handler(temp, currval);
}
}
return callback;
}
var myhandler = function (oldval, newval) {
//do something
};
var intervalH = setInterval(watch(myobj, "a", myhandler), 100);
myobj.set_a(2);
Sorry to bring up an old thread, but here is a little manual for those who (like me!) don't see how Eli Grey's example works:
var test = new Object();
test.watch("elem", function(prop,oldval,newval){
//Your code
return newval;
});
Hope this can help someone
As Luke Schafer's answer (note: this refers to his original post; but the whole point here remains valid after the edit), I would also suggest a pair of Get/Set methods to access your value.
However I would suggest some modifications (and that's why I'm posting...).
A problem with that code is that the field a of the object myobj is directly accessible, so it's possible to access it / change its value without triggering the listeners:
var myobj = { a : 5, get_a : function() { return this.a;}, set_a : function(val) { this.a = val; }}
/* add listeners ... */
myobj.a = 10; // no listeners called!
Encapsulation
So, to guarantee that the listeners are actually called, we would have to prohibit that direct access to the field a. How to do so? Use a closure!
var myobj = (function() { // Anonymous function to create scope.
var a = 5; // 'a' is local to this function
// and cannot be directly accessed from outside
// this anonymous function's scope
return {
get_a : function() { return a; }, // These functions are closures:
set_a : function(val) { a = val; } // they keep reference to
// something ('a') that was on scope
// where they were defined
};
})();
Now you can use the same method to create and add the listeners as Luke proposed, but you can rest assured that there's no possible way to read from or write to a going unnoticed!
Adding encapsulated fields programmatically
Still on Luke's track, I propose now a simple way to add encapsulated fields and the respective getters/setters to objects by the means of a simple function call.
Note that this will only work properly with value types. For this to work with reference types, some kind of deep copy would have to be implemented (see this one, for instance).
function addProperty(obj, name, initial) {
var field = initial;
obj["get_" + name] = function() { return field; }
obj["set_" + name] = function(val) { field = val; }
}
This works the same as before: we create a local variable on a function, and then we create a closure.
How to use it? Simple:
var myobj = {};
addProperty(myobj, "total", 0);
window.alert(myobj.get_total() == 0);
myobj.set_total(10);
window.alert(myobj.get_total() == 10);
Recently found myself with the same issue. Wanted to listen for on change of a variable and do some stuff when the variable changed.
Someone suggested a simple solution of setting the value using a setter.
Declaring a simple object that keeps the value of my variable here:
var variableObject = {
value: false,
set: function (value) {
this.value = value;
this.getOnChange();
}
}
The object contains a set method via which I can change the value. But it also calls a getOnChange() method in there. Will define it now.
variableObject.getOnChange = function() {
if(this.value) {
// do some stuff
}
}
Now whenever I do variableObject.set(true), the getOnChange method fires, and if the value was set as desired (in my case: true), the if block also executes.
This is the simplest way I found to do this stuff.
If you're using jQuery {UI} (which everyone should be using :-) ), you can use .change() with a hidden <input/> element.
AngularJS (I know this is not JQuery, but that might help. [Pure JS is good in theory only]):
$scope.$watch('data', function(newValue) { ..
where "data" is name of your variable in the scope.
There is a link to doc.
For those tuning in a couple years later:
A solution for most browsers (and IE6+) is available that uses the onpropertychange event and the newer spec defineProperty. The slight catch is that you'll need to make your variable a dom object.
Full details:
http://johndyer.name/native-browser-get-set-properties-in-javascript/
Easiest way I have found, starting from this answer:
// variable holding your data
const state = {
count: null,
update() {
console.log(`this gets called and your value is ${this.pageNumber}`);
},
get pageNumber() {
return this.count;
},
set pageNumber(pageNumber) {
this.count = pageNumber;
// here you call the code you need
this.update(this.count);
}
};
And then:
state.pageNumber = 0;
// watch the console
state.pageNumber = 15;
// watch the console
The functionality you're looking for can be achieved through the use of the "defineProperty()" method--which is only available to modern browsers:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object/defineProperty
I've written a jQuery extension that has some similar functionality if you need more cross browser support:
https://github.com/jarederaj/jQueue
A small jQuery extension that handles queuing callbacks to the
existence of a variable, object, or key. You can assign any number of
callbacks to any number of data points that might be affected by
processes running in the background. jQueue listens and waits for
these data you specify to come into existence and then fires off the
correct callback with its arguments.
Not directly: you need a pair getter/setter with an "addListener/removeListener" interface of some sort... or an NPAPI plugin (but that's another story altogether).
A rather simple and simplistic solution is to just use a function call to set the value of the global variable, and never set its value directly. This way you have total control:
var globalVar;
function setGlobalVar(value) {
globalVar = value;
console.log("Value of globalVar set to: " + globalVar);
//Whatever else
}
There is no way to enforce this, it just requires programming discipline... though you can use grep (or something similar) to check that nowhere does your code directly set the value of globalVar.
Or you could encapsulate it in an object and user getter and setter methods... just a thought.
With the help of getter and setter, you can define a JavaScript class that does such a thing.
First, we define our class called MonitoredVariable:
class MonitoredVariable {
constructor(initialValue) {
this._innerValue = initialValue;
this.beforeSet = (newValue, oldValue) => {};
this.beforeChange = (newValue, oldValue) => {};
this.afterChange = (newValue, oldValue) => {};
this.afterSet = (newValue, oldValue) => {};
}
set val(newValue) {
const oldValue = this._innerValue;
// newValue, oldValue may be the same
this.beforeSet(newValue, oldValue);
if (oldValue !== newValue) {
this.beforeChange(newValue, oldValue);
this._innerValue = newValue;
this.afterChange(newValue, oldValue);
}
// newValue, oldValue may be the same
this.afterSet(newValue, oldValue);
}
get val() {
return this._innerValue;
}
}
Assume that we want to listen for money changes, let's create an instance of MonitoredVariable with initial money 0:
const money = new MonitoredVariable(0);
Then we could get or set its value using money.val:
console.log(money.val); // Get its value
money.val = 2; // Set its value
Since we have not defined any listeners for it, nothing special happens after money.val changes to 2.
Now let's define some listeners. We have four listeners available: beforeSet, beforeChange, afterChange, afterSet.
The following will happen sequentially when you use money.val = newValue to change variable's value:
money.beforeSet(newValue, oldValue);
money.beforeChange(newValue, oldValue); (Will be skipped if its value not changed)
money.val = newValue;
money.afterChange(newValue, oldValue); (Will be skipped if its value not changed)
money.afterSet(newValue, oldValue);
Now we define afterChange listener which be triggered only after money.val has changed (while afterSet will be triggered even if the new value is the same as the old one):
money.afterChange = (newValue, oldValue) => {
console.log(`Money has been changed from ${oldValue} to ${newValue}`);
};
Now set a new value 3 and see what happens:
money.val = 3;
You will see the following in the console:
Money has been changed from 2 to 3
For full code, see https://gist.github.com/yusanshi/65745acd23c8587236c50e54f25731ab.
In my case, I was trying to find out if any library I was including in my project was redefining my window.player. So, at the begining of my code, I just did:
Object.defineProperty(window, 'player', {
get: () => this._player,
set: v => {
console.log('window.player has been redefined!');
this._player = v;
}
});
Based On akira's answer I added that you can manipulate the dom through the listerner.
https://jsfiddle.net/2zcr0Lnh/2/
javascript:
x = {
aInternal: 10,
aListener: function(val) {},
set a(val) {
this.aInternal = val;
this.aListener(val);
},
get a() {
return this.aInternal;
},
registerListener: function(listener) {
this.aListener = listener;
}
}
x.registerListener(function(val) {
document.getElementById('showNumber').innerHTML = val;
});
x.a = 50;
function onClick(){
x.a = x.a + 1;
}
html:
<div id="showNumber">
</div>
<button onclick="onClick()">
click me to rerender
</button>
The registerListener method is fired when the variable x.a changes.
//ex:
/*
var x1 = {currentStatus:undefined};
your need is x1.currentStatus value is change trigger event ?
below the code is use try it.
*/
function statusChange(){
console.log("x1.currentStatus_value_is_changed"+x1.eventCurrentStatus);
};
var x1 = {
eventCurrentStatus:undefined,
get currentStatus(){
return this.eventCurrentStatus;
},
set currentStatus(val){
this.eventCurrentStatus=val;
//your function();
}
};
or
/* var x1 = {
eventCurrentStatus:undefined,
currentStatus : {
get : function(){
return Events.eventCurrentStatus
},
set : function(status){
Events.eventCurrentStatus=status;
},
}*/
console.log("eventCurrentStatus = "+ x1.eventCurrentStatus);
x1.currentStatus="create"
console.log("eventCurrentStatus = "+ x1.eventCurrentStatus);
x1.currentStatus="edit"
console.log("eventCurrentStatus = "+ x1.eventCurrentStatus);
console.log("currentStatus = "+ x1.currentStatus);
or
/* global variable ku*/
var jsVarEvents={};
Object.defineProperty(window, "globalvar1", {//no i18n
get: function() { return window.jsVarEvents.globalvarTemp},
set: function(value) { window.window.jsVarEvents.globalvarTemp = value; }
});
console.log(globalvar1);
globalvar1=1;
console.log(globalvar1);
Please guys remember the initial question was for VARIABLES, not for OBJECTS ;)
in addition to all answers above, I created a tiny lib called forTheWatch.js,
that use the same way to catch and callback for changes in normal global variables in javascript.
Compatible with JQUERY variables, no need to use OBJECTS, and you can pass directly an ARRAY of several variables if needed.
If it can be helpful... :
https://bitbucket.org/esabora/forthewatch Basically you just have to call the function :
watchIt("theVariableToWatch", "varChangedFunctionCallback");
And sorry by advance if not relevant.
The question is about variables, not object properties! So my approach is to take advantage of the window object, with its custom getters/setters, and then use/change the variable like a "normal" variable (not like an object property).
The simplest way is that of #José Antonio Postigo in his answer (i voted that answer). What I'd like to do here, is to reduce that to an even simpler "creator" function (so even someone that does not understand object getters/setters can easily use it).
A live example is here: https://codepen.io/dimvai/pen/LYzzbpz
This is the general "creator" function you must have as is:
let createWatchedVariable = (variableName,initialValue,callbackFunction) => {
// set default callback=console.log if missing
callbackFunction ??= function(){console.log(variableName+" changed to " + window[variableName])};
// the actual useful code:
Object.defineProperty(window, variableName, {
set: function(value) {window["_"+variableName] = value; callbackFunction()},
get: function() {return window["_"+variableName]}
});
window[variableName]=initialValue??null;
};
Then, instead of declaring the variable using var or let, use this:
// 1st approach - default callback//
createWatchedVariable ('myFirstVariable',12);
// instead of: let myFirstVariable = 12;
Or, in order to use your custom callback (instead of the default console.log) use:
// 2nd approach - set a custom callback//
var myCallback = ()=>{/*your custom code...*/}
// now use callback function as the third optional argument
createWatchedVariable('mySecondVariable',0,myCallback);
That's it! Now, you can change it like a "normal" variable:
myFirstVariable = 15; // logs to console
myFirstVariable++; // logs to console
mySecondVariable = 1001; // executes your custom code
mySecondVariable++; // executes your custom code
The solution of #akira and #mo-d-genesis can be further simplified because the DOM manipulation does not depend on state in this example:
CodePen
const render = (val) => {
document.getElementById("numberDiv").innerHTML = val;
};
state = {
_value_internal: undefined,
set value(val) {
// 1. set state value
this._value_internal = val;
// 2. render user interface
render(val);
},
get value() {
return this._value_internal;
},
};
const onClick = () => {
state.value = state.value + 1; // state change leads to re-render!
};
// set default value
state.value = 0;
The corresponding html:
<div id="numberDiv"></div>
<button onclick="onClick()">
Click to rerender
</button>
Remarks:
I renamed variables and functions to better reflect their semantics.
FYI: Svelte offers a very similar reactive behavior by changing variables
It's not directly possible.
However, this can be done using CustomEvent: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/CustomEvent/CustomEvent
The below method accepts an array of variable names as an input and adds event listener for each variable and triggers the event for any changes to the value of the variables.
The Method uses polling to detect the change in the value. You can increase the value for timeout in milliseconds.
function watchVariable(varsToWatch) {
let timeout = 1000;
let localCopyForVars = {};
let pollForChange = function () {
for (let varToWatch of varsToWatch) {
if (localCopyForVars[varToWatch] !== window[varToWatch]) {
let event = new CustomEvent('onVar_' + varToWatch + 'Change', {
detail: {
name: varToWatch,
oldValue: localCopyForVars[varToWatch],
newValue: window[varToWatch]
}
});
document.dispatchEvent(event);
localCopyForVars[varToWatch] = window[varToWatch];
}
}
setTimeout(pollForChange, timeout);
};
let respondToNewValue = function (varData) {
console.log("The value of the variable " + varData.name + " has been Changed from " + varData.oldValue + " to " + varData.newValue + "!!!");
}
for (let varToWatch of varsToWatch) {
localCopyForVars[varToWatch] = window[varToWatch];
document.addEventListener('onVar_' + varToWatch + 'Change', function (e) {
respondToNewValue(e.detail);
});
}
setTimeout(pollForChange, timeout);
}
By calling the Method:
watchVariables(['username', 'userid']);
It will detect the changes to variables username and userid.
This is what I did: Call JSON.stringify twice and compare the two strings...
Drawbacks:
You can only know whether the whole object changes
You have to detect changes manually
You better have only primitive fields in the object(no properties, no functions...)
This is NOT a production ideal answer, but what it is doing is setting an interval in JavaScript for every 100 milliseconds and checking to see if the variable is changed and when it is, it does something (anything intended by the OP) and then clears the interval, so it sort of simulates what the OP is asking.
let myvar = "myvar";
const checkChange = setInterval(() => {
if (myvar !== "myvar") {
console.log("My precious var has been changed!");
clearInterval(checkChange);
}
}, 100);
Now if myvar gets changed to something else then this program will say "My precious var has been changed!" :)
This is an old great question, has more than 12 years. Also, there are many ways to solve it. However, most of then are complicated or using old JS concepts we are in 2022 and we can use ES6 to improve our code.
I will implemented two main solutions that I constantly use.
Simple variable
If we have a simple variable and we don't care about reutilization then we can declare our variable as an object. We define a set and get methods and a listener attribute to handle the "change" event.
const $countBtn = document.getElementById('counter')
const $output = document.getElementById('output')
const counter = {
v: 0,
listener: undefined,
set value(v) {
this.v = v
if (this.listener) this.listener(v)
},
get value() { return this.v },
count() { this.value++ },
registerListener(callback) {
this.listener = callback
},
}
const countOnClick = () => { counter.count() }
$countBtn.onclick = countOnClick
counter.registerListener(v => {
$output.textContent = v
})
counter.value = 50
#output {
display: block;
font-size: 2em;
margin-top: 0.67em;
margin-bottom: 0.67em;
margin-left: 0;
margin-right: 0;
font-weight: bold;
}
<button id="counter">Count</button>
<div id="output"></div>
Advanced Class for reusability
If we will have multiple variables and we need to monitor them, we can create a class and then apply it to our variables. I recommend to add two listeners one beforeChange and afterChange this will give you flexibility to use the variable in different process.
class ObservableObject {
constructor(v) {
this.v = v ?? 0
this.on = {
beforeChange(newValue, oldValue) {},
afterChange(newValue, oldValue) {},
}
}
set value(newValue) {
const oldValue = this.v
// newValue, oldValue are the same
if (oldValue === newValue) return
this.on.beforeChange(newValue, oldValue)
this.v = newValue
this.on.afterChange(newValue, oldValue)
}
get value() { return this.v }
}
const $countABtn = document.getElementById('counter-a')
const $countBBtn = document.getElementById('counter-b')
const $outputA = document.getElementById('output-a')
const $outputB = document.getElementById('output-b')
const counterA = new ObservableObject()
const counterB = new ObservableObject()
const countOnClick = counter => { counter.value++ }
const onChange = (v, output) => { output.textContent = v }
$countABtn.onclick = () => { countOnClick(counterA) }
$countBBtn.onclick = () => { countOnClick(counterB) }
counterA.on.afterChange = v => { onChange(v, $outputA) }
counterB.on.afterChange = v => { onChange(v, $outputB) }
counterA.value = 50
counterB.value = 20
.wrapper {
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
width: 100vw
}
.item {
width: 50%
}
.output {
display: block;
font-size: 2em;
margin-top: 0.67em;
margin-bottom: 0.67em;
margin-left: 0;
margin-right: 0;
font-weight: bold;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="item">
<button id="counter-a">Count A</button>
<div id="output-a" class="output"></div>
</div>
<div class="item">
<button id="counter-b">Count B</button>
<div id="output-b" class="output"></div>
</div>
</div>
This is an old thread but I stumbled onto second highest answer (custom listeners) while looking for a solution using Angular. While the solution works, angular has a better built in way to resolve this using #Output and event emitters. Going off of the example in custom listener answer:
ChildComponent.html
<button (click)="increment(1)">Increment</button>
ChildComponent.ts
import {EventEmitter, Output } from '#angular/core';
#Output() myEmitter: EventEmitter<number> = new EventEmitter<number>();
private myValue: number = 0;
public increment(n: number){
this.myValue += n;
// Send a change event to the emitter
this.myEmitter.emit(this.myValue);
}
ParentComponent.html
<child-component (myEmitter)="monitorChanges($event)"></child-component>
<br/>
<label>{{n}}</label>
ParentComponent.ts
public n: number = 0;
public monitorChanges(n: number){
this.n = n;
console.log(n);
}
This will now update non parent each time the child button is clicked. Working stackblitz
I came here looking for same answer for node js. So here it is
const events = require('events');
const eventEmitter = new events.EventEmitter();
// Createing state to watch and trigger on change
let x = 10 // x is being watched for changes in do while loops below
do {
eventEmitter.emit('back to normal');
}
while (x !== 10);
do {
eventEmitter.emit('something changed');
}
while (x === 10);
What I am doing is setting some event emitters when values are changed and using do while loops to detect it.
I searched for JavaScript two-way data binding library and came across this one.
I did not succeed to make it work in DOM to variable direction, but in variable to DOM direction it works and that is what we need here.
I have rewritten it slightly, as the original code is very hard to read (for me). It uses
Object.defineProperty, so the second most upvoted answer by Eliot B. at least partially wrong.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>TODO supply a title</title>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<script>
const dataBind = (function () {
const getElementValue = function (selector) {
let element = document.querySelectorAll(selector)[0];
return 'value' in element ? element.value : element.innerHTML;
};
const setElementValue = function (selector, newValue) {
let elementArray = document.querySelectorAll(selector);
for (let i = 0; i < elementArray.length; i++) {
let element = elementArray[i];
if ('value' in element) {
element.value = newValue;
if (element.tagName.toLowerCase() === 'select'){
let options = element.querySelectorAll('option');
for (let option in options){
if (option.value === newValue){
option.selected = true;
break;
}
}
}
} else {
element.innerHTML = newValue;
}
}
};
const bindModelToView = function (selector, object, property, enumerable) {
Object.defineProperty(object, property, {
get: function () {
return getElementValue(selector);
},
set: function (newValue) {
setElementValue(selector, newValue);
},
configurable: true,
enumerable: (enumerable)
});
};
return {
bindModelToView
};
})();
</script>
</head>
<body>
<div style="padding: 20%;">
<input type="text" id="text" style="width: 40px;"/>
</div>
<script>
let x = {a: 1, b: 2};
dataBind.bindModelToView('#text', x, 'a'); //data to dom
setInterval(function () {
x.a++;
}, 1000);
</script>
</body>
</html>
JSFiddle.
JSFiddle with original code.
In the provided example a property of object x updated by the setInterval and value of text input automatically updated as well. If it is not enough and event is what you looking for, you can add onchange listener to the above input. Input also can be made hidden if needed.
Utils = {
eventRegister_globalVariable : function(variableName,handlers){
eventRegister_JsonVariable(this,variableName,handlers);
},
eventRegister_jsonVariable : function(jsonObj,variableName,handlers){
if(jsonObj.eventRegisteredVariable === undefined) {
jsonObj.eventRegisteredVariable={};//this Object is used for trigger event in javascript variable value changes ku
}
Object.defineProperty(jsonObj, variableName , {
get: function() {
return jsonObj.eventRegisteredVariable[variableName] },
set: function(value) {
jsonObj.eventRegisteredVariable[variableName] = value; handlers(jsonObj.eventRegisteredVariable[variableName]);}
});
}

func.apply with THIS applying to no object

I don't understand why the following code passes this and arguments to func.apply.
I tried to play with the code to figure out what it is doing, searched on the internet, etc., but couldn't find anything about using apply this way.
function work(a, b) {
alert( a + b );
}
function spy(func) {
function wrapper(...args) {
wrapper.calls.push(args);
return func.apply(this,arguments);
}
wrapper.calls = []
return wrapper;
}
work = spy(work)
work(1, 2); // 3
work(4, 5); // 9
The following call returns the result of wrapper
work.apply(this,arguments(a,b))
The result of spy is the same as the above.
But what makes this and arguments do the right thing in wrapper? Because without the this it doesn't work and why when i declare
let work = spy(work)
It doesn't work.
work is already declared here (function declaration). You can use var instead if you want to redeclare.
In this particular example, you are not using this inside work function. So it doesn't make a difference even if you invoke func like this func(...args) as below:
function work(a, b) {
alert( a + b );
}
function spy(func) {
function wrapper(...args) {
wrapper.calls.push(args);
console.log({ this: this });
return func(...args);
}
wrapper.calls = []
return wrapper;
}
var work = spy(work)
work(1, 2);
work(4, 5);

Pointers and array class in javascript [duplicate]

This question already has an answer here:
Double-Queue Code needs to be reduced
(1 answer)
Closed 9 years ago.
Is there any way for me to shorten this code by using pointers?
I need to make a class that has mostly the same function as a given array class unshift,shift,push and pop but with different names.
var makeDeque = function()
{
var a= [], r=new Array(a);
length = r.length=0;
pushHead=function(v)
{
r.unshift(v);
}
popHead=function()
{
return r.shift();
}
pushTail=function(v)
{
r.push(v);
}
popTail=function()
{
return r.pop();
}
isEmpty=function()
{
return r.length===0;
}
return this;
};
(function() {
var dq = makeDeque();
dq.pushTail(4);
dq.pushHead(3);
dq.pushHead(2);
dq.pushHead("one");
dq.pushTail("five");
print("length " + dq.length + "last item: " + dq.popTail());
while (!dq.isEmpty())
print(dq.popHead());
})();
Output should be
length 5last item: five
one
2
3
4
Thanks!
Maybe I'm oversimplifying, but why not just add the extra methods you need to the Array prototype and call it directly?
I need to make a class that has mostly the same function as a given array class unshift,shift,push and pop but with different names.
I suppose you could add these "new" methods to Array.prototype.
Like this perhaps?
var makeDeque = (function (ap) {
var Deque = {
length: 0,
pushHead: ap.unshift,
popHead: ap.shift,
pushTail: ap.push,
popTail: ap.pop,
isEmpty: function () {
return !this.length;
}
};
return function () {
return Object.create(Deque);
};
})(Array.prototype);
DEMO
If it's still too long, you can always directly augment Array.prototype like others already mentionned. We agree that it's all experimental here and the only goal is to save characters.
!function (ap) {
ap.pushHead = ap.unshift;
ap.popHead = ap.shift;
ap.pushTail = ap.push;
ap.popTail = ap.pop;
ap.isEmpty = function () {
return !this.length;
};
}(Array.prototype);
function makeDeque() {
return [];
}
This can be compressed to 174 chars:
function makeDeque(){return[]}!function(e){e.pushHead=e.unshift;e.popHead=e.shift;e.pushTail=e.push;e.popTail=e.pop;e.isEmpty=function(){return!this.length}}(Array.prototype)
DEMO
Not sure why you need this, but my suggestions per best practice are:
Don't override the Array.prototype. The reason for this is because other libraries might try to do the same, and if you include these libraries into yours, there will be conflicts.
This code is not needed. var a= [], r=new Array(a);. You only need ...a = [];.
Ensure you are creating a real class. In your code, makeDeque is not doing what you want. It is returning this which when a function is not called with the new keyword will be the same as the window object (or undefined if you are using what is called as "strict mode"). In other words, you have made a lot of globals (which are usually a no-no, as they can conflict with other code too).
When you build a class, it is good to add to the prototype of your custom class. This is because the methods will only be built into memory one time and will be shared by all such objects.
So I would first refactor into something like this:
var makeDeque = (function() { // We don't need this wrapper in this case, as we don't have static properties, but I've kept it here since we do want to encapsulate variables in my example below this one (and sometimes you do need static properties).
function makeDeque () {
if (!(this instanceof makeDeque)) { // This block allows you to call makeDeque without using the "new" keyword (we will do it for the person using makeDeque)
return new makeDeque();
}
this.r = [];
this.length = 0;
}
makeDeque.prototype.setLength = function () {
return this.length = this.r.length;
};
makeDeque.prototype.pushHead=function(v) {
this.r.unshift(v);
this.setLength();
};
makeDeque.prototype.popHead=function() {
return this.r.shift();
this.setLength();
};
makeDeque.prototype.pushTail=function(v){
this.r.push(v);
this.setLength();
};
makeDeque.prototype.popTail=function() {
return this.r.pop();
this.setLength();
};
makeDeque.prototype.isEmpty=function() {
return this.r.length === 0;
};
return makeDeque;
}());
Now you could shorten this as follows, but I wouldn't recommend doing this, since, as it was well said by Donald Knuth, "premature optimization is the root of all evil". If you try to shorten your code, it may make it inflexible.
var makeDeque = (function() {
function makeDeque () {
if (!(this instanceof makeDeque)) {
return new makeDeque();
}
this.r = [];
this.length = 0;
}
makeDeque.prototype.setLength = function () {
return this.length = this.r.length;
};
for (var i=0, methodArray = [
['pushHead', 'unshift'], ['popHead', 'shift'], ['pushTail', 'push'], ['popTail', 'pop']
]; i < methodArray.length; i++) {
makeDeque.prototype[methodArray[i][0]] = (function (i) { // We need to make a function and immediately pass in 'i' here because otherwise, the 'i' inside this function will end up being set to the value of 'i' after it ends this loop as opposed to the 'i' which varies with each loop. This is a common "gotcha" of JavaScript
return function () {
var ret = this.r[methodArray[i][1]].apply(this.r, arguments);
this.setLength();
return ret;
};
}(i));
}
makeDeque.prototype.isEmpty=function() {
return this.r.length === 0;
};
return makeDeque;
}());
If you need to get the length by a length property, as opposed to a method like setLength() which sets it manually after each update, either of the above code samples could be shortened by avoiding the setLength() method, but you'd need to use the Object.defineProperty which does not work (or does not work fully) in older browsers like IE < 9.

Have a javascript function privately track it's number of calls

I'm trying to figure out how I can have a javascript function privately track the number of times it has been called. The objective is to be able to query this value in the console during debugging by doing func.run
My first attempt:
function asdf() {
if (!asdf.run) {
asdf.run = 0;
} else {
asdf.run++;
console.error('run: ' + asdf.run);
}
console.error('asdf.run def: ');
console.error(asdf.run);
}
asdf();
This is a good lesson of why one should ALWAYS aim to use === in nearly all javascript booleans, cause they could secretly be ==
Closures are the way to go here:
var asdf = (function () {
var runs = 0;
var f = function () {
++runs;
// your function here
};
f.runs = function () {
return runs;
};
return f;
}());
Usage:
asdf();
asdf();
asdf.runs(); // 2
asdf();
asdf.runs(); // 3
Or, you could use a mocking framework like (shameless self plug) Myrtle.
Your first try would work fine except you've forgotten that 0 is a "falsy" value in JavaScript, so on the first run and every run thereafter !this.run will evaluate to true and your else block will never be reached. This is pretty easy to work around.
function foo() {
if(typeof(foo.count) == 'undefined') {
foo.count = 0;
} else {
foo.count++;
}
console.log(foo.count);
}
foo(); # => 0
foo(); # => 1
foo(); # => 2
# ...
I haven't actually tried this, but I looked up "static function variables in JavaScript", and I found this resource. I think the main difference between what you wrote and what's in that solution is how the first run of the function is detected. Perhaps your !asdf.run test is not working the way you thought it was, and you should use typeof asdf.run == 'undefined' to test instead.
OK, here is a method that I came up with that does not require the function to be modified at all.
So if you have this.
function someFunction() {
doingThings();
}
you could add a counter like this...
addCounter(this, "someFunction");
where this is the scope you are in, you could use any object that has a method you want to count.
Here's the code for it.
<html>
<head>
<script>
function someFunc() {
console.log("I've been called!");
};
// pass an object, this or window and a function name
function wrapFunction(parent, functionName) {
var count = 0, orig = parent[functionName];
parent[functionName] = function() {
count++;
return orig.call(this, Array.prototype.slice(arguments));
}
parent[functionName].getCount = function() {
return count;
};
}
var someObj = {
someFunc: function() {
console.log("this is someObj.someFunc()");
}
}
wrapFunction(this, "someFunc");
wrapFunction(someObj, "someFunc");
someFunc();
someObj.someFunc();
someObj.someFunc();
someObj.someFunc();
console.log("Global someFunc called " + someFunc.getCount() + " time" + (someFunc.getCount() > 1 ? "s" : "")) ;
console.log("Global someObj.someFunc called " + someObj.someFunc.getCount() + " time" + (someObj.someFunc.getCount() > 1 ? "s" : "")) ;
</script>
</head>
So, !asdf.run is a form of the double equals operator == and I had set asdf.run to 0 so it was false.
Using the triple equals === :
typeof asdf.run === "undefined" for the boolean solves my issue.
So a final usable and useful version:
function sdf() {
if (typeof sdf.run === "undefined") { sdf.run = 0; }
sdf.run++;
}
To query the number of times sdf has been called:
sdf.run;
To actually make this variable private and protect it from change, one would implement a closure.
//using a closure and keeping your functions out of the global scope
var myApp = (function() {
//counter is a private member of this scope
var retObj = {}, counter = 0;
//function fn() has privileged access to counter
retObj.fn = function() {
counter++;
console.log(counter);
};
//set retObj to myApp variable
return retObj;
}());
myApp.fn(); //count = 1
myApp.fn(); //count = 2
myApp.fn(); //count = 3
You don't necessarily need a closure. Just use a static variable.
var foo = function(){
alert( ++foo.count || (foo.count = 1) );
}
// test
function callTwice(f){ f(); f(); }
callTwice(foo) // will alert 1 then 2
or
callTwice( function bar(){
alert( ++bar.count || (bar.count = 1) );
}); // will alert 1 then 2
the second one is a named anonymous function. And note this syntax:
var foo = function bar(){ /* foo === bar in here */ }

What is the best way to have a function toggle between two different processes?

I have a function that I want it execute alternating processes every time it's triggered. Any help on how I would achieve this would be great.
function onoff(){
statusOn process /*or if on*/ statusOff process
}
One interesting aspect of JavaScript is that functions are first-class objects, meaning they can have custom properties:
function onoff() {
onoff.enabled = !onoff.enabled;
if(onoff.enabled) {
alert('on');
} else {
alert('off');
}
}
For this to work, your function should have a name. If your function is anonymous (unnamed), you can try to use arguments.callee to access it, but that is deprecated in the new ES5 standard and not possible when using its strict mode.
With the use of closures, you can define a static variable that is only accessible by the function itself:
var toggle = (function()
{
var state = true;
return function()
{
if(state)
alert("A");
else
alert("B");
state = !state;
};
})();
Now you can repeatedly invoke toggle(), and it would alternate between "A" and "B". The state variable is unaccessible from the outside, so you don't pollute the global variable scope.
Use closures. In addition to closures, this method demonstrates arbitrary arguments and arbitrary numbers of functions to cycle through:
Function cycler
function cycle() {
var toCall = arguments;
var which = 0;
return function() {
var R = toCall[which].apply(this, arguments);
which = (which+1) % toCall.length; // see NOTE
return R;
}
}
Demo:
function sum(a,b) {return a+b}
function prod(a,b) {return a*b}
function pow(a,b) {return Math.pow(a,b)}
function negate(x) {return -x;}
var f = cycle(sum, prod, pow, negate);
console.log(f(2,10)); // 12
console.log(f(2,10)); // 20
console.log(f(2,10)); // 1024
console.log(f(2)); // -2
// repeat!
console.log(f(2,10)); // 12
console.log(f(2,10)); // 20
console.log(f(2,10)); // 1024
console.log(f(2)); // -2
Arbitrary cycler
Alternatively if you do not wish to assume all cycled things are functions, you can use this pattern. In some ways it is more elegant; in some ways it is less elegant.
function cycle() {
var list = arguments;
var which = 0;
return function() {
var R = list[which];
which = (which+1) % toCall.length; // see NOTE
return R;
}
}
Demo:
var cycler = cycle(function(x){return x}, 4, function(a,b){return a+b});
cycler()(1); // 1
cycler(); // 4
cycler()(1,5); // 6
// repeat!
cycler()(1); // 1
cycler(); // 4
cycler()(1,5); // 6
NOTE: Because javascript thinks 10000000000000001%2 is 0 (i.e. that this number is even), this function must be three codelines longer than necessary, or else you will only be able to call this function 10 quadrillion times before it gives an incorrect answer. You are unlikely to reach this limit in a single browsing session... but who knows
If I'm understanding what you want, this may be what you're looking for:
var AlternateFunctions = function() {
var one = function() {
// do stuff...
current = two;
}, two = function() {
// do stuff...
current = one;
}, current = one;
return function() {
current();
}
}();
Then calling AlternateFunctions(); will cycle between one() and two()
There are a couple of good answers already posted, but I'm wondering what you're trying to achieve. If you're keeping track of some DOM element's state, instead of having state saved within the function, you should check the state of the element so that the function isn't operating in a vacuum (and possibly not doing what you expect). You can check some attribute, e.g., class:
function onoff(obj){
if(obj.className === 'on') {
obj.className = 'off';
}else{
obj.className = 'on';
}
}
var last=0;
function toggle() {
if(last) {
last=0;
// do process 2
}
else {
last=1;
// do process 1
}
}
See jsfiddle demo
var status=true;
function onOff(el){
/*
* toggle
*/
status = (status ? false : true);
status
? el.html('on')
: el.html('off');
}

Categories

Resources