I have made few changes on this huge JSF page, which is full of Javascript as well. I dont know which change make the problem happen.
The problem is: after some Javascript is executed, all the text fields in the page become readonly. The problem is not occurring in IE7 nor in Firefox. I have debugged all the javascript, there is no errors thrown! And there is nothing telling the fields to become readonly, since its working correctly in IE7.
Not sure what the problem is, could be CSS related? or Javascript? And why is it happening on IE6 only?
Note: "Don't support IE6 is not an option"
While IE may be buggy make trouble in some situations, I'm quite sure this is not an IE bug.
How do you tell the fields are read only? Do you get any optical confirmation or is it just that you can't click them any more? In that case, I'll bet you a beer that is's some invisible DIV or other layout element that, due to some CSS setting, squeezes itself above the input fields.
Try the IE developer toolbar to find out whether it's a layout problem.
If they are really disabled as in <input disabled> you need to show some JavaScript or (better) a link.
Still not sure what happened with that build, but what i was sure about is all the Ajax modifications i did was responsible for the problem.
The scenario was like:
Fill textfield1 (hit getValues1 , then hit a validate Ajax)
Fill textfield2 (hit getValues2 , then hit validate on both values together)
Fill textfield3 (hit getValues3 , then hit validate on all three values)
And a forth time again the same scenario. The page was built by a new to JSF guy, and it was very huge. I took long time refactoring it. But now its much better, each text field still have a getValues Ajax, but instead of validating them after getting all the values, i filter the allowed values on the server by sending the chosen criteria
The scenario now:
Fill textfield1 (hit getValues1 Ajax)
Fill textfield2 (hit getValues2 Ajax with value of 1, and get only allowed values)
... etc
The problem seems to be an Ajax racing conditions and at some moment IE6 was hanging or stuck in a deadlock, im not sure.
Lesson learned, "Refactoring once may take a week, but without every single issue will take longer"
um... don't support IE6??? ;)
Suggest disabling your CSS and seeing if the problem goes away. I'm not aware of any CSS tags that can disable a field, though.
Other than that, debugging is your only option. Remove all your .js and add it back in line-by-line until something breaks.
It will probably be hard for us to help you without seeing some code.
See if the HTML for the page has the 'disabled' attribute set on those INPUT elements. If so, then javascript is being used to enable the elements after the page has loaded. This is a not-uncommon technique to keep users from prematurely trying to interact with a page before all scripts have loaded.
If that's what is happening, then what you've probably done is break the way the script recognizes which elements need to be enabled. Since this is only happening on IE6, it sounds like the script might be doing some esoteric DOM navigation, which broke as a result of changes to the markup or CSS.
Unfortunately this is something you'll have to debug by reverting back to previous versions until you identify the change you made that broke the page.
Based on the other answers here, and some of your comments to them, it seems there is a JavaScript function in your page that sets elements to be enabled or disabled.
In order to help, we would have to see your code. Here is something you can do yourself, though, that would solve your problem:
Find that function (or ANY function) that sets elements in your page to disabled or enabled.
Depending on your development environment, there are different ways to do this, but somehow add a breakpoint there at the function.
Load the page.
Whenever that function is called, code execution will stop at that function. Whenever it stops, make sure that it was supposed to be called (and watch the call stack).
Eventually, you'll hit that breakpoint at a point where you weren't supposed to. Look at the call stack to see what caused it (which function resulted in a call to this function).
Related
Is it possible to have a radio button in an alert box?
The requirement is, not to use any modal box, that why we just think if it's possible with alert box or confirm box. then we can good to go.
Any help will appreciate.
Sample Screenshot is below.
i don't guess. i know that this is in fact impossible.
the reason is simple:
alert(), prompt() aswell as confirm() were part of html + js since js exists.
they never got deprecated though they break the asyncronous flow of javascript.
this is essentially why they only allow you to play around with strings.
they were never intended to be feature rich.
they were actually invented out of the blue because the inventor (Brendan Eich) thought they'd come in handy. (wich at that time was more than enough for everyone)
they are by design blocking operations and should be avoided as much as possible.
to get around them simply create a so called modal dialog (thats basically a <div> with position: fixed above the pages content.
benefit:
you can easily make it appear as you want and you would not break any network connections or behavior of your application.
PS:
don't use w3schools as reference for learning or anything else.
they are a low quality database. you should look stuff up on mdn or other sites but should seriously avoid w3schools since it's not feature complete on any topic.
keep in mind this is an opinion.
It is impossible to use radio inside of alert window.
Message parameter in window.alert(message); has a string type and you cannot put Object or HTML there (will be transfomed to string).
Do not overuse window.prompt() Method , as it prevents the user from accessing the other parts of the page until the box is closed.
Window prompt Usage Note
This question may seem a little out of the block, but it actually gave me a pretty hard time.
DOM objects in Google Chrome and Opera are actually reload-transient. That is, if you create a textbox in a html page and refresh the page, the information in the textbox vanishes. While, the same DOM objects in IE and Firefox are reload-persistent. That is, the textbox retains its value after refresh, unless a javascript code is written to prevent the same.
All the 4 browsers have scored 100 in Acid 3 tests, but still they are different in this aspect. Can anyone actually help me out why this difference is actually present ? Is it because of the underlying layout engines (like gecko for Firefox, presto for Opera etc.) or is it the ideology of the browser designers ?
This problem actually gave me a pretty hard time to make my website compatible for the browsers, since my code expected a hidden field in my iframe to retain its value after the reload. A detailed information of my problem has been written in this stackoverflow link.
It is an interesting phenomenon which I came across and would be more than happy if someone can share their thoughts on this.
Thanks a lot...
If the text boxes are in an html form, you can use the form's reset() method to return the text boxes to their default state. If you're using jQuery you could do something like:
$('form').each(function(index, formElement){
formElement.reset();
});
I'll pick Chrome for this example, but I'm open to a solution from any browser.
Use Case:
I have an update button on my website that is used to update item quantities in a shopping cart. I'd like to allow a user to enter a 0 and click update in order to remove the item. Trouble is, there is some listener in some js function that is denying the ability to enter a 0 and click update (after clicking update the old quantity remains).
My question is, what developer tool can I use to find which js function is running during that event? I don't think that Chrome's inspector does this, and I'm not very familiar with Firebug, but I couldn't find the functionality there either.
I feel that I should be able to inspect js firings just like I do css stylings. Is anyone aware of a tool I may use?
I've had to debug some particularly nasty unseen-cause Javascript issues at my job. Knowing the full depth of developer tools like Chrome's is definitely helpful. It undeniably takes some creativity to find places that might be causing the issue, but a few tips:
Tracking down event listeners
Under Chrome's Elements view, try Inspect-ing an element (right-click, Inspect); then, on the right side of the developer view, scroll down to Event Listeners. Here you can view what code files have hooked up an event. Often, this will just point you to a middle-framework from the really devious code you're looking for, but sometimes it will point you in the right direction.
Trapping a DOM modification
Many of the unwanted effects I see are because of something changing some value or attribute on the page that I don't want. Anytime this happens, you can right-click on the element (under the Elements view) and say "Break on..." and the specific scenario you're looking for. When Chrome then hits a breakpoint, you can then look downward in the Stack Trace until you find something recognizable that shouldn't be called.
EDIT after reaching ten votes!
Trapping a JS object modification
If the change you're interested in is code-internal, not in the UI, things get trickier. What's meant by this scenario is that you know somewhere in the code, something incredibly annoying like the following is happening.
company.data.myObject.parameter = undefined;
In this situation, you know myObject is still the same object, but it's being modified, perhaps unintentionally. For that, I often insert the following bit of code, sometimes just through the developer console at some point before said modification happens.
Object.defineProperty(company.data.myObject, 'parameter', {
set: (val) => {
debugger;
}
});
This includes an arrow function - you're only using this for debugging and Chrome supports it, so might as well save keystrokes. What this will do is freeze your debugger as soon as some line of code attempts to modify myObject's "parameter" property. You don't necessarily have to have a global reference to the variable if you can run this line of code from a previous breakpoint that will have the given object in the locals.
Otherwise, if all I'm starting out with is the HTML code, and I want to tie that to Javascript code, I'll often just look for identifying features like "id" elements, and search all JS files in my development directory for it. Normally, I can reach it pretty fast.
Open your page in Firefox with Firebug enabled.
Go to console tab in firebug and click profiling
enter 0 in the textbox and click the button.
Stop profiling.
You will be able to see all the javascript functions which have executed due to your actions. You can view them one by one to figure out which method has caused the mischief.
Go to you code. If you are using jQuery there is going to be a function that will be called with the class or id of that particular update button. Or, if you are using Javascript, there is going to be a function called inside the
<input type="button" name="update" onclick="update()">
These are the two ways to look for the function that is being called; there is no software that I know
Download Firebug for Mozilla Firefox, open it, click on Net and refresh your website. Than, you can see which files are loaded on the page.
If you want to check on errors and what goes wrong with an explanation, than click on console and refresh the page once again. You will see the errors and on which line it goes wrong.
Note: in your console, you can say hold or stop, so that the js file stops loading. And you can edit the script by clicking on script in Firebug. Debugging is simple, as it says on their official page https://getfirebug.com/javascript
Almost all web pages that I see designed to set the focus to an input box add the code into a body onload event. This causes the code to execute once the entire html document has loaded. In theory, this seems like good practice.
However, in my experience, what this usually causes is double work on the user, as they have already entered data into two or three fields and are typing into another when their cursor is jumped back without their knowledge. I've seen a staggering number of users type the last 2/3 of their password into the beginning of a username field. As such, I've always placed the JS focus code immediately after the input to insure there is no delay.
My question is: Is there any technical reason not to place this focus code inline? Is there an advantage to calling it at the end of the page, or within an onload event? I'm curious why it has become common practice considering the obvious practical drawbacks.
A couple thoughts:
I would use a framework like jQuery and have this type of code run on $(document).ready(.... window.onload doesn't run until everything on the page is fully loaded, which explains the delay you have experienced. $(document).ready(... runs when jQuery determines the DOM has been loaded. You could probably write the same sort of logic without jQuery, but it varies by browser.
I prefer to keep my Javascript separate from my HTML because it allows for a cleaner separation of concerns. Then your behavior is then kept separate from your document structure which is separate from your presentation in your CSS. This also allows you to more easily re-use logic and maintain that code — possibly across projects.
Google and Yahoo both suggest placing scripts at the bottom of the html page for performance reasons.
The Yahoo article: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#js_bottom
You should definitely place the script in the appropriate place if it means the correct user experience -- in fact I would load that part of the script (Used for tabbing inputs) before the inputs to ensure it always works no matter how slow the connection.
The "document.ready" function allows you to ensure the elements you want to reference are in the dom and fires right when your whole document dom is loaded (This does not mean images are fully loaded).
If you want you could have the inputs start out as disabled and then reenable them on document ready. This would handle the rare case the script is not ready yet when the inputs are displayed.
Well if you call it before whole page has loaded you really don't know if the element already has been loaded when you make your call. And if you make your call in pre-hand you should check if the element really exists even if you know it always should.
Then to make the call inline, which might seem ideal. But on the other hand it's really bad if a page takes that long to load that you can make several inputs during the loading phase.
Also you could check if input has been made etc.
Also it is possible to check if any input on page contains focus if($("input::focus, textarea::focus").length)... and otherwise set focus on desired input.
Use the autofocus HTML attribute to specify which element should initially receive focus. This decouples JavaScript and gracefully degrades in older browsers.
This is a rather complicated question that may simply be impossible with what's currently available, but if there was an easy way of doing it it would be huge.
I'm debugging some JavaScript in Chrome, and because it's very event-driven, I prefer to get trace reports of the code (what got called, etc.) instead of breakpoints. So wherever I leave a breakpoint, I'd like to see the local function name and arguments.
The closest I can get is to drop a conditional breakpoint in, like the following:
There are two big problems with this approach:
Pasting this into each breakpoint is too cumbersome. People would be far more likely to use it if it could be chosen as the default action for each breakpoint.
In Google Chrome, the log calls get fired twice.
Any ideas on a way to surmount either of these problems? I think it might be possible in IE with VS, but the UI there seems equally cumbersome.
IE11 now has "tracepoints", independent of Visual Studio. They do exactly what you asked for three years ago. I don't see them in Chrome or any other browsers yet, but hopefully they will catch on soon!
The best option I found was to edit the javascript code in Chrome's Javascript panel, adding a console.log.
It would only work after the page has been loaded (unless you can afford to put a break point after refresh and then add the logging lines) and (to be worse) you would have to do it each time you reload the page.
Good luck with your search!
I couldn't find something to do this, so I wrote my own.
Now, instead of constantly inserting and removing console.log calls, I leave the logging in and only watch it when necessary.
Warning: specific code below is untested.
var debug = TraceJS.GetLogger("debug", "mousemove");
$('div').mousemove(function(evt) {
debug(this.id, evt);
});
Every time the mouse is moved over a DIV, it generates a logevent tagged ["mousemove", {id of that element}]
The fun part is being able to selectively watch events. When you want to only see mousemove events for element #a, call the following in the console:
TraceJS('a');
When I want to see all mousemove events, you can call:
TraceJS('mousemove');
Only events that match your filter are shown. If you call TraceJS(no argument), the log calls stop being shown.