I am using analytics.js to make a custom tracking over my website. As I wish to send the hit to PubSub, I used this documentation (Node.JS tab) to connect my TypeScript code to PubSub (not perfect I know. I am trying to make it work before cleaning).
ga(() => {
ga("set", "cookieExpires", 0);
const tracker = ga.getByName(trackerName);
tracker.set("sendHitTask", (model: any) => {
var refusedParam = ["_gid", "tid"];
let hit = model.get("hitPayload").split("&").filter((paramValue: string) => {
let param = paramValue.split("=")[0];
return (refusedParam.indexOf(param) == -1);
}).join("&");
/**
* TODO(developer): Uncomment these variables before running the sample.
*/
const topicNameOrId = 'tracking-test';
const data = JSON.stringify(hit);
// Creates a client; cache this for further use
const pubSubClient = new PubSub();
console.log("DATA IS " + data);
async function publishMessage() {
// Publishes the message as a string, e.g. "Hello, world!" or JSON.stringify(someObject)
const dataBuffer = Buffer.from(data);
try {
const messageId = await pubSubClient
.topic(topicNameOrId)
.publishMessage({data: dataBuffer});
console.log(`Message ${messageId} published.`);
} catch (error) {
console.error(`Received error while publishing: ${error.message}`);
process.exitCode = 1;
}
}
publishMessage();
});
});
I don't have any error when building and running this code. But, when I locally connect to my website, I have the following error inside the JS console Uncaught TypeError: a.grpc is undefined.
I tried to put grpc inside my package.json, but no success at removing the error and having a correct behavior.
Did I miss something ? How can I use analytics.js, and send data directly to PubSub ?
Related
I have updated the question as found the root cause of the issue.
As I have hosted my React SSR app which uses firebase database in the client serving by one of the cloud function named app throwing an error of Error: FIREBASE FATAL ERROR: Database initialized multiple times. Please make sure the format of the database URL matches with each database() call.. When I comment out one by one and deploy, works perfectly. But when I deploy together doesn't work. How do I separate these two keeping both at the same repo?
ORIGINAL Question: Why firebase cloud function throwing an error of 'The default Firebase app does not exist.'?
So I am trying out firebase function for the first time. admin.messaging() throwing me the following error. Help me figure out why?
If I look at the console I get results till console.log('deviceToken', deviceToken);
so whats wrong in const messageDone = await admin.messaging().sendToDevice(deviceToken, payload);?
const functions = require('firebase-functions');
const admin = require('firebase-admin');
exports.updateUnreadCount = functions.database.ref('/chats/{chatId}/{messageId}')
.onCreate(async(snap, context) => {
const appOptions = JSON.parse(process.env.FIREBASE_CONFIG);
appOptions.databaseAuthVariableOverride = context.auth;
const adminApp = admin.initializeApp(appOptions, 'app');
const { message, senderId, receiverUid } = snap.val();
console.log(message, senderId, receiverUid);
console.log('------------------------');
const deleteApp = () => adminApp.delete().catch(() => null);
try {
const db = adminApp.database();
const reciverUserRef = await db.ref(`users/${receiverUid}/contacts/${senderId}/`);
console.log('reciverUserRef', reciverUserRef);
const deviceTokenSnapshot = await reciverUserRef.child('deviceToken').once('value');
const deviceToken = await deviceTokenSnapshot.val();
console.log('deviceToken', deviceToken);
const payload = {
notification: {
title: 'Test Notification Title',
body: message,
sound: 'default',
badge: '1'
}
};
const messageDone = await admin.messaging().sendToDevice(deviceToken, payload);
console.log('Successfully sent message: ', JSON.stringify(messageDone));
return deleteApp().then(() => res);
} catch (err) {
console.log('error', err);
return deleteApp().then(() => Promise.reject(err));
}
});
Update1: According to this https://firebase.google.com/docs/cloud-messaging/send-message#send_to_a_topic, admin.messaging().sendToDevice(deviceToken, payload) APIs are only available in the Admin Node.js SDK?
So switched to
const payload = {
data: {
title: 'Test Notification Title',
body: message,
sound: 'default',
badge: '1'
},
token: deviceToken
};
const messageDone = await admin.messaging().send(payload);
Which is not working either. Getting an error Error: The default Firebase app does not exist. Make sure you call initializeApp() before using any of the Firebase services. Any lead will be helpful.
EDIT: Finally got the function working.
My index.js is exporting to functions, follwoing
exports.app = functions.https.onRequest(app); //React SSR
exports.updateChat = functions.database.ref('/chats/{chatId}/{messageId}').onCreate(updateChat);
exports.app is a react ssr function, which I am using to host my site. This uses database too. and throwing error of multiple database instance.
When I comment out one by one and deploy, works perfectly. But when I deploy together doesn't work. How do I separate these two keeping both at the same repo? Any suggestions, please?
You can initialise db outside export function.
const admin = require('firebase-admin');
const adminApp = admin.initializeApp(appOptions, 'app')
//continue code
Update:
const admin = require('firebase-admin');
const adminApp = admin.initializeApp(options);
async function initialize(options, apps = 'app') {
try {
const defaultApp = adminApp.name
if(defaultApp) {
const adminApp1 = admin.initializeApp(apps);
}else {
const adminApp1 = admin.initializeApp(options, apps);
}
}catch(err) {
console.error(err);
}
}
Modify this snippet as per your need and try it out
It abstracts initialize of app in another function. Just call this function at appropriate place in your code.
I've deployed this code to my firebase functions project:
import * as functions from 'firebase-functions'
import * as admin from 'firebase-admin'
admin.initializeApp()
export const getEmail = functions.https.onRequest((request, response) => {
var from = request.body.sender;
admin.auth().getUserByEmail(from)
.then(snapshot => {
const data = snapshot.toJSON()
response.send(data)
})
.catch(error => {
//Handle error
console.log(error)
response.status(500).send(error)
})
})
Which takes in a email parameter that it gets from the user's input on my app. My app's code looks like this:
Functions.functions().httpsCallable("https://us-central1-projectname.cloudfunctions.net/getEmail").call(email) { (result, error) in
if let error = error as NSError? {
if error.domain == FunctionsErrorDomain {
//email isnt taken
let code = FunctionsErrorCode(rawValue: error.code)
let message = error.localizedDescription
let details = error.userInfo[FunctionsErrorDetailsKey]
print(code, message, details)
}
// ...
}
if let text = (result?.data as? [String: Any])?["text"] as? String {
// email taken
}
}
When I run the app and when that function is called, it seems to do nothing, no error message is shown and no data has been sent back. What am I missing?
Update: I went to the logs and nothing has happened in there as if the function was never called.
You are actually mixing up HTTP Cloud Functions and Callable Cloud Functions:
You Cloud Function code corresponds to an HTTP one but the code in your front-end seems to call a Callable one.
You should adapt one or the other, most probably adapt your Cloud Function to a Callable one, along the following lines:
exports.getEmail = functions.https.onCall((data, context) => {
const from = data.sender;
return admin.auth().getUserByEmail(from)
.then(userRecord => {
const userData = userRecord.toJSON();
return { userData: userData };
})
});
Have a look at the doc for more details, in particular how to handle errors. The doc is quite detailed and very clear.
I'm currently trying to modify my Cloud Functions and move in under https.onRequest so that i can call use it to schedule a cron job. How it i'm getting the following error in the logs.
TypeError: admin.database.ref is not a function
at exports.scheduleSendNotificationMessageJob.functions.https.onRequest (/user_code/index.js:30:20)
at cloudFunction (/user_code/node_modules/firebase-functions/lib/providers/https.js:57:9)
exports.scheduleSendNotificationMessageJob = functions.https.onRequest((req, res) => {
admin.database.ref('/notifications/{studentId}/notifications/{notificationCode}')
.onCreate((dataSnapshot, context) => {
const dbPath = '/notifications/' + context.params.pHumanId + '/fcmCode';
const promise = admin.database().ref(dbPath).once('value').then(function(tokenSnapshot) {
const theToken = tokenSnapshot.val();
res.status(200).send(theToken);
const notificationCode = context.params.pNotificationCode;
const messageData = {notificationCode: notificationCode};
const theMessage = { data: messageData,
notification: { title: 'You have a new job reminder' }
};
const options = { contentAvailable: true,
collapseKey: notificationCode };
const notificationPath = '/notifications/' + context.params.pHumanId + '/notifications/' + notificationCode;
admin.database().ref(notificationPath).remove();
return admin.messaging().sendToDevice(theToken, theMessage, options);
});
return null;
});
});
You cannot use the definition of an onCreate() Realtime Database trigger within the definition of an HTTP Cloud Function.
If you switch to an HTTP Cloud Function "so that (you) can call use it to schedule a cron job" it means the trigger will be the call to the HTTP Cloud Function. In other words you will not be anymore able to trigger an action (or the Cloud Function) when new data is created in the Realtime Database.
What you can very well do is to read the data of the Realtime Database, as follows, for example (simplified scenario of sending a notification):
exports.scheduleSendNotificationMessageJob = functions.https.onRequest((req, res) => {
//get the desired values from the request
const studentId = req.body.studentId;
const notificationCode = req.body.notificationCode;
//Read data with the once() method
admin.database.ref('/notifications/' + studentId + '/notifications/' + notificationCode)
.once('value')
.then(snapshot => {
//Here just an example on how you would get the desired values
//for your notification
const theToken = snapshot.val();
const theMessage = ....
//......
// return the promise returned by the sendToDevice() asynchronous task
return admin.messaging().sendToDevice(theToken, theMessage, options)
})
.then(() => {
//And then send back the result (see video referred to below)
res.send("{ result : 'message sent'}") ;
})
.catch(err => {
//........
});
});
You may watch the following official Firebase video about HTTP Cloud Functions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IkUgCLr5oA&t=1s&list=PLl-K7zZEsYLkPZHe41m4jfAxUi0JjLgSM&index=3. It shows how to read data from Firestore but the concept of reading and sending back the response (or an error) is the same for the Realtime Database. Together with the 2 other videos of the series (https://firebase.google.com/docs/functions/video-series/?authuser=0), it also explains how it is important to correctly chain promises and to indicate to the platform that the work of the Cloud Function is finished.
For me, this error happened when writing admin.database instead of admin.database().
I'm trying to send ethereum transaction that sends ERC20 tokens to someone with Ledger Nano S through Node.JS but I'm not able to successfully sign and send this transaction.
First of all, I signed the transaction through the method, signTransaction, of ledgerhq API and then after signing it, I sended it to the main net by using sendSignedTransaction. When I execute below code, Ledger receives request and shows details of a transaction. However, after pressing Ledger's confirm button, the console returns error 'Returned error: Invalid signature: Crypto error (Invalid EC signature)'.
import AppEth from "#ledgerhq/hw-app-eth";
import TransportU2F from "#ledgerhq/hw-transport-u2f";
import TransportNodeHid from "#ledgerhq/hw-transport-node-hid";
import EthereumTx from "ethereumjs-tx"
const Web3 = require('web3');
import { addHexPrefix, bufferToHex, toBuffer } from 'ethereumjs-util';
const web3 = new Web3(new Web3.providers.HttpProvider('http://localhost:8545'));
var destAddresses = ['0xa6acFa18468786473269Dc1521fd4ff40F6481D9'];
var amount = 1000000000000;
var i=0;
var contract = new web3.eth.Contract([token contract ABI... ], '0x74a...');
const data1 = contract.methods.transfer(destAddresses[0], amount).encodeABI();
const exParams = {
gasLimit: 6e6,
gasPrice: 3e9,
from: '0x1A...',
data : data1,
to: '0x74a...',
value: '0x00',
nonce: "0x0",
chainId: 1,
v: "0x01",
r: "0x00",
s: "0x00"
}
async function makeSign(txParams) {
const tx = new EthereumTx(txParams);
const txHex = tx.serialize().toString("hex");
const signedTransaction = '0x' + txHex;
let transport;
try {
transport = await TransportNodeHid.create();
let eth2 = new AppEth(transport);
const result = await eth2.signTransaction("m/44'/60'/0'/0", txHex).then(result => {
web3.eth.sendSignedTransaction('0x' + txHex)
.then(res => {
console.log(res);
}).catch(err => {
console.log('sendSignedTransaction');
console.log(err);
});
}).catch(err => {
console.log('signTransaction');
console.log(err);
});
txParams.r = `0x${result.r, 'hex'}`;
txParams.s = `0x${result.s, 'hex'}`;
txParams.v = `0x${result.v, 'hex'}`;
return result;
} catch (e) {
console.log(e);
}
}
makeSign(exParams).then(function () {
console.log("Promise Resolved2");
}.catch(function () {
console.log("Promise Rejected2");
});
When I only use signTransaction function, I can confirm the transaction in the ledger device and return txhash on the console. However, ultimately I want to broadcast a transaction to the main net. Could you please give me any idea? I want any feedback. Also, if there are any examples of creating and broadcasting a raw transaction by using the ledger, notice me please.
Your code already sends the transaction to the network. However, just awaiting the "send" promise only gives you the transaction hash, not the receipt. You need to treat it as an event emitter and wait for the 'confirmation' event.
const serializedTx = tx.serialize();
web3.eth.sendSignedTransaction(serializedTx.toString('hex'))
.once('transactionHash', hash => console.log('Tx hash', hash))
.on('confirmation', (confNumber, receipt) => {
console.log(`Confirmation #${confNumber}`, receipt);
})
.on('error', console.error);
To send it to mainnet as you mention, you can either run a local geth node on port 8545 and use your code unchanged, or point web3 at infura or similar.
I am trying to implement a very simple dialogflow agent integration with nodejs.
Here is what I did so far
I followed the code from Intent detection
I added the service account private key file .json to my server.
I added the environment variable GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS with the path to my .json private key file.
Here is the code I am trying to run right now:
require('dotenv').config()
const projectId = 'gg-chatbot-216808';
const sessionId = 'quickstart-session-id';
const query = 'hello';
const languageCode = 'en-US';
// Instantiate a DialogFlow client.
const dialogflow = require('dialogflow');
const sessionClient = new dialogflow.SessionsClient();
// Define session path
const sessionPath = sessionClient.sessionPath(projectId, sessionId);
// The text query request.
const request = {
session: sessionPath,
queryInput: {
text: {
text: query,
languageCode: languageCode,
},
},
};
// This prints the private key path correctly.
console.log(process.env.GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS);
// Send request and log result
sessionClient
.detectIntent(request)
.then(responses => {
console.log('Detected intent');
const result = responses[0].queryResult;
console.log(` Query: ${result.queryText}`);
console.log(` Response: ${result.fulfillmentText}`);
if (result.intent) {
console.log(` Intent: ${result.intent.displayName}`);
} else {
console.log(` No intent matched.`);
}
})
.catch(err => {
console.error('ERROR:', err);
});
Then I get this error in the console when I run this file
Auth error:Error: invalid_user: Robot is disabled.
ERROR: { Error: 14 UNAVAILABLE: Getting metadata from plugin failed with error: invalid_user: Robot is disabled.
at Object.exports.createStatusError (/var/www/html/google_auth/node_modules/grpc/src/common.js:87:15)
at Object.onReceiveStatus (/var/www/html/google_auth/node_modules/grpc/src/client_interceptors.js:1188:28)
at InterceptingListener._callNext (/var/www/html/google_auth/node_modules/grpc/src/client_interceptors.js:564:42)
at InterceptingListener.onReceiveStatus (/var/www/html/google_auth/node_modules/grpc/src/client_interceptors.js:614:8)
at callback (/var/www/html/google_auth/node_modules/grpc/src/client_interceptors.js:841:24)
code: 14,
metadata: Metadata { _internal_repr: {} },
details: 'Getting metadata from plugin failed with error: invalid_user: Robot is disabled.' }
i also faced a similar issue for my angular bot.
What i did was, instead of using using the google_credentials from the json file, i created an object with private_key,client_email {these values can be taken from the service account private key file .json}, and passed the object while setting up the session client.
var config = {
credentials: {
private_key: "YOUR_PRIVATE_KEY",
client_email: "YOUR_CLIENT_EMAIL"
}
}
const sessionClient = new dialogflow.SessionsClient(config);
note: do copy the full private_key string from .json. It will start as "-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY-----\n......" .
Also, in GCP go to the project->IAM then try setting role for the service as DIALOGLOW API ADMIN. Check if this works.
If this has not been resolved yet , the solution is to provide "fileKey" inside sessionClient.
const sessionClient = new dialogflow.SessionsClient({
fileKey:" path of your credentials.json file"
});
or
let filePath = process.env.GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS ="Location of credentials file".
const sessionClient = new dialogflow.SessionsClient({
fileKey:filePath
});
this will even work if there is no system env variable is set as GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS.
Hope this is helpful.