having access to a parent state from component's props.children: - javascript

I am making a container for a d3 line graph that I'm going to create, my format so far is this:
import React from "react";
import AnalyticPads from "../AnalyticPad/AnalyticPad";
import Pad from "../AnalyticPad/Pad";
import MainContent from "../AnalyticPad/MainContent";
import Extention from "../AnalyticPad/Extention";
const GraphPad = () => {
return (
<AnalyticPads properties={{height: "200px"}}>
<Pad>
<MainContent>
</MainContent>
<Extention>
</Extention>
</Pad>
</AnalyticPads>
)
}
export default GraphPad;
And my "AnalyticsPad" looks like this:
import React from "react";
const AnalyticPads = (props) => {
return (
<div className="analytic-pad-container">
{props.children}
</div>
)
}
export default AnalyticPads;
What I want is that there will be a grid of "Pads" and I want this "AnalyticsPad" to provide default styles for each pad, for example if I want each pad to have a height of 200px I set it in this wrapper and then for any individual pad that I want to differ from the default I can overide it.
The "MainContent" component is where the line graph will be and any extra information will be put inside the "Extention" which will render if a button is pressed.
Throughout my react app I keep using the context api to provide the data to the children components, but I know ( or think ) it is bad practice to do this, from what I understand context should only be used for providing data to global components.
What is best practice?
please don't answer with a solution for class components as I have never used them before as I am new to react.

Related

Designing persistent layouts in Next.js

I'm going through this article and I'm trying to figure out how the persistence is supposed to occur in Option 4. From what I can tell, you'd need to redefine the .getLayout for every page. I'm not sure how the logic for nesting is incorporated into further urls.
Here's the code from the article
// /pages/account-settings/basic-information.js
import SiteLayout from '../../components/SiteLayout'
import AccountSettingsLayout from '../../components/AccountSettingsLayout'
const AccountSettingsBasicInformation = () => <div>{/* ... */}</div>
AccountSettingsBasicInformation.getLayout = page => (
<SiteLayout>
<AccountSettingsLayout>{page}</AccountSettingsLayout>
</SiteLayout>
)
export default AccountSettingsBasicInformation
// /pages/_app.js
import React from 'react'
import App from 'next/app'
class MyApp extends App {
render() {
const { Component, pageProps, router } = this.props
const getLayout = Component.getLayout || (page => page)
return getLayout(<Component {...pageProps}></Component>)
}
}
export default MyApp
For example, say AccountSettingsBasicInformation.getLayout is /settings/, how would I use this template to produce something at /settings/username
P.S. If someone has done something in the past they'd recommend over this, I'm open to ideas.
Yes, you have to redefine the getLayout function to every page. As long as the SiteLayout component stays “unchanged” (eg.no props change) the rendered content in that layout component (not the page content itself) stays persistent. This is because React wont rerender that component.
I used Adam’s article when I was building next.js lib for handlin modal routes. You can check the example folder where you can see I am defining the getLayout property on every page which should be rendered with layout.
Example: https://github.com/svobik7/next-bodies/tree/master/example

Persist data between two pages with Next.js

I would like to refactor my Next.js webapp to have different pages handle different screens. Currently, I have this component holding several states to know in which screen I'm in. In the jsx section, I'm using {value && ... } to render the right component.
But I feel this is not good design, and won't be maintainable when adding more and more screens.
I would also like to avoid Redux as it is overkill for my project.
I was thinking about persisting data in cookies so I can retrieve them with getInitialProps in every component when rendering a new page, but is there a more elegant way?
I've read about tweaking the _app.js but I'm not sure to understand the consequences of doing so, and how it could help me..
Any suggestion?
When multiple of your pages need to make use of same data, you can make use of Context to store the result. It a good way to make a centralized storage without using complex and more self sufficient libraries like redux
You can implement context inside of _app.js file which must reside inside your root folder. This way next.js treats it as a root wrapper and you would just need to use 1 instance of Context
contexts/appContext
import React from 'react';
const AppContext = React.createContext();
export const AppProvider = AppContext.Provider;
export const AppConsumer = AppContext.Consumer;
export default AppContext;
_app.js
import React from 'react'
import App from 'next/app'
import AppProvider from '../contexts/appContext';
class MyApp extends App {
state={
data:[]
}
render() {
const { Component, pageProps } = this.props;
// You can implement logic in this component to fetch data and update state
return (
<div>
<AppProvider value={this.state.data}> // pass on value to context
<Component {...pageProps} />
</AppProvider>
</div>
)
}
}
export default MyApp
Now further each component can make use of context value by using AppConsumer or using useContext if you use hooks
Please read more about how to use Context here

Convert website from HTML,CSS,bootstrap & JQuery to React?

Hi guys hope you're fine, I'm student and I have this year to do some thing like a project to end my studies , so I chose to create a website (using React/Django) I already have the site but made by HTML,CSS,bootstrap & JQuery , so now i have to convert it to react , but i have a problem i don't know how to include some js files inside a components , every things else is going good, I need just what is in the js files to applied it in some components.
Hope you help me out.
cordially
You can have javascript code inside your components likewise
const Component = props => {
//javascript code
return (<div>-- Component JSX---</div>)
}
if the javascript code if just needed for the initializing of the component you can use react hooks to run a piece of code only one time after the component is created.
import React, { useEffect } from 'react';
const Component = props => {
useEffect(() => {
// javascript code
}, [])
return (<div>--Component JSX---</div>
}
the empty array as second argument indicates the useEffect hook that the effect should only be ran once after the component has been initialized.
So the way React works is you will be building "HTML" using React functional/class components like this example
import React from 'react';
//Just like a normal javascript function, it listens to in this
instance, the return statement. You're returning regular HTML.
function Navbar() {
return (
<div>This is some text built by react</div>
<p>Saying hello to react by building a functional component</p>
)
}
export default Navbar; //This right here is exporting the file so it can be
//used elsewhere just import it in other file.
So the return is where you will build your website, then in the next component you will import should look something like this.
Normally, it is called App.js or in some instances where it's more complex it's anythinng you want.
import Navbar from '../components/Navbar.js';
function App() {
return (
<Navbar /> //Now you don't have to write your main content in here you can
//just import it. Just like Navbar
<div>This is my main content in page</div>
)
}

How do I properly extend React Bootstrap components?

Say I have a badge component I want to add sizing for. This is how I currently do it:
import React from 'react';
import Badge from 'react-bootstrap/Badge';
import classNames from 'classnames';
const BadgeExtended = props => {
const {className, size, ...attr} = props;
const classes = classNames(
className,
size && `badge-${size}`
);
return <Badge className={classes} {...attr}>{props.children}</Badge>;
};
export default BadgeExtended;
which works OK. Is that a correct way to do it? Is there a way to extend the original component so that I dind't have to import an extended one, using react-bootstrap/Badge instead?
I think the way you came up with is the right way. If you look at the repository (here), the Badge component is functional, not a class, so there's no way to use the extend keyword.
Making an HOC seems like the best way to achieve what you're doing.

Why HOC are applied during exporting of component in place of importing it

My basic understading is that HOC like connect (for connecting with redux store) and other HOC's are applied to a component while exporting it.
Like this
import React, { Component } from 'react';
import './App.css';
import myHoc from './myHoc/index';
class App extends Component {
render() {
return (
<div className="App">
</div>);
}
}
export default myHoc({})(App);
Where as a better thing would be to apply HOC during import as it would make it easier to make reusable component. The same component can pick up props from store or from props and that would be the responsibility of the parent component to check what to give which HOC to apply on the component.
I know we can use container components which takes the component and render children but that just adds code in the JSX (wont look good if there are many container components)
though we can do it like this
import React, { Component } from 'react';
import './App.css';
import myHoc from './myHoc/index';
import AppChild from './AppChild';
const NewAppChild = myHoc({}, ()=> {
})(AppChild);
class App extends Component {
state = {
count: 1,
};
reRender = () => {
this.setState({count: this.state.count + 1});
};
render() {
return (
<div className="App">
<NewAppChild handleClick={this.reRender} count={this.state.count}/>
</div>
);
}
}
export default App;
What my question is that, is there something better that can handle this kind of situations where I want to apply my HOC on import that is each many container components can import it and they can apply different HOCs depending on the needs.
There is no single concrete reason for this design choice - as you have already seen you can invoke your HOC wherever you use the component - but I see at least 1 advantage: configuration & component reuse.
In your example, myHoc takes no parameters or configuration so this doesn't necessarily apply, but imagine instead that you are invoking connect from redux.
In most use cases, connect accepts 2 configuration functions -
mapStateToProps & mapDispatchToProps - that define the behaviour. If you define those within MyComponent then any consuming component can import MyComponent from 'MyComponent' and start using it.
If you instead rely on the parent component to call connect() then you are forcing every consumer to re-implement the configuration of connect as well. That may mean many instances of duplicated configuration and adds to the complexity for consuming components.
That being said, there are certainly cases where you might want this behaviour - for example, if you wanted to connect the same component to different state definitions. Ultimately you need to pick the best pattern to support what you need from the component.

Categories

Resources