React classes in main component constructor - javascript

Let's say I have a lot of app state to manage in my React application.
Therefore, I would like to split the state into smaller, manageable chunks.
For example I have the following main component with state and methods that alter this state.
class App extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
foo: ['some', 'items'],
bar: [{ arr: 'of objects'}]
}
}
changeFoo() {some code in here...}
changeBar() {some code in here...}
}
The state and methods written in the App component are getting out of hand. Yet it must be written in the App component since the state is passed to other components as props.
How would you usually manage this?

When you see that the state of your React application is getting out of hand, it's usually time to bring in a state management library like Redux (there're a few and Redux is the most popular one).
It'll help you have a global state that is managed in a reasonable way.

When we see how React works. It is based on one-directional data flow.
So, usually the Application state is kept at the top most Component (Say, App Component) in your case. So that data/state can be passed down as props to the component that needs it.
There, however may be the cases where children components of the parent, needs to work with the same data(Say in case of an event - a button click that happens in the child component.) In that case we write a function in the parent component and pass the function as props to the children, so that the state gets updated in the parent itself and any child gets updated data.
In pure React (without using any state management library), we have to pass the state as props to work with our app. But in case you choose to use a state management library such as Redux, then the components (known as Containers) can directly communicate with the Application State.
And If your application state contains objects within objects(like you have shown) or Array of Objects containing more Objects, then you cannot use setState() to update the state directly. In most of the cases, you take copy of the state and then use JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(state)) to do deep cloning and work with the state in a best possible manner.
There are other things in the example, the functions that you have used within the class , you need to bind the scope of this variable to point to the current class. This we do inside the constructor method, or simple make use of arrow function in order to avoid errors.
If you need more explanation, I will share with you :)

One solution is to make a generic change() function with a parameter for the key that should be changed:
change(key, value) {
setState({key: value, ...this.state});
}
Now when you want to add a listener to a child component:
<Foo onChange={ value => change('foo', value) }/>
<Bar onChange={ value => change('bar', value) }/>

Related

Is there a problem with setting React.Component state equal to a this.props value in typescript?

I am attempting to assign an object that is passed into a React.Component as a property to a state value like so,
state = {
rota: this.props.rota
}
render() {
// const { cleaning, chairs, creche, flowers } = this.state.rota;
const { cleaning, chairs, creche, flowers } = this.props.rota;
console.log(creche);
}
The commented out section where it get's the value of the state prints out an empty string, however the property values are correct. Am I doing something wrong when assigning the props.rota to the state.rota?
I am using typescript and have done exactly this in another place in my program - however the property being passed in was a value type (string) rather than an object type.
Thanks!
That's usually a bad practice.
Take your case.
You get a value as prop from a parent component.
The inner component will already be re rendered every time that this value changes in the parent component.
If you go with an approach like yours, what most probably you will do, is to change that value inside the inner component too (through state), whose changes will not be reflected on the parent component.
You are actually breaking the design pattern of uni directional data flow, on which react relies a lot on.
So my personal opinion is to lift up the state in this case and avoid such kind of situations. Use callbacks instead if you want to communicate changes to the parent, or use some state management (context, redux, etc..).
Or design a better solution using HOC or render props Components.
Even though #quirimmo has pretty much answered your question, if you want to do this sometime in the future, the easiest way would be to use a constructor function and pass the props in as a param, and then just set that as the default value of the state
class SomeComponent extends Component {
constructor(props){
super(props);
this.state = {
rota: props.rota,
}
}
}
This makes sure that the prop is actually available in the moment you want to set the initial state, since the constructor is the first function that is called in the component lifecycle.

ReactJS - Lifting state up vs keeping a local state

At my company we're migrating the front-end of a web application to ReactJS.
We are working with create-react-app (updated to v16), without Redux.
Now I'm stuck on a page which structure can be simplified by the following image:
The data displayed by the three components (SearchableList, SelectableList and Map) is retrieved with the same backend request in the componentDidMount() method of MainContainer. The result of this request is then stored in the state of MainContainer and has a structure more or less like this:
state.allData = {
left: {
data: [ ... ]
},
right: {
data: [ ... ],
pins: [ ... ]
}
}
LeftContainer receives as prop state.allData.left from MainContainer and passes props.left.data to SearchableList, once again as prop.
RightContainer receives as prop state.allData.right from MainContainer and passes props.right.data to SelectableList and props.right.pins to Map.
SelectableList displays a checkbox to allow actions on its items. Whenever an action occur on an item of SelectableList component it may have side effects on Map pins.
I've decided to store in the state of RightContainer a list that keeps all the ids of items displayed by SelectableList; this list is passed as props to both SelectableList and Map. Then I pass to SelectableList a callback, that whenever a selection is made updates the list of ids inside RightContainer; new props arrive in both SelectableList and Map, and so render() is called in both components.
It works fine and helps to keep everything that may happen to SelectableList and Map inside RightContainer, but I'm asking if this is correct for the lifting-state-up and single-source-of-truth concepts.
As feasible alternative I thought of adding a _selected property to each item in state.right.data in MainContainer and pass the select callback three levels down to SelectableList, handling all the possible actions in MainContainer. But as soon as a selection event occurs this will eventually force the loading of LeftContainer and RightContainer, introducing the need of implementing logics like shouldComponentUpdate() to avoid useless render() especially in LeftContainer.
Which is / could be the best solution to optimise this page from an architectural and performance point of view?
Below you have an extract of my components to help you understand the situation.
MainContainer.js
class MainContainer extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
allData: {}
};
}
componentDidMount() {
fetch( ... )
.then((res) => {
this.setState({
allData: res
});
});
}
render() {
return (
<div className="main-container">
<LeftContainer left={state.allData.left} />
<RightContainer right={state.allData.right} />
</div>
);
}
}
export default MainContainer;
RightContainer.js
class RightContainer extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
selectedItems: [ ... ]
};
}
onDataSelection(e) {
const itemId = e.target.id;
// ... handle itemId and selectedItems ...
}
render() {
return (
<div className="main-container">
<SelectableList
data={props.right.data}
onDataSelection={e => this.onDataSelection(e)}
selectedItems={this.state.selectedItems}
/>
<Map
pins={props.right.pins}
selectedItems={this.state.selectedItems}
/>
</div>
);
}
}
export default RightContainer;
Thanks in advance!
As React docs state
Often, several components need to reflect the same changing data. We
recommend lifting the shared state up to their closest common
ancestor.
There should be a single “source of truth” for any data that changes
in a React application. Usually, the state is first added to the
component that needs it for rendering. Then, if other components also
need it, you can lift it up to their closest common ancestor. Instead
of trying to sync the state between different components, you should
rely on the top-down data flow.
Lifting state involves writing more “boilerplate” code than two-way
binding approaches, but as a benefit, it takes less work to find and
isolate bugs. Since any state “lives” in some component and that
component alone can change it, the surface area for bugs is greatly
reduced. Additionally, you can implement any custom logic to reject or
transform user input.
So essentially you need to lift those state up the tree that are being used up the Siblings component as well. So you first implementation where you store the selectedItems as a state in the RightContainer is completely justified and a good approach, since the parent doesn't need to know about and this data is being shared by the two child components of RightContainer and those two now have a single source of truth.
As per your question:
As feasible alternative I thought of adding a _selected property to
each item in state.right.data in MainContainer and pass the select
callback three levels down to SelectableList, handling all the
possible actions in MainContainer
I wouldn't agree that this is a better approach than the first one, since you MainContainer doesn't need to know the selectedItems or handler any of the updates. MainContainer isn't doing anything about those states and is just passing it down.
Consider to optimise on performance, you yourself talk about implementing a shouldComponentUpdate, but you can avoid that by creating your components by extending React.PureComponent which essentially implements the shouldComponentUpdate with a shallow comparison of state and props.
According to the docs:
If your React component’s render() function renders the same result
given the same props and state, you can use React.PureComponent for a
performance boost in some cases.
However if multiple deeply nested components are making use of the same data, it makes sense to make use of redux and store that data in the redux-state. In this way it is globally accessible to the entire App and can be shared between components that are not directly related.
For example consider the following case
const App = () => {
<Router>
<Route path="/" component={Home}/>
<Route path="/mypage" component={MyComp}/>
</Router>
}
Now here if both Home and MyComp want to access the same data. You could pass the data as props from App by calling them through render prop. However it would easily be done by connecting both of these components to Redux state using a connect function like
const mapStateToProps = (state) => {
return {
data: state.data
}
}
export connect(mapStateToProps)(Home);
and similarly for MyComp. Also its easy to configure actions for updating relevant informations
Also its particularly easy to configure Redux for your application and you would be able to store data related to the same things in the individual reducers. In this way you would be able to modularise your application data as well
My honest advice on this. From experience is:
Redux is simple. It's easy to understand and scale BUT you should use Redux for some specific use cases.
Since Redux encapsulates your App you can think of storing stuff like:
current app locale
current authenticated user
current token from somewhere
Stuff that you would need on a global scale. react-redux even allows for a #connect decorator on components. So like:
#connect(state => ({
locale: state.locale,
currentUser: state.currentUser
}))
class App extends React.Component
Those are all passed down as props and connect can be used anywhere on the App. Although I recommend just passing down the global props with the spread operator
<Navbar {...this.props} />
All other components (or "pages") inside your app can do their own encapsulated state. For example the Users page can do it's own thing.
class Users extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
loadingUsers: false,
users: [],
};
}
......
You would access locale and currentUser through props because they were passed down from the Container components.
This approach I've done it multiple times and it works.
But, since you wanted to really consolidate the knowledge of React first, before doing Redux you can just store your state on the top-level component and pass it down to the children.
Downsides:
You're gonna have to keep passing them down into inner level components
To update state from the inner level components you're gonna have to pass the function that updates the state.
These downsides are a little boring and cumbersome to manage. That's why Redux was built.
Hope I helped. good luck
By using Redux you can avoid such callbacks and maintain the whole state in one single store - so make your parent component connected component - and make left and right components dumb ones - and just pass in the props you get from parent to child - and you don't have to worry about callbacks in this case.

How to handle props changes without using componentWillReceiveProps in React

I've been working on a project which is coded with React. I have a component set that I implemented many components for my own requirements. Many of these act like a composite component. For example, TextBox component which has its own label, own error message mechanism and own input filter etc. Moreover, you know, components have props to manage sth.
Everytime to update my component view (render), I use componentWillReceiveProps and I compare the props changes.
But everytime implementing the componentWillReceiveProps method is so repulsive.
Is there any way to pass props from top to down without using componentWillReceiveProps. I don't want to compare props changes manually. Is there any way to do it automatically.
When I change the props in parent, I'd like to update all views just changing the some prop values from top to down.
I'm not an react expert and performance is not my first purpose also!
One more thing that the answer is not use Redux!
I'm waiting your creative approaches and helpful ideas.
Without seeing the code for the particular thing you're working on, I may be missing something about what you're doing...
As others have commented, React will re-render your component if new props are provided, regardless of whether or not you implement componentWillReceiveProps -- the only reason to implement it is to do some kind of specific comparison or set a state based on new prop values.
From the React docs (emphasis mine):
componentWillReceiveProps() is invoked before a mounted component receives new props. If you need to update the state in response to prop changes (for example, to reset it), you may compare this.props and nextProps and perform state transitions using this.setState() in this method.
Note that React may call this method even if the props have not changed, so make sure to compare the current and next values if you only want to handle changes. This may occur when the parent component causes your component to re-render.
In other words, if you have a component like:
<TextBox title={"Foo"} content={"Bar"} />
That internally passes prop changes on to a couple of child components like:
class TextBox extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<div className={'text-box'}>
<Title text={this.props.title} />
<Body text={this.props.content} />
</div>
);
}
}
Then each time new props are passed to <TextBox>, <Title> and <Body> will also get re-rendered with their new text props, and there's no reason to use componentWillReceiveProps if you're just looking to update with prop changes. React will automatically see the changes and re-render. And React handles diffing and should fairly efficiently re-render only things that have changed.
However, if you have a separate state value that needs to be set in response to props, for example, if you wanted to show a "changed" state (or whatever) on the component if the new props are different, then you could implement componentWillReceiveProps, like:
class TextBox extends React.Component {
componentWillReceiveProps(nextProps) {
if (this.props.content !== nextProps.content) {
this.setState({changed: true});
}
}
render() {
const changed = this.state.changed ? 'changed' : 'unchanged';
return (
<div className={`text-box ${changed}`}>
<Title text={this.props.title} />
<Body text={this.props.content} />
</div>
);
}
}
If you're trying to prevent re-render in cases where it's unnecessary for performance, do as Andrey suggests and use shouldComponentUpdate: https://facebook.github.io/react/docs/react-component.html#shouldcomponentupdate
TLDR; unless you're setting component state from props, there's likely no need to run new props through componentWillReceiveProps
UPDATE Feb 2018: in a future release, React will be deprecating componentWillReceiveProps in favor of the new getDerivedStateFromProps, more info here: https://medium.com/#baphemot/whats-new-in-react-16-3-d2c9b7b6193b
There are few suggestions:
Don't copy props into state in componentWillReceiveProps - just render directly from this.props
If your component need performance tweak (and only if there is problem with performance):
start from using shouldComponentUpdate in generic form like advised here https://facebook.github.io/react/docs/shallow-compare.html
If generic approach doesn't work for you - write custom code
The general approach, how to develop text-box-like components is to keep it stateless.Component renders props directly, and notifies parent component about changes, it don't cares about managing value.
Hope this will help
Please consider pureComponent which by defualt implements the shouldComponentUpdate inside which shallow equals is used for comparison between previous and next
try following codes:
class MyComponent extends PureComponent {...}

react, redux - Modifying parent components with redux

Okay so I had a problem when programming in react, and I've found that it's a common one. If I have multiple nested components, in my case I have:
<AppView>
<Navigation/> // this is a navbar
<ViewHandler currentTab={props.currentTab}/>
<Footer/>
</AppView>
And then in <ViewHandler/> I have other dumb presentational components, which also have nested components as well. If I have a button in a deeply nested component within <ViewHandler>, and I want to respond to onClick from that button by changing something many parent components above the component that I am in, how would I do so? In my case I would be reacting to the button being clicked in that deeply nested component, and then I want to change the selected tab on <Navigation>. I don't want to pass a bunch of callback functions down as properties, because that feels very scotch-tape-ish.
I learned redux because I read that it solved this problem. But for me it hasn't. I am giving <AppView> access to my redux store using react-redux's <Provider>, and I can access the store through props (props.currentTab). But for all the components nested within <AppView>, they don't have access to the store or any of my action creators. How can modify my store from within a deeply nested component so that I may change a parent component without passing a ton of callback functions down? Or is this just incorrect architecture? I thought redux would solve this problem but it hasn't.
Yes I have connected my component. I just don't like the idea of passing down store.state information as props because it gets very redundant with many nested components.
I don't know why you think you have to send props all the way down your component tree. That's what connect and mapStateToProps help you avoid: they let you turn bits of app state into props only for the components which need it.
in your button's onClick handler, create and dispatch a Redux action:
// button.js
onClick={() => {
dispatch({
payload: 1 // or whatever value
type: 'SET_SELECTED_TAB'
});
}}
next, have your reducer function watch for this action and modify a bit of Redux app state:
// reducer.js
if (action.type === 'SET_SELECTED_TAB') {
return {
...currentAppState,
selectedTab: action.payload
};
}
finally, in the render function of your <Navigation> component, you decide which tab to show based on the current values in that bit of app state:
// Navigation.js
render() {
return (
<div>
current tab: {this.props.selectedTab}
</div>
);
}
access to that state is via connect and mapStateToProps:
// Navigation.js still
const mapStateToProps = (appState) => {
return {
selectedTab: appState.selectedTab
};
};
export default connect(mapStateToProps)(Navigation);
Hoc (higher order components) is a wrapper that is serving methods and data to the children components, usually it's a good idea to use it , but it enforces some 'discipline'.
Example: if your HOC is at level 0 and you have a deeply nested button component at level 4 that calls a method in this same HOC , What should you do ? pass it down the to all 4 levels? the answer is NO WAY !
Because doing so will bring the spaghetti to it , Everytime you click this button , and assuming the method binded to it will mess with the state (internal or the store itself) it will rerender all the 4 levels , and you could avoid that by using the shouldComponentUpdate() but this is way too much work for nothing useful.
So the solution would be to connect every component with mapStateToProps and mapDispatchToProps , right ?
well kind of , in fact after using extensively react and redux , you will notice that for every component , there is a sweet spot in terms of size , childrens , and what you should put in it and what you should not.
Example: you have a button inside a form that controls the send mechanism , there's no need to make a component for the button , it will add up complexity without any benefit. just put it on the form component and you will have both ready to use.
If you really need to call actions or to pass props between a deeply nested component and an HOC then use the connect module at the component level (for your case the button) , but not much because it will make your components heavier (to load and to display).Here are some tips to help :
you need to be as specfic as possible when you use mapStateToProps , don't return the whole store , just the piece of data needed , same for mapDispatchToprops , just bind the method that you will be using nothing else.
in your case the button doesn't have to know which tab is selected , so a mapDispatchToProps is enough.
avoid deep nesting components that handles some kind of logic ,refactor your structure or create A HOC for that component , logic less components in contrary can be nested deeply
If you are writing a huge app with a lot of reducers and states , consider using selectors , and some libraries like reselect.
I know that this is not the answer you were expecting but following this guideline will saves you countless hours of refactoring.
Hope it helps

What is the difference between state and props in React?

I was watching a Pluralsight course on React and the instructor stated that props should not be changed. I'm now reading an article (uberVU/react-guide) on props vs. state and it says
Both props and state changes trigger a render update.
Later in the article it says:
Props (short for properties) are a Component's configuration, its options if you may. They are received from above and immutable.
So props can change but they should be immutable?
When should you use props and when should you use state?
If you have data that a React component needs, should it be passed through props or setup in the React component via getInitialState?
Props and state are related. The state of one component will often become the props of a child component. Props are passed to the child within the render method of the parent as the second argument to React.createElement() or, if you're using JSX, the more familiar tag attributes.
<MyChild name={this.state.childsName} />
The parent's state value of childsName becomes the child's this.props.name. From the child's perspective, the name prop is immutable. If it needs to be changed, the parent should just change its internal state:
this.setState({ childsName: 'New name' });
and React will propagate it to the child for you. A natural follow-on question is: what if the child needs to change its name prop? This is usually done through child events and parent callbacks. The child might expose an event called, for example, onNameChanged. The parent would then subscribe to the event by passing a callback handler.
<MyChild name={this.state.childsName} onNameChanged={this.handleName} />
The child would pass its requested new name as an argument to the event callback by calling, e.g., this.props.onNameChanged('New name'), and the parent would use the name in the event handler to update its state.
handleName: function(newName) {
this.setState({ childsName: newName });
}
For parent-child communication, simply pass props.
Use state to store the data your current page needs in your controller-view.
Use props to pass data & event handlers down to your child components.
These lists should help guide you when working with data in your components.
Props
are immutable
which lets React do fast reference checks
are used to pass data down from your view-controller
your top level component
have better performance
use this to pass data to child components
State
should be managed in your view-controller
your top level component
is mutable
has worse performance
should not be accessed from child components
pass it down with props instead
For communication between two components that don't have a
parent-child relationship, you can set up your own global event
system. Subscribe to events in componentDidMount(), unsubscribe in
componentWillUnmount(), and call setState() when you receive an event.
Flux pattern is one of the possible ways to arrange this.
- https://facebook.github.io/react/tips/communicate-between-components.html
What Components Should Have State?
Most of your components should simply take some data from props and
render it. However, sometimes you need to respond to user input, a
server request or the passage of time. For this you use state.
Try to keep as many of your components as possible stateless. By doing
this you'll isolate the state to its most logical place and minimize
redundancy, making it easier to reason about your application.
A common pattern is to create several stateless components that just
render data, and have a stateful component above them in the hierarchy
that passes its state to its children via props. The stateful
component encapsulates all of the interaction logic, while the
stateless components take care of rendering data in a declarative way.
- https://facebook.github.io/react/docs/interactivity-and-dynamic-uis.html#what-components-should-have-state
What Should Go in State?
State should contain data that a component's event handlers may change
to trigger a UI update. In real apps this data tends to be very small
and JSON-serializable. When building a stateful component, think about
the minimal possible representation of its state, and only store those
properties in this.state. Inside of render() simply compute any other
information you need based on this state. You'll find that thinking
about and writing applications in this way tends to lead to the most
correct application, since adding redundant or computed values to
state means that you need to explicitly keep them in sync rather than
rely on React computing them for you.
- https://facebook.github.io/react/docs/interactivity-and-dynamic-uis.html#what-should-go-in-state
You can understand it best by relating it to Plain
JS functions.
Simply put,
State is the local state of the component which cannot be accessed and modified outside of the component. It's equivalent to local variables in a function.
Plain JS Function
const DummyFunction = () => {
let name = 'Manoj';
console.log(`Hey ${name}`)
}
React Component
class DummyComponent extends React.Component {
state = {
name: 'Manoj'
}
render() {
return <div>Hello {this.state.name}</div>;
}
Props, on the other hand, make components reusable by giving components the ability to receive data from their parent component in the form of props. They are equivalent to function parameters.
Plain JS Function
const DummyFunction = (name) => {
console.log(`Hey ${name}`)
}
// when using the function
DummyFunction('Manoj');
DummyFunction('Ajay');
React Component
class DummyComponent extends React.Component {
render() {
return <div>Hello {this.props.name}</div>;
}
}
// when using the component
<DummyComponent name="Manoj" />
<DummyComponent name="Ajay" />
Credits: Manoj Singh Negi
Article Link: React State vs Props explained
The props vs state summary I like best is here: react-guide Big hat tip to those guys. Below is an edited version of that page:
props vs state
tl;dr If a Component needs to alter one of its attributes at some point in time, that attribute should be part of its state, otherwise it should just be a prop for that Component.
props
Props (short for properties) are a Component's configuration. They are received from above and immutable as far as the Component receiving them is concerned. A Component cannot change its props, but it is responsible for putting together the props of its child Components. Props do not have to just be data -- callback functions may be passed in as props.
state
The state is a data structure that starts with a default value when a Component mounts. It may be mutated across time, mostly as a result of user events.
A Component manages its own state internally. Besides setting an initial state, it has no business fiddling with the state of its children. You might conceptualize state as private to that component.
Changing props and state
props state
Can get initial value from parent Component? Yes Yes
Can be changed by parent Component? Yes No
Can set default values inside Component?* Yes Yes
Can change inside Component? No Yes
Can set initial value for child Components? Yes Yes
Can change in child Components? Yes No
Note that both props and state initial values received from parents override default values defined inside a Component.
Should this Component have state?
State is optional. Since state increases complexity and reduces predictability, a Component without state is preferable. Even though you clearly can't do without state in an interactive app, you should avoid having too many Stateful Components.
Component types
Stateless Component Only props, no state. There's not much going on besides the render() function. Their logic revolves around the props they receive. This makes them very easy to follow, and to test.
Stateful Component Both props and state. These are used when your component must retain some state. This is a good place for client-server communication (XHR, web sockets, etc.), processing data and responding to user events. These sort of logistics should be encapsulated in a moderate number of Stateful Components, while all visualization and formatting logic should move downstream into many Stateless Components.
sources
Question about 'props' and 'state' - Google Groups
Thinking in React: Identify where your state should live
The key difference between props and state is that state is internal and controlled by the component itself while props are external and controlled by whatever renders the component.
function A(props) {
return <h1>{props.message}</h1>
}
render(<A message=”hello” />,document.getElementById(“root”));
class A extends React.Component{
constructor(props) {
super(props)
this.state={data:"Sample Data"}
}
render() {
return(<h2>Class State data: {this.state.data}</h2>)
}
}
render(<A />, document.getElementById("root"));
State can be changed (Mutable)
Whereas Props can't (Immutable)
props (short for “properties”) and state are both plain JavaScript
objects. While both hold information that influences the output of
render, they are different in one important way: props get passed to
the component (similar to function parameters) whereas state is
managed within the component (similar to variables declared within a
function).
So simply state is limited to your current component but props can be pass to any component you wish... You can pass the state of the current component as prop to other components...
Also in React, we have stateless components which only have props and not internal state...
The example below showing how they work in your app:
Parent (state-full component):
class SuperClock extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {name: "Alireza", date: new Date().toLocaleTimeString()};
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<Clock name={this.state.name} date={this.state.date} />
</div>
);
}
}
Child (state-less component):
const Clock = ({name}, {date}) => (
<div>
<h1>{`Hi ${name}`}.</h1>
<h2>{`It is ${date}`}.</h2>
</div>
);
Basically, the difference is that state is something like attributes in OOP : it's something local to a class (component), used to better describe it. Props are like parameters - they are passed to a component from the caller of a component (the parent) : as if you called a function with certain parameters.
Both state and props in react are used to control data into a component, generally props are set by parent and passed to child components and they are fixed throughout the component. For data that is going to change, we have to use state. And props are immutable while states are mutable, if you want to change props you can do from parent component and then pass it to child components.
as I learned while working with react.
props are used by a component to get data from external environment i.e another component ( pure, functional or class) or a general class or javascript/typescript code
states are used to manage the internal environment of a component means the data changes inside the component
Props : Props is nothing but property of component and react component is nothing but a javascript function.
class Welcome extends React.Component {
render() {
return <h1>Hello {this.props.name}</h1>;
}
}
const element = ;
here <Welcome name="Sara" /> passing a object {name : 'Sara'} as props of Welcome component. To pass data from one parent component to child component we use props.
Props is immutable. During a component’s life cycle props should not change (consider them immutable).
State: state is accessible only within Component. To keep track of data within component we use state. we can change state by setState. If we need to pass state to child we have to pass it as props.
class Button extends React.Component {
constructor() {
super();
this.state = {
count: 0,
};
}
updateCount() {
this.setState((prevState, props) => {
return { count: prevState.count + 1 }
});
}
render() {
return (<button
onClick={() => this.updateCount()}
>
Clicked {this.state.count} times
</button>);
}
}
State:
states are mutable.
states are associated with the individual components can't be used by other components.
states are initialize on component mount.
states are used for rendering dynamic changes within component.
props:
props are immutable.
you can pass props between components.
props are mostly used to communicate between components.You can pass from parent to child directly. For passing from child to parent
you need use concept of lifting up states.
class Parent extends React.Component{
render()
{
return(
<div>
<Child name = {"ron"}/>
</div>
);
}
}
class Child extends React.Component{
{
render(){
return(
<div>
{this.props.name}
</div>
);
}
}
state - It is a special mutable property that hold a Component data. it has default value when Componet mounts.
props - It is a special property which is immutable by nature and used in case of pass by value from parent to child. props are just a communation channel between Components, always moving from top (parent) to buttom(child).
below are complete example of combinding the state & props :-
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8" />
<title>state&props example</title>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react#0.14.8/dist/react.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom#0.14.8/dist/react-dom.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/babel-standalone#6.15.0/babel.min.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
<div id="root"></div>
<script type="text/babel">
var TodoList = React.createClass({
render(){
return <div className='tacos-list'>
{
this.props.list.map( ( todo, index ) => {
return <p key={ `taco-${ index }` }>{ todo }</p>;
})}
</div>;
}
});
var Todo = React.createClass({
getInitialState(){
return {
list : [ 'Banana', 'Apple', 'Beans' ]
}
},
handleReverse(){
this.setState({list : this.state.list.reverse()});
},
render(){
return <div className='parent-component'>
<h3 onClick={this.handleReverse}>List of todo:</h3>
<TodoList list={ this.state.list } />
</div>;
}
});
ReactDOM.render(
<Todo/>,
document.getElementById('root')
);
</script>
</body>
</html>
Props: represents "read-only" data, that are immutable and refer to attributes from parents component.
State: represents mutable data, that ultimately affects what is rendered on the page and managed by internally by the component itself and change overtime commonly due to User input.
Props
props use to pass data in the child component
props change a value outside a component(child component)
State
state use inside a class component
state change a value inside a component
If you render the page, you call setState to update DOM(update page
value)
State has an important role in react
Basically, props and state are two ways the component can know what and how to render. Which part of the application state belongs to state and which to some top-level store, is more related to your app design, than to how React works. The simplest way to decide, IMO, is to think, whether this particular piece of data is useful for application as a whole, or it's some local information. Also, it's important to not duplicate state, so if some piece of data can be calculated from props - it should calculated from props.
For example, let's say you have some dropdown control (which wraps standart HTML select for custom styling), which can a) select some value from list, and b) be opened or closed (i.e., the options list displayed or hidden).
Now, let's say your app displays a list of items of some sort and your dropdown controls filter for list entries. Then, it would be best to pass active filter value as a prop, and keep opened/closed state local. Also, to make it functional, you would pass an onChange handler from parent component, which would be called inside dropdown element and send updated information (new selected filter) to the store immediately. On the other hand, opened/closed state can be kept inside dropdown component, because the rest of the application doesn't really care if the control is opened, until user actually changes it value.
The following code is not completely working, it needs css and handling dropdown click/blur/change events, but I wanted to keep example minimal. Hope it helps to understand the difference.
const _store = {
items: [
{ id: 1, label: 'One' },
{ id: 2, label: 'Two' },
{ id: 3, label: 'Three', new: true },
{ id: 4, label: 'Four', new: true },
{ id: 5, label: 'Five', important: true },
{ id: 6, label: 'Six' },
{ id: 7, label: 'Seven', important: true },
],
activeFilter: 'important',
possibleFilters: [
{ key: 'all', label: 'All' },
{ key: 'new', label: 'New' },
{ key: 'important', label: 'Important' }
]
}
function getFilteredItems(items, filter) {
switch (filter) {
case 'all':
return items;
case 'new':
return items.filter(function(item) { return Boolean(item.new); });
case 'important':
return items.filter(function(item) { return Boolean(item.important); });
default:
return items;
}
}
const App = React.createClass({
render: function() {
return (
<div>
My list:
<ItemList items={this.props.listItems} />
<div>
<Dropdown
onFilterChange={function(e) {
_store.activeFilter = e.currentTarget.value;
console.log(_store); // in real life, some action would be dispatched here
}}
filterOptions={this.props.filterOptions}
value={this.props.activeFilter}
/>
</div>
</div>
);
}
});
const ItemList = React.createClass({
render: function() {
return (
<div>
{this.props.items.map(function(item) {
return <div key={item.id}>{item.id}: {item.label}</div>;
})}
</div>
);
}
});
const Dropdown = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function() {
return {
isOpen: false
};
},
render: function() {
return (
<div>
<select
className="hidden-select"
onChange={this.props.onFilterChange}
value={this.props.value}>
{this.props.filterOptions.map(function(option) {
return <option value={option.key} key={option.key}>{option.label}</option>
})}
</select>
<div className={'custom-select' + (this.state.isOpen ? ' open' : '')} onClick={this.onClick}>
<div className="selected-value">{this.props.activeFilter}</div>
{this.props.filterOptions.map(function(option) {
return <div data-value={option.key} key={option.key}>{option.label}</div>
})}
</div>
</div>
);
},
onClick: function(e) {
this.setState({
isOpen: !this.state.isOpen
});
}
});
ReactDOM.render(
<App
listItems={getFilteredItems(_store.items, _store.activeFilter)}
filterOptions={_store.possibleFilters}
activeFilter={_store.activeFilter}
/>,
document.getElementById('root')
);
State is the way react deals with the information held by your component.
Let's suppose you have a component which need to fetch some data from the server. You usually would want to inform the user if the request is processing, if it has failed, etc. This is a piece of information which is just relevant for that specific component. This is where state enters the game.
Usually the best way to define state is as follows:
class MyComponent extends React.Component {
constructor() {
super();
this.state = { key1: value1, key2: value2 }
}
}
but in the latests implementations of react native you can just do:
class MyComponent extends React.Component {
state = { key1: value1, key2: value2 }
}
These two examples execute in the exact same way, it's just a syntax improvement.
So, what is different from just using object attributes as we always have in OO programming? Usually, the information held in your state is not meant to be static, it will change over time and your View will need to update in order to reflect this changes. State offers this functionality in a simple way.
State IS MEANT TO BE INMUTABLE! and I cannot make enough stress on this. What does this means? It means that you should NEVER do something like this.
state.key2 = newValue;
The proper way of doing it is:
this.setState({ key2: newValue });
Using this.setState your component runs through the update cycle and if any part of the state changes, your Component render method will be called again to reflect this changes.
Check the react docs for an even more expanded explanation:
https://facebook.github.io/react/docs/state-and-lifecycle.html
Props simply are shorthand for properties. Props are how components talk to each other. If you’re at all familiar with React then you should know that props flow downwards from the parent component.
There is also the case that you can have default props so that props are set even if a parent component doesn’t pass props down.
This is why people refer to React as having uni-directional data flow. This takes a bit of getting your head around and I’ll probably blog on this later, but for now just remember: data flows from parent to child. Props are immutable (fancy word for it not changing)
So we’re happy. Components receive data from the parent. All sorted, right?
Well, not quite. What happens when a component receives data from someone other than the parent? What if the user inputs data directly to the component?
Well, this is why we have state.
STATE
Props shouldn’t change, so state steps up. Normally components don’t have state and so are referred to as stateless. A component using state is known as stateful. Feel free to drop that little tidbit at parties and watch people edge away from you.
So state is used so that a component can keep track of information in between any renders that it does. When you setState it updates the state object and then re-renders the component. This is super cool because that means React takes care of the hard work and is blazingly fast.
As a little example of state, here is a snippet from a search bar (worth checking out this course if you want to learn more about React)
Class SearchBar extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = { term: '' };
}
render() {
return (
<div className="search-bar">
<input
value={this.state.term}
onChange={event => this.onInputChange(event.target.value)} />
</div>
);
}
onInputChange(term) {
this.setState({term});
this.props.onSearchTermChange(term);
}
}
SUMMARY
Props and State do similar things but are used in different ways. The majority of your components will probably be stateless.
Props are used to pass data from parent to child or by the component itself. They are immutable and thus will not be changed.
State is used for mutable data, or data that will change. This is particularly useful for user input. Think search bars for example. The user will type in data and this will update what they see.
In short.
props values can't be changed [immutable]
state values can be changed, using setState method [mutable]
In general, state of one component(parent) is prop for the child component.
State resides within a component where as props are passed from parent to
child.
Props are generally immutable.
class Parent extends React.Component {
constructor() {
super();
this.state = {
name : "John",
}
}
render() {
return (
<Child name={this.state.name}>
)
}
}
class Child extends React.Component {
constructor() {
super();
}
render() {
return(
{this.props.name}
)
}
}
In the above code, we have a parent class(Parent) which has name as its state which is passed to the child component(Child class) as a prop and the child component renders it using {this.props.name}
In React the states store the data as well as the props. Its difference with the latter is that the stored data can be modified by different changes. These are nothing more than objects written in flat JavaScript, so they can contain data or codes, represent the information you want to model. If you need more details it is recommended that you see these publications
Use of the State in React and
Use of Props in React
The key difference between props and state is that state is internal and controlled by the component itself while props are external and controlled by whatever renders the component.
In answer to the initial question about props being immutable, they are said to be immutable as far as the child component is concerned but are of course changeable in the parent that is passing these props down.
A change in these in the parent will trigger a re-render of the child component with the updated props.
This is my current point of view regarding the explanation between state and props
State is like your local variable inside your component. You can manipulate
the value of state by using set state. You can then pass the value of state
to your child component for example.
Props is the value that exactly located inside your redux store, this actually
comes from state that's originated from reducer. Your component
should be connected to redux to get the value from props. You can also pass
your props value to your child component
You have some data that is being entered by users somewhere in the application.
the component in which the data is being entered should have this data in its state because it needs to manipulate and change it during data entry
anywhere else in the application the data should be passed down as props to all the other components
So yes the props are changing but they are changed at the 'source' and will then simply flow down from there. So props are immutable in the context of the component receiving them.
E.g. a reference data screen where users edit a list of suppliers would manage this in state, which would then have an action cause the updated data to be saved in ReferenceDataState which could be one level below AppState and then this supplier list would be passed as props to all the components that needed to use it.
Some differences between “state” and “props” in react.
React controls and renders DOM based on state. There are two types of component states: props is the state that transfers between components, and state is internal state of components. Props is used for data transfer from the parent component to the child component. The components also have their own state inside: state which can only be modified inside the component.
Generally the state of certain component could be the props of the child component ,props will be passed to children which is stated inside the rendering method of the parent component
From: Andrea Chiarelli book “Beginning React: Simplify your frontend development workflow and enhance the user experience of your applications with React” :
Every React component has a props property. The purpose of this property is to collect data input passed to the component itself. JSX attribute is attached to a React element, a property with the same name is attached to the props object. So, we can access the passed data by using the attached property. In addition, the immutability of props allows us to think of components as pure functions, which are functions that have no side effects (since they don't change their input data). We can think of data passing from one component to another as a unidirectional data flow, from the parent component toward the child components. This gives us a more controllable system.
React provides a mechanism to support the automatic rendering of a component when data changes. Such a mechanism is based on the concept of state. React state is a property that represents data that changes over time. Every component supports the state property, but it should be used carefully. Components that store data that can change over time are said to be stateful components. A stateful component stores the state in the this.state property. To inform a component that the state has changed, you must use the setState() method. State initialization is the only case where you can assign a value to the this.state property without using setState().
setState() merges new data with old data already contained in the state, and overwrites the previous state
setState() triggers the execution of the render() method, so you should never call render() explicitly
State is a special variable in react and is used to re-render component whenever it updates
State is private to the component itself. I.e, it cannot be accessed or modified outside of component. setState/hook used to update state. Whenever state update, component re renders
State is mutable
Props are inputs to component and render content using props data
Props are immutable(Object.Frozen= true)
we can change states value but we can not change props value , or we can say props is immutable and states is mutable
I want to explain state and props in a simple way to you:
state
we use states to store some data. it's also like a variable that when you change it, your component will render again.
to use states you need to import useState hook:
import { useState } from 'react';
const [state_name,function_name] = useState(initial_value);
you can access your state by state_name and you can change it and set a new value to it by function_name.
more info: https://reactjs.org/docs/state-and-lifecycle.html
props
It is a mechanism to send data from one component to other. it also looks like properties in CSS. for example:
<Component props_value={custom_function} />
you can send a custom function to Component and receive it to be manipulate.
more info: https://reactjs.org/docs/components-and-props.html
React Components use state to READ/WRITE the internal variables that can be changed/mutated by for example:
this.setState({name: 'Lila'})
React props is special object that allow programmer to get variables and methods from Parent Component into Child Component.
It's something like a Windows and doors of the house. Props are also immutable Child Component can not change/update them.
There are couple of the methods that help to listen when props are changed by Parent Component.

Categories

Resources