I have a folder /resources/js/stubs. In that folder sits a few files, lets say User.stub, Controller.stub and Migration.stub. I would like to use the content of these files in my javascript by doing something like this
import Templates from './Templates.js'
console.log(Templates.User)
// The content of User.stub is printed
I don't want to use this approach
module.exports = name => `
...
`
I could also use the backend to load the files into the view but I would prefer not to.
So then that requires preprocessing. Can I do it with Laravel mix somehow? If not what are my options, what do I need to add to my Laravel app?
partial solution
Thanks to Diogo Sgrillo for pointing out this solution in the comment.
Install raw-loader
yarn add raw-loader --dev
webpack.mix.js
Add this configuration (In my case all the files will be named with a .stub extension.):
mix.webpackConfig({
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.stub$/i,
use: 'raw-loader',
},
],
},
});
Also add a separate pipe in webpack.mix.js like this:
mix.js('src/templates/index.js', 'src/templates.js')
It will compile a list of templates in index.js file and put them in templates.js.
src/templates/index.js
// Dynamically load all stubs using raw-loader (see webpack.mix.js)
let stubs = require.context('./', true, /\.stub$/i);
// Create a object with the filename as key and content as value
exports.stubs = stubs.keys().reduce((result, key) => {
return {
[key.replace(/\.\//,'').replace(/\.stub$/,'')] : stubs(key).default,
...result
}
}, {});
export default { /* dont remove this export default or it will break !?? */}
Later it can be used like this:
let templates = require('./templates.js')
console.log(templates['User.php'])
Please comment or add another answer on how to do this more smooth. What is the difference between exports/export? I cant use import with this method, only require and it breaks if I try to export default (or remove export default.
Related
I'm building a blog using Vue, where I'd like my posts to be written as markdown files.
Currently I have the following structure
src/
posts/
blogpost1.md
blogpost2.md
view/
myComponent.vue
I want myComponent.vue to dynamically load a markdown post based on the route params.
For instance if we visited .../blog/blogpost2, then we would dynamically load in blogpost2.md
My current implementation is as follows:
<template>
<div
v-html="md"
></div>
</template>
<script>
import marked from "marked";
export default {
data () {
return {
md: undefined,
};
},
created () {
const importRoute = `posts/blog/${this.$route.params.postName}.md`;
const md = require(importRoute);
this.md = marked(md);
},
};
</script>
To load the markdown file I'm using markdown-loader in webpack.
I'm also using copy-webpack-plugin to try to copy my entire /posts dir into my build folder.
configureWebpack: {
module: {
rules: [{
test: /\.md$/,
use: [
{ loader: "html-loader", options: {} },
{ loader: "markdown-loader", options: {} },
],
},
],
},
plugins: [
new CopyPlugin({
patterns: [
{ from: "src/posts", to: "posts" },
],
}),
],
},
When I run npm run serve however, I receive
[Vue warn]: Error in created hook: "Error: Cannot find module './posts/blogpost2.md'"
And when I look at the pages in my browser I don't see the posts directory (see image below)
However, when running npm run build:staging I do see the posts directory in /dist
Why am I unable to import import blogpost2.mddynamically?
My attempt at using a dynamic import that changes based on the route will not work because webpack is unable to properly bundle the imported files. This is because webpack needs to know what it will be importing in order to bundle them correctly.
Instead we can use a different approach of copying our markdown directory as it is into /dist and sending a request to fetch each markdown file.
We end up with this in our webpack config (or in my case vue.config.js):
const CopyPlugin = require("copy-webpack-plugin");
configureWebpack: {
plugins: [
new CopyPlugin({
patterns: [
{ from: "src/posts", to: "posts" },
],
}),
],
},
Note that we don't need the webpack loaders shown in my initial question because webpack itself isn't handling the loading of these files.
This ensures that posts/ gets copied as it is when we build this project.
Then in our component we can dynamically retrieve Markdown files like so:
<template>
<div
v-html="md"
></div>
</template>
<script>
import marked from "marked";
export default {
data () {
return {
md: undefined,
};
},
async created () {
const res = await fetch(`http://localhost:8081/posts/${this.$route.params.postName}.md`);
const md = await res.text();
this.md = marked(md);
},
};
</script>
// I once need to do a similar thing and faced similar challenges but it was built with Create React App, so please take my answer with a pinch of salt.
Try placing your import path inside require(…) (or import(…), if you ever use it) instead of declaring a variable then passing it in. I remember WebPack has trouble finding files when the paths are not static strings (hard-coded in this way). Whatever dynamic path it may be, your path needs to start with a static string, but you can concatenate dynamic values behind it.
Also, notice the ./ I added to the front of the path. Ignore it if you're using absolute imports, otherwise, this might also be a reason why the code failed?
created () {
// Instead of:
// const importRoute = `posts/blog/${this.$route.params.postName}.md`;
// const md = require(importRoute);
// Try:
const md = require(
`./posts/blog/${this.$route.params.postName}.md`
);
this.md = marked(md);
},
Extra: As much as I know, that the created hook in Vue is supposed only be synchronous, but after stumbling upon this answer I decided to include this snippet too. This one uses dynamic import. If all else fails perhaps you can give this a try?
async created () {
const { default: url } = await import(
`posts/blog/${this.$route.params.postName}.md`
);
const res = await fetch(url);
const md = res.text();
this.md = marked(md);
},
I'm trying to build a modular application in Vue via the vue-cli-service. The main app and the modules are separated projects living in different folders, the structure is something like this:
-- app/package.json
/src/**
-- module1/package.json
/src**
-- module2/package.json
/src**
The idea is to have the Vue app completely agnostic about the application modules that can be there at runtime, the modules themself are compiled with vue-cli-service build --target lib in a local moduleX/dist folder, pointed with the package.json "main" and "files" nodes.
My first idea (now just for development speed purposes) was to add the modules as local NPM packages to the app, building them with a watcher and serving the app with a watcher itself, so that any change to the depending modules would (I think) be distributed automatically to the main app.
So the package.json of the app contains dependencies like:
...
"module1": "file:../module1",
"module2": "file:../module2",
...
This dependencies are mean to be removed at any time, or in general be composed as we need, the app sould just be recompiled and everything should work.
I'm trying to understand now how to dynamically load and activate the modules in the application, as I cannot use the dynamic import like this:
import(/* webpackMode: "eager" */ `module1`).then(src => {
src.default.boot();
resolve();
});
Because basically I don't know the 'module1', 'module2', etc...
In an OOP world I would just use dependency injection retrieving classes implementing a specific interface, but in JS/TS I'm not sure it is viable.
There's a way to accomplish this?
Juggling with package.json doesn't sound like a good idea to me - doesn't scale. What I would do:
Keep all available "modules" in package.json
Create separate js file (or own prop inside package.json) with all available configurations (for different clients for example)
module.exports = {
'default': ['module1', 'module2', 'module3'],
'clientA': ['module1', 'module2', 'module4'],
'clientB': ['module2', 'module3', 'module4']
}
tap into VueCLI build process - best example I found is here and create js file which will run before each build (or "serve") and using simple template (for example lodash) generate new js file which will boot configured modules based on the value of some ENV variable. See following (pseudo)code (remember this runs inside node during build):
const fs = require('fs')
const _ = require('lodash')
const modulesConfig = require(`your module config js`)
const configurationName = process.env.MY_APP_CONFIGURATION ?? 'default'
const modules = modulesConfig[configurationName]
const template = fs.loadFileSync('name of template file')
const templateCompiled = _.template(template)
const generatedJS = templateCompiled({ `modules`: modules })
fs.writeFileSync('bootModules.js', generatedJS)
Write your template for bootModules.js. Simplest would be:
<% _.forEach(modules , function(module) { %>import '<%= module %>' as <%= module %><% }); %>;
import bootModules.js into your app
Use MY_APP_CONFIGURATION ENV variable to switch desired module configuration - works not just during development but you can also setup different CI processes targeting same repo with just different MY_APP_CONFIGURATION values
This way you have all configurations at one place, you don't need to change package.json before every build, you have simple mechanism to switch between different module configurations and every build (bundle) contains only the modules needed....
In an OOP world I would just use dependency injection retrieving classes implementing a specific interface, but in JS/TS I'm not sure it is viable.
Why not?
More than this, with JS/TS you are not restricted to use classes implementing a specific interface: you just need to define the interface (i.e. the module.exports) of your modules and respecting it in the libraries entries (vue build lib).
EDIT: reading comments probably I understood the request.
Each module should respect following interface (in the file which is the entry of the vue library)
export function isMyAppModule() {
return true;
}
export function myAppInit() {
return { /* what you need to export */ };
}
Than in your app:
require("./package.json").dependencies.forEach(name => {
const module = require(name);
if(! module.isMyAppModule || module.isMyAppModule() !== true) return;
const { /* the refs you need */ } = module.myAppInit();
// use your refs as you need
});
I am developing React Native application that includes different configurations for different possible clients, in a file such as src/config/config.js. These configurations are quite complex. The file is structured based on the client name as key, and the values as the object entries, e.g.:
export default {
fooClient: {
apiUrl: "https://foo.example.com/",
barClient: {
apiUrl: "https://bar.example.com/"
}
}
Of course, there are many other option keys.
When building the app, I know for which client I want to do this, by specifying an Android build variant, e.g.:
ENVFILE=.env npx react-native run-android --variant fooDebug --appIdSuffix foo
For security reasons, I don't want keys of other clients to be included in the config file though. What are my options to remove all other client configs from this file before I build the app and ship it to a client?
I thought about the following: I modify the packager so that it strips out the keys that do not correspond to the current build variant.
I now have a transformer plugin for Metro that does the following:
const upstreamTransformer = require('metro-react-native-babel-transformer');
module.exports.transform = function(src, filename, options) {
if (typeof src === 'object') {
// handle RN >= 0.46
({ src, filename, options } = src);
}
if (filename.endsWith('config.js')) {
console.log('Transforming ' + filename);
let srcStripped = src.replace(';', '').replace('export default ', '');
let configObj = JSON.parse(srcStripped);
// TODO: get the build variant and strip all keys that we do not need from configObj
return upstreamTransformer.transform({
src: 'export default ' + JSON.stringify(configObj) + ';',
filename: filename,
options
});
} else {
return upstreamTransformer.transform({ src, filename, options });
}
};
But how do I know which build variant is being used?
If this seems like an XY problem, I am happy to explore alternatives to building the configuration dynamically. I cannot, however, use environment variables, since the configuration will be too complex for it to be just a list of .env keys.
You shouldn't use Metro transform this way. It's not clean and it may lead to missing configuration and/or damaged syntax sooner or later.
What I have done and suggest you, is to create 3 different configuration files under src/config/; one file for fooClient.js, one file for barClient.js and one last file with common configuration client.js. All files will export default configuration objects, but inside each fooClient and barClient, you'll use deepmerge module to merge client.js config:
client.js:
export default {
commonSettingA: "...",
commonSettings: {
...
}
...
}
fooClient.js:
import merge from 'deepmerge';
import config from './config';
export default merge.all([
config,
{
apiUrl: "https://foo.example.com/",
}
]);
barClient.js:
import merge from 'deepmerge';
import config from './config';
export default merge.all([
config,
{
apiUrl: "https://bar.example.com/",
}
]);
Then you can use an environment variable to pass the needed configuration and create a propriate metro resolve; #react-native-community/cli does not pass command line arguments to metro config script. You can use process.argv to parse it by yourself, but it's not worth it.
Here is how you can create a resolve inside metro.config.js using environment variable:
const path = require("path");
module.exports = {
projectRoot: path.resolve(__dirname),
resolver: {
sourceExts: ['js', 'jsx', 'ts', 'tsx'],
extraNodeModules: {
// Local aliases
"#config": path.resolve(__dirname, "src/config", `${process.env.METRO_VARIANT}Client.js`)
}
}
};
Using this resolve, you'll have to import the configuration like this:
import config from '#config';
Then you add 2 package.json scripts, one for fooClient and one for barClient:
{
...
"scripts": {
"run:android:foo": "METRO_VARIANT=foo ENVFILE=.env npx react-native run-android --variant fooDebug --appIdSuffix foo",
"run:android:bar": "METRO_VARIANT=bar ENVFILE=.env npx react-native run-android --variant barDebug --appIdSuffix bar",
...
}
...
}
Then you just run the needed script:
yarn run:android:foo # will build with fooClient.js
yarn run:android:bar # will build with barClient.js
Can't you just add a "duplicated" parameter to the command?
Like so
METRO_VARIANT=fooDebug ENVFILE=.env npx react-native run-android --variant fooDebug --appIdSuffix foo
And get it with process.env.METRO_VARIANT
You might not want to make your setup much more complex. Depending on the number of the number of different clients, you might wanna go with multiple schemas/variants per client, but that is probably way overkill.
For example, I use AMD definition in my project, and use "webpack" for project building. It's possible to create some loader which will take a dependencies in array format?
define(
[
'mySuperLoader![./path/dependency-1, ./path/dependency-2, ...]'
],
function() {
// ... some logic here
}
)
Project example: gitHub
If you want to port the load-plugin's behavior to webpack, you need to do this:
1. Create a custom resolver
This is because mySuperLoader![./path/dependency-1, ./path/dependency-2, ...] does not point to a single file. When webpack tries to load a file, it first:
resolves the file path
loads the file content
matches and resolves all loaders
passes the file content to the loader chain
Since [./path/dependency-1, ./path/dependency-2, ...] is not a proper file path, there is some work to do. It is even not a proper JSON.
So, our first goal is to turn this into mySuperLoader!some/random/file?["./path/dependency-1", "./path/dependency-2", ...]. This is usually done by creating a custom resolver:
// webpack.config.js
var customResolverPlugin = {
apply: function (resolver) {
resolver.plugin("resolve", function (context, request) {
const matchLoadRequest = /^\[(.+)]$/.exec(request.path);
if (matchLoadRequest) {
request.query = '?' + JSON.stringify(
matchLoadRequest[1]
.split(", ")
);
request.path = __filename;
}
});
}
};
module.exports = {
...
plugins: [
{
apply: function (compiler) {
compiler.resolvers.normal.apply(customResolverPlugin);
}
}
]
};
Notice request.path = __filename;? We just need to give webpack an existing file so that it does not throw an error. We will generate all the content anyway. Probably not the most elegant solution, but it works.
2. Create our own load-loader (yeah!)
// loadLoader.js
const path = require("path");
function loadLoader() {
return JSON.parse(this.request.match(/\?(.+?)$/)[1])
.map(module =>
`exports['${path.basename(module, '.js')}'] = require('${module}');`
)
.join('\n');
}
module.exports = loadLoader;
This loader parses the request's query we have re-written with our custom resolver and creates a CommonJS module that looks like this
exports['dependency-1'] = require('path/to/dependency-1');
exports['dependency-2'] = require('path/to/dependency-2');
3. Alias our own load-loader
// webpack.config.js
...
resolveLoader: {
alias: {
load: require.resolve('./loadLoader.js')
}
},
4. Configure root
Since /path/to/dependency-1 is root-relative, we need to add the root to the webpack config
// webpack.config.js
resolve: {
root: '/absolute/path/to/root' // usually just __dirname
},
This is neither a beautiful nor an ideal solution, but should work as a makeshift until you've ported your modules.
I don't think that you should use a loader for that. Why don't you just write:
require("./path/dependency-1");
require("./path/dependency-2");
require("./path/dependency-3");
It accomplishes the same thing, is much more expressive and requires no extra code/loader/hack/configuration.
If you're still not satisfied, you might be interested in webpack contexts which allow you to require a bulk of files that match a given filter. So, if you write
require("./template/" + name + ".jade");
webpack includes all modules that could be accessed by this expression without accessing parent directories. It's basically the same like writing
require("./table.jade");
require("./table-row.jade");
require("./directory/folder.jade")
You can also create contexts manually like this
var myRequire = require.context(
"./template", // search inside this directory
false, // false excludes sub-directories
/\.jade$/ // use this regex to filter files
);
var table = myRequire("./table.jade");
I use webpack path aliases for ES6 module loading.
E.g. If I define an alias for utils instead of something like
import Foo from "../../../utils/foo", I can do
import Foo from "utils/foo"
The problem is that once I start using aliases, WebStorm looses track of the import and I'm left with warnings and no auto-completion.
Is there a way to instruct WebStorm to use such aliases?
Yes, there is.
In fact, Webstorm can't automatically parse and apply Webpack config, but you can set up aliases the same way.
You just have to mark the parent folder of "utils" (in your example) as a resource root (right-click, mark directory as / resource root).
We just managed to do with the following structure :
/src
/A
/B
/C
We have A B and C folders declared as alias in Webpack.
And in Webstorm we marked "src" as "Resource Root".
And now we can simply import :
import A/path/to/any/file.js
instead of
import ../../../../../A/path/to/any/file.js
while still having Webstorm correctly parsing and indexing all code, link to files, autocompleting and so on ...
I managed to set up aliases for WebStorm 2017.2 within webpack like this:
For the record: in PHPSTORM, working with laravel mix, I managed to solve this by creating a webpack.config.js file separately like:
const path = require('path')
const webpack = require('webpack')
module.exports = {
...
resolve: {
extensions: ['.js', '.json', '.vue'],
alias: {
'~': path.resolve(__dirname, './resources/assets/js')
}
},
...
}
And then importing it in the webpack.mix.js like:
const config = require('./webpack.config')
...
mix.webpackConfig(config)
Make sure the webpack configuration file is pointed correctly in the configuration of the PhpStorm in: Settings > Languages & Frameworks > Javascript > Webpack
You can define custom paths, so WebStorm/PhpStorm can understand your aliases. But make sure, they are identical with your aliases. Create file in your root directory and call it something like this: webStorm.config.js (any js file will be ok). Then configure your paths inside:
System.config({
"paths": {
"components/*": "./src/components/*",
"core/*": "./src/core/*",
...
}
});
WebStorm/PhpStorm will recognize System as it's own module and will treat this file as configuration.
This is answered in a comment but to save people digging into comments and link only information, here it is:
As of WS2017.2 this will be done automatically. The information is here.
According to this, webstorm will automatically resolve aliases that are included within the webpack.config in the root of the project. If you have a custom structure and your webpack.config isn't in the root folder then go to Settings | Languages & Frameworks | JavaScript | Webpack and set the option to the config you require.
Note: Most setups have a base config which then call a dev or prod version. In order for this to work properly, you need to tell webstorm to use the dev one.
Not right now, We were also using path aliases for the files in our react project. The import names were shorter but we lost a lot on static checking of webstorm as well as completion features.
We later came up with a decision to reduce the code to only 3 levels of depth, as well a single level for the common parts. The path completion feature of webstom (ctrl + space) even helps reduce the typing overhead. The production build does not use longer names, so hardly makes any difference in final code.
I will suggest please reconsider your decision about aliases. You loose semantic meaning of modules coming from node_modules and your own code, as well as referencing the alias files again and again to make sense of your code, is a much bigger overhead.
add jsconfig.js on your project root
{
"compilerOptions": {
"baseUrl": ".",
"paths": {
"~/*": ["./src/*"]
}
}
}
In PHPStorm (using 2017.2 currently), I have not been able to get webpack configs to work properly in regards to aliases.
My fix involves using the "Directories" section of the main settings. I just had to mark each folder referenced by an alias as a sources root, then click the properties dropdown for each and specify the alias as a "Package prefix". This made everything link up for me.
Not sure if the Directories section exists in WebStorm, but if it does, this seems to be a fool-proof method for getting import aliases working.
For anyone struggling: path.resolve() must be called with "__dirname" first argument for Idea (Websorm) to be able to resolve the path correctly.
Will work for Idea (Websorm):
alias: {
'#someAlias': pathLib.resolve(__dirname, 'path/to/directory')
}
Will not work for Idea (Websorm) (while still being valid webpack alias):
alias: {
'#someAlias': pathLib.resolve('path/to/directory')
}
Webstorm can't read webpack.config if module.exports return a function.
For example
module.exports = function (webpackEnv) {
return {
mode: isEnvProduction ? 'production' : isEnvDevelopment && 'development',
...
}
}
Check your config file, maybe this cause you are a problem.
There is a lot of discussion here about Laravel Mix, so I'll leave this here to help out future readers. I solved this by creating a separate (fake) webpack config file which is only used by my IDE (PHPStorm).
1. Create a separate alias.js file (e.g. /webpack/alias.js)
const path = require('path');
const assets = path.join(__dirname,'..','resources','assets');
module.exports = {
'#js' : path.resolve(assets, 'js'),
'#c' : path.resolve(assets, 'js', 'components'),
'#errors' : path.resolve(assets, 'js', 'errors'),
'#utils' : path.resolve(assets, 'js', 'utils'),
'#store' : path.resolve(assets, 'js', 'store'),
'#api' : path.resolve(assets, 'js', 'api'),
'#less' : path.resolve(assets, 'less')
}
2. Require the alias.js file into webpack.mix.js
const mix = require('laravel-mix');
mix.alias(require('./webpack/alias'))
// ... The rest of your mix, e.g.
.js('app.js')
.vue()
.less('app.less');
3. Create the fake webpack config for your IDE (e.g. /webpack/ide.config.js)
Here, import the laravel-mix webpack config, plus your aliases, and any other config that the IDE might need help finding. Also include the prefixed ~ aliases for importing styles into your Vue components.
/*
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| A fake config file for PhpStorm to enable aliases
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| File > Settings... > Languages & Frameworks > Javascript > Webpack
|
| Select "Manually" and set the configuration file to this
|
*/
const path = require('path');
const mixConfig = require('./../node_modules/laravel-mix/setup/webpack.config')();
module.exports = {
...mixConfig,
resolve: {
alias: {
...require('./alias'),
'~#less' : path.resolve('#less'), // <--
},
...mixConfig.resolve
}
}
4. Set your IDE to use webpack/ide.config.js as your webpack config file.
Had the same problem on a new Laravel project with Jetstream. The webpack.config.js was present and correct. But PHPStorm still didn't recognize the # symbol as a resource root.
After opening the webpack config, I got a notification:
After Clicking on Trust project and run, the # symbol became recognized.
I know that this isn't the solution or use-case for everyone. But I still found it worthy to note on this post, because it helped me in my situation.
Using
laravel/framework:8.77.1
npm:8.3.0
node:v14.18.1