Why are these functions working different? - javascript

I'm trying to set the state of a property after making an API call only if the component hasn't been unmounted. In the first function the variable "unmounted" is initialize inside the function "Component"; in this case I'm getting this warning: "Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component. This is a no-op, but it indicates a memory leak in your application."
In the second function I initialize the variable "unmounted" globally and in this case I'm not getting any warning.
Shows a warning:
function Component() {
const [emailSent, setEmailSent] = useState(false);
var unmounted = false;
async function handleClickEvent() {
try {
await AuthApi.sendRecoverAccountEmail('123');
!unmounted && setEmailSent(true);
} catch (err) {
!unmounted && setIsSendingEmail(false);
}
}
useEffect(() => {
return () => {
unmounted = true;
};
}, []);
}
No warnings:
var unmounted = false;
function Component() {
const [emailSent, setEmailSent] = useState(false);
async function handleSendEmail(formValues) {
try {
await AuthApi.sendRecoverAccountEmail('123');
!unmounted && setEmailSent(true);
} catch (err) {
!unmounted && setIsSendingEmail(false);
}
}
useEffect(() => {
return () => {
unmounted = true;
};
}, []);
}
Anyone can explain why is this happening?

On your first example, unmounted will always be false after each render.
Here's the right way without using an global instance:
function Component() {
const [emailSent, setEmailSent] = useState(false);
const unmounted = useRef(false);
async function handleSendEmail(formValues) {
try {
await AuthApi.sendRecoverAccountEmail('123');
!unmounted.current && setEmailSent(true);
} catch (err) {
!unmounted.current && setIsSendingEmail(false);
}
}
useEffect(() => {
return () => {
unmounted.current = true;
};
}, []);
}

An interesting question. You might find the FAQ about hooks useful, as I think it addresses your question rather specifically.
In your first example, your unmounted var is part of your component properties, where in the second example, it is just picked up as part of the javascript closure.
Usually, you want to make sure that you change the mounted parameter as part of the componentDidUnmount lifecycle method.
I think if you add unmounted into the list of dependencies, it might work? I normally use react from another framework in Clojurescript, so I'm not completely familiar with the semantics of the main javascript interface, but that would at least be why you're getting a warning for the first example.
In your first example, what happens if you change the last part to the following?
useEffect(() => {
return () => {
unmounted = true;
};
}, [unmounted]);
}
You may need to define unmounted as a more formal react property instead of just a property enclosed in your component.

Related

Cannot read properties of undefined for 3rd party library after useEffect has run

I am using an external 3rd Party that mounts onto the window object when the site loads. This library can be accessed using window.truste. My problem is that truste doesnt exist on the first render of my component and seem to load in a split second after.
useEffect(() => {
const state = window.truste.eu.bindMap.state;
if (validStates.includes(state)) {
setValidState(true);
}
}, []);
If i create a setTimeout function like so then I don't face any issues but this approach seems a little sloppy. I am wondering if there is a way to know that a library is loaded and then try to execute my code.
useEffect(() => {
setTimeout(() => {
const state = window.truste.eu.bindMap.state;
if (validStates.includes(state)) {
setValidState(true);
}
},1000)
}, []);
If the library lets you use it in a dependency array, do that:
useEffect(() => {
if (!validState && window.truste) {
const state = window.truste.eu.bindMap.state;
if (validStates.includes(state)) {
setValidState(true);
}
}
}, [window.truste, validState]);
Otherwise if it's an asynchronous import, wait for it:
useEffect(() => {
(async () => {
const otherLibrary = await import('other-library');
const state = window.truste.eu.bindMap.state;
if (validStates.includes(state)) {
setValidState(true);
}
})();
}, []);
Maybe you can create a polling in useEffect check the window.truste is avaliable.
useEffect(() => {
function check() {
if (!window.truste) {
setTimeout(check, timeout)
} else {
// use window.truste
}
}
check()
}, [])

custom hook memory leak [duplicate]

When fetching data I'm getting: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component. The app still works, but react is suggesting I might be causing a memory leak.
This is a no-op, but it indicates a memory leak in your application. To fix, cancel all subscriptions and asynchronous tasks in a useEffect cleanup function."
Why do I keep getting this warning?
I tried researching these solutions:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/AbortSignal
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/AbortController
but this still was giving me the warning.
const ArtistProfile = props => {
const [artistData, setArtistData] = useState(null)
const token = props.spotifyAPI.user_token
const fetchData = () => {
const id = window.location.pathname.split("/").pop()
console.log(id)
props.spotifyAPI.getArtistProfile(id, ["album"], "US", 10)
.then(data => {setArtistData(data)})
}
useEffect(() => {
fetchData()
return () => { props.spotifyAPI.cancelRequest() }
}, [])
return (
<ArtistProfileContainer>
<AlbumContainer>
{artistData ? artistData.artistAlbums.items.map(album => {
return (
<AlbumTag
image={album.images[0].url}
name={album.name}
artists={album.artists}
key={album.id}
/>
)
})
: null}
</AlbumContainer>
</ArtistProfileContainer>
)
}
Edit:
In my api file I added an AbortController() and used a signal so I can cancel a request.
export function spotifyAPI() {
const controller = new AbortController()
const signal = controller.signal
// code ...
this.getArtist = (id) => {
return (
fetch(
`https://api.spotify.com/v1/artists/${id}`, {
headers: {"Authorization": "Bearer " + this.user_token}
}, {signal})
.then(response => {
return checkServerStat(response.status, response.json())
})
)
}
// code ...
// this is my cancel method
this.cancelRequest = () => controller.abort()
}
My spotify.getArtistProfile() looks like this
this.getArtistProfile = (id,includeGroups,market,limit,offset) => {
return Promise.all([
this.getArtist(id),
this.getArtistAlbums(id,includeGroups,market,limit,offset),
this.getArtistTopTracks(id,market)
])
.then(response => {
return ({
artist: response[0],
artistAlbums: response[1],
artistTopTracks: response[2]
})
})
}
but because my signal is used for individual api calls that are resolved in a Promise.all I can't abort() that promise so I will always be setting the state.
For me, clean the state in the unmount of the component helped.
const [state, setState] = useState({});
useEffect(() => {
myFunction();
return () => {
setState({}); // This worked for me
};
}, []);
const myFunction = () => {
setState({
name: 'Jhon',
surname: 'Doe',
})
}
Sharing the AbortController between the fetch() requests is the right approach.
When any of the Promises are aborted, Promise.all() will reject with AbortError:
function Component(props) {
const [fetched, setFetched] = React.useState(false);
React.useEffect(() => {
const ac = new AbortController();
Promise.all([
fetch('http://placekitten.com/1000/1000', {signal: ac.signal}),
fetch('http://placekitten.com/2000/2000', {signal: ac.signal})
]).then(() => setFetched(true))
.catch(ex => console.error(ex));
return () => ac.abort(); // Abort both fetches on unmount
}, []);
return fetched;
}
const main = document.querySelector('main');
ReactDOM.render(React.createElement(Component), main);
setTimeout(() => ReactDOM.unmountComponentAtNode(main), 1); // Unmount after 1ms
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.8.3/umd/react.development.js"></script>
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.8.3/umd/react-dom.development.js"></script>
<main></main>
For example, you have some component that does some asynchronous actions, then writes the result to state and displays the state content on a page:
export default function MyComponent() {
const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false);
const [someData, setSomeData] = useState({});
// ...
useEffect( () => {
(async () => {
setLoading(true);
someResponse = await doVeryLongRequest(); // it takes some time
// When request is finished:
setSomeData(someResponse.data); // (1) write data to state
setLoading(false); // (2) write some value to state
})();
}, []);
return (
<div className={loading ? "loading" : ""}>
{someData}
<Link to="SOME_LOCAL_LINK">Go away from here!</Link>
</div>
);
}
Let's say that user clicks some link when doVeryLongRequest() still executes. MyComponent is unmounted but the request is still alive and when it gets a response it tries to set state in lines (1) and (2) and tries to change the appropriate nodes in HTML. We'll get an error from subject.
We can fix it by checking whether compponent is still mounted or not. Let's create a componentMounted ref (line (3) below) and set it true. When component is unmounted we'll set it to false (line (4) below). And let's check the componentMounted variable every time we try to set state (line (5) below).
The code with fixes:
export default function MyComponent() {
const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false);
const [someData, setSomeData] = useState({});
const componentMounted = useRef(true); // (3) component is mounted
// ...
useEffect( () => {
(async () => {
setLoading(true);
someResponse = await doVeryLongRequest(); // it takes some time
// When request is finished:
if (componentMounted.current){ // (5) is component still mounted?
setSomeData(someResponse.data); // (1) write data to state
setLoading(false); // (2) write some value to state
}
return () => { // This code runs when component is unmounted
componentMounted.current = false; // (4) set it to false when we leave the page
}
})();
}, []);
return (
<div className={loading ? "loading" : ""}>
{someData}
<Link to="SOME_LOCAL_LINK">Go away from here!</Link>
</div>
);
}
Why do I keep getting this warning?
The intention of this warning is to help you prevent memory leaks in your application. If the component updates it's state after it has been unmounted from the DOM, this is an indication that there could be a memory leak, but it is an indication with a lot of false positives.
How do I know if I have a memory leak?
You have a memory leak if an object that lives longer than your component holds a reference to it, either directly or indirectly. This usually happens when you subscribe to events or changes of some kind without unsubscribing when your component unmounts from the DOM.
It typically looks like this:
useEffect(() => {
function handleChange() {
setState(store.getState())
}
// "store" lives longer than the component,
// and will hold a reference to the handleChange function.
// Preventing the component to be garbage collected after
// unmount.
store.subscribe(handleChange)
// Uncomment the line below to avoid memory leak in your component
// return () => store.unsubscribe(handleChange)
}, [])
Where store is an object that lives further up the React tree (possibly in a context provider), or in global/module scope. Another example is subscribing to events:
useEffect(() => {
function handleScroll() {
setState(window.scrollY)
}
// document is an object in global scope, and will hold a reference
// to the handleScroll function, preventing garbage collection
document.addEventListener('scroll', handleScroll)
// Uncomment the line below to avoid memory leak in your component
// return () => document.removeEventListener(handleScroll)
}, [])
Another example worth remembering is the web API setInterval, which can also cause memory leak if you forget to call clearInterval when unmounting.
But that is not what I am doing, why should I care about this warning?
React's strategy to warn whenever state updates happen after your component has unmounted creates a lot of false positives. The most common I've seen is by setting state after an asynchronous network request:
async function handleSubmit() {
setPending(true)
await post('/someapi') // component might unmount while we're waiting
setPending(false)
}
You could technically argue that this also is a memory leak, since the component isn't released immediately after it is no longer needed. If your "post" takes a long time to complete, then it will take a long time to for the memory to be released. However, this is not something you should worry about, because it will be garbage collected eventually. In these cases, you could simply ignore the warning.
But it is so annoying to see the warning, how do I remove it?
There are a lot of blogs and answers on stackoverflow suggesting to keep track of the mounted state of your component and wrap your state updates in an if-statement:
let isMountedRef = useRef(false)
useEffect(() => {
isMountedRef.current = true
return () => {
isMountedRef.current = false
}
}, [])
async function handleSubmit() {
setPending(true)
await post('/someapi')
if (!isMountedRef.current) {
setPending(false)
}
}
This is not an recommended approach! Not only does it make the code less readable and adds runtime overhead, but it might also might not work well with future features of React. It also does nothing at all about the "memory leak", the component will still live just as long as without that extra code.
The recommended way to deal with this is to either cancel the asynchronous function (with for instance the AbortController API), or to ignore it.
In fact, React dev team recognises the fact that avoiding false positives is too difficult, and has removed the warning in v18 of React.
You can try this set a state like this and check if your component mounted or not. This way you are sure that if your component is unmounted you are not trying to fetch something.
const [didMount, setDidMount] = useState(false);
useEffect(() => {
setDidMount(true);
return () => setDidMount(false);
}, [])
if(!didMount) {
return null;
}
return (
<ArtistProfileContainer>
<AlbumContainer>
{artistData ? artistData.artistAlbums.items.map(album => {
return (
<AlbumTag
image={album.images[0].url}
name={album.name}
artists={album.artists}
key={album.id}
/>
)
})
: null}
</AlbumContainer>
</ArtistProfileContainer>
)
Hope this will help you.
I had a similar issue with a scroll to top and #CalosVallejo answer solved it :) Thank you so much!!
const ScrollToTop = () => {
const [showScroll, setShowScroll] = useState();
//------------------ solution
useEffect(() => {
checkScrollTop();
return () => {
setShowScroll({}); // This worked for me
};
}, []);
//----------------- solution
const checkScrollTop = () => {
setShowScroll(true);
};
const scrollTop = () => {
window.scrollTo({ top: 0, behavior: "smooth" });
};
window.addEventListener("scroll", checkScrollTop);
return (
<React.Fragment>
<div className="back-to-top">
<h1
className="scrollTop"
onClick={scrollTop}
style={{ display: showScroll }}
>
{" "}
Back to top <span>⟶ </span>
</h1>
</div>
</React.Fragment>
);
};
I have getting same warning, This solution Worked for me ->
useEffect(() => {
const unsubscribe = fetchData(); //subscribe
return unsubscribe; //unsubscribe
}, []);
if you have more then one fetch function then
const getData = () => {
fetch1();
fetch2();
fetch3();
}
useEffect(() => {
const unsubscribe = getData(); //subscribe
return unsubscribe; //unsubscribe
}, []);
This error occurs when u perform state update on current component after navigating to other component:
for example
axios
.post(API.BASE_URI + API.LOGIN, { email: username, password: password })
.then((res) => {
if (res.status === 200) {
dispatch(login(res.data.data)); // line#5 logging user in
setSigningIn(false); // line#6 updating some state
} else {
setSigningIn(false);
ToastAndroid.show(
"Email or Password is not correct!",
ToastAndroid.LONG
);
}
})
In above case on line#5 I'm dispatching login action which in return navigates user to the dashboard and hence login screen now gets unmounted.
Now when React Native reaches as line#6 and see there is state being updated, it yells out loud that how do I do this, the login component is there no more.
Solution:
axios
.post(API.BASE_URI + API.LOGIN, { email: username, password: password })
.then((res) => {
if (res.status === 200) {
setSigningIn(false); // line#6 updating some state -- moved this line up
dispatch(login(res.data.data)); // line#5 logging user in
} else {
setSigningIn(false);
ToastAndroid.show(
"Email or Password is not correct!",
ToastAndroid.LONG
);
}
})
Just move react state update above, move line 6 up the line 5.
Now state is being updated before navigating the user away. WIN WIN
there are many answers but I thought I could demonstrate more simply how the abort works (at least how it fixed the issue for me):
useEffect(() => {
// get abortion variables
let abortController = new AbortController();
let aborted = abortController.signal.aborted; // true || false
async function fetchResults() {
let response = await fetch(`[WEBSITE LINK]`);
let data = await response.json();
aborted = abortController.signal.aborted; // before 'if' statement check again if aborted
if (aborted === false) {
// All your 'set states' inside this kind of 'if' statement
setState(data);
}
}
fetchResults();
return () => {
abortController.abort();
};
}, [])
Other Methods:
https://medium.com/wesionary-team/how-to-fix-memory-leak-issue-in-react-js-using-hook-a5ecbf9becf8
If the user navigates away, or something else causes the component to get destroyed before the async call comes back and tries to setState on it, it will cause the error. It's generally harmless if it is, indeed, a late-finish async call. There's a couple of ways to silence the error.
If you're implementing a hook like useAsync you can declare your useStates with let instead of const, and, in the destructor returned by useEffect, set the setState function(s) to a no-op function.
export function useAsync<T, F extends IUseAsyncGettor<T>>(gettor: F, ...rest: Parameters<F>): IUseAsync<T> {
let [parameters, setParameters] = useState(rest);
if (parameters !== rest && parameters.some((_, i) => parameters[i] !== rest[i]))
setParameters(rest);
const refresh: () => void = useCallback(() => {
const promise: Promise<T | void> = gettor
.apply(null, parameters)
.then(value => setTuple([value, { isLoading: false, promise, refresh, error: undefined }]))
.catch(error => setTuple([undefined, { isLoading: false, promise, refresh, error }]));
setTuple([undefined, { isLoading: true, promise, refresh, error: undefined }]);
return promise;
}, [gettor, parameters]);
useEffect(() => {
refresh();
// and for when async finishes after user navs away //////////
return () => { setTuple = setParameters = (() => undefined) }
}, [refresh]);
let [tuple, setTuple] = useState<IUseAsync<T>>([undefined, { isLoading: true, refresh, promise: Promise.resolve() }]);
return tuple;
}
That won't work well in a component, though. There, you can wrap useState in a function which tracks mounted/unmounted, and wraps the returned setState function with the if-check.
export const MyComponent = () => {
const [numPendingPromises, setNumPendingPromises] = useUnlessUnmounted(useState(0));
// ..etc.
// imported from elsewhere ////
export function useUnlessUnmounted<T>(useStateTuple: [val: T, setVal: Dispatch<SetStateAction<T>>]): [T, Dispatch<SetStateAction<T>>] {
const [val, setVal] = useStateTuple;
const [isMounted, setIsMounted] = useState(true);
useEffect(() => () => setIsMounted(false), []);
return [val, newVal => (isMounted ? setVal(newVal) : () => void 0)];
}
You could then create a useStateAsync hook to streamline a bit.
export function useStateAsync<T>(initialState: T | (() => T)): [T, Dispatch<SetStateAction<T>>] {
return useUnlessUnmounted(useState(initialState));
}
Try to add the dependencies in useEffect:
useEffect(() => {
fetchData()
return () => { props.spotifyAPI.cancelRequest() }
}, [fetchData, props.spotifyAPI])
Usually this problem occurs when you showing the component conditionally, for example:
showModal && <Modal onClose={toggleModal}/>
You can try to do some little tricks in the Modal onClose function, like
setTimeout(onClose, 0)
This works for me :')
const [state, setState] = useState({});
useEffect( async ()=>{
let data= await props.data; // data from API too
setState(users);
},[props.data]);
I had this problem in React Native iOS and fixed it by moving my setState call into a catch. See below:
Bad code (caused the error):
const signupHandler = async (email, password) => {
setLoading(true)
try {
const token = await createUser(email, password)
authContext.authenticate(token)
} catch (error) {
Alert.alert('Error', 'Could not create user.')
}
setLoading(false) // this line was OUTSIDE the catch call and triggered an error!
}
Good code (no error):
const signupHandler = async (email, password) => {
setLoading(true)
try {
const token = await createUser(email, password)
authContext.authenticate(token)
} catch (error) {
Alert.alert('Error', 'Could not create user.')
setLoading(false) // moving this line INTO the catch call resolved the error!
}
}
Similar problem with my app, I use a useEffect to fetch some data, and then update a state with that:
useEffect(() => {
const fetchUser = async() => {
const {
data: {
queryUser
},
} = await authFetch.get(`/auth/getUser?userId=${createdBy}`);
setBlogUser(queryUser);
};
fetchUser();
return () => {
setBlogUser(null);
};
}, [_id]);
This improves upon Carlos Vallejo's answer.
useEffect(() => {
let abortController = new AbortController();
// your async action is here
return () => {
abortController.abort();
}
}, []);
in the above code, I've used AbortController to unsubscribe the effect. When the a sync action is completed, then I abort the controller and unsubscribe the effect.
it work for me ....
The easy way
let fetchingFunction= async()=>{
// fetching
}
React.useEffect(() => {
fetchingFunction();
return () => {
fetchingFunction= null
}
}, [])
options={{
filterType: "checkbox"
,
textLabels: {
body: {
noMatch: isLoading ?
:
'Sorry, there is no matching data to display',
},
},
}}

State values passed in as arguments in useEffect not being read in reactjs

I am trying to build a cryptocurrency application. But I am having trouble getting populated state values that are passed into the useEffect as parameters to a debouncing/polling function.
The issue is that the debouncing works well, as in it detects the value and calls the api after the 500ms that I specified in debounce. However, the polling portion seems to not have the state values of of transactionType, fromCurrencyAmount, and pair. It seems like after I debounce the input, after 6 seconds the polling will do its thing but the values passed in the params are undefined. Is there anyway I can solve this?
Here is the method that serves two purposes. It has an api to be polled from every 6 seconds, as well as getting debounced input if the user enters an amount inside the input.
function handleInitPoll(baseAndQuote, side, value) {
getSwapPrice(baseAndQuote, side, value || 0)
.then((res) => {
if (!res.price) {
setIsLoading(true);
} else if (res.error) {
setErrorMessage(res.error);
} else if (res.price) {
setIsLoading(false);
setSwapPriceInfo(res);
}
});
}
And here is the useEffect:
useEffect(() => {
handleInitPoll(pair, transactionType, fromCurrencyAmount);
const timer = setInterval(handleInitPoll, 6000, pair, transactionType, fromCurrencyAmount);
return () => {
clearInterval(timer);
};
}
setSelectedCurrencyState({ ...selectedCurrencyState, selectedFromCurrency: 'USDT', selectedToCurrency: 'XLM' });
}, [pair, transactionType, fromCurrencyAmount]);
And here is the debounce declaration:
const debounceOnChange = useCallback(debounce(handleInitPoll, 500, pair, transactionType, fromCurrencyAmount), []);
And here is where the debouncing is being done, which is inside an onChange handler:
const handleAssetAmount = (e) => {
const { value } = e.target;
const formattedAmount = handleAssetAmountFormat(value);
setFromCurrencyAmount(formattedAmount);
validateInputAmount(formattedAmount);
debounceOnChange(pair, transactionType, formattedAmount);
};
Issue
The issue here is that you've closed over stale values in the interval callback.
Solution
One solution is to cache these state values in a React ref such that the current value can be accessed in the polling function.
Example:
const pairRef = React.useRef(pair);
const transactionTypeRef = React.useRef(transactionType);
const fromCurrencyAmountRef = React.useRef(fromCurrencyAmount);
useEffect(() => {
pairRef.current = pair;
}, [pair]);
useEffect(() => {
transactionTypeRef.current = transactionTypeRef;
}, [transactionType]);
useEffect(() => {
fromCurrencyAmountRef.current = fromCurrencyAmount;
}, [fromCurrencyAmount]);
useEffect(() => {
handleInitPoll(pair, transactionType, fromCurrencyAmount);
const timer = setInterval(() => {
handleInitPoll(
pairRef.current,
transactionTypeRef.current,
fromCurrencyAmountRef.current
);
}, 6000);
return () => {
clearInterval(timer);
};
}, [pair, transactionType, fromCurrencyAmount]);
Fundamentally, your code seems to be correct with a few issues:
There is a race condition.
If getSwapPrice is running and the component is updated, it can still
affect the state when setSwapPriceInfo or setLoading are called when
the promise is resolved.
This is particularly bad, because network requests can "overtake" each
other. Thus it can happen that the return value of getSwapPrice
updates the component with the result of an old network request.
This is discussed in this article.
There is this odd call to setSelectedCurrencyState in the useEffect
block. It's not clear what this is supposed to do, but it clearly doesn't
belong there.
However, the underlying application should work fine, I reproduced it with a simpler application here:
import { useEffect, useState } from "react";
function fetchExchangeRateAsync(multiplier) {
return new Promise(resolve => {
setTimeout(() => {
resolve(Math.random() * multiplier);
}, 100);
});
}
function CurrencyExchangeRate() {
const [exchangeRate, setExchangeRate] = useState(null);
const [inputValueString, setInputValueString] = useState("");
const inputValue = Number(inputValueString);
const [multiplier, setMultiplier] = useState(1.0);
let outputValue = null;
if (!isNaN(inputValue) && exchangeRate !== null) {
outputValue = inputValue * exchangeRate;
}
useEffect(() => {
// To avoid race conditions, we must not update the state from an asynchronous operation if
// the component was re-rendered since then.
//
// https://overreacted.io/a-complete-guide-to-useeffect/
let didCancel = false;
// Do not delay the first request.
fetchExchangeRateAsync(multiplier)
.then(newExchangeRate => {
if (!didCancel) {
setExchangeRate(newExchangeRate);
}
});
// Poll exchange rate.
let intervalHandle = setInterval(() => {
fetchExchangeRateAsync(multiplier)
.then(newExchangeRate => {
if (!didCancel) {
setExchangeRate(newExchangeRate);
}
});
}, 500);
return () => {
didCancel = true;
clearInterval(intervalHandle);
};
}, [multiplier]);
return (
<div>
<input value={inputValueString} onChange={event => setInputValueString(event.target.value)} /><br />
<p>With current exchange rate: {outputValue !== null ? outputValue : "(loading)"}</p>
<button onClick={() => setMultiplier(100.0)}>Set Multiplier</button>
</div>
);
}
function App() {
return (
<CurrencyExchangeRate />
);
}
export default App;
This is quite a bit different from what you are doing but it does demonstrate that your code should generally work:
It is possible to trigger the fetch logic by changing the input field (here without debouncing) or in a given interval.
The fetch logic runs immediately when the component is rendered for the first time.
The "Set Multiplier" button can affect the value of multiplier and this information arrives in the setInterval call correctly.
This works because [multiplier] dictates that the effect should be re-run if that variable changes. When this happens, the old interval is first cleared with clearInterval and then re-started with setInterval.
In your case that would be pair, transactionType and fromCurrencyAmount instead of multiplier.
In other words, your issue seems to be outside the code that you provided in the question.

React Context - useEffect

Is it correct that a useEffect is listening to the context?
const {
data,
} = useContext(AuthContext);
async function getProfile() {
try {
setLoading(true);
console.info('getProfile called', data.token);
const response = await getByToken(data.token);
if (response && response.ok) {
setFirstName(response.userData.firstName);
setLastName(response.userData.lastName);
setEmail(response.userData.email);
}
} catch (e) {
console.info('Error', e);
} finally {
setLoading(false);
}
}
useEffect(() => {
if (data.userData) {
getProfile();
}
}, [data.userData]);
This is the way I found to make it make calls to getProfile with a userData different from null
Yes that is how it works. Although it might be incorrect to say that useEffect is listening to changes in the variable. The callback inside useEffect runs because of 2 conditions being fulfilled:
a render happens.
the dependency array has a changing dependency
The rerender is because the context value has changed and the inner component is a Consumer of the Context (cause it calls useContext).
And since the dependency included in the useEffect dependency array also changes, the callback is run.
A sandbox link with a simple example

Why useState not apply new value

I use hook useState for set post value.
const [firstPost, setFirstPost] = useState();
useEffect(() => {
(async () => { await onFetchPosts(); })();
}, []);
const onFetchPosts = async () => {
try {
const { body } = await publicService.fetchPostById(119);
// get post
const post = body.posts;
if (post && post.postsId) {
console.log(`save...`, body.posts);
setFirstPost(body.posts);
}
console.log(`firstPost...`, firstPost);
} catch (error) {
console.log(error);
} finally {
setLoading(false);
}
}
I dont understand, firstPost is not updated.
This is because setState calls are asynchronous. Read it here and here. As the per the doc I linked
setState() enqueues changes to the component state and tells React that this component and its children need to be re-rendered with the updated state
setState() does not always immediately update the component. It may batch or defer the update until later. This makes reading this.state right after calling setState() a potential pitfall
Therefore, the state is usually not updated yet when you console.log it on the next line, but you can access/see the updated state on the next render. If you want to log values, you can put them as inside a <pre> tag in your HTML, or do console.log at the beginning, like below:
const [firstPost, setFirstPost] = useState();
// Console.log right on at the start of the render cycle
console.log("First post", firstPost);
useEffect(() => {
(async () => {
await onFetchPosts();
})();
}, []);
const onFetchPosts = async () => {
try {
const { body } = await publicService.fetchPostById(119);
// get post
const post = body.posts;
if (post && post.postsId) {
console.log(`save...`, body.posts);
setFirstPost(body.posts);
}
// Do not console.log the state here
// console.log(`firstPost...`, firstPost);
} catch (error) {
console.log(error);
} finally {
setLoading(false);
}
};
// Can also debug like this
return <pre>{JSON.stringify(firstPost)}</pre>;
React may batch multiple setState() calls into a single update for performance.
Because this.props and this.state may be updated asynchronously, you should not rely on their values for calculating the next state.
https://reactjs.org/docs/state-and-lifecycle.html#state-updates-may-be-asynchronous
React does not change the state variables immediately when state is changed i.e why you are getting undefined in console.
However the new value of firstPost is assured to be there in the next render.

Categories

Resources