How to find data from a GET array with parameters already present - javascript

Sorry, the title isn't worded very well. I'm using a category choose to choose a category from an API. I currently get the list of categories, filter through their names, and display them in the category chooser. When the user clicks submit, I want the to parse through the API and find the id associated with that category name. Here's an example output from the API:
{
"_id": "5c2fde414502d923ceafaa30",
"title": "Category 2",
"description": "My second category, testing 123",
"createdAt": "2019-01-04T22:29:21.047Z",
"updatedAt": "2019-01-04T22:29:21.047Z",
"__v": 0
},
Here's the code I use for the Category Chooser:
JS:
$.getJSON("http://localhost:2672/categories", function (json) {
$('#category-chooser').empty();
$('#category-chooser').append($('<option>').text("Choose a Category"));
$.each(json, function (i, obj) {
$('#category-chooser').append($('<option>').text(obj.title));
});
});
HTML
<select id="category-chooser" class="form-control" name="category">
<option selected="selected">blank</option>
</select>

If you store the json returned from getJSON somewhere outside the callback, your submit button would fire off something like below:
function getCategoryId(){
const categoryChooser = document.getElementById('category-chooser');
const categorySelected = categoryChooser.value;
json.forEach(entry => {
if(entry.title === categorySelected){
return entry["_id"];
}
});
}

Related

Optimalization of firebase query. Getting data by ids

I'm new in Firebase. I would like to create an app (using Angular and AngularFire library), which shows current price of some wares. I have list all available wares in Firebase Realtime Database in the following format:
"warehouse": {
"wares": {
"id1": {
"id": "id1",
"name": "name1",
"price": "0.99"
},
"id2": {
"id": "id2",
"name": "name2",
"price": "15.00"
},
... //much more stuff
}
}
I'm using ngrx with my app, so I think that I can load all wares to store as an object not list because normalizing state tree. I wanted load wares to store in this way:
this.db.object('warehouse/wares').valueChanges();
The problem is wares' price will be refresh every 5 minutes. The number og wares is huge (about 3000 items) so one response will be weight about 700kB. I know that I will exceed limit downloaded data in a short time, in this way.
I want limit the loading data to interesing for user, so every user will can choose wares. I will store this choices in following way:
"users": {
"user1": {
"id": "user1",
"wares": {
"id1": {
"order": 1
},
"id27": {
"order": 2
},
"id533": {
"order": 3
}
},
"waresIds": ["id1", "id27", "id533"]
}
}
And my question is:
Is there a way to getting wares based on waresIds' current user? I mean, does it exist way to get only wares, whose ids are in argument array? F.e.
"wares": {
"id1": {
"id": "id1",
"name": "name1",
"price": "0.99"
},
"id27": {
"id": "id27",
"name": "name27",
"price": "0.19"
},
"id533": {
"id": "id533",
"name": "name533",
"price": "1.19"
}
}
for query like:
this.db.object('warehouse/wares').contains(["id1", "id27", "id533"]).valueChanges();
I saw query limits in Angular Fire like equalTo and etc. but every is for list. I'm totally confused. Is there anyone who can help me? Maybe I'm making mistakes in the design of the app structure. If so, I am asking for clarification.
Because you are saving the ids inside user try this way.
wares: Observable<any[]>;
//inside ngOnInit or function
this.wares = this.db.list('users/currentUserId/wares').snapshotChanges().map(changes => {
return changes.map(c => {
const id = c.payload.key; //gets ids under users/wares/ids..
let wares=[];
//now get the wares
this.db.list('warehouse/wares', ref => ref.orderByChild('id').equalTo(id)).valueChanges().subscribe(res=>{
res.forEach(data=>{
wares.push(data);
})
});
return wares;
});
});
There are two things you can do. I don't believe Firebase allows you to query for multiple equals values at once. You can however loop over the array of "ids" and query for each one directly.
I am assuming you already queried for "waresIds" and you've stored those ID's in an array named idArray:
for id in idArray {
database.ref('warehouse/wares').orderByChild('id').equalTo(id).once('value').then((snapshot) => {
console.log(snapshot.val());
})
}
In order to use the above query efficiently you'll have to index your data on id.
Your second option would be to use .childChanged to get only the updated data after your initial fetch. This should cut down drastically on the amount of data you need to download.
Yes , you can get exactly data that you want in firebase,
See official Firebase documents about filtering
You need to get each waresID
var waresID = // logic to get waresID
var userId = // logic to get userId
var ref = firebase.database().ref("wares/" + userId).child(waresID);
ref.once("value")
.then(function(snapshot) {
console.log(snapshot.val());
});
this will return only data related to that waresID or userId
Note: this is javascript code, i hope this will work for you.

Load nested JSON array into select in Vue using computed properties

Originally in my Vue component I had a series of nested if statements that would go through the JSON data to determine whether a text input should be displayed or a select based on a has_selectable_value option being true (select display) or false (text input display), and if it was a select then loop through the data and output associated options.
I have been able to change that to a computed statement which almost does everything I need it to do apart from one little thing which is to display the select options.
Here is the relevant part of the Vue Code:
<template v-else-if="searchtype == 9">
<select v-for="service in selectableServices" class="form-control" v-model="searchvalue" required>
<option value="">Select A Location</option>
<option v-for="sl in selectableLocations" :value="sl.location_id">{{sl.name}}</option>
</select>
<input v-for="service in nonSelectableServices" class="form-control" v-model="searchvalue" placeholder="Enter Search Value" required>
</template>
The current computed functions:
services: function () {
var ret = []
this.countries.forEach(function(country) {
country.states.forEach(function(state) {
state.services.forEach(function(service) {
ret.push(service)
});
});
});
return ret;
},
selectableServices: function () {
return this.services.filter(service => service.id == this.service && service.has_selectable_location);
},
nonSelectableServices: function () {
return this.services.filter(service => service.id == this.service && !service.has_selectable_location);
},
selectableLocations: function () {
// Filter one more level down
return this.selectableServices.map(service => service.selectablelocations);
},
This is the JSON data structure I am working with as well (I cut it back to the relevant parts for this part of the code):
[
{
"id": 1,
"name": "Country Name",
"states": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "State Name",
"services": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "Service Name",
"has_selectable_location": 1,
"selectablelocations": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "Selectable Location A",
},
]
}
]
}
]
}
]
Using a Vue plugin for Chrome I can see that the computed function selectableLocations loads an array containing the individual locations, but the existing v-for statement isn't able to function correctly. Instead I still need to go down one more level which I can do by adding an extra v-for loop like so:
<template v-for="selectableLocationsList in selectableLocations" >
<option v-for="sl in selectableLocationsList" :value="sl.location_id">{{sl.name}}</option>
</template>
Everything displays correctly, but I am not sure if this is best practice as I was hoping to do as much of this in a computed function as possible and ideally only require a single v-for statement. But if it's not possible like that I understand and I can leave it as is.
Thank you in advance.
Edit: After more testing and research I have come up with this code that works as I had desired:
var formArray = []
var locationsArray = this.servicesArray.filter(service => service.id == this.service);
locationsArray.map(service => service.selectablelocations);
locationsArray.forEach(function(selectableLocations) {
selectableLocations.selectablelocations.forEach(function(location) {
formArray.push(location)
});
});
return formArray;
Is there a way I can refactor this further and make it a bit cleaner?
Solely considering the code you posted after the Edit , the code can be refactored this way:
let formArray = [];
formArray = this.servicesArray
.filter(service => service.id == this.service)
.map(service => service.selectablelocations)
.reduce((prev, curr) => prev.concat(curr))
return formArray
Note that the map you used doesn't do anything as Array.prototype.map only returns a new array, but you didn't assign it to anything.

AngularJS select default option according to url

I have a dropdown menu that contains some links for various section of the page. The application is written with AngularJS version 1.4, the dropdown menu does works, but when I enter the page directly through the url in the dropdown menu is always selected the empty voice instead of the correct one. Here' the code:
HTML
<select ng-options="menu_voice.name for menu_voice in menu_voices track by menu_voice.url" ng-model='selectedOption' ng-change="changeLink()">
</select>
JS:
$scope.changeLink = function(){
$state.go($scope.selectedOption.url);
};
$scope.menu_voices = [
{
"url": 'account.company',
"name": 'Company'
},
{
"url": 'account.billing',
"name": 'Billing'
},
{
"url": 'account.password',
"name": 'Password'
},
{
"url": 'account.design',
"name": 'Design'
},
{
"url": 'account.social',
"name": 'Social'
},
{
"url": 'account.notifications',
"name": 'Notifications'
}
];
If I select a voice in the dropdown menu, I go to the correct link with the correct voice selected. But if in the url bar I enter something like:
www.myapp.com/account/billing
I go to the correct page but in the dropdown menu the selected voice is empty.
How can I solve this?
EDIT after first reply:
I added this:
var name = $window.location.pathname;
name = name.substring(9);
name = name.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + name.slice(1);
var url = $window.location.pathname.substring(1).replace(/\//g, '.');
$scope.getSelectedFromUrl = function(){
$scope.selectedOption = {"name": name, "url": url};
};
If I print in the console
console.log($scope.selectedOption);
I get the correct object, e.g:
Object {name: "Design", url: "account.design"}
In the html I simply added the ng-init:
<select ng-options="menu_voice.name for menu_voice in menu_voices track by menu_voice.url" ng-model='selectedOption' ng-change="changeLink()" ng-init="selectedOption = getSelectedFromUrl()">
</select>
But nothing changed.
You could use the ng-init directive to call a function that parses the route and matches it to an item from the voices array. Then set the selectedOption model to that array item, which will set the select option.
ng-init="selectedOption = getSelectedFromURL()"

Change ng-model before submit

I have simple model that submits a form that are all from a select I am using an ng-repeat like so:
'Ctrl'
isdom.scheduleOptions = ['Pass', 'N/A'];
'html'
<select ng-model="isdom.isdomForm.isDom101">
<option ng-repeat="option in isdom.scheduleOptions" value="{{option}}">{{option}}</option>
</select>
The person who has built the api end point is asking for the data in this format:
"outcomes": [
{ "itemNo": "is11", "outcome": "Pass" }
,
{ "itemNo": "is12", "outcome": "Pass" }...
How can I do this when my model is like so?
{
"isDom11": "N/A",
"isDOm12": "Pass",...
}
I thought about try to get all the elements in the model that start with isDom and pushing them into an outcomes array that has been modified into objects to copy the format required.
Is there a different way I can use ng-repeat to achieve this?
You could use ng-options for populating the select.
See: ngOptions or select
So it should be something like this:
$scope.isdom.scheduleOptions = [
{ "itemNo": "is11", "outcome": "N/A" }
,
{ "itemNo": "is12", "outcome": "Pass" }
];
<select ng-model="isdom.isdomForm.isDom101"
ng-options="item as item.outcome for item in isdom.scheduleOptions track by item.itemNo"></select>
Try using the (key, value) syntax as given in angular docs.
Key value in ng-repeat
(key, value) in expression –
where key and value can be any user defined identifiers, and expression is the scope expression giving the collection to enumerate.
For example: (name, age) in {'adam':10, 'amalie':12}.
Your example,
isdom.scheduleOptions = {
"isDom11": "N/A",
"isDOm12": "Pass",...
}
<select ng-model="isdom.outcomes">
<option ng-repeat="(itemNo, outcome) in isdom.scheduleOptions" value="{{outcome}}">{{outcome}}</option>
</select>

Angular select and ng-options

I have this angular select:
<select ng-model='obj.status' ng-options='status.code as (status.code + " " + status.phrase) for status in status_codes.data track by status.code'>`
My $scope.status_codes is like this:
data: [
{
"code":"100",
"phrase":"...",
"spec_title":"RFC7231#6.2",
"spec_href":"http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-6.2"
}
...
]
My $scope.obj.status is updated to "300" or "100" or whatever as I change my select, but the select display is always blank. So, the model updates to the selected value of the select input but the input does not show the currently selected value, it shows a blank item.
If i change ng-options to be ng-options='status as (status.code ...' it works, but I only want status.code in my model, not the whole status array. What gives?
I have {{obj | json }} in my HTML and it reads:
obj = {
"name": "",
"description": "",
"payload": "",
"status": "200",
"responseHeaders": {
"entry": [
{
"key": "",
"value": ""
},
{
"key": "",
"value": ""
}
]
}
}
Remove track by.
From the Docs:
Be careful when using select as and track by in the same expression.
My best guess is that the as uses a normal value, like "300", but the track by is using a typed value, like "int:300". Removing one or the other should do it, preferably the track by.
They are giving this as an example:
This will work:
<select ng-options="item as item.label for item in items track by item.id" ng-model="selected"></select>
but this will not work:
<select ng-options="item.subItem as item.label for item in items track by item.id" ng-model="selected"></select>
According to the docs here: https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/directive/ngOptions:
select as label for value in array
So in your example this should work (you will get code value as select value in model):
status.code as (status.code + " " + status.phrase) for status in status_codes.data
track by should be used when you have object as value in model, array of objects for options and you want to match current model value to one of objects in array.

Categories

Resources