Develop Reference

Is there a way to force a javascript element to redefine itself based on how it was originally defined?

I was playing around with objects and constructors and stuff like that, and I was wondering if there was a way to bind a value to a variable based on how it was originally defined. I have the following code:
typescript
let cr = "create",
ap = "apply",
$this = {
set: (prop, value) => {
this[prop] = value;
}
};
function creator() {
this.$ = (array: Object[]) => {
array.forEach((kp: Object) => {
let key = Object.keys(kp)[0];
let val = kp[Object.keys(kp)];
$this[key] = val;
creator.create(key, { value: val });
});
};
this.apply = (...objects: Object[]) => {
objects.forEach((obj: Object) => {
creator.call(obj);
});
};
}
function create(obj) {
function createValues(arr) {
let instance: Object = new obj();
let vals: any[] = [];
arr.forEach(name => {
vals.push(instance[name]);
});
return vals;
}
let names: string[] = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(new obj());
let values: string[] = createValues(names);
return combineArrays(names, values);
}
function combineArrays(arr1, arr2): { $?: any } { // the question mark removes an IDE error
let newObj: Object = {};
arr1.forEach(prop => {
newObj[prop] = arr2[arr1.indexOf(prop)];
});
return newObj;
}
Object.prototype.create = function(prop, options) {
return Object.defineProperty(this, prop, options);
};
create(creator).$([
{ hi: "hi" },
{ bye: $this["hi"] } // this is the important stuff
]);
I was wondering if there is a way, inside the set function of the $this variable, to detect how it is being set and therefore determine if that value has changed and so it's value should to, if that makes any sense? Let's say you had this:
let $this = {
set: function(prop, value) {
this[prop] = value;
}
}
let name = 'Ezra';
$this['name'] = name;
// then :
name = 'Bob';
// change $this.name too, so then:
console.log($this.name);
// >> 'Bob'
I believe this is called Data-Binding but I am unsure how to do it without creating endless numbers of proxies.

What you're describing is not really "data-binding" but pass-by-reference. In your example you expect an update to name to be reflected in $this['name']. That would only be possible if you were passing a reference (or a pointer) to the variable.
However, in this case the variable is a string, and strings in JavaScript are immutable:
no string methods change the string they operate on, they all return new strings. The reason is that strings are immutable – they cannot change, we can only ever make new strings.
So, going step-by-step through your example:
This creates a new string named 'Ezra', and assigns a variable called name to reference that string.
let name = 'Ezra';
This creates (or sets) a property in $this called 'name' that references the string in name (which is 'Ezra').
$this['name'] = name;
This creates a new string called 'Bob' and stores it in the variable called name. The variable already exists. This does not mutate the value that was previously held in there. Instead, name is being updated to point to a new reference.
// then :
name = 'Bob';
However, if you were to pass an object, you'll notice that you can actually mutate it. This is because objects are passed-by-reference and you can mutate the value at that reference.
For example:
// Create a new value that stores an object, with a property 'firstName'
let name = { firstName: 'Ezra' };
// Assign myObject to $this['name']. Now $this['name'] and name both point to the same reference.
$this['name'] = name;
// Change the value in the object pointed-to by name
name.firstName = 'Bob'
console.log($this['name'].firstName); // <- This will output 'Bob'

How to write a global get+set method for object

My question is easy to understand, I have an object (or class), and I want to have ONE method which can getting AND setting a property.
In fact, I have no problem to write it for "simple" properties. It becomes difficult when my class has object properties, and that I want to access or alter a nested one.
My class:
var MyClass = function() {
this.name = 'defaultName';
this.list = {
a: 1,
b: 6
};
}
Simple class, isn't it? Then, what I write for my method:
MyClass.prototype.getset = function(prop) {
let value = arguments[1];
let path = prop.split('.');
prop = this;
$(path).each(function(i) { prop = prop[this]; }
if (value) {
prop = value;
return this;
}
return prop;
}
The "get part" works (MyClass.getset('list.b') returns 6).
But the "set part"... does not work.
I want that when I execute MyClass.getset('list.b', 2), the b property of list becomes 2, and that's not the case.
I know why my version is not working (my prop variable is just a "copy" and does not affect the object itself), but I can't find solution for this...
Thanks for you help!

If you're assigning a primitive, you need to assign to a property of an object for the object to be changed as well. Check if value, and if so, navigate to and change from the next to last property, rather than the final property. Use reduce for brevity:
var MyClass = function() {
this.name = 'defaultName';
this.list = {
a: 1,
b: 6
};
}
MyClass.prototype.getset = function(prop, value) {
const props = prop.split('.');
const lastProp = props.pop();
const lastObj = props.reduce((obj, prop) => obj[prop], this);
if (value) {
lastObj[lastProp] = value;
return this;
} else return lastObj[lastProp];
}
const mc = new MyClass();
mc.getset('list.b', 2);
console.log(mc.list.b);
console.log(mc.getset('list.b'));

Merge objects dynamically - Object Property Name Issue

I'm trying to merge objects together, or add new objects to existing objects.
I've already got it working as for merge using jQuery, but it's the name of the property that wont work dynamically.
The parameter filters is an object, such as {test:123}.
When invoking filter({test:123});, I want the filter function to dynamically add objects to a global object. (and of course can't use push() since its not an array)
this.filter = function(filters) {
for (var key in filters) {
$.extend( settings.filter, {key:filters[key]} );
}
};
The problem is that "key" turns into "key" as the name of the property. When it should be "test" as the property name; I can not get the property name to be created dynamically.
The goal would be to allow the user to fire the function like this:
filter({test:123,test2:1321,test55:4})
and dynamically add objects to the global settings object without the user meddling with the object itself.

Your code does not work because key is not being interpreted as a variable when being directly set in the object.
$.extend( settings.filter, {key:filters[key]} );
Considering:
var keyName = "Test";
var badObj = { keyName: "Hello World" };
You would get undefined when calling newObj.Test because it is actually newObj.keyName.
In order to use a variable to create a property name, you need to use different syntax.
var keyName = "Test";
var newObj = {};
newObj[keyName] = "Hello World";
You could then reference and use newObj.Test to get "Hello World"
To fix the method you provided, you can adjust it to:
this.filter = function(filters) {
for (var key in filters) {
if (filters.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
var newObj = {};
newObj[key] = filters[key];
$.extend(settings.filter, newObj);
}
}
};
Keep in mind you can simplify this and just use the extend method. This would be better, unless you are looking to do your own filtering as the method name suggests.
this.filter = function(filters) {
$.extend(settings.filter, filters);
};
Demos

You should create temp obj before extend :
this.filter = function(filters) {
for (var key in filters) {
var obj = {};
obj[key] = filters[key];
$.extend( settings.filter, obj );
}
};

Unexpected behavior using getters and setters

Look this code:
<script>
function dbg (object) {
var _string = "";
for (var a in object) {
_string += a + ":\n";
for (var b in object[a])
if (/^get_/.test (b))
_string += "\t" + b + " - " + object[a][b] () + "\n";
}
return _string;
}
function Order () {
var products = [];
this.get_products = function () {return products;}
this.set_products = function (_products) {products = _products;}
}
function Product () {
var id = null;
var name = null;
this.get_id = function () {return id;}
this.get_name = function () {return name;}
this.set_id = function (_id) {id = _id;}
this.set_name = function (_name) {name = _name}
}
var order = new Order ();
var product = new Product ();
product.set_id (1);
product.set_name ("Banana");
order.set_products (order.get_products ().concat (product));
alert (dbg (order.get_products ())); // Ok
product.set_id (2);
product.set_name ("Orange");
order.set_products (order.get_products ().concat (product));
alert (dbg (order.get_products ())); // Duplicated values! What?
</script>
The first time you push the object "Product" into the object "Order", everything looks fine.
When you set new values to the object "Product", the object itself overwrites the previous values of the object "Order". The final result is a array of duplicated values. Is it normal ? Is there a workaround? Just tried everything I knew without success. Thanks.

Crazy Train has already answered it in the comments. The question is listed having 0 answers so I'll add it as an answer.
When adding a variable containing an object to an array you add a reference to the variable, when you re assign the variable the reference is broken.
Adding a variable containing an object to an array then re assigning the variable doesn't change the object in the array:
var arr=[];
var object={name:"John"};
arr.push(object);
object=33;
console.log(arr);//=[Object {name="john"}]
Adding a variable containing an object to an array then changing the internal values of the object that the variable contains does change the object in the array:
var arr=[];
var object={name:"John"};
arr.push(object);
object.name="Jane";
console.log(arr);//=[Object {name="Jane"}]
So to correct your code you could do the following:
Create a new variable for the product to be added:
var product2=new Product();
product2.set_id (2);
product2.set_name ("Orange");
order.set_products (order.get_products ().concat (product2));
Or break the reference between your product variable and the products array in order:
product=null;//product has no ref to order.products
product=new Product();
product.set_id (2);
product.set_name ("Orange");
order.set_products (order.get_products ().concat (product));
I would not define members of an object in a constructor function with var as JavaScript doesn't support private members. You can simulate them by creating closures but that has it's own problem when you have instance specific privates (as is your case). You can't use prototype if the functions need to access private instance variables, you can't clone it unless you have public accesssors, inheritance and overriding functions will be a pain.
Here is some more info on using constructor functions.
If you have Chrome or Firefox (with Firebug) then you can press F12 to open the console. You an detach the console window (have it's own window) then copy code in the before mentioned answers and paste them in the commandline of the console. There you can run and re run the code, change and see the output to better understand JS behavior.

You are just overriding the variables in object. I'd do it like this, much simpler:
var products = {
set : function(name,id) {
products.list.push({name:name,id:id});
},
get : function(id) {
var r;
if(typeof id === 'number'){
products.list.forEach(function(e,i){ if(e.id==id) r= products.list[i];});
} else {
products.list.forEach(function(e,i){ if(e.name==id) r = products.list[i];});
}
return r;
},
list : []
};
var order={
set : function(p) {
order.list[p.id]=p;
},
get : function(id) {
return order.list[id];
},
delete : function(id) {
return delete order.list[id];
},
list : {}
};
then you can do this
products.set('apple',34);
products.set('orange',4);
products.set('mango',1);
var x = products.get(1);
var y = products.get('orange');
order.set(x);
order.set(y);
working demo:
http://jsfiddle.net/techsin/tjDVv/2/

Can you use custom objects as properties of an object in javascript?

Suppose I create a custom object/javascript "class" (airquotes) as follows:
// Constructor
function CustomObject(stringParam) {
var privateProperty = stringParam;
// Accessor
this.privilegedGetMethod = function() {
return privateProperty;
}
// Mutator
this.privilegedSetMethod = function(newStringParam) {
privateProperty = newStringParam;
}
}
Then I want to make a list of those custom objects where I can easily add or remove things from that list. I decide to use objects as a way to store the list of custom objects, so I can add custom objects to the list with
var customObjectInstance1 = new CustomObject('someString');
var customObjectInstance2 = new CustomObject('someOtherString');
var customObjectInstance3 = new CustomObject('yetAnotherString');
myListOfCustomObjects[customObjectInstance1] = true;
myListOfCustomObjects[customObjectInstance2] = true;
myListOfCustomObjects[customObjectInstance3] = true;
and remove custom objects from the list with
delete myListOfCustomObjects[customObjectInstance1];
but if i try to iterate through the list with
for (i in myListOfCustomObjects) {
alert(i.privilegedGetMethod());
}
I would get an error in the FireBug console that says "i.privilegedGetMethod() is not a function". Is there a way to fix this problem or an idiom in javascript to do what I want? Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I'm new to javascript and have scoured the internet for solutions to my problem with no avail. Any help would be appreciated!
P.S. I realize that my example is super simplified, and I can just make the privateProperty public using this.property or something, but then i would still get undefined in the alert, and I would like to keep it encapsulated.

i won't be the original object as you were expecting:
for (i in myListOfCustomObjects) {
alert(typeof i); // "string"
}
This is because all keys in JavaScript are Strings. Any attempt to use another type as a key will first be serialized by toString().
If the result of toString() isn't somehow unique for each instance, they will all be the same key:
function MyClass() { }
var obj = {};
var k1 = new MyClass();
var k2 = new MyClass();
obj[k1] = {};
obj[k2] = {};
// only 1 "[object Object]" key was created, not 2 object keys
for (var key in obj) {
alert(key);
}
To make them unique, define a custom toString:
function CustomObject(stringParam) {
/* snip */
this.toString = function () {
return 'CustomObject ' + stringParam;
};
}
var obj = {};
var k1 = new CustomObject('key1');
var k2 = new CustomObject('key2');
obj[k1] = {};
obj[k2] = {};
// "CustomObject key1" then "CustomObject key2"
for (var key in obj) {
alert(key);
}
[Edit]
With a custom toString, you can set the object as the serialized key and the value to keep them organized and still continue to access them:
var customObjectInstance1 = new CustomObject('someString');
var customObjectInstance2 = new CustomObject('someOtherString');
var customObjectInstance3 = new CustomObject('yetAnotherString');
myListOfCustomObjects[customObjectInstance1] = customObjectInstance1;
myListOfCustomObjects[customObjectInstance2] = customObjectInstance2;
myListOfCustomObjects[customObjectInstance3] = customObjectInstance3;
for (i in myListOfCustomObjects) {
alert(myListOfCustomObjects[i].privilegedGetMethod());
}

The for iteration variable is just the index, not the object itself. So use:
for (i in myListOfCustomObjects) {
alert(myListOfCustomObjects[i].privilegedGetMethod());
}
and, in my opinion, if you use an Object as an array index / hash, it just would be converted to the string "Object", which ends up in a list with a single entry, because all the keys are the same ("Object").

myListOfCustomObjects =[
new CustomObject('someString'),
new CustomObject('someOtherString'),
new CustomObject('yetAnotherString')
]
you will get access to any element by index of array.