Content in the viewport is fluid so when viewed on a smaller device the content height exceeds the 100vh. I was thinking of just using JS to calc the min-height of content blocks. Any ideas on a straight on if there is CSS approach? Cannot think of much... but maybe other smart folks can :-)
.content.intro {
height: 100vh;
min-height: 800px; // content can be higher than this
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
margin-top: -80px;
padding-top: 80px; // adjust for the 80px header at top
}
Thanks for the comments. In this case it's a block of copy that can exceed the height of 100vh, because it's centered in flex layout it was clipping the text at smaller heights. My solution was just some simple JS triggered on load and resize:
setMinHeight : function() {
$('.content.intro').each(function() {
var bodyCopy = $(this).find('.bodyCopy'),
padTop = $(this).css('padding-top').substring(0,2),
padBottom = $(this).css('padding-bottom').substring(0,2);
minHeight = bodyCopy.outerHeight(true) + parseInt(padTop) + parseInt(padBottom) + $('header').outerHeight();
$(this).css( { 'min-height' : minHeight + 'px' });
});
}
Basically just set min-height of bodyCopy so the viewport is never smaller that the content inside it.
In my case -> content height + top/bottom padding of parent + height of header to stop overlapping
Related
I'm trying to create a map of button elements that overlay a full-screen image, positioned over all the 'buttons' depicted on the image. When the image resizes, the button elements should resize as well.
I initially used an SVG image map for this, but it had a positioning bug (the link below) that didn't allow for the video player inside the foreignObject to show.
SVG foreignObject and absolute positioning
I figured using absolute positioning, and JS to measure the width of the background image was the best way to go. However, I'm having trouble making it work.
Below is the project, with the white box needing to be positioned over the background image (the entire box, with chocolates, and the screen).
The image is within a div as a background, like so:
export const BackgroundLightsOn = styled.div`
position: absolute;
background: url(${BgLightsOn});
background-position: center center;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
border: 1px solid red;
`
Unfortunately, getting the dimensions of this DOM element gets the dimensions of the div, not the image (which is sometimes larger than the viewport). Below is the 'resizing' code, but this connects to backgroundRef (which is the div element the image is the background, not the image itself).
import React, { useEffect, useRef } from 'react';
import {
TruffleTinContainer,
TruffleTinOutside,
} from '../truffle-tin/styledTruffleTin';
export default function TruffleTin({ backgroundRef }) {
const truffleTinRef = useRef();
const initialPos = { x: 150, y: 150 };
const padding = 25;
let truffleBoxWidth = 0;
let truffleBoxHeight = 0;
useEffect(() => {
truffleBoxWidth = truffleTinRef.current.offsetWidth;
truffleBoxHeight = truffleTinRef.current.offsetHeight;
resize();
}, []);
function resize() {
let backgroundDivRect = backgroundRef.current.getBoundingClientRect();
truffleTinRef.current.style.left =
(initialPos.x / truffleBoxWidth) * backgroundDivRect.width -
padding +
'px';
truffleTinRef.current.style.top =
(initialPos.y / truffleBoxHeight) * backgroundDivRect.height -
padding +
'px';
}
useEffect(() => {
window.addEventListener('resize', resize);
return () => window.removeEventListener('resize', resize);
});
return (
<TruffleTinContainer ref={truffleTinRef}>
I'm the truffle tin
</TruffleTinContainer>
);
}
See the GIF below for the issue:
What's the best way to get this div to proportionally match the width of the background image?
(Edit: I changed the 'div with image background' to an img tag, but even then, the getBoundingClientRect shows not the width of the image, but the width of the viewport:
(in other words, even though the image is much wider than the viewport, I'm still getting the viewports dimensions, when what I want is the image's dimensions))
You don't need JS for that. This is achieved with plain CSS, all you need is the button center positions relative to left-top corner of the block. Sample HTML/CSS:
<div class='wrapper'> <!-- Will need this later -->
<div class='container'>
<a class='button' style='--left: 25%; --top: 20%'>1</a>
<a class='button' style='--left: 35%; --top: 80%'>2</a>
</div>
</div>
.container{
position: relative;
background: url('/path/to/image');
background-size: 100% auto;
}
.button{
position: absolute;
left: var(--left);
top: var(--top);
transform: translate(-50%, -50%); /* Move button a bit so its center matches the actual position */
/* These are just for visualization */
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
border-radius: 100%;
background: pink;
display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center;
}
The next step is to make .container have a constant width, or at least a constant width/height ratio if you care about vertical resizing. The constant width is achieved with a simple min-width. To avoid horizontal scroll we will add a .wrapper to hide the cut-off sides:
.wrapper{
display: flex;
align-items: center;
max-width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
}
/* A-and a min-width for .container */
.container{
min-width: 1200px; /* Or whatever */
}
If you need a fixed ratio:
.container::before{
content: '';
display: block;
padding-top: 56.25%; /* 56.25% of the parent width this is, ratio 16x9 */
}
min-width can still be applied if needed. There's an aspect-ratio CSS property that can be used instead of that pseudo-element hack, but it is supported only in relatively fresh browser versions; still might be used if you don't plan supporting a little outdated browsers.
I have a footer that contain the user name. I want to show it always on the bottom of the viewport. Like a fixed bottom bar but only on my sidebar.
I use the function
function setFooterStyle() {
var docHeight = $(window).height();
var footerHeight = $('#footer').outerHeight();
var footerTop = $('#footer').position().top + footerHeight;
$('#footer').css('margin-top', (docHeight - footerTop) + 'px');
$('#footer').removeClass('invisible');
}
this inside:
$( function () {
setFooterStyle();
window.onresize = setFooterStyle;
}
But because I use a sidebar I thing the margin-top will place the footer the amount of pixel under the sidebar and not under the page top. So it is somewhere at the bottom of the document and I have to scroll to see.
Any idea what I do wrong to keep the text always on the bottom of the viewport, while resize ans while scroll?
The general term for what you are trying to do is "Sticky Footer". The trick is to make a wrapper div for your content above the footer that takes up 100% of the height of the viewport, then to use negative margins on the footer to move it up the same amount as the height of the footer. Then the footer is always at the bottom of the viewport. Then you need to add padding to the bottom of the content so that it never gets covered by the footer, now that the footer is not taking up space in the regular flow of the layout.
html, body {
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
.content {
min-height: 100%;
}
.content-inside {
padding: 20px;
padding-bottom: 50px;
}
.footer {
height: 50px;
margin-top: -50px;
}
https://css-tricks.com/couple-takes-sticky-footer/
I'm working on a Video editing tool, and I need to maintain the 16:9 aspect ratio of the video when resizing the screen horizontally and vertically. So far I got it to work as expected when resizing horizontally, and when resizing down vertically, but can't get it to work when sizing up vertically. The Javascript code I used to calculate the height of the video and resize it is below (notice how the else clause is empty because that's where the code should go):
const calculateHeight = () => {
// Get the other elements on the page
const header = document.querySelector('.main-navigation');
const meshTopBar = document.querySelector('.mesh__top-bar');
const footer = document.querySelector('.mesh__bottom-bar');
// Get the section to apply the window height to it
const mainSection = document.querySelector('.insert-level-container');
// Get the video elements
const editor = document.querySelector('.mesh__insert-editor-container');
const video = document.querySelector('.mesh__insert-editor-video-container');
// Apply the height to the main section by calculating the window height minus the other elements' height
if(mainSection !== null) {
mainSection.style.height = (window.innerHeight - header.offsetHeight - meshTopBar.offsetHeight - footer.offsetHeight) + 'px';
}
// This should be the ideal height for the video
video.style.minHeight = ((video.offsetWidth * 9) / 16) + 'px';
// If the video height is bigger than the section height (calculated above), then resize it
if(video.offsetHeight + 115 > mainSection.offsetHeight) {
video.style.minHeight = video.offsetHeight - 1 + 'px';
editor.style.maxWidth = video.offsetHeight * 16 / 9 + 'px';
} else {
// This is where the logic for the vertical resizing should go
}
}
The relevant CSS for these items is:
.mesh__insert-editor-container {
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
.mesh__insert-editor-video-container {
position: relative;
width: 100%:
}
And the HTML:
<section class="mesh__insert-editor-container flex__one flex-container flex-column horizontally-left-aligned" id="video-main-container">
<div class="mesh__insert-editor-video-container flex-container horizontally-right-aligned flex-wrap">
<video class="mesh__insert-editor-video-placeholder"></video>
</div>
</section>
All this code is:
Get the height of all the elements on the page, sum them and calculate the main section height by subtracting that height;
If the video height gets bigger than the section height, I reduce its height by -1px each time the window gets resized, and calculate the new width.
All the above code is giving me this result, which works great for most scenarios, but I need the video to size up when the condition on the if statement is not met. Everything I tried inside the else statement gets "jumpy".
Any better alternatives to solve this would be much appreciated. Thanks all!
The CSS aspect ratio trick might be a good solution: https://css-tricks.com/aspect-ratio-boxes/
The approach takes advantage of a quirk in CSS where padding based on a percentage value will be relative to the element's width. Create a container using this trick, the important bit is this line:
padding-top: calc(9/16 * 100%);
The value is calculating the correct height based on the aspect ratio you want (9 tall over 16 wide in this case) and generating it relative to the width of the element by multiplying by 100%.
With the container maintaining aspect ratio, just place the content inside an absolute positioned inner div and you should be good. This solution is fully responsive at that point.
* { box-sizing: border-box }
.outer-max-width {
max-width: 960px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.aspect-ratio-box {
width: 100%;
padding-top: calc(9/16 * 100%);
position: relative;
border: 2px solid red; /* for demo visibility, remove */
}
.aspect-ratio-box-content {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
top: 0;
left: 0;
border: 2px solid blue; /* for demo visibility, remove */
}
.video-placeholder {
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
<div class="outer-max-width">
<div class="aspect-ratio-box">
<div class="aspect-ratio-box-content">
<img class="video-placeholder" src="https://placeimg.com/640/360/nature" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
Got it to work! I used this amazing CSS-only solution: https://codepen.io/EightArmsHQ/pen/BvNzrm similar to BugsArePeopleToo's suggestion, from eightarmshq:
.content{
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background: #555;
box-shadow: inset 1vh 1vh 10vh 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5);
display: flex;
box-sizing: border-box;
border: 25px solid #cecece;
}
I have a <div> of fixed size say height:100px and width:100px.
I have to display images of unknown size inside this <div> such that following cases arise:
image width > div width
image width < div width
image width = div width
image height > div height
image height < div height
image height = div height
no matter what, what is the best cross browser strategy, with support for legacy browsers, to display them with following criteria:
no white space around image
nicely centered (horizontally and vertically) if overflow
To eliminate white space, set min-height and min-width to 100% for the images. To clip the overflow, set overflow: hidden on the div. To center overflowing images, use absolute positioning and some JavaScript to set top and left values based on the size of the image.
Edit: If the image is larger than the container in both dimensions, use some JavaScript to remove the minHeight and minWidth and then set the height to 100%. If that leaves whitespace on the width, set height to "" and set width to 100%:
.centeredImageContainer {
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
overflow: hidden;
position: relative;
}
.centeredImage {
min-width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
position: absolute;
}
function centerImage(img) {
var container = img.parentNode;
if (img.offsetHeight > container.clientHeight &&
img.offsetWidth > container.clientWidth) {
img.style.minHeight = "0";
img.style.minWidth = "0";
img.style.height = "100%";
if (img.offsetWidth < container.clientWidth) {
img.style.height = "";
img.style.width = "100%";
}
}
img.style.top = ((container.offsetHeight - img.offsetHeight) / 2) + "px";
img.style.left = ((container.offsetWidth - img.offsetWidth) / 2) + "px";
}
jsfiddle.net/QRU4w/2
edit:
fiddle
html:
<div id="myPic"></div>
css, if you want a big pic to shrink to fit while still filling the whole div, and want a small pic to expand to fill the whole div:
#myPic{
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-image: url(/abs/path/img.jpg);
background-size: cover;
}
css, if you want a big pic to only display a window of the middle without resizing:
#myPic{
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-image: url(/abs/path/img.jpg);
background-position: center center;
}
I don't know of a way to both expand small images to fit, while not shrinking big images.
If you mean that you need to have no whitespace including above a landscape-oriented image, for example (i.e. the photo needs to fill the square, regardless of whether it is originally a square), then you may want to look into setting the image as the div's background and using background-size: cover. See this link for browser support.
The best way to do this is by using object-fit property.
.image-container {
width: 400px;
height: 300px;
}
.centered-image {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
object-fit: cover;
}
<div class="image-container">
<img src="https://24seven.co.ke/uploads/sliders/1550944223ecommmerce.jpg" alt="24seven Developers slider" class="centered-image">
</div>
For more illustrations and geeks see this.
How can I scale a div to fit inside the browser view port but preserve the aspect ratio of the div. How can I do this using CSS and/or JQuery?
Thanks!
You don't need javascript for this. You can use pure CSS.
A padding-top percentage is interpreted relative to the containing block width. Combine it with position: absolute on a child element, and you can put pretty much anything in a box that retains its aspect ratio.
HTML:
<div class="aspectwrapper">
<div class="content">
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.aspectwrapper {
display: inline-block; /* shrink to fit */
width: 100%; /* whatever width you like */
position: relative; /* so .content can use position: absolute */
}
.aspectwrapper::after {
padding-top: 56.25%; /* percentage of containing block _width_ */
display: block;
content: '';
}
.content {
position: absolute;
top: 0; bottom: 0; right: 0; left: 0; /* follow the parent's edges */
outline: thin dashed green; /* just so you can see the box */
}
The display: inline-block leaves a little extra space below the bottom edge of the .aspectwrapper box, so another element below it won't run flush against it. Using display: block will get rid of it.
Thanks to this post for the tip!
Another approach relies on the fact that browsers respect an image's aspect ratio when you resize only its width or height. (I'll let google generate a 16x9 transparent image for demonstration purposes, but in practice you would use your own static image.)
HTML:
<div class="aspectwrapper">
<img class="aspectspacer" src="http://chart.googleapis.com/chart?cht=p3&chs=160x90" />
<div class="content">
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.aspectwrapper {
width: 100%;
position: relative;
}
.aspectspacer {
width: 100%; /* let the enlarged image height push .aspectwrapper's bottom edge */
}
.content {
position: absolute;
top: 0; bottom: 0; right: 0; left: 0;
outline: thin dashed green;
}
Thanks to Geoff for the tip on how to structure the math and logic. Here's my jQuery implementation, which I'm using to size a lightbox so it fills the window:
var height = originalHeight;
var width = originalWidth;
aspect = width / height;
if($(window).height() < $(window).width()) {
var resizedHeight = $(window).height();
var resizedWidth = resizedHeight * aspect;
}
else { // screen width is smaller than height (mobile, etc)
var resizedWidth = $(window).width();
var resizedHeight = resizedWidth / aspect;
}
This is working well for me right now across laptop and mobile screen sizes.
I have a different pure HTML/CSS approach which does not rely on padding or absolute positioning. Instead it uses em units and relies on the CSS min() function plus a little bit of math.
Imagine that we want a viewport div with 16:9 aspect ratio which always fits the browser window and is centered in the axis with excess space. Here's how we can accomplish that:
HTML
<body>
<div class="viewport">
<p>
This should be a 16:9 viewport that fits the window.
</p>
</div>
</body>
CSS
body {
width: 100vw;
height: 100vh;
margin: 0;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
background-color: white;
font-size: min(1vw, 1.778vh);
}
div.viewport {
width: 100em;
height: 56.25em;
background-color: lightblue;
}
div.viewport > p {
font-size: 3em;
text-align: center;
}
You can experiment with this in a sample JSFiddle here.
The secret sauce is in the body font-size. It should be set to min(1vw, Avh), where A is the aspect ratio you want the div to have, i.e. width / height. In the example above we're using 1.778, which is approximately 16 / 9.
In CSS, em units are based on the font-size of the element, which is inherited from parent element if not explicitly set. For your viewport div, set the width to 100em (NOT rem) and the height to Iem, where I is the inverse of the aspect ratio expressed as a percentage, i.e. 100 / A or 100 * height / width. In the example above we're using 56.25, which is 100 * 9 / 16.
One bonus of this approach is that all of your nested elements may also use em units so that they always scale precisely with the size of the viewport. You can see this used on the p element in the example.
Note that as an alternative to the above, you may set the font-size on your html element and use rem units everywhere. CSS rem units are similar to em units but always relative to the root element's font-size.
Javascipt:
//Responsive Scaling
let outer = document.getElementById('outer'),
wrapper = document.getElementById('wrap'),
maxWidth = outer.clientWidth,
maxHeight = outer.clientHeight;
window.addEventListener("resize", resize);
resize();
function resize(){
let scale,
width = window.innerWidth,
height = window.innerHeight,
isMax = width >= maxWidth && height >= maxHeight;
scale = Math.min(width/maxWidth, height/maxHeight);
outer.style.transform = isMax?'':'scale(' + scale + ')';
wrapper.style.width = isMax?'':maxWidth * scale;
wrapper.style.height = isMax?'':maxHeight * scale;
}
HTML:
<div id="wrap">
<div id="outer">
{{ fixed content here }}
</div>
</div>
Styling:
/* Responsive Scaling */
#wrap {
position: relative;
width: 1024px;
height: 590px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
#outer {
position: relative;
width: 1024px;
height: 590px;
transform-origin: 0% 0%;
overflow: hidden;
}
This is possible with JQuery and a bit of maths.
Use JQuery to get the view ports width and height as well as the divs current dimensions.
$(document).width();
Calculate the divs current aspect ratio. eg width/height
You need a bit of logic to determine whether to set the width or height first, then use the initial ratio to calculate the other side.
jQuery has a plugin that grows an object until one of it's sides reaches a certain px-value. Coupling this will the viewport's height, you could expand any element to that size: jQuery MaxSide.