I have an array of objects, each object is similar to:
{ word: 'intentional',
definition: 'done by intention or design',
type: 'adjective',
Synonyms: [ 'conscious', 'deliberate', 'intended', 'knowing', ] }
I am trying to convert the whole array into following json format:
{
"conscious": {
"data": ["done by intention or design"],
"type": "adjective",
"Synonym For": ["intentional"]
},
"deliberate": {
"data": ["done by intention or design"],
"type": "adjective",
"Synonym For": ["intentional"]
},
...
}
This json format is an input to another program, which I do not control.
I am running it on node.js.
How can I declare an object and then loop through the array to fill it as intended?
var obj = { word: 'intentional',
definition: 'done by intention or design',
type: 'adjective',
Synonyms: [ 'conscious', 'deliberate', 'intended', 'knowing' ] },
res = obj.Synonyms.reduce(function(s,a) {
s[a] = { data: [obj.definition], type: obj.type, SynonymFor: [obj.word] };
return s;
}, {});
console.log(res);
var jsonObj = {};
wordArray.forEach((word) => {
word.Synonyms.forEach((synonym) => {
jsonObj[synonym] = {
data: [word.definition],
type: word.type,
'Synonym For': [word.word]
};
})
})
Related
This is the result I want to achieve
dataset: [
dataset: [
{
seriesname: "",
data: [
{
value: "123",
},
{
value: "123",
},
]
},
]
]
My problem right now is that the second dataset gets duplicated.
This is how I am setting it (val is an integer and allYears is an array of integers):
this.grphColumn.dataSource.dataset[0].dataset = this.allYears.map(el => {
return {
seriesname: "Planned",
data: [{value: val}, {value: val}]
}
});
How can I make it so the dataset doesn't get duplicated?
You have to map the values separately, if you dont want the seriesName to be Repeated..
const yearsMap = this.allYears.map((el) => { return { value: el } });
this.grphColumn.dataSource.dataset[0].dataset = {
seriesname: "Planned",
data: yearsMap
}
I have an array with nested objects that I need to update from another array of objects, if they match.
Here is the data structure I want to update:
const invoices = {
BatchItemRequest: [
{
bId: "bid10",
Invoice: {
Line: [
{
SalesItemLineDetail: {
ItemAccountRef: { AccountCode: "10110" },
},
},
{
SalesItemLineDetail: {
ItemAccountRef: { AccountCode: "11110" },
},
Amount: 2499,
},
],
},
},
{
bId: "bid10",
Invoice: {
Line: [
{
SalesItemLineDetail: {
ItemAccountRef: { AccountCode: "10110" },
},
},
{
SalesItemLineDetail: {
ItemAccountRef: { AccountCode: "10111" },
},
Amount: 2499,
},
],
},
},
],
};
Here is the array of objects I want to update it from:
const accounts = [
{ AccountCode: "10110", Id: "84" },
{ AccountCode: "11110", Id: "5" },
{ AccountCode: "10111", Id: "81" },
];
I want to update invoices, using accounts, by inserting Id if AccountCode matches, to get the following structure:
const invoices = {
BatchItemRequest: [
{
bId: "bid10",
Invoice: {
Line: [
{
SalesItemLineDetail: {
ItemAccountRef: { AccountCode: "10110", Id: "84" },
},
},
{
SalesItemLineDetail: {
ItemAccountRef: { AccountCode: "11110", Id: "5" },
},
Amount: 2499,
},
],
},
},
{
bId: "bid10",
Invoice: {
Line: [
{
SalesItemLineDetail: {
ItemAccountRef: { AccountCode: "10110", Id: "84" },
},
},
{
SalesItemLineDetail: {
ItemAccountRef: { AccountCode: "10111", Id: "81" },
},
Amount: 2499,
},
],
},
},
],
};
I have tried various methods, such as the following:
const mapped = invoices.BatchItemRequest.map((item1) => {
return Object.assign(
item1,
accounts.find((item2) => {
return item2 && item1.Invoice.Line.ItemAccountRef.AccountCode === item2.AccountCode;
})
);
});
Problem with this approach (it doesn't work as I think I need to do another nested map), but it also creates a new array, only including the nested elements of invoices.
Does anyone know a good approach to this?
This isn't the cleanest of code but it gets the job done:
function matchInvoiceWithAccount(invoices, accounts) {
const mappedInvoices = invoices.BatchItemRequest.map((request) => {
// Shouldn't modify input parameter, could use Object.assign to create a copy and modify the copy instead for purity
request.Invoice.Line = request.Invoice.Line.map((line) => {
const accountCode = line.SalesItemLineDetail.ItemAccountRef.AccountCode;
// If accounts was a map of AccountCode to Id you would't need to search for it which would be more effective
const account = accounts.find((account) => account.AccountCode === accountCode);
if (account) {
line.SalesItemLineDetail.ItemAccountRef.Id = account.Id;
}
return line;
});
return request;
});
return {
BatchItemRequest: mappedInvoices,
};
}
What you could and probably should do to improve this is to not modify the input parameters of the function, but that requires that you in a better way copy the original, either using Object.assign or spread operator.
At first, it will be good to create Map from your accounts array. We will go one time for array with O(n) and then will read ids by code with O(1). And nested fors is O(m*n), that will be much more slower at big arrays.
const idsByAccountCodes = new Map();
accounts.forEach((data) => {
idsByAccountCodes.set(data.AccountCode, data.Id);
})
or shorter:
const idsByAccountCode = new Map(accounts.map((data) => [data.AccountCode, data.Id]))
then if you want to mutate original values you can go through all nesting levels and add values
for ( const {Invoice:{ Line: line }} of invoices.BatchItemRequest){
for ( const {SalesItemLineDetail: {ItemAccountRef: item}} of line){
item.Id = idsByAccountCodes.get(item.AccountCode) || 'some default value'
// also if you don't have ids for all codes you need to define logic for that case
}
}
If you don't need to mutate original big object "invoices" and all of nested objects, then you can create recursive clone of if with something like lodash.cloneDeep
I've have a complex data structure with multiple nested arrays in place.
Below is the current structure
var contentData = {
data: {
content: [
{
type: "column",
sections: [
{
sub: [
{
type: "heading-1",
text: "Heading Text"
}
]
}
]
},
{
type: "acc-item",
sections: [
{
sub: [
{
type: "heading-1",
text: "Heading Text"
},
{
type: "ordered-item",
text: "Item 1"
},
{
type: "unordered-item",
text: "Item 2"
}
]
}
]
},
{
type: "acc-item",
sections: [
{
sub: [
{
type: "heading-1",
text: "Heading Text 2"
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
}
So What I wanted is,
I wanted to group all the ordered-item & unordered-item into a new object like {type: 'list', items:[all list items]}.
I need to extract all items which are inside sub and push it to new object embedded and it should placed in the root level like below,
{type:"acc-item",embedded:[{type:"heading-1",text:"Heading Text 2"}]};
So What I've done so far,
I can able to group acc-item, but not the ordered-item & unordered-item.
So my final expected result should like this,
[{
"type": "column",
"embedded": [
{
"type": "heading-1",
"text": "Heading Text"
}
]
},
{
"type": "acc-group",
"items": [
{
"type": "acc-item",
"embedded": [
{
"type": "heading-1",
"text": "Heading Text"
},
{
"type": "list",
"items": [
{
"type": "ordered-item",
"text": "Item 1"
},
{
"type": "unordered-item",
"text": "Item 2"
}
]
}
]
},
{
"type": "acc-item",
"embedded": [
{
"type": "heading-1",
"text": "Heading Text 2"
}
]
}
]
}]
Below is my code,
var group,contentData={data:{content:[{type:"column",sections:[{sub:[{type:"heading-1",text:"Heading Text"}]}]},{type:"acc-item",sections:[{sub:[{type:"heading-1",text:"Heading Text"},{type:"ordered-item",text:"Item 1"},{type:"unordered-item",text:"Item 2"}]}]},{type:"acc-item",sections:[{sub:[{type:"heading-1",text:"Heading Text 2"}]}]}]}},types=[["list",["ordered-item","unordered-item"]],["accordion",["acc-item"]]];
var result = contentData.data.content.reduce((r, o) => {
var type = (types.find(({ 1: values }) => values.indexOf(o.type) > -1)|| {})[0];
if (!type) {
r.push(o);
group = undefined;
return r;
}
if (!group || group.type !== type) {
group = { type, items: [] };
r.push(group);
}
group.items.push(o);
return r;
}, []);
document.body.innerHTML = '<pre>' + JSON.stringify(result, null, ' ') + '</pre>';
You could store the last items array as well as the last embedded array and use them until a column type is found.
var contentData = { data: { content: [{ type: "column", sections: [{ sub: [{ type: "heading-1", text: "Heading Text" }] }] }, { type: "acc-item", sections: [{ sub: [{ type: "heading-1", text: "Heading Text" }, { type: "ordered-item", text: "Item 1" }, { type: "unordered-item", text: "Item 2" }] }] }, { type: "acc-item", sections: [{ sub: [{ type: "heading-1", text: "Heading Text 2" }] }] }] } },
list = ["ordered-item", "unordered-item"],
lastItems, lastEmbedded,
result = contentData.data.content.reduce((r, { type, sections }) => {
if (type === 'column') {
r.push({ type, embedded: sections.reduce((q, { sub }) => q.concat(sub), []) });
lastItems = undefined;
lastEmbedded = undefined;
return r;
}
if (!lastItems) r.push({ type: "acc-group", items: lastItems = [] });
lastItems.push(...sections.map(({ sub }) => ({
type,
embedded: sub.reduce((q, o) => {
if (list.includes(o.type)) {
if (!lastEmbedded) q.push({ type: 'list', items: lastEmbedded = [] });
lastEmbedded.push(o);
} else {
q.push(o);
lastEmbedded = undefined;
}
return q;
}, [])
})));
return r;
}, []);
console.log(result);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
The Array.prototype and Object.prototype methods are perfect for this kind of thing.
And you're right that this is some complicated kind of logic.
I would suggest that you definitely need some unit tests for this, and try break in to separate pieces.
Here's how I'm thinking I'd do it.
1. Group By the type to create your groups..
I'm actually creating a more generic solution that you've asked for here. That is, I'm not just grouping the 'acc-item', but everything.
I did a quick search for 'array group by javascript' and it gives us this answer which suggests using Array.reduce, so let's do that.
const groupedData = contentData.data.content.reduce((acc, cur) => {
//Check if this indexed array already exists, if not create it.
const currentArray = (acc[`${cur.type}-group`] && acc[`${cur.type}-group`].items) || [];
return {
...acc,
[`${cur.type}-group`]: {
type: `${cur.type}-group`,
items: [...currentArray, cur]
}
}
}, {});
2. Now for each of those items, we need to look at their subs, and group just the list items.
To do this, we basically want to find all the `item -> sections -> sub -> types and filter them into two arrays. A quick google on how to create two arrays using a filter gives me this answer.
First though, we need to flatten that sections-> subs thing, so lets just do that.
function flattenSectionsAndSubs(item) {
return {
type: item.type,
subs: item.sections.reduce((acc, cur) => ([...acc, ...cur.sub]), [])
};
}
And I'll just copy paste that partition function in:
function partition(array, isValid) {
return array.reduce(([pass, fail], elem) => {
return isValid(elem) ? [[...pass, elem], fail] : [pass, [...fail, elem]];
}, [[], []]);
}
const listTypes = ['ordered-item', 'unordered-item'];
function createEmbeddedFromItem(item) {
const [lists, nonLists] = partition(item.subs, (v) => listTypes.includes(v.type);
return {
type: item.type,
embedded: [
...nonLists,
{
type: "list",
items: lists
}
]
}
}
Putting this all together and we get.
const contentData = {
data: {
content: [{
type: "column",
sections: [{
sub: [{
type: "heading-1",
text: "Heading Text"
}]
}]
},
{
type: "acc-item",
sections: [{
sub: [{
type: "heading-1",
text: "Heading Text"
},
{
type: "ordered-item",
text: "Item 1"
},
{
type: "unordered-item",
text: "Item 2"
}
]
}]
},
{
type: "acc-item",
sections: [{
sub: [{
type: "heading-1",
text: "Heading Text 2"
}]
}]
}
]
}
}
function partition(array, isValid) {
return array.reduce(([pass, fail], elem) => {
return isValid(elem) ? [
[...pass, elem], fail
] : [pass, [...fail, elem]];
}, [
[],
[]
]);
}
function flattenSectionsAndSubs(item) {
return {
type: item.type,
subs: item.sections.reduce((acc, cur) => ([...acc, ...cur.sub]), [])
};
}
const listTypes = ['ordered-item', 'unordered-item'];
function createEmbeddedFromItem(item) {
const [lists, nonLists] = partition(item.subs, (v) => listTypes.includes(v.type));
return {
type: item.type,
embedded: [
...nonLists,
{
type: "list",
items: lists
}
]
}
}
const groupedData = contentData.data.content.reduce((acc, cur) => {
//Check if this indexed array already exists, if not create it.
const currentArray = (acc[`${cur.type}-group`] && acc[`${cur.type}-group`].items) || [];
const flattenedItem = flattenSectionsAndSubs(cur);
const embeddedItem = createEmbeddedFromItem(flattenedItem);
return {
...acc,
[`${cur.type}-group`]: {
type: `${cur.type}-group`,
items: [...currentArray, embeddedItem]
}
}
}, {});
console.log(groupedData);
Now this doesn't exactly match what you've asked for - but it should probably work.
You can add your own bits into only add a list item, if the array isn't empty, and to stop the column from being in its own group.
The thing is - tbh it seems like a little bit of a red flag that you would create an array of items that don't having matching structures, which is why I've done it this way.
I have some data that has the following shape. The schedule data also has other identifying information attached to it, being schedules.included which is an array of arrays. I want to loop through each included array and find it by type element. I'm not entirely sure how to get each included[] by type then update state with data from each array, respectively. Is forEach the correct approach?
const schedules = {
data: [
{
id: "2147483610",
type: "Schedule"
}
],
included: [
{
id: "21468486",
type: "Query",
name: "Query1"
},
{
id: "43573457345",
type: "DataSource",
name: "DataSource1"
}
]
};
I then want to update state with whatever data I need.
getData = () => {
axios({
method: "get",
url: `/endpoint/with/this/data`
})
.then(response => {
console.log(response);
var obj = schedules.included[i].type;
obj.forEach(function(type) {
alert(type.name);
});
this.setState({
schedules: schedules.data,
//update with name from type Query
});
})
.catch(error => console.log(error.response));
};
If you want to find the name of the element from the included array which has type = Query, and there is only one such element:
var query = schedules.included.find(el => el.type == "Query");
console.log(query.name); // output Query1
If there is more than one query element you could use filter to get all query elements, then loop thru them doing stuff with each one.
var queries = schedules.included.filter(el => el.type == "Query");
queries.forEach(q => console.log(q.name));
If there is only one element with the type you are looking for then you can use find or if there is more use filter.
const schedules = {
data: [
{
id: "2147483610",
type: "Schedule"
}
],
included: [
{
id: "21468486",
type: "Query",
name: "Query1"
},
{
id: "43573457345",
type: "DataSource",
name: "DataSource1"
}
]
};
const typeMatched = schedules.included.find( included => included.type === "Query");
console.log(': ', typeMatched);
const schedulesObj = {
data: [
{
id: "2147483610",
type: "Schedule"
}
],
included: [
{
id: "21468486",
type: "Query",
name: "Query1"
},
{
id: "43573457345",
type: "DataSource",
name: "DataSource1"
},
{
id: "21468482",
type: "Query",
name: "Query2"
},
{
id: "21468484",
type: "Query",
name: "Query3"
},
]
};
const typeMatchedArray = schedulesObj.included.filter( included => included.type === "Query");
console.log('Query Type List: ', typeMatchedArray)
I'm trying to get data from a complicated API structure. How would I get all the image from the following objects and arrays:
const x = { cars: [
{ types:
{
name: "VW",
image: [{ url: "http://www.lkjl.com" }]
}
},
{...},
{...}
]};
I know I can get the image url like this:
x.cars[0].types.image[0].url
But how can I print out all the image urls?
x.cars.map(item => {
return(
item.image[0].url; // this is wrong
);
});
Do I need to have another map inside the map function?
You could use Array#reduce with mapping the url property.
const
x = { cars: [{ types: { name: "VW", image: [{ url: "http://www.lkjl.com" },{ url: "http://www.alkjl.com" }] } }, { types: { name: "Tata", image: [{ url: "http://www.lskal.com" },{ url: "http://www.lkfjl.com" }] } }] },
images = x.cars.reduce((r, item) => r.concat(item.types.image.map(i => i.url)), []);
console.log(images);
Within the cars array you have image array inside the types object, So you have to iterate over both the arrays to print out all the images.
See the code below.
const x = { cars: [
{ types:
{
name: "VW",
image: [{ url: "http://www.lkjl.com" }]
}
},
{ types:
{
name: "VW",
image: [{ url: "http://www.lkjl12.com" }]
}
}
]};
x.cars.forEach(car => {
car.types.image.forEach( i => console.log(i.url));
})
i think you missed to access the 'types' object in your map function
it should be like this :
x.cars.map(item => {
return(
item.types.image[0].url; //this should work for you
);
});
x.cars.map(item => item.types.image[0].url)
I think you missed types:
x.cars.map(item => {
return(
item.types.image[0].url;
);
});
have you try this way ?
x.cars.map((item, key) => {
return(
item.types.image[0].url;
//you're missing 'types'
);
});
i hope it can help you.