var generateSearchObject = function() {
var searchObj = {
/*value assigned to variable "check" should be here like "fileName":check*/
};
return searchObj;
};
var s = {
renderBreadCrumbs: function(breadCrumbs, state, node) {
$(breadCrumbs).each(function(index, value) {
//var check = "Something";
});
//return check
}
}
I tried my best to resolve this issue and reaching out to Community. I would like to access the variable which is there in $(breadCrumbs) in searchObj. Thank you.
Related
When I try to grab the object from the array, the type is undefined. Therefore I cannot use a method from the undefined object as it doesn't exist. I am relatively new to JavaScript and I have come straight from Java so the way of retrieving objects is kind of new to me. This is what I currently have.
var fleetAmount = 0;
var fleets = [];
function Fleet(number) {
this.number = number;
this.activities = [];
this.addActivity = function (activity) {
this.activities.push(activity);
};
fleets.push(this);
}
var getFleet = function(fleetNumber) {
return fleets[fleetAmount - fleetNumber];
}
This is where I try to grab the object and preform the function
const Fl = require(‘fleet.js’);
const fleet = Fl.getFleet(fleetNumber);
fleet.addActivity(activity);
I am also working in Node.js, which is how I am using the require method.
In combination with the answer from #audzzy I changed the getFleet() function so that it would be more efficient. I tested it out and it worked. This is what I used
function getFleet(fleetNumber) {
let result = fleets.filter(function (e) {
return e.number = fleetNumber;
})
return result[0];
}
Thanks for the help! I appreciate it.
you want to create a new fleet object and add it, not "this"..
adding "this" would cause a circular reference, where
this.fleets[i] = this (and all fleets would have the same value)
when calling get fleet, I would check that a fleet was returned from get fleet
in case amount is less than the number you send to getFleet (where according to what you posted: 1 returns the last, 2 returns second to last etc..)..
I hope this explanation makes sense.. anyways, this should work..
var fleets = [];
doStuff();
function doStuff(){
addFleet(1);
addFleet(2);
addFleet(7);
addFleet(3);
// should return null
let fleet1 = getFleetByNumber(5);
// should return the fleet with number 7, and not change the fleet with number 1
let fleet2 = getFleetByNumber(7);
if(fleet2){
fleet2.addActivity("activity");
}
console.log(`fleets: ${JSON.stringify(fleets)} \nfleet1: ${JSON.stringify(fleet1)} \nfleet2: ${JSON.stringify(fleet2)}`);
}
function addFleet(number) {
let fleet = { number: number,
activities: [] };
fleet.addActivity = function (activity) {
this.activities.push(activity);
};
fleets.push(fleet);
}
function getFleetByNumber(fleetNumber) {
return fleets.find(function (e) {
return e.number == fleetNumber;
});
}
function getFleet(fleetNumber) {
let result = null;
if(fleets.length - fleetNumber >= 0){
result = fleets[fleets.length - fleetNumber];
}
return result;
}
I am trying to push data attribute value into array parameter but it throws the above error on the line parameter[parent].push(parent);
var parameter = {};
var currentTabSelected = "";
var parent = "";
$("#categories").on("click", ":checkbox", function () {
if($(this).is(":checked")) {
parent = $(this).data("parent");
console.log(parent)
if (!(currentTabSelected in parameter)) {
parameter[currentTabSelected] = []
}
var found = $.inArray($(this).val(), parameter[currentTabSelected]) > -1;
if (!found) {
parameter[currentTabSelected].push($(this).val());
parameter[parent].push(parent);
console.log(parameter)
}
} else {
var index = parameter[currentTabSelected].indexOf($(this).val());
var parent_index = parameter[parent].indexOf(parent)
if (index > -1) {
parameter[currentTabSelected].splice(index, 1);
parameter[parent].splice(parent_index , 1);
}
}
})
what can i do to overcome the above problem?
If parameter is an object you should create keys before using them.
You are trying to access the key which is not present in the parameter.
For example , make sure your object contains currentTabSelected and parent:
parameter[currentTabSelected] = []
parameter[parent] = []
After initializing currentTabSelected and parent you can perform operation on parameter[currentTabSelected], parameter[parent].
I suffered from the same issue few days ago, the solution is directly related with the 'this' keyword. Your 'this' is referring to another scope that your variable is not a part of. You might want to do a
var that=this;
Or if you're comfortable with ES6, you can use the arrow function syntax.
I have a very complex class so i decided to break into sub modules and trying to use revealing modules pattern.
I have main class and decided to divide into smaller container function. but in current scenario
But i am not able to access any internal function from outside i.e callSearchResultWithCallBack using searchFinder.Search.callSearchResultWithCallBack(). which pattern should i use to keep this code clean as well have control to call internal function in sub module.
Thanks
var searchFinder;
function SearchFinder() {
me = this;
this.searchResult = null;
this.init = function() {
declareControls();
createAccordian();
addEvents();
fillControls();
var declareControls = function() {
this.SearchButtons = jQuery('.doSearch');
this.InputLocation = jQuery('#inputLocation');
this.InputDistanceWithIn = jQuery('#inputDistanceWithIn');
this.InputName = jQuery('#inputName');
}
var addEvents = function() {
me.SearchButtons.click(function() {
me.Search();
});
}
var fillControls = function() {
var getGetCategory = function() {
}
}
}
this.Search = function() {
var url = '';
var searchCriteria = {};
validateAndCreateCriteria();
callSearchResultWithCallBack();
function validateAndCreateCriteria() {
function validateAandGetCategory() {
if (SearchValidation.ValidateZipCode(me.InputLocation.val().trim())) {
searchCriteria.location = me.InputLocation.val().trim();
} else if (SearchValidation.ValidateCityState(me.InputLocation.val().trim())) {
searchCriteria.location = me.InputLocation.val().trim();
}
}
}
// need to access it outsite
function callSearchResultWithCallBack() {
me.searchResult(searchCriteria, SearchResultCallBack);
function SearchResultCallBack() {
}
}
}
}
jQuery(function() {
searchFinder = new SearchFinder();
searchFinder.init();
searchFinder.Search.callSearchResultWithCallBack();
});
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.8.3/jquery.min.js"></script>
This code has multiple issues, first I will address the fact that for example declareControls is not executing. First declare the function than execute!
this.init = function() {
var declareControls = function() {
this.SearchButtons = jQuery('.doSearch');
this.InputLocation = jQuery('#inputLocation');
this.InputDistanceWithIn = jQuery('#inputDistanceWithIn');
this.InputName = jQuery('#inputName');
}
var addEvents = function() {
this.SearchButtons.click(function() {
me.Search();
});
}
var fillControls = function() {
var getGetCategory = function() {
}
}
declareControls();
//createAccordian(); //not defined
addEvents();
fillControls();
}
Now let's look at others problems that will arise.
the me object referring to this is in the scope of searchFinder and does not refer to the same this in the instance of searchFinder.
function jQuery can be replaced by the commonly used $.
searchFinder.Search.callSearchResultWithCallBack() this is never going to work. Since the Search function is an object and callSearchResultWithCallBack isn't a property of this function.
Solution; make it part of the prototype of Search.
Steps:
Move callSearchResultWithCallBack outside the search function.
Add prototype to Search function
Call function via prototype.
function callSearchResultWithCallBack() {
me.searchResult(searchCriteria, SearchResultCallBack);
function SearchResultCallBack() {
}
}
this.Search.prototype.callSearchResultWithCallBack = callSearchResultWithCallBack;
If you want to fire this function outside of search use this:
searchFinder.Search.prototype.callSearchResultWithCallBack();
Please remember that callSearchResultWithCallBack will throw an error because searchCriteria is undefined.
This fixes your problems for now, but this code has to be revised thoroughly. But this should get you started. http://ejohn.org/blog/simple-javascript-inheritance/
Can someone shed some light as to why this doesn't work the way I think it should (or what I'm overlooking).
function Pane(data) {
var state = {
show: function(data) {
var pane = document.querySelector('.pane[data-content='+data.target+']');
pane.classList.add('active');
},
hide: function(data) {
var pane = document.querySelector('.pane[data-content='+data.target+']');
var paneSibling = $(pane.parentNode.childNodes);
paneSibling.each(function(sibling) {
if(check.isElement(sibling)) {
var isActive = sibling.classList.contains('active');
if(sibling != pane && isActive) {
sibling.classList.remove('active');
};
};
});
}
}
return state;
}
So I can console log Pane(arg).show/hide and it'll log it as a function, so why is it when I call Pane(arg).show it doesn't do anything? The functions in the object work (outside of the constructor function in their own functions).
The function is returning the state object, so it will never return the constructed object, even when used with new. Since state contains those methods, you can just call the function and immediately invoke one of the methods on the returned object.
Now, if you're expecting show and hide to automatically have access to data via closure, it's not working because you're shadowing the variable by declaring the method parameters. You can do this instead:
function Pane(data) {
var state = {
show: function() {
var data = data || arguments[0];
var pane = document.querySelector('.pane[data-content='+data.target+']');
pane.classList.add('active');
},
hide: function() {
var data = data || arguments[0];
var pane = document.querySelector('.pane[data-content='+data.target+']');
var paneSibling = $(pane.parentNode.childNodes);
paneSibling.each(function(sibling) {
if(check.isElement(sibling)) {
var isActive = sibling.classList.contains('active');
if(sibling != pane && isActive) {
sibling.classList.remove('active');
};
};
});
}
}
return state;
}
Then you can use it like this:
Pane({}).show();
Or like this:
var p = Pane();
p.show();
Or force a new argument when needed:
p.show({foo:'bar'});
You are overriding the original argument in each function.
So what you are doing is to find elements with the attribute data-content='undefined'
This obviously doesn't work.
So to fix this you should just remove the data argument in the show/hide function.
Here is a plnkr showing the problem and fix.
I'm using the revealing module pattern somewhat like this:
var SomeClosure = function () {
var SomeInnerVar = 4;
function InnerGetTheVar() {
return SomeInnerVar;
}
function InitClosure() {
// there's something else happening here that requires me to
// wait for document.ready before initializing the closure
setInterval(IncreaseSomeInnerVar, 10000);
}
function IncreaseSomeInnerVar() {
SomeInnerVar = SomeInnerVar + 1;
}
InitClosure();
return {
GetTheVar: InnerGetTheVar
}
}
$(document).ready(function () {
SomeClosure = SomeClosure();
});
Now why is it that if in the console I type this:
SomeClosure.GetTheVar = 2;
SomeClosure.GetTheVar; // outputs 2!
Why doesn't the closure keep SomeInnerVar protected? I don't want the outer scope to be able to change SomeInnerVar like that.
Thanks for your suggestions.
Actually, SomeInnerVar is still 'protected', in this sense. However, you are overwriting SomeClosure's GetTheVar attribute with the value 2, which isn't 'protected' in the same sense. In other words, you aren't modifying SomeInnerVar, you're modifying GetTheVar.
Instead of just returning an object literal, use Object.defineProperty:
var out = {};
if ( Object.defineProperty ) {
Object.defineProperty(out, 'GetTheVar', {
value: InnerGetTheVar,
writable: false
});
} else {
out.GetTheVar = InnerGetTheVar;
}
return out;