Trying to sort array by key [duplicate] - javascript
I have a multidimensional array. The primary array is an array of
[publicationID][publication_name][ownderID][owner_name]
What I am trying to do is sort the array by owner_name and then by publication_name. I know in JavaScript you have Array.sort(), into which you can put a custom function, in my case i have:
function mysortfunction(a, b) {
var x = a[3].toLowerCase();
var y = b[3].toLowerCase();
return ((x < y) ? -1 : ((x > y) ? 1 : 0));
}
This is fine for just sorting on the one column, namely owner_name, but how do I modify it to sort on owner_name, then publication_name?
If owner names differ, sort by them. Otherwise, use publication name for tiebreaker.
function mysortfunction(a, b) {
var o1 = a[3].toLowerCase();
var o2 = b[3].toLowerCase();
var p1 = a[1].toLowerCase();
var p2 = b[1].toLowerCase();
if (o1 < o2) return -1;
if (o1 > o2) return 1;
if (p1 < p2) return -1;
if (p1 > p2) return 1;
return 0;
}
I think what you're looking for is thenBy.js: https://github.com/Teun/thenBy.js
It allows you to use the standard Array.sort, but with firstBy().thenBy().thenBy() style.
An example can be seen here.
A good way to sort on many fields that are strings is to use toLocaleCompare and the boolean operator ||.
Something like:
// Sorting record releases by name and then by title.
releases.sort((oldRelease, newRelease) => {
const compareName = oldRelease.name.localeCompare(newRelease.name);
const compareTitle = oldRelease.title.localeCompare(newRelease.title);
return compareName || compareTitle;
})
If you wanted to sort on more fields, you could simply chain them off the return statement with more boolean operators.
Came across a need to do SQL-style mixed asc and desc object array sorts by keys.
kennebec's solution above helped me get to this:
Array.prototype.keySort = function(keys) {
keys = keys || {};
// via
// https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5223/length-of-javascript-object-ie-associative-array
var obLen = function(obj) {
var size = 0, key;
for (key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key))
size++;
}
return size;
};
// avoiding using Object.keys because I guess did it have IE8 issues?
// else var obIx = function(obj, ix){ return Object.keys(obj)[ix]; } or
// whatever
var obIx = function(obj, ix) {
var size = 0, key;
for (key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
if (size == ix)
return key;
size++;
}
}
return false;
};
var keySort = function(a, b, d) {
d = d !== null ? d : 1;
// a = a.toLowerCase(); // this breaks numbers
// b = b.toLowerCase();
if (a == b)
return 0;
return a > b ? 1 * d : -1 * d;
};
var KL = obLen(keys);
if (!KL)
return this.sort(keySort);
for ( var k in keys) {
// asc unless desc or skip
keys[k] =
keys[k] == 'desc' || keys[k] == -1 ? -1
: (keys[k] == 'skip' || keys[k] === 0 ? 0
: 1);
}
this.sort(function(a, b) {
var sorted = 0, ix = 0;
while (sorted === 0 && ix < KL) {
var k = obIx(keys, ix);
if (k) {
var dir = keys[k];
sorted = keySort(a[k], b[k], dir);
ix++;
}
}
return sorted;
});
return this;
};
sample usage:
var obja = [
{USER:"bob", SCORE:2000, TIME:32, AGE:16, COUNTRY:"US"},
{USER:"jane", SCORE:4000, TIME:35, AGE:16, COUNTRY:"DE"},
{USER:"tim", SCORE:1000, TIME:30, AGE:17, COUNTRY:"UK"},
{USER:"mary", SCORE:1500, TIME:31, AGE:19, COUNTRY:"PL"},
{USER:"joe", SCORE:2500, TIME:33, AGE:18, COUNTRY:"US"},
{USER:"sally", SCORE:2000, TIME:30, AGE:16, COUNTRY:"CA"},
{USER:"yuri", SCORE:3000, TIME:34, AGE:19, COUNTRY:"RU"},
{USER:"anita", SCORE:2500, TIME:32, AGE:17, COUNTRY:"LV"},
{USER:"mark", SCORE:2000, TIME:30, AGE:18, COUNTRY:"DE"},
{USER:"amy", SCORE:1500, TIME:29, AGE:19, COUNTRY:"UK"}
];
var sorto = {
SCORE:"desc",TIME:"asc", AGE:"asc"
};
obja.keySort(sorto);
yields the following:
0: { USER: jane; SCORE: 4000; TIME: 35; AGE: 16; COUNTRY: DE; }
1: { USER: yuri; SCORE: 3000; TIME: 34; AGE: 19; COUNTRY: RU; }
2: { USER: anita; SCORE: 2500; TIME: 32; AGE: 17; COUNTRY: LV; }
3: { USER: joe; SCORE: 2500; TIME: 33; AGE: 18; COUNTRY: US; }
4: { USER: sally; SCORE: 2000; TIME: 30; AGE: 16; COUNTRY: CA; }
5: { USER: mark; SCORE: 2000; TIME: 30; AGE: 18; COUNTRY: DE; }
6: { USER: bob; SCORE: 2000; TIME: 32; AGE: 16; COUNTRY: US; }
7: { USER: amy; SCORE: 1500; TIME: 29; AGE: 19; COUNTRY: UK; }
8: { USER: mary; SCORE: 1500; TIME: 31; AGE: 19; COUNTRY: PL; }
9: { USER: tim; SCORE: 1000; TIME: 30; AGE: 17; COUNTRY: UK; }
keySort: { }
(using a print function from here)
here is a jsbin example.
edit: cleaned up and posted as mksort.js on github.
This is handy for alpha sorts of all sizes.
Pass it the indexes you want to sort by, in order, as arguments.
Array.prototype.deepSortAlpha= function(){
var itm, L=arguments.length, order=arguments;
var alphaSort= function(a, b){
a= a.toLowerCase();
b= b.toLowerCase();
if(a== b) return 0;
return a> b? 1:-1;
}
if(!L) return this.sort(alphaSort);
this.sort(function(a, b){
var tem= 0, indx=0;
while(tem==0 && indx<L){
itm=order[indx];
tem= alphaSort(a[itm], b[itm]);
indx+=1;
}
return tem;
});
return this;
}
var arr= [[ "Nilesh","Karmshil"], ["Pranjal","Deka"], ["Susants","Ghosh"],
["Shiv","Shankar"], ["Javid","Ghosh"], ["Shaher","Banu"], ["Javid","Rashid"]];
arr.deepSortAlpha(1,0);
I suggest to use a built in comparer and chain the wanted sort order with logical or ||.
function customSort(a, b) {
return a[3].localeCompare(b[3]) || a[1].localeCompare(b[1]);
}
Working example:
var array = [
[0, 'Aluminium', 0, 'Francis'],
[1, 'Argon', 1, 'Ada'],
[2, 'Brom', 2, 'John'],
[3, 'Cadmium', 3, 'Marie'],
[4, 'Fluor', 3, 'Marie'],
[5, 'Gold', 1, 'Ada'],
[6, 'Kupfer', 4, 'Ines'],
[7, 'Krypton', 4, 'Joe'],
[8, 'Sauerstoff', 3, 'Marie'],
[9, 'Zink', 5, 'Max']
];
array.sort(function (a, b) {
return a[3].localeCompare(b[3]) || a[1].localeCompare(b[1]);
});
document.write('<pre>');
array.forEach(function (a) {
document.write(JSON.stringify(a) + '<br>');
});
You could concat the 2 variables together into a sortkey and use that for your comparison.
list.sort(function(a,b){
var aCat = a.var1 + a.var2;
var bCat = b.var1 + b.var2;
return (aCat > bCat ? 1 : aCat < bCat ? -1 : 0);
});
I found multisotr. This is simple, powerfull and small library for multiple sorting. I was need to sort an array of objects with dynamics sorting criteria:
const criteria = ['name', 'speciality']
const data = [
{ name: 'Mike', speciality: 'JS', age: 22 },
{ name: 'Tom', speciality: 'Java', age: 30 },
{ name: 'Mike', speciality: 'PHP', age: 40 },
{ name: 'Abby', speciality: 'Design', age: 20 },
]
const sorted = multisort(data, criteria)
console.log(sorted)
<script src="https://cdn.rawgit.com/peterkhayes/multisort/master/multisort.js"></script>
This library more mutch powerful, that was my case. Try it.
String Appending Method
You can sort by multiple values simply by appending the values into a string and comparing the strings. It is helpful to add a split key character to prevent runoff from one key to the next.
Example
const arr = [
{ a: 1, b: 'a', c: 3 },
{ a: 2, b: 'a', c: 5 },
{ a: 1, b: 'b', c: 4 },
{ a: 2, b: 'a', c: 4 }
]
function sortBy (arr, keys, splitKeyChar='~') {
return arr.sort((i1,i2) => {
const sortStr1 = keys.reduce((str, key) => str + splitKeyChar+i1[key], '')
const sortStr2 = keys.reduce((str, key) => str + splitKeyChar+i2[key], '')
return sortStr1.localeCompare(sortStr2)
})
}
console.log(sortBy(arr, ['a', 'b', 'c']))
Recursion Method
You can also use Recursion to do this. It is a bit more complex than the String Appending Method but it allows you to do ASC and DESC on the key level. I'm commenting on each section as it is a bit more complex.
There are a few commented out tests to show and verify the sorting works with a mixture of order and default order.
Example
const arr = [
{ a: 1, b: 'a', c: 3 },
{ a: 2, b: 'a', c: 5 },
{ a: 1, b: 'b', c: 4 },
{ a: 2, b: 'a', c: 4 }
]
function sortBy (arr, keys) {
return arr.sort(function sort (i1,i2, sKeys=keys) {
// Get order and key based on structure
const compareKey = (sKeys[0].key) ? sKeys[0].key : sKeys[0];
const order = sKeys[0].order || 'ASC'; // ASC || DESC
// Calculate compare value and modify based on order
let compareValue = i1[compareKey].toString().localeCompare(i2[compareKey].toString())
compareValue = (order.toUpperCase() === 'DESC') ? compareValue * -1 : compareValue
// See if the next key needs to be considered
const checkNextKey = compareValue === 0 && sKeys.length !== 1
// Return compare value
return (checkNextKey) ? sort(i1, i2, sKeys.slice(1)): compareValue;
})
}
// console.log(sortBy(arr, ['a', 'b', 'c']))
console.log(sortBy(arr, [{key:'a',order:'desc'}, 'b', 'c']))
// console.log(sortBy(arr, ['a', 'b', {key:'c',order:'desc'}]))
// console.log(sortBy(arr, ['a', {key:'b',order:'desc'}, 'c']))
// console.log(sortBy(arr, [{key:'a',order:'asc'}, {key:'b',order:'desc'}, {key:'c',order:'desc'}]))
Try this:
t.sort( (a,b)=> a[3].localeCompare(b[3]) || a[1].localeCompare(b[1]) );
let t = [
//[publicationID, publication_name, ownderID, owner_name ]
[1, 'ZBC', 3, 'John Smith'],
[2, 'FBC', 5, 'Mike Tyson'],
[3, 'ABC', 7, 'Donald Duck'],
[4, 'DBC', 1, 'Michael Jackson'],
[5, 'XYZ', 2, 'Michael Jackson'],
[6, 'BBC', 4, 'Michael Jackson'],
];
// owner_name subarrray index = 3
// publication_name subarrray index = 1
t.sort( (a,b)=> a[3].localeCompare(b[3]) || a[1].localeCompare(b[1]) );
console.log(t.join('\n'));
I assume that your data in array let t = [ [publicationID, publication_name, ownderID, owner_name ], ... ] where index of owner_name = 3 and publication_name =1.
I was working with ng-grid and needed to to multiple column sorting on an array of records returned from an API, so I came up with this nifty, dynamic multi-sort function.
First of all, ng-grid fires an "event" for "ngGridSorted" and passes this structure back, describing the sort:
sortData = {
columns: DOM Element,
directions: [], //Array of string values desc or asc. Each index relating to the same index of fields
fields: [], //Array of string values
};
So I built a function that will dynamically generate a sort function based on the sortData as shown above (Don't be scared by the scroll bar! It's only about 50 lines long! Also, I'm sorry about the slop. It prevented a horizontal scrollbar!):
function SortingFunction(sortData)
{
this.sortData = sortData;
this.sort = function(a, b)
{
var retval = 0;
if(this.sortData.fields.length)
{
var i = 0;
/*
Determine if there is a column that both entities (a and b)
have that are not exactly equal. The first one that we find
will be the column we sort on. If a valid column is not
located, then we will return 0 (equal).
*/
while( ( !a.hasOwnProperty(this.sortData.fields[i])
|| !b.hasOwnProperty(this.sortData.fields[i])
|| (a.hasOwnProperty(this.sortData.fields[i])
&& b.hasOwnProperty(this.sortData.fields[i])
&& a[this.sortData.fields[i]] === b[this.sortData.fields[i]])
) && i < this.sortData.fields.length){
i++;
}
if(i < this.sortData.fields.length)
{
/*
A valid column was located for both entities
in the SortData. Now perform the sort.
*/
if(this.sortData.directions
&& i < this.sortData.directions.length
&& this.sortData.directions[i] === 'desc')
{
if(a[this.sortData.fields[i]] > b[this.sortData.fields[i]])
retval = -1;
else if(a[this.sortData.fields[i]] < b[this.sortData.fields[i]])
retval = 1;
}
else
{
if(a[this.sortData.fields[i]] < b[this.sortData.fields[i]])
retval = -1;
else if(a[this.sortData.fields[i]] > b[this.sortData.fields[i]])
retval = 1;
}
}
}
return retval;
}.bind(this);
}
I then sort the results of my API (results) like so:
results.sort(new SortingFunction(sortData).sort);
I hope somebody else enjoys this solution as much as I do! Thanks!
I had a similar problem while displaying memory pool blocks from the output of some virtual DOM h-functions composition. Basically I faced to the same problem as sorting multi-criteria data like scoring results from players around the world.
I have noticed that multi-criteria sorting is:
- sort by the first column
- if equal, sort by the second
- if equal, sort by the third
- etc... nesting and nesting if-else
And if you don't care, you could fail quickly in a if-else nesting hell... like callback hell of promises...
What about if we write a "predicate" function to decide if which part of alternative using ? The predicate is simply :
// useful for chaining test
const decide = (test, other) => test === 0 ? other : test
Now after having written your classifying tests (byCountrySize, byAge, byGameType, byScore, byLevel...) whatever who need, you can weight your tests (1 = asc, -1 = desc, 0 = disable), put them in an array, and apply a reducing 'decide' function like this:
const multisort = (s1, s2) => {
const bcs = -1 * byCountrySize(s1, s2) // -1 = desc
const ba = 1 *byAge(s1, s2)
const bgt = 0 * byGameType(s1, s2) // 0 = doesn't matter
const bs = 1 * byScore(s1, s2)
const bl = -1 * byLevel(s1, s2) // -1 = desc
// ... other weights and criterias
// array order matters !
return [bcs, ba, bgt, bs, bl].reduce((acc, val) => decide(val, acc), 0)
}
// invoke [].sort with custom sort...
scores.sort(multisort)
And voila ! It's up to you to define your own criterias / weights / orders... but you get the idea. Hope this helps !
EDIT:
* ensure that there is a total sorting order on each column
* be aware of not having dependencies between columns orders, and no circular dependencies
if, not, sorting can be unstable !
function multiSort() {
var args =$.makeArray( arguments ),
sortOrder=1, prop='', aa='', b='';
return function (a, b) {
for (var i=0; i<args.length; i++){
if(args[i][0]==='-'){
prop=args[i].substr(1)
sortOrder=-1
}
else{sortOrder=1; prop=args[i]}
aa = a[prop].toLowerCase()
bb = b[prop].toLowerCase()
if (aa < bb) return -1 * sortOrder;
if (aa > bb) return 1 * sortOrder;
}
return 0
}
}
empArray.sort(multiSort( 'lastname','firstname')) Reverse with '-lastname'
My own library for working with ES6 iterables (blinq) allows (among other things) easy multi-level sorting
const blinq = window.blinq.blinq
// or import { blinq } from 'blinq'
// or const { blinq } = require('blinq')
const dates = [{
day: 1, month: 10, year: 2000
},
{
day: 1, month: 1, year: 2000
},
{
day: 2, month: 1, year: 2000
},
{
day: 1, month: 1, year: 1999
},
{
day: 1, month: 1, year: 2000
}
]
const sortedDates = blinq(dates)
.orderBy(x => x.year)
.thenBy(x => x.month)
.thenBy(x => x.day);
console.log(sortedDates.toArray())
// or console.log([...sortedDates])
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/blinq#2.0.2"></script>
I have just published to npm a micro-library called sort-helper (source on github). The idea is to import the helper by to create the comparison function for sort array method through the syntax items.sort(by(column, ...otherColumns)), with several way to express the columns to sort by:
By key: persons.sort(by('lastName', 'firstName')),
By selector: dates.sort(by(x => x.toISOString())),
In descending order: [3, 2, 4, 1].sort(by(desc(n => n))) → [3, 2, 1, 0],
Ignoring case: ['B', 'D', 'c', 'a'].sort(by(ignoreCase(x => x))).join('') → 'aBcD'.
It's similar to the nice thenBy mentioned in this answer but with the following differences that may be more to the taste of some:
An approach more functional than object-oriented (see thenBy fluent API),
A syntax a bit terser and still as much readable, natural almost like SQL.
Fully implemented in TypeScript, to benefit from type safety and type expressivity.
Sourced from GitHub
function sortMethodAsc(a, b) {
return a == b ? 0 : a > b ? 1 : -1;
}
function sortMethodWithDirection(direction) {
if (direction === undefined || direction == "asc") {
return sortMethodAsc;
} else {
return function(a, b) {
return -sortMethodAsc(a, b);
}
}
}
function sortMethodWithDirectionByColumn(columnName, direction){
const sortMethod = sortMethodWithDirection(direction)
return function(a, b){
return sortMethod(a[columnName], b[columnName]);
}
}
function sortMethodWithDirectionMultiColumn(sortArray) {
//sample of sortArray
// sortArray = [
// { column: "column5", direction: "asc" },
// { column: "column3", direction: "desc" }
// ]
const sortMethodsForColumn = (sortArray || []).map( item => sortMethodWithDirectionByColumn(item.column, item.direction) );
return function(a,b) {
let sorted = 0;
let index = 0;
while (sorted === 0 && index < sortMethodsForColumn.length) {
sorted = sortMethodsForColumn[index++](a,b);
}
return sorted;
}
}
//=============================================
//=============================================
//=============================================
//test
var data = [
{"CountryName":"Aruba","CountryCode":"ABW","GNI":280},{
"CountryName":"Afghanistan","CountryCode":"ABW","GNI":280},{"CountryName":"Angola","CountryCode":"AGO","GNI":280},{"CountryName":"Albania","CountryCode":"ALB","GNI":4320},
{"CountryName":"Arab World","CountryCode":"ARB","GNI":280},{"CountryName":"United Arab Emirates","CountryCode":"ARE","GNI":39130},
{"CountryName":"Argentina","CountryCode":"ARG","GNI":13030},{"CountryName":"Armenia","CountryCode":"ARM","GNI":3990},{"CountryName":"American Samoa","CountryCode":"ASM","GNI":280},
{"CountryName":"Antigua and Barbuda","CountryCode":"ATG","GNI":13810},{"CountryName":"Australia","CountryCode":"AUS","GNI":51360},
{"CountryName":"Austria","CountryCode":"AUT","GNI":45440},{"CountryName":"Azerbaijan","CountryCode":"AZE","GNI":4080},{"CountryName":"Burundi","CountryCode":"BDI","GNI":280},
{"CountryName":"Belgium","CountryCode":"BEL","GNI":41790},{"CountryName":"Benin","CountryCode":"BEN","GNI":800},{"CountryName":"Burkina Faso","CountryCode":"BFA","GNI":590},
{"CountryName":"Bangladesh","CountryCode":"BGD","GNI":1470},{"CountryName":"Bulgaria","CountryCode":"BGR","GNI":7860},{"CountryName":"Bahrain","CountryCode":"BHR","GNI":21150},
{"CountryName":"Bosnia and Herzegovina","CountryCode":"BIH","GNI":4910},{"CountryName":"Belarus","CountryCode":"BLR","GNI":5280},
{"CountryName":"Belize","CountryCode":"BLZ","GNI":4390},{"CountryName":"Bolivia","CountryCode":"BOL","GNI":3130},{"CountryName":"Brazil","CountryCode":"BRA","GNI":8600},
{"CountryName":"Barbados","CountryCode":"BRB","GNI":15270},{"CountryName":"Brunei Darussalam","CountryCode":"BRN","GNI":29600},
{"CountryName":"Bhutan","CountryCode":"BTN","GNI":2660},{"CountryName":"Botswana","CountryCode":"BWA","GNI":6730},
{"CountryName":"Central African Republic","CountryCode":"CAF","GNI":390},{"CountryName":"Canada","CountryCode":"CAN","GNI":42870},
{"CountryName":"Central Europe and the Baltics","CountryCode":"CEB","GNI":13009},{"CountryName":"Switzerland","CountryCode":"CHE","GNI":80560},
{"CountryName":"Chile","CountryCode":"CHL","GNI":13610},{"CountryName":"China","CountryCode":"CHN","GNI":8690},{"CountryName":"Cote d'Ivoire","CountryCode":"CIV","GNI":1580},
{"CountryName":"Cameroon","CountryCode":"CMR","GNI":1370},{"CountryName":"Colombia","CountryCode":"COL","GNI":5890},{"CountryName":"Comoros","CountryCode":"COM","GNI":1280},
{"CountryName":"Cabo Verde","CountryCode":"CPV","GNI":3030},{"CountryName":"Costa Rica","CountryCode":"CRI","GNI":11120},
{"CountryName":"Caribbean small states","CountryCode":"CSS","GNI":8909},{"CountryName":"Cyprus","CountryCode":"CYP","GNI":23720},
{"CountryName":"Czech Republic","CountryCode":"CZE","GNI":18160},{"CountryName":"Germany","CountryCode":"DEU","GNI":43490},
{"CountryName":"Djibouti","CountryCode":"DJI","GNI":1880},{"CountryName":"Dominica","CountryCode":"DMA","GNI":6590},{"CountryName":"Denmark","CountryCode":"DNK","GNI":55220},
{"CountryName":"Dominican Republic","CountryCode":"DOM","GNI":6630},{"CountryName":"Algeria","CountryCode":"DZA","GNI":3940},
{"CountryName":"East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)","CountryCode":"EAP","GNI":6987},{"CountryName":"Early-demographic dividend","CountryCode":"EAR","GNI":3352},
{"CountryName":"East Asia & Pacific","CountryCode":"EAS","GNI":10171},{"CountryName":"Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)","CountryCode":"ECA","GNI":7375},
{"CountryName":"Europe & Central Asia","CountryCode":"ECS","GNI":22656},{"CountryName":"Ecuador","CountryCode":"ECU","GNI":5920},
{"CountryName":"Euro area","CountryCode":"EMU","GNI":35645},{"CountryName":"Spain","CountryCode":"ESP","GNI":27180},{"CountryName":"Estonia","CountryCode":"EST","GNI":18190},
{"CountryName":"Ethiopia","CountryCode":"ETH","GNI":740},{"CountryName":"European Union","CountryCode":"EUU","GNI":32784},
{"CountryName":"Fragile and conflict affected situations","CountryCode":"FCS","GNI":1510},{"CountryName":"Finland","CountryCode":"FIN","GNI":44580},
{"CountryName":"Fiji","CountryCode":"FJI","GNI":4970},{"CountryName":"France","CountryCode":"FRA","GNI":37970},{"CountryName":"Gabon","CountryCode":"GAB","GNI":6650},
{"CountryName":"United Kingdom","CountryCode":"GBR","GNI":40530},{"CountryName":"Georgia","CountryCode":"GEO","GNI":3780},{"CountryName":"Ghana","CountryCode":"GHA","GNI":1880},
{"CountryName":"Guinea","CountryCode":"GIN","GNI":790},{"CountryName":"Guinea-Bissau","CountryCode":"GNB","GNI":660},
{"CountryName":"Equatorial Guinea","CountryCode":"GNQ","GNI":7050},{"CountryName":"Greece","CountryCode":"GRC","GNI":18090},
{"CountryName":"Grenada","CountryCode":"GRD","GNI":9180},{"CountryName":"Guatemala","CountryCode":"GTM","GNI":4060},{"CountryName":"Guyana","CountryCode":"GUY","GNI":4500},
{"CountryName":"High income","CountryCode":"HIC","GNI":40142},{"CountryName":"Honduras","CountryCode":"HND","GNI":2250},{"CountryName":"Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)","CountryCode":"HPC","GNI":904},{"CountryName":"Croatia","CountryCode":"HRV","GNI":12570},{"CountryName":"Haiti","CountryCode":"HTI","GNI":760},{"CountryName":"Hungary","CountryCode":"HUN","GNI":12870},{"CountryName":"IBRD only","CountryCode":"IBD","GNI":5745},{"CountryName":"IDA & IBRD total","CountryCode":"IBT","GNI":4620},{"CountryName":"IDA total","CountryCode":"IDA","GNI":1313},{"CountryName":"IDA blend","CountryCode":"IDB","GNI":1791},
{"CountryName":"Indonesia","CountryCode":"IDN","GNI":3540},{"CountryName":"IDA only","CountryCode":"IDX","GNI":1074},{"CountryName":"India","CountryCode":"IND","GNI":1800},{"CountryName":"Ireland","CountryCode":"IRL","GNI":55290},{"CountryName":"Iraq","CountryCode":"IRQ","GNI":4630},{"CountryName":"Iceland","CountryCode":"ISL","GNI":60830},{"CountryName":"Israel","CountryCode":"ISR","GNI":37270},{"CountryName":"Italy","CountryCode":"ITA","GNI":31020},{"CountryName":"Jamaica","CountryCode":"JAM","GNI":4760},{"CountryName":"Jordan","CountryCode":"JOR","GNI":3980},{"CountryName":"Japan","CountryCode":"JPN","GNI":38550},{"CountryName":"Kazakhstan","CountryCode":"KAZ","GNI":7970},{"CountryName":"Kenya","CountryCode":"KEN","GNI":1460},{"CountryName":"Kyrgyz Republic","CountryCode":"KGZ","GNI":1130},
{"CountryName":"Cambodia","CountryCode":"KHM","GNI":1230},{"CountryName":"Kiribati","CountryCode":"KIR","GNI":3010},{"CountryName":"St. Kitts and Nevis","CountryCode":"KNA","GNI":16240},{"CountryName":"Kuwait","CountryCode":"KWT","GNI":31430},{"CountryName":"Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)","CountryCode":"LAC","GNI":7470},{"CountryName":"Lao PDR","CountryCode":"LAO","GNI":2270},{"CountryName":"Lebanon","CountryCode":"LBN","GNI":8400},{"CountryName":"Liberia","CountryCode":"LBR","GNI":620},{"CountryName":"Libya","CountryCode":"LBY","GNI":5500},{"CountryName":"St. Lucia","CountryCode":"LCA","GNI":8830},{"CountryName":"Latin America & Caribbean","CountryCode":"LCN","GNI":8251},{"CountryName":"Least developed countries: UN classification","CountryCode":"LDC","GNI":1011},{"CountryName":"Low income","CountryCode":"LIC","GNI":774},{"CountryName":"Sri Lanka","CountryCode":"LKA","GNI":3850},{"CountryName":"Lower middle income","CountryCode":"LMC","GNI":2118},{"CountryName":"Low & middle income","CountryCode":"LMY","GNI":4455},{"CountryName":"Lesotho","CountryCode":"LSO","GNI":1210},{"CountryName":"Late-demographic dividend","CountryCode":"LTE","GNI":8518},{"CountryName":"Lithuania","CountryCode":"LTU","GNI":15200},{"CountryName":"Luxembourg","CountryCode":"LUX","GNI":70260},{"CountryName":"Latvia","CountryCode":"LVA","GNI":14740},{"CountryName":"Morocco","CountryCode":"MAR","GNI":2860},{"CountryName":"Moldova","CountryCode":"MDA","GNI":2200},{"CountryName":"Madagascar","CountryCode":"MDG","GNI":400},{"CountryName":"Maldives","CountryCode":"MDV","GNI":9760},
{"CountryName":"Middle East & North Africa","CountryCode":"MEA","GNI":7236},{"CountryName":"Mexico","CountryCode":"MEX","GNI":8610},{"CountryName":"Marshall Islands","CountryCode":"MHL","GNI":4840},{"CountryName":"Middle income","CountryCode":"MIC","GNI":4942},{"CountryName":"Mali","CountryCode":"MLI","GNI":770},
{"CountryName":"Malta","CountryCode":"MLT","GNI":24080},{"CountryName":"Myanmar","CountryCode":"MMR","GNI":1210},{"CountryName":"Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income)","CountryCode":"MNA","GNI":3832},{"CountryName":"Montenegro","CountryCode":"MNE","GNI":7400},{"CountryName":"Mongolia","CountryCode":"MNG","GNI":3270},{"CountryName":"Mozambique","CountryCode":"MOZ","GNI":420},{"CountryName":"Mauritania","CountryCode":"MRT","GNI":1100},{"CountryName":"Mauritius","CountryCode":"MUS","GNI":10130},{"CountryName":"Malawi","CountryCode":"MWI","GNI":320},{"CountryName":"Malaysia","CountryCode":"MYS","GNI":9650},{"CountryName":"North America","CountryCode":"NAC","GNI":56721},{"CountryName":"Namibia","CountryCode":"NAM","GNI":4570},{"CountryName":"Niger","CountryCode":"NER","GNI":360},{"CountryName":"Nigeria","CountryCode":"NGA","GNI":2100},
{"CountryName":"Nicaragua","CountryCode":"NIC","GNI":2130},{"CountryName":"Netherlands","CountryCode":"NLD","GNI":46180},{"CountryName":"Norway","CountryCode":"NOR","GNI":75990},{"CountryName":"Nepal","CountryCode":"NPL","GNI":800},{"CountryName":"Nauru","CountryCode":"NRU","GNI":10220},{"CountryName":"New Zealand","CountryCode":"NZL","GNI":38970},{"CountryName":"OECD members","CountryCode":"OED","GNI":37273},{"CountryName":"Oman","CountryCode":"OMN","GNI":14440},{"CountryName":"Other small states","CountryCode":"OSS","GNI":12199},{"CountryName":"Pakistan","CountryCode":"PAK","GNI":1580},{"CountryName":"Panama","CountryCode":"PAN","GNI":13280},{"CountryName":"Peru","CountryCode":"PER","GNI":5960},{"CountryName":"Philippines","CountryCode":"PHL","GNI":3660},{"CountryName":"Palau","CountryCode":"PLW","GNI":12700},{"CountryName":"Papua New Guinea","CountryCode":"PNG","GNI":2340},{"CountryName":"Poland","CountryCode":"POL","GNI":12730},{"CountryName":"Pre-demographic dividend","CountryCode":"PRE","GNI":1379},{"CountryName":"Portugal","CountryCode":"PRT","GNI":19820},{"CountryName":"Paraguay","CountryCode":"PRY","GNI":5470},{"CountryName":"West Bank and Gaza","CountryCode":"PSE","GNI":3180},{"CountryName":"Pacific island small states","CountryCode":"PSS","GNI":3793},{"CountryName":"Post-demographic dividend","CountryCode":"PST","GNI":41609},{"CountryName":"Qatar","CountryCode":"QAT","GNI":60510},{"CountryName":"Romania","CountryCode":"ROU","GNI":10000},{"CountryName":"Russian Federation","CountryCode":"RUS","GNI":9230},{"CountryName":"Rwanda","CountryCode":"RWA","GNI":720},{"CountryName":"South Asia","CountryCode":"SAS","GNI":1729},{"CountryName":"Saudi Arabia","CountryCode":"SAU","GNI":20090},{"CountryName":"Sudan","CountryCode":"SDN","GNI":2380},{"CountryName":"Senegal","CountryCode":"SEN","GNI":1240},{"CountryName":"Singapore","CountryCode":"SGP","GNI":54530},{"CountryName":"Solomon Islands","CountryCode":"SLB","GNI":1920},{"CountryName":"Sierra Leone","CountryCode":"SLE","GNI":510},{"CountryName":"El Salvador","CountryCode":"SLV","GNI":3560},{"CountryName":"Serbia","CountryCode":"SRB","GNI":5180},{"CountryName":"Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)","CountryCode":"SSA","GNI":1485},{"CountryName":"Sub-Saharan Africa","CountryCode":"SSF","GNI":1486},{"CountryName":"Small states","CountryCode":"SST","GNI":11099},{"CountryName":"Sao Tome and Principe","CountryCode":"STP","GNI":1770},{"CountryName":"Suriname","CountryCode":"SUR","GNI":5150},{"CountryName":"Slovak Republic","CountryCode":"SVK","GNI":16610},{"CountryName":"Slovenia","CountryCode":"SVN","GNI":22000},{"CountryName":"Sweden","CountryCode":"SWE","GNI":52590},{"CountryName":"Eswatini","CountryCode":"SWZ","GNI":2950},{"CountryName":"Seychelles","CountryCode":"SYC","GNI":14170},{"CountryName":"Chad","CountryCode":"TCD","GNI":640},{"CountryName":"East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)","CountryCode":"TEA","GNI":7061},
{"CountryName":"Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)","CountryCode":"TEC","GNI":7866},{"CountryName":"Togo","CountryCode":"TGO","GNI":610},{"CountryName":"Thailand","CountryCode":"THA","GNI":5950},{"CountryName":"Tajikistan","CountryCode":"TJK","GNI":990},{"CountryName":"Turkmenistan","CountryCode":"TKM","GNI":6380},{"CountryName":"Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)","CountryCode":"TLA","GNI":8179},{"CountryName":"Timor-Leste","CountryCode":"TLS","GNI":1790},{"CountryName":"Middle East & North Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)","CountryCode":"TMN","GNI":3839},{"CountryName":"Tonga","CountryCode":"TON","GNI":4010},{"CountryName":"South Asia (IDA & IBRD)","CountryCode":"TSA","GNI":1729},
{"CountryName":"Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)","CountryCode":"TSS","GNI":1486},{"CountryName":"Trinidad and Tobago","CountryCode":"TTO","GNI":15340},{"CountryName":"Tunisia","CountryCode":"TUN","GNI":3490},{"CountryName":"Turkey","CountryCode":"TUR","GNI":10940},{"CountryName":"Tuvalu","CountryCode":"TUV","GNI":4970},{"CountryName":"Tanzania","CountryCode":"TZA","GNI":910},{"CountryName":"Uganda","CountryCode":"UGA","GNI":600},{"CountryName":"Ukraine","CountryCode":"UKR","GNI":2390},{"CountryName":"Upper middle income","CountryCode":"UMC","GNI":8197},{"CountryName":"Uruguay","CountryCode":"URY","GNI":15250},{"CountryName":"United States","CountryCode":"USA","GNI":58270},{"CountryName":"Uzbekistan","CountryCode":"UZB","GNI":2000},{"CountryName":"St. Vincent and the Grenadines","CountryCode":"VCT","GNI":7390},{"CountryName":"Vietnam","CountryCode":"VNM","GNI":2160},{"CountryName":"Vanuatu","CountryCode":"VUT","GNI":2920},{"CountryName":"World","CountryCode":"WLD","GNI":10371},{"CountryName":"Samoa","CountryCode":"WSM","GNI":4090},{"CountryName":"Kosovo","CountryCode":"XKX","GNI":3900},
{"CountryName":"South Africa","CountryCode":"ZAF","GNI":5430},{"CountryName":"Zambia","CountryCode":"ZMB","GNI":1290},{"CountryName":"Zimbabwe","CountryCode":"ZWE","GNI":1170},
{"CountryName":"Zimbabwe","CountryCode":"ZWE","GNI":1171}];
const sortMethod = sortMethodWithDirectionMultiColumn(
[
{ column: "GNI", direction: "asc" },
{ column: "CountryCode", direction: "desc" }
]
);
let sortedData = data.sort(sortMethod);
console.log("sorted by: 1)column:GNI-asc, 2)column:CountryCode-desc")
console.table(sortedData);
console.log(sortedData);
I need this for a small project I'm working on, so performance is not a priority.
I have two arrays, main array I want to be sorted, and array of sorting rules. I loop that rules array inside sorting callback function, and try to exit that loop as soon as possible.
I use multiplier in order to convert -1 to 1 depending on weather I'm sorting a property in ascending or descending order.
let array = [
{fullName: 'Michael Schumacher', sport: 'Formula 1'},
{fullName: 'Michael Jordan', sport: 'Basketball'},
{fullName: 'Damon Hill', sport: 'Formula 1'},
{fullName: 'Kobe Bryant', sport: 'Basketball'},
{fullName: 'Lebron James', sport: 'Basketball'},
{fullName: 'Lewis Hamilton', sport: 'Formula 1'},
];
const sortArray = (array, options) => {
if (!Array.isArray(options)) {
options = [{ key: options, order: 'asc' }];
}
options.forEach(item => {
item.multiplier = item.order != 'desc' ? -1 : 1;
});
return array.sort((firstItem, secondItem) => {
for (item of options) {
const { key, multiplier } = item;
const firstValue = firstItem[key];
const secondValue = secondItem[key];
if (firstValue != secondValue) {
return multiplier * (firstValue < secondValue ? 1 : -1);
}
}
return 0;
});
}
console.log('Original array');
console.log([...array]);
sortArray(array, 'sport');
console.log('Sorted by sport only (ascending, implicit, keeping the same order of athletes)');
console.log([...array]);
sortArray(array, [{key: 'sport'}, {key: 'fullName', order: 'desc'}]);
console.log('Sorted by sport (ascending, implicit), and by fullName (descending)');
console.log(array);
To simplify the understanding
The sort method compares numbers, if below 0, it sorts it to the let, if above zero it sorts it to the right.
So to add multi level sorting, check if the match === 0, then further sort it.
See example below
['a/b/c', 'a long piece of text/b', 'apple/b'].sort((a, b) => {
const asc = a.split('/').length - b.split('/').length
return asc
})
// outputs ['a long piece of text/b', 'apple/b', 'a/b/c']
['a/b/c', 'a long piece of text/b', 'apple/b'].sort((a, b) => {
const asc = a.split('/').length - b.split('/').length
return asc === 0 ? a.length - b.length : asc
})
// outputs: 'apple/b', 'a long piece of text/b', 'a/b/c'
I see a lot of complicated solutions, so I'll paste here what I'm using:
assignedIssues.sort((a, b) => {
let order = sortByText(a.assignee?.username, b.assignee?.username)
if (order === 0) order = sort(a.labels, b.labels, statusLabels)
if (order === 0) order = sort(a.labels, b.labels, priorityLabels)
if (order === 0) order = sortByText(a.web_url, b.web_url)
return order
})
I think that this is much more readable, let you implement any custom sorting function for each level, without calling all unnecessarily.
Assuming you want to sort by multiple indexes, and assuming that you don't know the type of each field (string, number, or null).
You can create a function to sort with as many indexes as you like.
const compareWithType = (a, b) => {
if (typeof a === 'string') return a.localeCompare(b);
if (typeof a === 'number') return a - b;
return (!!a) - (!!b); // to sort non-string non-number falsy or null values, modify as you like.
}
const compareWithIndexes = (...indexes) => {
return (a, b) => {
for (let i in indexes) {
let diff = 0;
while (!diff) {
compareWithType(a[i], b[i]);
}
return diff;
}
}
}
[[1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [0, 2, 3, 4, 6]].sort(compareWithIndexes(2, 3, 4));
// compares (3 - 3) then (4 - 4) then (5 - 6)
Despite a lot of complicated answers here, I still like the basic way to do it
var arr = [
[3, 'pub2', 1, 'ownA'],
[1, 'pub1', 2, 'ownA'],
[2, 'pub1', 3, 'ownC']
];
// sorting priority is bottom to top, in this case owner name then publication name
// sort publication name
arr.sort((a,b) => a[1].localeCompare(b[1]));
// sort owner name
arr.sort((a,b) => a[3].localeCompare(b[3]));
console.log(arr);
Related
Sort Array by Element Frequency JavaScript
I want to sort an array by element frequency. My code works for arrays of strings, but not for arrays of numbers: const countOccurrences = (arr, val) => arr.reduce((a, v) => (v === val ? a + 1 : a), 0); function frequencySort(arr){ let d = {} arr.forEach(i => d[i] = countOccurrences(arr,i)) arr.sort(function(a,b){ return d[b] - d[a] }) return arr } frequencySort(['a','b','b','b','c','c'])) returns [ 'b', 'b', 'b', 'c', 'c', 'a' ] frequencySort([4, 6, 2, 2, 6, 4, 4, 4]) returns [ 4, 4, 4, 4, 6, 2, 2, 6 ]
The only reason your letters worked is because you didn't have the same number of any two letters, where in your numbers, you have 2 of both 2 and 6. Here's your snippet, but with 2 a's and 2 c's. You'll see it's out of order just like the numbers. const countOccurrences = (arr, val) => arr.reduce((a, v) => (v === val ? a + 1 : a), 0); function frequencySort(arr){ let d = {} arr.forEach(i => d[i] = countOccurrences(arr,i)) arr.sort(function(a,b){ return d[b] - d[a] }) return arr } console.log(frequencySort(['a','b','b','b','c','c', 'a'])) You need a way to sort instances that have the same number of occurrences. I adapted your forEach loop to give the last index of each letter to your b object and then changed your sort to use that index in case the number of occurrences is the same. const countOccurrences = (arr, val) => arr.reduce((a, v) => (v === val ? a + 1 : a), 0); function frequencySort(arr){ let d = {} arr.forEach((i,index) => d[i] = { num: countOccurrences(arr,i), i: index }); arr.sort(function(a,b){ let diff = d[b].num - d[a].num; if(diff == 0) diff = d[b].i - d[a].i; return diff; }) return arr } console.log(frequencySort(['a','b','b','b','c','c', 'a'])) console.log(frequencySort([4, 6, 2, 2, 6, 4, 4, 4]));
It has nothing to do with the elements being letters or numbers. In you letters array, each letter has unique occurence count (3, 2, 1), therefore they are sorted the way you want to. However, in your numbers array, "2" and "6" both occur 2 times each. Therefore, your sort callback function returns 0 for them, and they are treated as equal order by the sort function.
In your array of numbers you have the same amount of the number 2 as 6 and your sorting function doesn't care about the actual values it just cares about their counts. So in your example 2 and 6 both have the same priority. You want to adjust your sorting function to compare values of elements if they have the same amount of occurrences. You'll need to implement separate comparisons for all the data types you want to accept and decide if you want ascending/descending order. Here is a basic example for number and string elements: const countOccurrences = (arr, val) => arr.reduce((a, v) => (v === val ? a + 1 : a), 0); function frequencySort(arr){ let d = {} arr.forEach(i => d[i] = countOccurrences(arr,i)) arr.sort(function(a,b){ const r = d[b] - d[a] if (r != 0) return r switch (typeof d[a]) { case 'number': return a - b case 'string': return a.localeCompare(b) default: return 0 } }) return arr } console.log(frequencySort(['a','b','b','b','c','c'])) // returns [ 'b', 'b', 'b', 'c', 'c', 'a' ] console.log(frequencySort([4, 6, 2, 2, 6, 4, 4, 4])) // returns [ 4, 4, 4, 4, 2, 2, 6, 6 ]
A possible approach would first collect all equal array items within an item specific group array by a reduce task ... console.log( "grouped ['a','b','b','b','c','c'] ...", ['a','b','b','b','c','c'].reduce((index, item) => { const groupList = index[`${ (typeof item) }_${ item }`] ??= []; groupList.push(item); return index; }, {}) ); console.log( "grouped [4, 6, 2, 2, 6, 4, 4, 4,'4','2','2'] ...", [4, 6, 2, 2, 6, 4, 4, 4,'4','2','2'].reduce((index, item) => { const groupList = index[`${ (typeof item) }_${ item }`] ??= []; groupList.push(item); return index; }, {}) ); .as-console-wrapper { min-height: 100%!important; top: 0; } The final computation then has to transform ... via Object.values ... the temporary result (as shown above) into an array of arrays of equal items where the former gets 1stly sorted by each array's length (indicates the items frequency) and 2ndly, for arrays of equal length', by a locale compare of each array's first item. The final result is the sorted array's flatted version ... function sortItemsByFrequency(arr) { const groupedItems = arr.reduce((index, item) => { const groupList = index[`${ (typeof item) }_${ item }`] ??= []; groupList.push(item); return index; }, {}); return Object .values(groupedItems) .sort((a, b) => // - sort by frequency first indicated by an // array's length. // - the higher frequency count wins. b.length - a.length || // in case of equal frequency counts do a // locale compare of both array's first items. b[0].toLocaleString().localeCompare(a[0].toLocaleString()) ) .flat(); } console.log( "sortItemsByFrequency(['a','b','b','b','c','c']) ...", sortItemsByFrequency(['a','b','b','b','c','c']) ); console.log( "sortItemsByFrequency([4, 6, 2, 2, 6, 4, 4, 4,'4','2','2']) ...", sortItemsByFrequency([4, 6, 2, 2, 6, 4, 4, 4,'4','2','2']) ); .as-console-wrapper { min-height: 100%!important; top: 0; }
sort first based on frequency of characters in desc order,if freq is same, then sort alphabetically in asc order. const str = 'zzzzvnttteeeqqaao'; const frequencySort = (str = '') => { let map = {} for (const letter of str) { map[letter] = (map[letter] || 0) + 1; }; let res = ""; let sorted = Object.keys(map).sort((a, b) => map[b] < map[a] ? -1 : 1); //console.log(sorted); for (let letter of sorted) { for (let count = 0; count < map[letter]; count++) { res += letter } } return res; }; console.log(frequencySort(str));
Custom implementation of comparing two non ordered array of object in Javascript
I want to compare two array of objects, they should be considered equal if their elements are same but not in same order. e.g. [{a:1}, {b:2}] and [{b:2}, {a:1}] I am using lodash-v3's isEqual which can compare two values but it only gives true if the order in array is same, so I've implement one function that compares elements recursively. function deepEqual(data1, data2) { data1 = _.cloneDeep(data1); data2 = _.cloneDeep(data2); function isDeepEqual(val1, val2) { if (_.isArray(val1) && _.isArray(val2)) { if (val1.length === val2.length) { for (let id1 in val1) { let hasMatch = false; let matchOnIndex = -1; for (let id2 in val2) { if (isDeepEqual(val1[id1], val2[id2])) { hasMatch = true; matchOnIndex = id2; break; } } if (hasMatch) { val2.splice(matchOnIndex, 1); } else { return false; } } return true; } else { return false; } } if (_.isPlainObject(val1) && _.isPlainObject(val2)) { if (Object.keys(val1).length === Object.keys(val2).length) { for (let temp1 in val1) { if (!isDeepEqual(val1[temp1], val2[temp1])) { return false; } } return true; } else { return false; } } return _.isEqual(val1, val2); } return isDeepEqual(data1, data2); } Above function works, but how can i improve it performance wise? If there is any simple implementation with lodash3 that works for me as well. Link to above function's fiddle. EDIT: The two array of objects can be nested, e.g. [{ a:1, b:[{ c: [1, 2] }, { d: [3, 4] }] },{ e:1, f:[{ g: [5, 6] }, { h: [7, 8] }] }] and [{ e:1, f:[{ h: [8, 7] },{ g: [6, 5] }] },{ a:1, b:[{ d: [4, 3] },{ c: [2, 1] }] }] Arrays can also not have unique values(as users are creating this arrays). This might be possible with _.isEqualWith as #Koushik and #tokland suggested. Unfortunately it's available from lodashv4 so I can't use it. Similar solution is also mentioned in this comment. Really sorry for not clearly specifying the examples. The fiddle has all different type of cases.
i think this is what you want var first = [{ a: 1 }, { b: 2 }]; var second = [{ b: 2 }, { a: 1 }]; function comparer(otherArray){ return function(current){ return otherArray.filter(function(other){ return other.a == current.a && other.b == current.b }).length == 0; } } var onlyInA = first.filter(comparer(second)); var onlyInB = second.filter(comparer(first)); result = (onlyInA.concat(onlyInB)).length===0; console.log(result);
how about simply check each Object of one array presents in another array and having same length (both array)? let isEqualArray = (arr1, arr2) => ( arr1 === arr2 || arr1.length === arr2.length && !arr1.some(a=> !arr2.find(b=>_.isEqual(a,b))) ) let a1 = [{a:1}, {b:2}], a2 = [{b:2}, {a:1}]; let isEqualArray = (arr1, arr2) => ( arr1 === arr2 || arr1.length === arr2.length && !arr1.some(a=> !arr2.find(b=>_.isEqual(a,b))) ) console.log(isEqualArray(a1,a2)); <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.10/lodash.min.js"></script> Usage of _.isEqual or _.isEqualWith with a customizer depending on how you want to compare two object! Note: this will not work 100% when you have duplicate items in your array, but it will atleast confirm that all the items of one array is present on another array. You can do a reverse check, or apply unique to perform this compare for duplicate arrays.
Function _.isEqualWith should be the starting point. Now, there are many ways you can implement it. You could make it pretty efficient by defining an ordering for the items in the arrays. An example using id as a key: function isEqualConsideringArraysAsSets(obj1, obj2, key) { const customizer = (objValue, othValue) => { if (_(objValue).isArray() && _(othValue).isArray()) { return _.size(objValue) === _.size(othValue) && _.zip(_.sortBy(objValue, key), _.sortBy(othValue, key)) .every(([val1, val2]) => isEqualConsideringArraysAsSets(val1, val2)); } }; return _.isEqualWith(obj1, obj2, customizer); } console.log(isEqualConsideringArraysAsSets([{id: 1}, {id: 2}], [{id: 2}, {id: 1}], "id"))
How to correctly sort these type of array?
I am in trouble with this sort. I have an array containing values like this: array = [ {SortTime : 123456, Operation : Assigning}, {SortTime : 4567 , Operation: Assigning}, {SortTime : 123456 , Operation: Assigned} ]; So if I compare array[0] and array[2] I would like to keep the order so that I have "Assigning" before of "Assigned" Everyone of these number is an epoch number so I need that if the algorithm works with two equals numbers it leave the same initial order for these two numbers (if I have array[4] = 12345 and array[5] = 12345, I want that array[4] and array[5] don't become array[5] and array[4] in the order). array.sort(function(a, b) { if (a.val.SortTime === b.val.SortTime) { return -1; } else { return a.val.SortTime - b.val.SortTime; } }); This doens't work because often make swap of position between equals number. I am sorry if my explanation is bad. Thank you in advance!
You could add to the objects an index property and sort by time and then by index, to keep the relation of same time items. The result is a stable result, because of the taken index. var array = [ { SortTime: 123456, Operation: 'Assigning', index: 0 }, { SortTime: 4567, Operation: 'Assigning', index: 1 }, { SortTime: 123456, Operation: 'Assigned', index: 2 } ]; array.sort(function (a, b) { return a.SortTime - b.SortTime || a.index - b.index; }); console.log(array); .as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
What you want is a stable sort. See Wikipedia for a list of stable sort algorithms Here's a merge sort implementation from Rosetta Code: function merge(left, right, arr) { var a = 0; while (left.length && right.length) { arr[a++] = (right[0] < left[0]) ? right.shift() : left.shift(); } while (left.length) { arr[a++] = left.shift(); } while (right.length) { arr[a++] = right.shift(); } } function mergeSort(arr) { var len = arr.length; if (len === 1) { return; } var mid = Math.floor(len / 2), left = arr.slice(0, mid), right = arr.slice(mid); mergeSort(left); mergeSort(right); merge(left, right, arr); } var arr = [1, 5, 2, 7, 3, 9, 4, 6, 8]; console.log(arr); mergeSort(arr) console.log(arr);
There is working example at JSBin var arr = [ { SortTime: 123456, Operation: 'first operator' }, { SortTime: 4567, Operation: Assigning }, { SortTime: 123456, Operation: 'second operator' }]; var copy = [...arr]; copy.sort(function(a, b) { if (a.val.SortTime === b.val.SortTime) { return arr.indexOf(a) - arr.indexOf(b); } else { return a.val.SortTime - b.val.SortTime; } });
Javascript Array Filter to Execute Functions
I have an array with two values, (1 or 2) and (a, b, c or d). Depending on the two values a certain math function will execute. The function takes an separate inputted number and multiplies it by a constant, but that part isn't necessary to this. Essentially a user provides the 3 values, I've already removed the one value which is the constant 'k', so I'm left with 2 values that determine the right multiplier for the constant 'k'. I'm looking for something that would be easier and more robust than combining the array and running through all the possible solutions in a switch statement. There is a possibility of new variables for the array in the future. let k = 5; let input = [2, 'c']; if (input.join().includes('1')) { if (input.join().includes('a')) { return k * 10; }; else if (input.join().includes('b')) { return k * 11; }; else if (input.join().includes('c')) { return k * 12; }; else if (input.join().includes('d')) { return k * 13; }; }; else if (input.join().includes('2')) { if (input.join().includes('a')) { return k * 14; }; else if (input.join().includes('b')) { return k * 15; }; else if (input.join().includes('c')) { return k * 16; }; else if (input.join().includes('d')) { return k * 17; }; }; Basically I have something like this right now. input and k are provided by the user, but not necessarily in any certain order, so I can't reliable assume input[1] will give me (a, b, c or d).
I agree with Patrick's comment that there is a bit of mystery around what you're actually trying to do here. I also noticed your comment: would I be able to add: var mathFuncs = { 1: 'one': { a: mathFunc10, b: mathFunc20 } Are you saying you would like to be able to accept input values of 1 or one interchangeably? You can do this very simply. The calculate() function below makes a copy of the input array with each element converted to a number if it is one of the number names, then sorts this array to put it in a consistent order (numbers sort before letters). Next, we select which list of multipliers to use (1 or 2), and finally get the specific multiplier (a-d) to calculate the return value. If the input array doesn't match anything, we return NaN. const numbers = { 'one': 1, 'two': 2, }; const multipliers = { 1: { a:10, b:11, c:12, d:13 }, 2: { a:14, b:15, c:16, d:17 }, }; function calculate( k, input ) { const convert = n => numbers[ n.toString().toLowerCase() ] || n; const sorted = input.map( convert ).sort(); const list = multipliers[ sorted[0] ]; if( ! list ) return NaN; const multiplier = list[ sorted[1] ]; return multiplier == null ? NaN : k * multiplier; } function test( k, input) { console.log( k, input.toString(), calculate( k, input ) ); } test( 5, [ 1, 'a' ] ); // 50 test( 5, [ 'a', 1 ] ); // 50 test( 5, [ 'a', 'one' ] ); // 50 test( 5, [ 2, 'c' ] ); // 80 test( 5, [ 'two', 'c' ] ); // 80 test( 5, [ 2, 'e' ] ); // NaN test( 5, [ 3, 'a' ] ); // NaN test( 5, [ 'three', 'a' ] ); // NaN
var mathFunc = getMathFunc([2, 'b']); mathFunc(2); // 80 function getMathFunc(arr) { var inputString = arr.join(''); var mathFuncs = { 1: { a: mathFunc10, b: mathFunc20 }, 2: { a: mathFunc30, b: mathFunc40 } }; for (var numKey in mathFuncs) { if (inputString.includes(numKey)) { var numObj = mathFuncs[numKey]; for (var letterKey in numObj) { if (inputString.includes(letterKey)) { return numObj[letterKey]; } } } } function mathFunc10(num) { return 10 * num; } function mathFunc20(num) { return 20 * num; } function mathFunc30(num) { return 30 * num; } function mathFunc40(num) { return 40 * num; } }
If the logic of the returned value is like in your example, then this will do it: const ref = { 1: 10, 2: 14, a: 0, b: 1, c: 2, d: 3 }, calc = (k, input) => k * input.reduce( (res, x) => res + ref[x], 0 ); // Sample calls: console.log([ calc(5, [2, 'c']), // 80 calc(5, ['c', 2]), // 80 calc(5, ['a', 1]), // 50 calc(5, [2, 'b']), // 75 calc(5, [3, 'd']), // NaN calc(5, ['e', 2]), // NaN ]); Of course, if the logic is more complex in other cases, then you'll have to implement that logic in your function and/or the proposed ref mapping object. If the "variables" are more interdependent, you may even need several mapping objects.
javascript array sorting / array match sorted array [duplicate]
For example, if I have these arrays: var name = ["Bob","Tom","Larry"]; var age = ["10", "20", "30"]; And I use name.sort() the order of the "name" array becomes: var name = ["Bob","Larry","Tom"]; But, how can I sort the "name" array and have the "age" array keep the same order? Like this: var name = ["Bob","Larry","Tom"]; var age = ["10", "30", "20"];
You can sort the existing arrays, or reorganize the data. Method 1: To use the existing arrays, you can combine, sort, and separate them: (Assuming equal length arrays) var names = ["Bob","Tom","Larry"]; var ages = ["10", "20", "30"]; //1) combine the arrays: var list = []; for (var j = 0; j < names.length; j++) list.push({'name': names[j], 'age': ages[j]}); //2) sort: list.sort(function(a, b) { return ((a.name < b.name) ? -1 : ((a.name == b.name) ? 0 : 1)); //Sort could be modified to, for example, sort on the age // if the name is the same. See Bonus section below }); //3) separate them back out: for (var k = 0; k < list.length; k++) { names[k] = list[k].name; ages[k] = list[k].age; } This has the advantage of not relying on string parsing techniques, and could be used on any number of arrays that need to be sorted together. Method 2: Or you can reorganize the data a bit, and just sort a collection of objects: var list = [ {name: "Bob", age: 10}, {name: "Tom", age: 20}, {name: "Larry", age: 30} ]; list.sort(function(a, b) { return ((a.name < b.name) ? -1 : ((a.name == b.name) ? 0 : 1)); }); for (var i = 0; i<list.length; i++) { alert(list[i].name + ", " + list[i].age); } For the comparisons,-1 means lower index, 0 means equal, and 1 means higher index. And it is worth noting that sort() actually changes the underlying array. Also worth noting, method 2 is more efficient as you do not have to loop through the entire list twice in addition to the sort. http://jsfiddle.net/ghBn7/38/ Bonus Here is a generic sort method that takes one or more property names. function sort_by_property(list, property_name_list) { list.sort((a, b) => { for (var p = 0; p < property_name_list.length; p++) { prop = property_name_list[p]; if (a[prop] < b[prop]) { return -1; } else if (a[prop] !== a[prop]) { return 1; } } return 0; }); } Usage: var list = [ {name: "Bob", age: 10}, {name: "Tom", age: 20}, {name: "Larry", age: 30}, {name: "Larry", age: 25} ]; sort_by_property(list, ["name", "age"]); for (var i = 0; i<list.length; i++) { console.log(list[i].name + ", " + list[i].age); } Output: Bob, 10 Larry, 25 Larry, 30 Tom, 20
You could get the indices of name array using Array.from(name.keys()) or [...name.keys()]. Sort the indices based on their value. Then use map to get the value for the corresponding indices in any number of related arrays const indices = Array.from(name.keys()) indices.sort( (a,b) => name[a].localeCompare(name[b]) ) const sortedName = indices.map(i => name[i]), const sortedAge = indices.map(i => age[i]) Here's a snippet: const name = ["Bob","Tom","Larry"], age = ["10", "20", "30"], indices = Array.from(name.keys()) .sort( (a,b) => name[a].localeCompare(name[b]) ), sortedName = indices.map(i => name[i]), sortedAge = indices.map(i => age[i]) console.log(indices) console.log(sortedName) console.log(sortedAge)
This solution (my work) sorts multiple arrays, without transforming the data to an intermediary structure, and works on large arrays efficiently. It allows passing arrays as a list, or object, and supports a custom compareFunction. Usage: let people = ["john", "benny", "sally", "george"]; let peopleIds = [10, 20, 30, 40]; sortArrays([people, peopleIds]); [["benny", "george", "john", "sally"], [20, 40, 10, 30]] // output sortArrays({people, peopleIds}); {"people": ["benny", "george", "john", "sally"], "peopleIds": [20, 40, 10, 30]} // output Algorithm: Create a list of indexes of the main array (sortableArray) Sort the indexes with a custom compareFunction that compares the values, looked up with the index For each input array, map each index, in order, to its value Implementation: /** * Sorts all arrays together with the first. Pass either a list of arrays, or a map. Any key is accepted. * Array|Object arrays [sortableArray, ...otherArrays]; {sortableArray: [], secondaryArray: [], ...} * Function comparator(?,?) -> int optional compareFunction, compatible with Array.sort(compareFunction) */ function sortArrays(arrays, comparator = (a, b) => (a < b) ? -1 : (a > b) ? 1 : 0) { let arrayKeys = Object.keys(arrays); let sortableArray = Object.values(arrays)[0]; let indexes = Object.keys(sortableArray); let sortedIndexes = indexes.sort((a, b) => comparator(sortableArray[a], sortableArray[b])); let sortByIndexes = (array, sortedIndexes) => sortedIndexes.map(sortedIndex => array[sortedIndex]); if (Array.isArray(arrays)) { return arrayKeys.map(arrayIndex => sortByIndexes(arrays[arrayIndex], sortedIndexes)); } else { let sortedArrays = {}; arrayKeys.forEach((arrayKey) => { sortedArrays[arrayKey] = sortByIndexes(arrays[arrayKey], sortedIndexes); }); return sortedArrays; } } See also https://gist.github.com/boukeversteegh/3219ffb912ac6ef7282b1f5ce7a379ad
If performance matters, there is sort-ids package for that purpose: var sortIds = require('sort-ids') var reorder = require('array-rearrange') var name = ["Bob","Larry","Tom"]; var age = [30, 20, 10]; var ids = sortIds(age) reorder(age, ids) reorder(name, ids) That is ~5 times faster than the comparator function.
It is very similar to jwatts1980's answer (Update 2). Consider reading Sorting with map. name.map(function (v, i) { return { value1 : v, value2 : age[i] }; }).sort(function (a, b) { return ((a.value1 < b.value1) ? -1 : ((a.value1 == b.value1) ? 0 : 1)); }).forEach(function (v, i) { name[i] = v.value1; age[i] = v.value2; });
You are trying to sort 2 independet arrays by only calling sort() on one of them. One way of achieving this would be writing your own sorting methd which would take care of this, meaning when it swaps 2 elements in-place in the "original" array, it should swap 2 elements in-place in the "attribute" array. Here is a pseudocode on how you might try it. function mySort(originals, attributes) { // Start of your sorting code here swap(originals, i, j); swap(attributes, i, j); // Rest of your sorting code here }
inspired from #jwatts1980's answer, and #Alexander's answer here I merged both answer's into a quick and dirty solution; The main array is the one to be sorted, the rest just follows its indexes NOTE: Not very efficient for very very large arrays /* #sort argument is the array that has the values to sort #followers argument is an array of arrays which are all same length of 'sort' all will be sorted accordingly example: sortMutipleArrays( [0, 6, 7, 8, 3, 4, 9], [ ["zr", "sx", "sv", "et", "th", "fr", "nn"], ["zero", "six", "seven", "eight", "three", "four", "nine"] ] ); // Will return { sorted: [0, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9], followed: [ ["zr", th, "fr", "sx", "sv", "et", "nn"], ["zero", "three", "four", "six", "seven", "eight", "nine"] ] } */ You probably want to change the method signature/return structure, but that should be easy though. I did it this way because I needed it var sortMultipleArrays = function (sort, followers) { var index = this.getSortedIndex(sort) , followed = []; followers.unshift(sort); followers.forEach(function(arr){ var _arr = []; for(var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) _arr[i] = arr[index[i]]; followed.push(_arr); }); var result = {sorted: followed[0]}; followed.shift(); result.followed = followed; return result; }; var getSortedIndex = function (arr) { var index = []; for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { index.push(i); } index = index.sort((function(arr){ /* this will sort ints in descending order, change it based on your needs */ return function (a, b) {return ((arr[a] > arr[b]) ? -1 : ((arr[a] < arr[b]) ? 1 : 0)); }; })(arr)); return index; };
I was looking for something more generic and functional than the current answers. Here's what I came up with: an es6 implementation (with no mutations!) that lets you sort as many arrays as you want given a "source" array /** * Given multiple arrays of the same length, sort one (the "source" array), and * sort all other arrays to reorder the same way the source array does. * * Usage: * * sortMultipleArrays( objectWithArrays, sortFunctionToApplyToSource ) * * sortMultipleArrays( * { * source: [...], * other1: [...], * other2: [...] * }, * (a, b) => { return a - b }) * ) * * Returns: * { * source: [..sorted source array] * other1: [...other1 sorted in same order as source], * other2: [...other2 sorted in same order as source] * } */ export function sortMultipleArrays( namedArrays, sortFn ) { const { source } = namedArrays; if( !source ) { throw new Error('You must pass in an object containing a key named "source" pointing to an array'); } const arrayNames = Object.keys( namedArrays ); // First build an array combining all arrays into one, eg // [{ source: 'source1', other: 'other1' }, { source: 'source2', other: 'other2' } ...] return source.map(( value, index ) => arrayNames.reduce((memo, name) => ({ ...memo, [ name ]: namedArrays[ name ][ index ] }), {}) ) // Then have user defined sort function sort the single array, but only // pass in the source value .sort(( a, b ) => sortFn( a.source, b.source )) // Then turn the source array back into an object with the values being the // sorted arrays, eg // { source: [ 'source1', 'source2' ], other: [ 'other1', 'other2' ] ... } .reduce(( memo, group ) => arrayNames.reduce((ongoingMemo, arrayName) => ({ ...ongoingMemo, [ arrayName ]: [ ...( ongoingMemo[ arrayName ] || [] ), group[ arrayName ] ] }), memo), {}); }
You could append the original index of each member to the value, sort the array, then remove the index and use it to re-order the other array. It will only work where the contents are strings or can be converted to and from strings successfuly. Another solution is keep a copy of the original array, then after sorting, find where each member is now and adjust the other array appropriately.
I was having the same issue and came up with this incredibly simple solution. First combine the associated ellements into strings in a seperate array then use parseInt in your sort comparison function like this: <html> <body> <div id="outPut"></div> <script> var theNums = [13,12,14]; var theStrs = ["a","b","c"]; var theCombine = []; for (var x in theNums) { theCombine[x] = theNums[x] + "," + theStrs; } var theSorted = theAr.sort(function(a,b) { var c = parseInt(a,10); var d = parseInt(b,10); return c-d; }); document.getElementById("outPut").innerHTML = theS; </script> </body> </html>
How about: var names = ["Bob","Tom","Larry"]; var ages = ["10", "20", "30"]; var n = names.slice(0).sort() var a = []; for (x in n) { i = names.indexOf(n[x]); a.push(ages[i]); names[i] = null; } names = n ages = a
Simplest explantion is the best, merge the arrays, and then extract after sorting: create an array name_age=["bob#10","Tom#20","Larry#30"]; sort the array as before, then extract the name and the age, you can use # to reconise where name ends and age begins. Maybe not a method for the purist, but I have the same issue and this my approach.