I have couple of es6 modules. add.js, sub.js and calc.js.
calc.js imports add.js and sub.js.
I am building them with grunt and SystemJS builder. My grunt configuration for this looks like -
systemjs: {
es6: {
options: {
baseURL: "/",
configFile: "config.js",
},
files: [{
"src": ["src/main/calc.js"],
"dest": "dist/calc.js"
}]
}
}
Once the grunt build is done, it creates the resultant calc.js and in that file I can see this :
System.register("src/main/calc.js", [..
..................
I don't want the .js in that name. I want it something like :
System.register("src/main/calc", [..
What should I do? Am I missing some configuration ?
This naming behavior is by design. bundle() creates a bundle for SystemJs to use in the browser, so the names must match the file names that SystemJs will be attempting to load. If you are trying to avoid SystemJs in the browser, buildStatic() is what you are looking for.
There is paths option for the builder.
paths: {
"src/main/calc": "src/main/calc.js"
}
FYI, there is map option. I thought map would be the option for the purpose but it never worked for me.
Related
When using grunt-ts and specifying and out file my app runs as expected, but since that option has no support for fast compilation, i tried using a regular compilation where all my .ts files live on the dist folder
There are two issues, first, it will fail to load any imported file, since it will try to look for it without extension. As a quick fix i edited the load fn on the require.js file and all my dependencies load correctly, but then the sourcemaps stopped working, all i get is a blank file on the chrome inspector (and of course i don't want to rely on a dirty hack) .
Please note that i'm not very familiar with requirejs so I'm not quite sure if this is a misconfiguration on my side, a bug, or something that is missing.
My grunt config, related to ts
ts: {
options: {
module: 'amd',
target: 'es5',
experimentalDecorators: true
},
dev: {
src: ['client-app/**/*.ts'],
outDir: "dist",
watch: '.'
}
},
My bootstrap.js which is just the entry point and require.js config file
requirejs.config({
baseUrl: '.',
waitSeconds: 20
});
requirejs(['/init'], function(module) {
module.main()
});
A simplified version of the compiled init file
define(["require", "exports", './section-manager.view'], function (require, exports, section_manager_view_1,) {
"use strict";
function main() {
///
}
exports.main = main;
});
//# sourceMappingURL=init.js.map
And the html
<script src="/js/lib/require.js" data-main="/bootstrap"></script>
Any help is appreciated, thanks
Edit:
Using System.js or #Luis answer solves the loading issue.
The sourcemap issue is solved by using sourceRoot or
inlineSourceMap: true,
inlineSources: true
To the ts options
Don't use an absolute module name. If you do use an absolute name, RequireJS assumes that you do not want any alteration when it generates a path from the module name and will not add the .js extension. You should use a relative path, or you could do this:
requirejs.config({
baseUrl: '/'
});
requirejs(['init'], function(module) {
module.main()
});
By doing this, RequireJS will automatically add the .js extension.
I use webpack path aliases for ES6 module loading.
E.g. If I define an alias for utils instead of something like
import Foo from "../../../utils/foo", I can do
import Foo from "utils/foo"
The problem is that once I start using aliases, WebStorm looses track of the import and I'm left with warnings and no auto-completion.
Is there a way to instruct WebStorm to use such aliases?
Yes, there is.
In fact, Webstorm can't automatically parse and apply Webpack config, but you can set up aliases the same way.
You just have to mark the parent folder of "utils" (in your example) as a resource root (right-click, mark directory as / resource root).
We just managed to do with the following structure :
/src
/A
/B
/C
We have A B and C folders declared as alias in Webpack.
And in Webstorm we marked "src" as "Resource Root".
And now we can simply import :
import A/path/to/any/file.js
instead of
import ../../../../../A/path/to/any/file.js
while still having Webstorm correctly parsing and indexing all code, link to files, autocompleting and so on ...
I managed to set up aliases for WebStorm 2017.2 within webpack like this:
For the record: in PHPSTORM, working with laravel mix, I managed to solve this by creating a webpack.config.js file separately like:
const path = require('path')
const webpack = require('webpack')
module.exports = {
...
resolve: {
extensions: ['.js', '.json', '.vue'],
alias: {
'~': path.resolve(__dirname, './resources/assets/js')
}
},
...
}
And then importing it in the webpack.mix.js like:
const config = require('./webpack.config')
...
mix.webpackConfig(config)
Make sure the webpack configuration file is pointed correctly in the configuration of the PhpStorm in: Settings > Languages & Frameworks > Javascript > Webpack
You can define custom paths, so WebStorm/PhpStorm can understand your aliases. But make sure, they are identical with your aliases. Create file in your root directory and call it something like this: webStorm.config.js (any js file will be ok). Then configure your paths inside:
System.config({
"paths": {
"components/*": "./src/components/*",
"core/*": "./src/core/*",
...
}
});
WebStorm/PhpStorm will recognize System as it's own module and will treat this file as configuration.
This is answered in a comment but to save people digging into comments and link only information, here it is:
As of WS2017.2 this will be done automatically. The information is here.
According to this, webstorm will automatically resolve aliases that are included within the webpack.config in the root of the project. If you have a custom structure and your webpack.config isn't in the root folder then go to Settings | Languages & Frameworks | JavaScript | Webpack and set the option to the config you require.
Note: Most setups have a base config which then call a dev or prod version. In order for this to work properly, you need to tell webstorm to use the dev one.
Not right now, We were also using path aliases for the files in our react project. The import names were shorter but we lost a lot on static checking of webstorm as well as completion features.
We later came up with a decision to reduce the code to only 3 levels of depth, as well a single level for the common parts. The path completion feature of webstom (ctrl + space) even helps reduce the typing overhead. The production build does not use longer names, so hardly makes any difference in final code.
I will suggest please reconsider your decision about aliases. You loose semantic meaning of modules coming from node_modules and your own code, as well as referencing the alias files again and again to make sense of your code, is a much bigger overhead.
add jsconfig.js on your project root
{
"compilerOptions": {
"baseUrl": ".",
"paths": {
"~/*": ["./src/*"]
}
}
}
In PHPStorm (using 2017.2 currently), I have not been able to get webpack configs to work properly in regards to aliases.
My fix involves using the "Directories" section of the main settings. I just had to mark each folder referenced by an alias as a sources root, then click the properties dropdown for each and specify the alias as a "Package prefix". This made everything link up for me.
Not sure if the Directories section exists in WebStorm, but if it does, this seems to be a fool-proof method for getting import aliases working.
For anyone struggling: path.resolve() must be called with "__dirname" first argument for Idea (Websorm) to be able to resolve the path correctly.
Will work for Idea (Websorm):
alias: {
'#someAlias': pathLib.resolve(__dirname, 'path/to/directory')
}
Will not work for Idea (Websorm) (while still being valid webpack alias):
alias: {
'#someAlias': pathLib.resolve('path/to/directory')
}
Webstorm can't read webpack.config if module.exports return a function.
For example
module.exports = function (webpackEnv) {
return {
mode: isEnvProduction ? 'production' : isEnvDevelopment && 'development',
...
}
}
Check your config file, maybe this cause you are a problem.
There is a lot of discussion here about Laravel Mix, so I'll leave this here to help out future readers. I solved this by creating a separate (fake) webpack config file which is only used by my IDE (PHPStorm).
1. Create a separate alias.js file (e.g. /webpack/alias.js)
const path = require('path');
const assets = path.join(__dirname,'..','resources','assets');
module.exports = {
'#js' : path.resolve(assets, 'js'),
'#c' : path.resolve(assets, 'js', 'components'),
'#errors' : path.resolve(assets, 'js', 'errors'),
'#utils' : path.resolve(assets, 'js', 'utils'),
'#store' : path.resolve(assets, 'js', 'store'),
'#api' : path.resolve(assets, 'js', 'api'),
'#less' : path.resolve(assets, 'less')
}
2. Require the alias.js file into webpack.mix.js
const mix = require('laravel-mix');
mix.alias(require('./webpack/alias'))
// ... The rest of your mix, e.g.
.js('app.js')
.vue()
.less('app.less');
3. Create the fake webpack config for your IDE (e.g. /webpack/ide.config.js)
Here, import the laravel-mix webpack config, plus your aliases, and any other config that the IDE might need help finding. Also include the prefixed ~ aliases for importing styles into your Vue components.
/*
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| A fake config file for PhpStorm to enable aliases
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| File > Settings... > Languages & Frameworks > Javascript > Webpack
|
| Select "Manually" and set the configuration file to this
|
*/
const path = require('path');
const mixConfig = require('./../node_modules/laravel-mix/setup/webpack.config')();
module.exports = {
...mixConfig,
resolve: {
alias: {
...require('./alias'),
'~#less' : path.resolve('#less'), // <--
},
...mixConfig.resolve
}
}
4. Set your IDE to use webpack/ide.config.js as your webpack config file.
Had the same problem on a new Laravel project with Jetstream. The webpack.config.js was present and correct. But PHPStorm still didn't recognize the # symbol as a resource root.
After opening the webpack config, I got a notification:
After Clicking on Trust project and run, the # symbol became recognized.
I know that this isn't the solution or use-case for everyone. But I still found it worthy to note on this post, because it helped me in my situation.
Using
laravel/framework:8.77.1
npm:8.3.0
node:v14.18.1
Pulling my hair out here looking for a simple solution to share code, required via NPM, across multiple Browserify or Webpack bundles. Thinking, is there such a thing as a file "bridge"?
This isn't due to compile time (I'm aware of watchify) but rather the desire to extract out all of my vendor specific libs into vendor.js so to keep my app.js filesize down and to not crash the browser with massive sourcemaps. Plus, I find it way cleaner should the need to view the compiled js arise. And so:
// vendor.js
require('react');
require('lodash');
require('other-npm-module');
require('another-npm-module');
Its very important that the code be loaded from NPM as opposed to Bower, or saved into some 'vendor' directory in order to be imported via a relative path and identified via a shim. I'd like to keep every library reference pulled via NPM except for my actual application source.
In app.js I keep all of my sourcecode, and via the externals array, exclude vendor libraries listed above from compilation:
// app.js
var React = require('react');
var _ = require('lodash');
var Component = React.createClass()
// ...
And then in index.html, I require both files
// index.html
<script src='vendor.js'></script>
<script src='app.js'></script>
Using Browserify or Webpack, how can I make it so that app.js can "see" into those module loaded via npm? I'm aware of creating a bundle with externals and then referencing the direct file (in, say, node_modules) via an alias, but I'm hoping to find a solution that is more automatic and less "Require.js" like.
Basically, I'm wondering if it is possible to bridge the two so that app.js can look inside vendor.js in order to resolve dependencies. This seems like a simple, straightforward operation but I can't seem to find an answer anywhere on this wide, wide web.
Thanks!
Listing all the vendor files/modules and using CommonChunkPlugin is indeed the recommended way. This gets pretty tedious though, and error prone.
Consider these NPM modules: fastclick and mprogress. Since they have not adopted the CommonJS module format, you need to give webpack a hand, like this:
require('imports?define=>false!fastclick')(document.body);
require('mprogress/mprogress.min.css');
var Mprogress = require('mprogress/mprogress.min.js'),
Now assuming you would want both fastclick and mprogress in your vendor chunk, you would probably try this:
module.exports = {
entry: {
app: "./app.js",
vendor: ["fastclick", "mprogress", ...]
Alas, it doesn't work. You need to match the calls to require():
module.exports = {
entry: {
app: "./app.js",
vendor: [
"imports?define=>false!fastclick",
"mprogress/mprogress.min.css",
"mprogress/mprogress.min.js",
...]
It gets old, even with some resolve.alias trickery. Here is my workaround. CommonChunkPlugin lets you specify a callback that will return whether or not you want a module to be included in the vendor chunk. If your own source code is in a specific src directory, and the rest is in the node_modules directory, just reject the modules based on their path:
var node_modules_dir = path.join(__dirname, 'node_modules'),
app_dir = path.join(__dirname, 'src');
module.exports = {
entry: {
app: "./app.js",
},
output: {
filename: "bundle.js"
},
plugins: [
new webpack.optimize.CommonsChunkPlugin(
/* chunkName= */"vendor",
/* filename= */"vendor.bundle.js"
function (module, count) {
return module.resource && module.resource.indexOf(app_dir) === -1;
}
)
]
};
Where module.resource is the path to the module being considered. You could also do the opposite, and include only the module if it is inside node_modules_dir, i.e.:
return module.resource && module.resource.indexOf(node_modules_dir) === 0;
but in my situation, I'd rather say: "put everything that is not in my source source tree in a vendor chunk".
Hope that helps.
With webpack you'd use multiple entry points and the CommonChunkPlugin.
Taken from the webpack docs:
To split your app into 2 files, say app.js and vendor.js, you can require the vendor files in vendor.js. Then pass this name to the CommonChunkPlugin as shown below.
module.exports = {
entry: {
app: "./app.js",
vendor: ["jquery", "underscore", ...],
},
output: {
filename: "bundle.js"
},
plugins: [
new webpack.optimize.CommonsChunkPlugin(
/* chunkName= */"vendor",
/* filename= */"vendor.bundle.js"
)
]
};
This will remove all modules in the vendor chunk from the app chunk. The bundle.js will now contain just your app code, without any of it’s dependencies. These are in vendor.bundle.js.
In your HTML page load vendor.bundle.js before bundle.js.
<script src="vendor.bundle.js"></script>
<script src="bundle.js"></script>
// vendor anything coming from node_modules
minChunks: module => /node_modules/.test(module.resource)
Source: https://github.com/webpack/webpack/issues/2372#issuecomment-213149173
I have a package.json file with our version number, such as:
{
name: "myproject"
version: "2.0"
}
My goal is to dynamically add the version number from the package.json file into the output files. For example, in the javascript I don't want to manually update the version number, but would like something similar to this to be generated after each grunt build:
/* My Project, v2.0 */
window.myProject = {
version: "2.0"
};
Is there an easy way to do this in my Gruntfile.js configuration?
I implemented: https://github.com/erickrdch/grunt-string-replace
In my source css/js files, I use the text {{ VERSION }} which gets replaced with the version number set in the package.json file. Below is the config I added to Gruntfile.js.
'string-replace': {
version: {
files: {
// the files I did string replacement on
},
options: {
replacements: [{
pattern: /{{ VERSION }}/g,
replacement: '<%= pkg.version %>'
}]
}
}
},
pkg: grunt.file.readJSON('package.json'),
I think that what you only want to do is to put some kind of trick for unable the page to use the cache files that maybe the browser have, and by now, the only way for that cross-browser is putting something on the href urls like "app.v2_2.js" or "app.js?ver=22". So I use this grunt npm package:
https://www.npmjs.org/package/grunt-cache-breaker
By default it only adds a parameter to your javascript and in almost the cases is the thing you need for not using cache, but you can configure even if you change the name of the file in other grunt process. This only change the HTML headers to what you desire.
After you install the grunt-cache-breaker, add this to your GruntFile:
// Append a timestamp to 'app.js', 'controllers.min.js' which are both located in 'index.html'
// resulting in the index the call of : href="~/app.js?rel=1415124174159"...
cachebreaker: {
dev: {
options: {
match: ['app.js', 'styles.css']
},
files: {
src: ['dist/index.html']
}
}
},
Then where you load the modules:
grunt.loadNpmTasks('grunt-cache-breaker');
Add on the task you want to:
grunt.registerTask('deploy', [
'clean:app',
'copy:views',
'copy:imgs',
'copy:css',
'uglify:app',
'cssmin:app',
'cachebreaker:dev'
]);
And finally run the grunt action on the console/command prompt
> grunt deploy
I would suggest using the banner feature in grunt-contrib-concat
this can be done as well with the banner option of https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt-contrib-uglify - which takes also care of the minifiaction of the javascript files.
filerev provides this option now. Use process to manipulate the filename that will be otherwise suffixed with md5 hash of the file content. You can use this to insert your version to every file you want.
Ref: https://github.com/yeoman/grunt-filerev
create something like package.json in the root of your project
it should read that or you can do something like
pkg: grunt.file.readJSON('package.json'),
in that you'll have a version declaration which would obviously correspond to <%= pkg.version %> so have that string in your json output and then run grunt.config.process to do the variable replacement
do something similar for the comment header
I'm currently integrating foreign code into our application.
Part of the process, I must substitute one of their requirejs modules with ours.
Obviously I can't modify their code, otherwise I'd have to do the change at every update. What I can do is modify the main.js (data-main of requirejs).
Here is, roughly, what they have:
requirejs.config({
packages: [
'beerpong'
]
});
So they have this beerpong package, with some modules in there. Among these modules, there is the beer.js file. It can be required with a require('beerpong/beer').
Aside from this, I have my files, in a separate folder, say vodkapong/beersubstitute. What I would like is that, whenever someone require('beerpong/beer'), that requirejs actually serves him my vodkapong/beersubstitute instead.
tl;dr: How can I remap an existing module to use my module instead?
PS: Sadly, we're not actually writing a beerpong game... One day maybe!
You could use the map option. It can remap an AMD module for a specific module or for all modules with the "*" name. An example would be:
require.config({
map: {
"*": {
"beerpong/beer": "vodkapong/beersubstitute"
}
},
...
});
You can do something like this -
require.config({
paths: {
jquery_ui_scrollbar: 'libs/jquery/jquery.custom-scrollbar'
}
});
require(['dependency1', 'dependency2'], function (dep1, dep2) {
// code goes here
});
And in your define call you can do this -
define(['jquery_ui_scrollbar'], function(scrollbar) {});