Basically, I want to have a large rectangle and cut smaller rectangles out of it. I can draw the rectangle, then do clearRect(x, y, w, h) but it removes stuff I've drawn on previous to even creating the rectangle.
So basically, can I draw a rectangle over an image and then cut the rectangle without affecting the image underneath it? I have a small idea of using ctx.save and restore, but I can't quite get it to work - and I'm not 100% sure that's the right answer.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Cam
An alternative might be to use paths:
Call context.beginPath()
Define the outer rect with moveTo and lineTo and closePath, going clockwise
Cut out the holes the same way but, going counter-clockwise
Call context.fill() to fill the rectangle without the holes.
This only works if you know all the holes from the start, though. This answer has more details for this approach:
Polygon with a hole in the middle with HTML5's canvas
Thanks to markE and Stefan for giving a solution. However, after hours of searching I found my own answer based on this answer. I have no idea why it works, but check out what code I used below:
ctx.fillStyle = "grey";
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.rect(100, 100, 50, 50);
ctx.rect(400, 0, -400, 400);
ctx.fill();
For some reason, if you declare what shape you want to cut out first, and then draw the overlaying shape BACKWARDS (?!) over your area, it cuts out the shape. WTF Javascript? Anyways, it works :)
Related
I am trying to draw an opaque shape on top of a colorful background in p5.js. So I give both the fill color and the stroke color an alpha value. The problem is that the outline of the shape is partly drawn onto the shape. Because of the opaque stroke, this makes it look like there is two outlines with different colors. Here is an example:
function setup() {
createCanvas(60, 60);
}
function draw() {
background(255);
fill(127,127);
stroke(50,127);
strokeWeight(5);
rect(10,10,40,40);
}
What I get is this square which appears to have an inner dark gray and an outer light gray bounding box.
Is there an easy way to prevent this from happening? I know I could draw the shape "twice" (first the fill and then the outline a little bit further out), but
I am trying to draw a rather complicated polygon, so I would have to adjust all the vertex coordinates of the outer shape which would be pretty annoying to work out.
I have already tried the different blendModes, but they didn't seem to be able to solve my problem.
The reason this is happening is because you have a stroke weight of 5, which is drawn from the edge of the shape, in both directions. So some of the stroke is on the inside of the shape, and some of the stroke is on the outside.
I don't know of a way to change this setting. I tried playing with strokeCap and strokeJoin but nothing solved the problem.
One option that occurs to me is drawing a scaled-down version of the shape with a stroke weight of 1. That would look something like this:
let shapeGraphics;
function setup() {
createCanvas(260, 260);
// draw a scaled-down version of the shape
shapeGraphics = createGraphics(8, 8);
shapeGraphics.fill(127, 127);
shapeGraphics.stroke(50, 127);
shapeGraphics.rect(0, 0, 8, 8);
}
function draw() {
background(255);
noSmooth();
// draw a scaled-up version of the graphics
image(shapeGraphics, 10, 10, 40, 40);
}
If that doesn't work, then the only other option I can think of is to calculate the outer edges yourself and draw the shape twice, like you mentioned.
I am working on a real time canvas drawing webapp using socket.io, node.js, and p5.js. I am having trouble creating a smooth line when the mouse is dragged. If the mouse is dragged too fast there is a trail of empty space in between each ellipse. The end goal here is to create a smooth path. Here are the things I have tried so far:
Attempt 1:
noStroke();
fill(lineColor[0],lineColor[1],lineColor[2]);
ellipse(mouseX, mouseY, lineThickness, lineThickness);
Attempt 2:
strokeWeight(lineThickness);
line(mouseX,mouseY);
stroke(lineColor[0],lineColor[1],lineColor[2]);
Here is a picture of what the issue looks like:
canvas drawing incomplete path image
any feedback is welcome; thanks!
Kevin's answer is great because it will be more efficient to draw lines instead of many ellipses. You should also look into:
beginShape()/endShape()
bezierVertex()
curveVertex()
curvePoint()
The above should help you draw a smooth path and setting a thicker stroke will looks as it many filled ellipses are connected forming the path.
If for some reason you do want to draw many ellipses, you can interpolate position when the mouse move faster and create gaps to fill those gaps.
For more information and p5.js example, check out this answer:
Processing: Draw vector instead of pixels
You could use the pmouseX and pmouseY variables, which hold the previous position of the cursor. Use that to draw a line from the previous position to the current position to fill in the blank space between mouse events.
From the reference:
// Move the mouse across the canvas to leave a trail
function setup() {
//slow down the frameRate to make it more visible
frameRate(10);
}
function draw() {
background(244, 248, 252);
line(mouseX, mouseY, pmouseX, pmouseY);
print(pmouseX + " -> " + mouseX);
}
<script src="https://github.com/processing/p5.js/releases/download/0.5.11/p5.js"></script>
I'm trying to understand the combination of HTML5/CSS3 and Javascript more and more.
That's why I thought, make a little project so you learn all about that more.
In short, I like the new iOS7 wallpaper and use it on my website (http://www.betadevelops.com). Then I thought, let's make this more lightweight and draw it with pure Javascript.
I started and managed to get quite far (http://www.betadevelops.com/jOS7.html). But now I face a stupid problem I can't seem to get fixed.
I draw circles on the canvas, and dynamically assign colors to it. But each time a new circle (and so a new color gets chosen) it automatically recolors the old circles...
So let's say, 10 circles:
1: blue circle, draw's it and done
2: yellow circle, draw's it and done, but it also colors the first blue one to yellow
I also wanted to add opacity and blurring. The opacity kinda works in the sense it has opacity on only 2-3 circles from the 20 I draw. I think this is not possible because I use Math.Random the calculate a random opacity.
Considered the blurring, I can add blurring to the whole canvas with follow code
canvas.style.webkitFilter = "blur(3px)";
but that's not what I want. I want the blur on the circle itself and to be more precisely, the outline. I read about it and it's not possible, but you can mimmick the looks with using CSS box-shadow.
So I tried
canvas.style.webkitFilter = "box-shadow(10px 10px 5px #888)";
but this also doesn't work it seems...
So, you website guru's. What am I doing wrong and can you help me out?
You can find the code by clicking on the second link. Uploaded it there.
EDIT:
Nevermind the blur, managed to solve it partially with this code
if (blurred) {
ctx.shadowColor = color;
ctx.shadowBlur = 15;
ctx.shadowOffsetX = 0;
ctx.shadowOffsetY = 0;
}
#Stig Runar Vangen has the correct answer.
I would just add that if you don't intend the circles to "run", you could use ctx.closePath after drawing each ctx.arc.
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(centerX, centerY, diameter, 0, 2 * Math.PI, false);
ctx.closePath();
color = color.replace('opacity', Math.random().toString());
ctx.fillStyle = color;
ctx.fill();
The reason why you see that all your circles gets the same color, might be because you join all circles into one draw operation. To separate each circle draw operation, start each circle placement with:
ctx.beginPath();
Each arc should then also be drawn with a call to either ctx.stoke() or ctx.fill() after the definition of each single circle.
This is purely guesswork as I haven't seen your code.
I'm writing a simple 2D game engine using the HTML5 canvas. I've come to adding a lighting engine. Each light source has a radius value and an intensity value (0-1, eg 1 would be very bright). There's also an ambient light value that is used to light everything else in the world that isn't near a light source (0-1, eg 0.1 would be moonlight). The process of lighting is done on a separate canvas above the main canvas:
For each light source, a radial gradient is drawn at that position with the same radius as the light source. The gradient is given two stops: the center is black with an alpha of 1-intensity of the light and the end/edge is black with alpha of 1-ambient light value. That all works fine.
This is where it goes wrong :/ I need to fill the whole canvas with black with and alpha of 1-ambient light value and at the moment I do this by setting the context.globalCompositeOperation to source-out then fillRecting the whole canvas.
My code for this stuff is:
var amb = 'rgba(0,0,0,' + (1-f.ambientLight) + ')';
for(i in f.entities) {
var e = f.entities[i], p = f.toScreenPoint(e.position.x, e.position.y), radius = e.light.radius;
if(radius > 0) {
var g = cxLighting.createRadialGradient(p.x, p.y, 0, p.x, p.y, radius);
g.addColorStop(0, 'rgba(0,0,0,' + (1-e.light.intensity) + ')');
g.addColorStop(1, amb);
cxLighting.fillStyle = g;
cxLighting.beginPath();
cxLighting.arc(p.x, p.y, radius, 0, Math.PI*2, true);
cxLighting.closePath();
cxLighting.fill();
}
}
//Ambient light
cxLighting.globalCompositeOperation = 'source-out';
cxLighting.fillStyle = amb;
cxLighting.fillRect(0, 0, f.width, f.height);
cxLighting.globalCompositeOperation = 'source-over';
However instead of getting what I wan't out of the engine (left) I get a kind of reversed gradient (right). I think this is because when I draw the rectangle with the source-out composite operation it affects the colours of the gradient itself because they are semi-transparent.
Is there a way to do this differently or better? Using clipping maybe, or drawing the rect over everything first?
Also, I modified the Mozila Dev Centre's example on composting to replicate what I need to do and none of the composite modes seemed to work, check that out if it would help.
Thanks very much, any answer would be great :)
One trivial way would be to use imageData but that would be painfully slow. It's an option, but not a good one for a game engine.
Another way would be to think of the ambient light and the light-source as if they were one path. That would make it very easy to do:
http://jsfiddle.net/HADky/
Or see it with an image behind: http://jsfiddle.net/HADky/10/
The thing you're taking advantage of here is the fact that any intersection of a path on canvas is always only unioned and never compounded. So you're using a single gradient brush to draw the whole thing.
But it gets a bit trickier than that if there's more than one light-source. I'm not too sure how to cover that in an efficient way, especially if you plan for two light-sources to intersect.
What you should probably do instead is devise an alpha channel instead of this overlay thing, but I can't currently think of a good way to get it to work. I'll revisit this if I think of anything else.
EDIT: Hey! So I've done a bit of thinking and came up with a good solution.
What you need to do is draw a sort of alpha channel, where the dark spots mark the places where you want light to be. So if you had three light sources it would look like this:
Then you want to set the fill style to your ambient color and set the globalCompositeOperation to xor and xor the whole thing.
ctx.fillStyle = amb;
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = 'xor';
ctx.fillRect(0,0,500,500);
That will leave you with the "opposite" image except the transparent parts will be correctly ambient:
Here's a working example of the code:
http://jsfiddle.net/a2Age/
Extra optimization: You can actually achieve the effect without using any paths at all, by simply drawing the exact same radial gradients onto rects instead of circular paths:
http://jsfiddle.net/a2Age/2/
Hope that helps!
Just an idea, but since you're getting the opposite effect you're going for from your gradient, have you tried reversing the gradient?
I am using an HTML canvas and javascript and I need to clear all of the pixels underneath a shape created by closing a path (for example, I am using flot, and I want to make rounded corners, and to do this, I first need to remove the square corners by drawing a curve on top of the corner to remove the desired pixels).
Right now, I am doing this by just filling the shape with the same color as the background, which can imitate what I want to do, but, it is not ideal as it makes it impossible to place the chart on top of non-solid backgrounds without seeing the square corners. I know that there is a clearRect method that would do what I want to do, but with only rectangles, I need to do it with any closed shape. Is it possible, and if so, how would I do it?
brainjam's code was heading in the right direction, but didn't fully solve the problem. Here's the solution:
context.save();
context.globalCompositeOperation = 'copy';
context.fillStyle = 'rgba(0,0,0,0)';
//draw shape to cover up stuff underneath
context.fill();
context.restore();
Here's an example of a function that will clear a circle from a canvas:
var clearCircle = function(x, y, radius)
{
context.save();
context.globalCompositeOperation = 'destination-out';
context.beginPath();
context.arc(x, y, radius, 0, 2 * Math.PI, false);
context.fill();
context.restore();
};
I think what you want is a clipping region, defined by the clip() function. The latter takes a bunch of paths. Here's an example.
This is a little different from what you are specifically asking (which is to remove pixels after drawing them), but actually not drawing the pixels in the first place is probably better, if I understand your requirements correctly.
Edit: I now think I understand that what you want to do is clear pixels to transparent black. To do that, after having defined your paths, do something like this:
context.fillStyle = 'rgba(0,0,0,0)';
context.fill();
The first statement sets the fill color to transparent black.
Use globalCompositeOperation = 'destination-out' instead of 'copy', it will erase all pixels of the shape in the canvas.
See all kinds of composition here
very usefull !