I'm trying to create a remote control app using Cordova.
There should be 2 vertical sliders (<input type="range">, with my customizations (height, width, color, etc.). One should be on the left, positioned at 25% of the page width; and the other on the right, at 75% of the page width.
The sliders also should be centered on the correct point (ex. calc(25% - 20px); for the slider on the left if it is 40px wide, which it will be).
The only other requirement is that this webpage works on iOS Safari (really Cordova, but it uses Apple's WebKit which is basically the same). Opera/Firefox would also be nice. It does not have to be IE compatible (you're welcome).
I don't mind using Javascript/jQuery, but I would prefer CSS.
Also, for reasons unexplained, the sliders go off the top of the page, which must be fixed. One last bug with what I currently have is that applying position: fixed; left: 0px; to a slider does not move it completely to the left, so the centerInViewport() function is offset.
Here's a JSFiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/Coder256/6zjnk3qt/
I already tried -webkit-appearance: slider-vertical. It doesn't allow styling. For sliders, any -webkit-appearance value aside from none that I've tried doesn't let you style anything.
UPDATE: Sorry if I wasn't clear. The question is: How do I correctly position the sliders while keeping my customization, correctly being not too far up off the page and at the correct x position as described above?
The trick is to set margin-topto half of the sliders width to keep the sliders from being too far up off the page.
Same principle is for the x position. Use calc to set left to 25% / 75% minus half of the sliders width to get the correct position.
html, body {margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%}
h1 {
text-align: center;
}
.app {
width: 100%;
}
.sliders {
position: relative;
}
input[type=range].vslider {
-webkit-appearance: none;
transform: rotate(270deg) translateY(-50%);
margin-top: 200px; /* 50% of the width because of the transformation */
width: 400px;
height: 40px;
outline: none;
position: absolute;
}
input[type=range].vslider::-webkit-slider-thumb {
-webkit-appearance: none;
background-color: #777;
opacity: 0.75;
width: 25px;
height: 40px;
transform: translateY(-10px);
}
input[type=range].vslider::-webkit-slider-runnable-track {
-webkit-appearance: none;
background-color: #444;
color: #444;
height: 20px;
width: 400px;
}
#LSlider {
left: calc(25% - 200px); /* 50% of the width because of the transformation */
}
#RSlider {
left: calc(75% - 200px); /* 50% of the width because of the transformation */
}
<div class="app">
<h1>RC Car Test</h1>
<div id="sliders">
<input type="range" min="-256" max="256" step="1" defaultValue="0" class="vslider" id="LSlider" />
<input type="range" min="-256" max="256" step="1" defaultValue="0" class="vslider" id="RSlider" />
</div>
</div>
Related
HI I have a vertical scrollbar. because I have some icons. And if the icons are increasing. you can't see the bottom icons anymore. So I added a scrollbar. But now the scrollbar is pressing half of the icons. So the icons are not visible totally anymore.
so this I have as css:
#makelist {
width: 250px;
/* max-height: 100%; */
max-width: 300px;
scrollbar-width: 500px;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
margin-left: -210px;
background-color: #91c7e1;
transition: all 0.5s cubic-bezier(0.7, 0, 0, 0.8);
z-index: 1;
margin-top: 70px;
overflow-y:overlay;
height: 700px;
}
this is html:"
<div id="makelist">
<ul id="makelistul"></ul>
</div>
So my question is: How to make the width of the scrollbar wider?
Thank you
You can hide a scrollbar:
.element::-webkit-scrollbar {
display: none;
}
But it's not the best practice, you should give a hint to a user that it's scrollable element by adding shadows or arrows at the ends of the element
For cross-browser compatibility add also:
scrollbar-width: none;
I'm not sure if this is really solvable/possible but...
I'm trying to implement a particular animation where my screen is divided in 2 vertically on the first page, but after doing some sort of event (wheel, scroll, click, etc), the layout will animate smoothly to divide the screen horizontally.
If you hover over the first example, I tried to just rotate both inner elements, and then tried to resize the elements based on the new, rotated position. This did not work well.
As you can see, as the elements rotate, there are several issues:
They don't rotate perfectly in sync
You can see the ugly whitespace of the container behind it as it rotates
After rotating, the elements do not fill the container perfectly
I have tried many different things, like using z-index, absolute positioning, tried putting the inner elements in another nested container and then rotating the container, then adding height and width, but again the sizes didn't fit the container. I cannot seem to figure out how to make this work (without Javscript, if possible).
Essentially, the animation I have in mind would make the transition from the Initial Stage to the Final Stage seamless (ie. You wouldn't be able to see the whitespace in the background of the container, and the starting vertical line of separation would just slowly rotate to a horizontal line, while changing the position of the inner elements)
I hope this makes sense? I've been trying to get this animation to work for days...and I am exhausted of options/not creative enough/don't have the knowledge I need; help would be greatly appreciated.
.container {
display: flex;
border: 1px solid black;
width: 425px;
height: 500px;
margin: 5% auto;
}
.container:hover .left {
transform-origin: 100% 50%;
transform: rotate(90deg);
width: 100%;
}
.container:hover .right {
transform-origin: 0 50%;
transform: rotate(90deg);
width: 100%;
}
.left {
background-color: purple;
height: 100%;
width: 50%;
transition: all 2s;
}
.right {
background-color: yellow;
height: 100%;
width: 50%;
transition: all 2s;
}
.container2 {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
border: 1px solid black;
width: 425px;
height: 500px;
margin: 5% auto;
}
.left2 {
background-color: purple;
height: 50%;
width: 100%;
}
.right2 {
background-color: yellow;
height: 50%;
width: 100%;
}
Initial Stage
<p>(width of the container is the viewport; I don't care about if the element extends outside of the viewport during the transtion, but at the final stage, the element must be within it's container perfectly)</p>
<div class="container">
<div class="left"></div>
<div class="right"></div>
</div>
Final Stage
<p>(width of the container is the viewport; I don't care about if the element extends outside of the viewport during the transtion, but at the final stage, the element must be within it's container perfectly)</p>
<div class="container2">
<div class="left2">
I have content in here that I need fit within this container
</div>
<div class="right2">
I have content in here that I need fit within this container
</div>
</div>
Instead of adding transition to left/ right divs add it to the container div
.container {
display: flex;
border: 1px solid black;
width: 425px;
height: 500px;
margin: 5% auto;
transition: all 2s;
transform: rotate(0deg);
}
.container:hover {
transform: rotate(90deg);
width: 100%;
}
Also Remove transitions and transforms from left right divs
Heres an image of the issue I'm trying to resolve. I am working on my portfolio site; and I have images of some of my personal projects, all of them are the same width but some have different heights. Due to getting full page screenshots of my work, some of the images have a much greater height than others. Instead of allowing displaying all the images the same size and allowing scrolling in the modal window, it scales the images down to fit within the same height as all the others. This gives it an odd look cause some of the images get scaled down a lot. I would like to get all the images to display in the same width, and those that need it to allow scrolling to see the rest of the image. I tried to use overflow: scroll; on the .lightbox but that didn't help. I've also tried overflow-y. I would also like to disable the page in the background from being able to scroll, to allow the scrolling to be focused on the images that it is necessary on.
.lightbox {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
z-index: 10000;
text-align: center;
line-height: 0;
font-weight: normal;
}
.lightbox .lb-image {
display: block;
min-width: 100%;
height: auto;
border-radius: 3px;
/* Image border */
border: 4px solid white;
}
.lightbox a img {
border: none;
}
.lb-outerContainer {
position: relative;
*zoom: 1;
width: 250px;
min-height: 250px;
margin: 0 auto;
border-radius: 4px;
/* Background color behind image.
This is visible during transitions. */
background-color: white;
}
Lightbox2 by default appends calculated width & height to the image and .lb-outerContainer. But you can override this by doing the following -
.lb-outerContainer {
width: 100% !important;
height: auto !important;
}
.lightbox .lb-image {
width: 100% !important;
height: auto !important;
}
I don't recommend this because this breaks the intended use of this plugin. I'm sure you'll find an alternative to lightbox2 that achieves what you're looking for. So you can consider this as a temporary fix.
EDIT: Here's a jsfiddle to see it work. https://jsfiddle.net/hsugx6wm/43/
I have an image which goes from one side off the screen to other. However, when I open the HTML on a different sized computer/laptop, it does not fit and looks out of place. How do I fix this?
CODE:
body {
text-align: center;
}
div.container {
text-align: left;
width: 710px;
margin: 0 auto;
border: 12px solid black;
border-radius: 10px;
}
div.content {
width: 700px;
min-height: 400px;
background-color: white;
padding: 5px;
}
#-webkit-keyframes mini {
from {
left: 410px;
}
}
.mini {
position: absolute;
top: 280px;
left: 950px;
width: 166px;
height: 70px;
z-index: 10000;
-webkit-animation: mini 3s;
animation: mini 8s;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="content">
<img src="Media/buscartoon.jpg" class="mini" />
</div>
</div>
maybe set initial left and top values
.imganim {
width:100px;
height:60px;
position:absolute;
-webkit-animation:myfirst 5s;
animation:myfirst 5s;
left: 0;
top: 0;
}
Your .content and .container have no position set, so I guess it's defaulting to the next parent element that does have these set.
Pop this on your .content div:
position: relative;
the image is still going to go over the limits because of left: 100% but adding a relative position to the container may well help you get to the next problem.
If you want the image to sit flush with the edge of the container rather than running over, you can also change your left: 100% to:
left: calc(100% - 100px)
...where 100px is the width of the element.
edit: jsfiddle example https://jsfiddle.net/w56r2xnr/
Try the following css classes that i have ammended. I have kept the top at 5px which makes room for the 5px padding within the content div. Also the 50% transformation formal includes the left 100% - (width of the image + right-padding).
You can now adjust the top to make it as you see fit.
CSS changes:
div.content {
width: 700px; min-height: 400px;
background-color: white; padding: 5px;
position: relative;
}
/* Chrome, Safari, Opera */
#-webkit-keyframes myfirst
{
0% {left:0%; top:5px;}
50% {left: calc(100% - 105px);}
100% {left:0%; top:5px;}
}
/* Standard syntax */
#keyframes myfirst
{
0% { left:0%; top:5px;}
50% {left: calc(100% - 105px);}
100% {left:0%; top:5px;}
}
Sample: http://codepen.io/Nasir_T/pen/ZBpjpw
Hope this helps.
[Edit - Code changed in question]
I think in both scenarios you will need to set the content div with position:relative to keep the image contained within it as the image itself is position:absolute. Along with that you need to use percentage values for the left and top in order for the animation and the position to be in the right place regardless of the size of the screen.
For the updated code in question please check the following code sample:
http://codepen.io/Nasir_T/pen/ObRwmO
Just adjust the key frame left percentage according to your need.
I am trying to animate a div upwards when a user hovers on the div.
I am able to animate the div making it bigger, however the animation happens downwards. I am trying to keep the bottom of the div remain in the same place, and have a smooth animating increasing the size of the div upwards.
See jsfiddle here which demonstrates what my code is currently doing.
Please see code below:
.box {
height: 170px;
padding-bottom: 15px;
width: 50%;
}
.content {
background-color: #e3e4e6;
height: 100%;
text-align: center;
}
.content:hover {
height: 110%;
}
<div class="box">
<div class="content">TEST</div>
</div>
You can do this using transform:scaleY() and set the transform-origin to bottom. I also put a margin-top:100px to see the effect better. Also you can use transition to make the scale smoother
You also need to scale back the text.
See here: jsfiddle
You need to scale the text back to it's original state in the same time that you scale the div. so if you scale the div 2 times. You need to scale back the text with 1/2 , same if you scale 3 times...scale back with 1/3
In this case you enlarge .content by 1.5 so you need to scale down the text inside by 1/1.5 = 0.66
Code:
.box {
height: 170px;
padding-bottom: 15px;
width: 50%;
}
.content {
background-color: #e3e4e6;
height: 100%;
text-align: center;
margin-top: 300px;
transition:0.3s;
}
.content:hover p {
transform: scaleY(0.66)
}
.content:hover {
transform: scaleY(1.5);
transform-origin: bottom;
}
<div class="box">
<div class="content">
<p>
TEST
</p>
</div>
</div>
Try it like this (I have no other idea...): You can give to the class "box" a bigger height (I put a red border around, so you can see it) than the class "content". After that, you can use flexbox, to put the class "content" on the bottom. After that, you can do it with hover to change your heigth upwards and fill it. With transition you can make a nice animation. I hope this is good enough. Perhaps there is also a way with jQUery at the moment I havn't got an idea. Let me know, if this helps you (I'm not sure if I understanded the question well) - Cheers. (Important: This heights and so on are just random values for testing)
.box {
display: flex;
justify-content: flex-end;
flex-direction: column;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid red;
}
.content {
background-color: #e3e4e6;
height: 50px;
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
-webkit-transition: height 1s;
/* Safari */
transition: height 1s;
}
.content:hover {
height: 100%;
}
<div class="box">
<div class="content">TEST</div>
</div>
If you just want to use css, just use:
.content:hover {
margin-top: -50px;
height: 110%;
}
See jsFiddle
since there isn't any space at top to expand, you may give an extra margin initially and remove it on hover like this JsFiddle -
.box {
height: 170px;
padding-bottom: 15px;
width: 50%;
}
.content {
background-color: #e3e4e6;
height: 100%;
text-align: center;
margin-top:25px;
}
.content:hover {
height: 110%;
margin-top:0;
}
Set top property with the value of height - 100 * -1
https://jsfiddle.net/x3cL1cpt/7/
.content:hover {
height: 110%;
top: -10%;
position: relative;
}
Why position relative? It's because I move the box, but without modifying the space that the box occuped. If you need to modify that space, change top with margin-top.
Replace this CSS with your current, needed to add transition:
.box {
height: 170px;
padding-bottom: 15px;
width: 50%;
}
.content {
background-color: #e3e4e6;
height: 100%;
text-align: center;
transition: 1s all ease;
}
.content:hover {
transform: scaleY(1.2);
transform-origin: bottom right;
}