I have a square with a logo inside. On hover in the square, I want the background color to change as well as the color of the logo.
I have the following code:
<div class="pure-u-1 pure-u-md-1-3">
<div class="project", id="project1">
</div>
</div>
.project {
background-color: #f5f4f4;
margin: 0 0.5em 2em;
padding: 4em 4em;
}
#project1:hover {
background-color: red;
}
I can get the logo to change on hover and I can get the square to change, but I can't get them to both change at the same time, i.e. when the mouse touches the square.
I'm assuming this needs javascript, which I do not know. Any tips/help is greatly appreciated.
No JavaScript required, just CSS. No need for an <img> either.
<div class="logo">Brand Name</div>
.logo {
width: 80px;
height: 78px;
text-indent: -9999em;
background-image: url('http://s17.postimg.org/7hltqe5e3/sprite.png');
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: 0 0;
background-color: blue;
}
.logo:hover {
background-color: red;
background-position: -80px 0;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/12u7ma2q/
Create a sprite with both versions of the logo side-by-side. When you hover you will change the background color and shift the position of the sprite image (left, right, up, down - depends on how you created your sprite).
The benefits to this answer over sailens is that you're not using invalid markup (<img> without a src attribute) and you're only making a single request for an image instead of two. Oh, and less markup - a single <div> (which could be an <a>, <span> etc).
You could also shorten .logo by using background instead of individual background properties. I listed them out at first for clarity.
.logo {
width: 80px;
height: 78px;
text-indent: -9999em;
background: blue url('http://s17.postimg.org/7hltqe5e3/sprite.png') no-repeat 0 0;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/12u7ma2q/1/
Cleaner HTML (since img tag needs a source, you can change it for a div):
<div class="pure-u-1 pure-u-md-1-3">
<div class="project", id="project1">
<div class="pure-img">
</div>
</div>
And the CSS:
.project {
background-color: #f5f4f4;
margin: 0 0.5em 2em;
padding: 4em 4em;
}
#project1:hover {
background-color: red;
}
.pure-img{
background-image: url(http://dummyimage.com/600x400/000/fff);
width: 80px;
height: 78px;
}
#project1:hover .pure-img {
background-image: url(http://dummyimage.com/600x400/666/0011fc);
}
and the fiddle
http://jsfiddle.net/h6gwwox6/1/
Related
I'm creating a homepage using HTML/CSS/Javascript, on this page I have text floating on the top left portion of the screen. I have a number of backgrounds saved from Reddit and a script which randomly selects one upon start, my problem is that because this background can be any colour it is difficult for the text to be readable, so my idea was to blur the background around just the text in order to make it readable. Ideally, it would follow just the text and blur the outline of it but I tried placing it in a box, however, because it uses relative layout it was difficult to have the box fill and blur the minimum space possible.
How can I improve the readability of text by blurring the background just around the text? I'm also open to other suggestions to improve readability (remembering the background changes)
Try using the CSS3 filters: https://www.inserthtml.com/2012/06/css-filters/
The link above should have a guide on how to blur image and you should be able to modify this to fit your requirements.
You have chosen the difficult way. Simply use CSS text-shadow Property. For example if the text is in black, use white shadow color for it.
Example:
body {
background-image: url('https://images.template.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/01191816/Perfect-Summer-Background-Free-Download.png');
background-size: cover
}
.text {
color: #000;
font-size: 3em;
text-shadow: 0 0 10px #fff, 0 0 10px #fff, 0 0 10px #fff
}
<div class="text">Some Text</div>
It's a quick n dirty fix... but I usually just add a contrast background color to the text wrapper (like the first one in the example below). You can also use blur filter if you want. I referred to this article frosting glass css filter for the second one. But in the comment of that article, some say there's a trade off of performance.
#bg {
background: url(https://picsum.photos/500/400?image=0) center center no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
width: 500px;
height: 300px;
margin-bottom: 30px;
}
#text-wrap1 {
padding: 30px;
background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0.7);
text-shadow: 1px 1px 1px white;
width: 150px;
}
#text-wrap2 {
padding: 30px;
width: 150px;
position: relative;
}
#text-wrap2 p {
position: relative;
text-shadow: 1px 1px 1px white;
}
#text-wrap2:before {
content: '';
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-color: white;
position: absolute;
left:0;
top:0;
-webkit-filter: url('#blur');
filter: url('#blur');
-webkit-filter: blur(5px);
filter: blur(5px);
background-size: cover;
opacity: 0.7;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="bg">
<div id="text-wrap1">
This is a random paragraph
</div>
</div>
<div id="bg">
<div id="text-wrap2">
<p>This is a random paragraph</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Relative newbie here. I have two different mouseover/hover functions I can get to work just fine: one, an inline mouseover that 'darkens' an image/box by making it lose opacity; and the second, text that appears over this image/box on hover (jumping up from a hidden position).
The problem is, I want to get them working together without this text losing opacity, which it does when part of the same div class as the image/box. But when I try two separate div classes and position them on top of each other (using z-index), whichever one I put on top seems to block the other one. Is there any way to have it so the image/box loses opacity, but the text that appears doesn't, all in the same mouseover/hover action?
These are the relevant bits in my stylesheet, mostly covering the text part:
.rightbox {
background: rgb(140, 183, 98);
width: 290px;
height: 160px;
margin-bottom: 18px;
padding: 2px;}
.rightboxtext {
display: table-cell;
height: 160px;
width: 290px;
vertical-align: bottom;
text-align: center;
font-weight: bold;
font-size: 20px;
color: #8CB762;
}
.rightboxtext span {
display: block;
height: 0px;
overflow: hidden;
}
.rightboxtext:hover span {
height: 80px;
}
This is the inline stuff that I used where everything, including text, gets the opacity treatment. (In this case the image is attached to the rightboxtext div class, but I also tried it attached to the rightbox div class.)
<div class="rightbox"
onmouseout="this.style.opacity=1;this.filters.alpha.opacity=100"
onmouseover="this.style.opacity=0.6;this.filters.alpha.opacity=60">
<div class="rightboxtext"
style="background-image: url(image.jpg); height: 160px; width: 290px;">
<span>Hello text.</span></div>
</div>
Otherwise I achieved this mangled bit of code, where one seems to block the other:
<div class="rightboxcontainer">
<div class="rightboxtext"
style="position: absolute; z-index: 100; height: 160px; width: 290px;">
<span>Hello text.</span></div>
<div class="rightbox"
style="position: absolute; z-index: 50; height: 160px; width: 290px;"
onmouseout="this.style.opacity=1;this.filters.alpha.opacity=100"
onmouseover="this.style.opacity=0.6;this.filters.alpha.opacity=60"><img
src="image.jpg">
</div>
</div>
With this extra bit in the stylesheet:
.rightboxcontainer { width: 290px; height: 160px; margin-bottom: 18px;}
Thanks in advance!
As a commenter pointed out above, you can do this entirely with CSS:
<style>
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
.box {
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
overflow: hidden;
}
.box img {
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
}
.box .message {
background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5);
opacity: 0;
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
position: relative;
top: -256px;
color: #fff;
font-size: 32px;
line-height: 250px;
text-align: center;
font-weight: bold;
font-family: arial;
}
.box .message:hover {
opacity: 1;
}
</style>
<div class="box">
<img src="http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/geology/people/clark-n/personal/copy_of_images/Satellite-map-of-Antarctica/image">
<div class="message">Antarctica</div>
</div>
.message is positioned on top of the container, .box. When you hover over .message, it fades in from 0 opacity. Its background is semi-opaque (using RGBA, where the fourth value is the opacity), so it dims the image. You could make the image the background-image of the .box if you wanted to.
http://jsfiddle.net/dgGG3/4/
Fist of all, try to avoid inline event handling as you can achieve the desired result with css :hover.
The problem as you can see here http://jsfiddle.net/UjY5Q/ is with opacity on a parent element all child elements also get that opacity.
.rightbox:hover {
opacity:0.5;
}
You can cheat on that one by setting positions to the elements and overlap one to the other one. That's kind a tricky and may also need browser support.
so the easyest way to get what you want is on :hover show a transparent background image example here: http://jsfiddle.net/UjY5Q/1/
I would say that's the way to go
I'm trying to change one image to another on mouseover. Specifically, when the visitor hovers over this:
The image will change to this:
The Current Code
I'd like to do this as lightweight as possible. But the image-background CSS thing doesn't work for me. My code is as follows:
<div id="featured-box-right"><a href="/videos/"
target="_self"><img src="../images/box-featured-home-right.png" title="videos"
alt="videos" width="300" height="150"></a></div>
But when I do this to the CSS:
#featured-box-right a:hover
{
background-image: url(../images/box-featured-home-right-hover.png);
}
The effect doesn't turn out right; it's not a background. It's an actual image. Any guidance as to how I can achieve this as lightweight as possible would be greatly appreciated!
The lightweight method is to use CSS, and use the property background-image of the div:
jsFiddle
<div id="featured-box-right"></div>
CSS:
#featured-box-right {
width: 300px;
height: 150px;
background-image: url('http://i.stack.imgur.com/OywDf.png');
}
#featured-box-right:hover {
background-image: url('http://i.stack.imgur.com/aRJOk.png');
}
You should use css image sprites techniques and do not use img tag here use css background property. You should try something below. you can use cllass or id or parent child relationship that is totally up to you.
<div id="featured-box-right">
</div>
css:
#img1
{
background: url(../images/box-featured-home-right.png);
}
#img1:hover
{
background: url(../images/box-featured-home-right-hover.png);
}
Remove the <img/> tag altogether and try this css.
#featured-box-right a {
background-image: url(../images/box-featured-home-right.png);
}
#featured-box-right a:hover {
background-image: url(../images/box-featured-home-right-hover.png);
}
CSS Sprites is a technique where you use a background-image, a set width and height, and adjust the background-position to display only the portion you need to show. This way you can use a single image and display lots of different graphics with it, saving server requests and speeding up page load times:
HTML:
<img src="images/arrow-sprite.png" alt="arrow" class="clip pos-1" />
CSS:
.clip { position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; }
.pos-1 { clip:rect(0 48px 48px 0); }
.pos-2 { clip:rect(0 96px 48px 48px); left: -48px; }
.pos-3 { clip:rect(48px 48px 96px 0); top: -48px; }
.pos-4 { clip:rect(48px 96px 96px 48px); top: -48px;
left: -48px; }
Took from here
You can delete the <img> tag and use CSS background iamge method, but you need to combine the 2 pic into one (one on top and one on bottom)
next, you need to use this code:
#featured-box-right {
width: 300px;
height: 150px;
background-image: url(image url here) center top;
}
#featured-box-right:hover {
background-image: url(image url here) center bottom;
}
Using this method makes you need only 1 image
No images (background or otherwise) are required.
This comes out to only 3.84% the size of your two images combined:http://fiddle.jshell.net/gWytK/show/:
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
<style>
body {
margin: 8px;
}
#links {
list-style: none;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
display: block !important;
display: inline-block;
overflow: hidden;
}
#links li {
float: left;
width: 300px;
height: 150px;
overflow: hidden;
background: #000000;
border-radius: 20px;
}
#links a {
display: block;
font: bold 30px/30px 'comic sans ms', sans-serif;
padding: 40px 66px 100px;
color: #5496ff;
text-decoration: none;
text-transform: capitalize;
text-shadow: 0 0 100px #ffffff, 0 0 100px #ffffff;
}
#links a:after {
content: ' >>';
}
#links a:hover,
#links a:focus {
color: #1b1b1b;
background: #5496ff;
text-shadow: none;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<ul id="links">
<li>
Our video collection
</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>
No image property in CSS. In order to get the desired effect you should replace it with background-image and delete the img tag from your HTML code.
#featured-box-right
{
background-image: url(../images/box-featured-home-right.png);
}
#featured-box-right:hover
{
background-image: url(../images/box-featured-home-right-hover.png);
}
for a button if i need a background image i would use background like below
#statusButton span {
color: #445058;
font-size: 14px;
font-weight: bold;
text-shadow: 1px 1px #fff;
padding: 7px 29px 9px 10px;
background: url('../images/Arrow.png') no-repeat 53px 7px;
display: block;
}
similar to here http://www.soundendeavors.com/clients/index.html
now How do i add this type of image as a foreground for a image. when i use same background attr for image th regular image will overlap is what i need is something of foreground type of css.
an image over a image.
So you want to put another image on top of one, right? You can do it this way:
div{ /*You can use whatever element you prefer*/
width: 400px;
height: 400px;
background-image: url('link1.jpg'), url('link2.png'); /*URLs*/
background-position: left top, right bottom; /*position*/
background-repeat: no-repeat; /*repeat or not*/
}
Fast and easy. The first image in the list will show up on the very top.
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/DerekL/Pdxpe/
The good thing about this method is that you still has one solid element, instead of wrappers floating around.
if i understand You right, You want to overlay another image over an image?
to overlay another image over an existing image You can work with position in CSS:
CSS:
#wrapper {
position: relative;
}
#img1 {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
z-index:0;
}
#img2 {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
z-index:100;
}
HTML:
<div id="wrapper">
<img src="img1.jpg" id="img1" />
<img src="img2.jpg" id="img2" />
</div>
now the image with the id #img1 is under the image #img2, because of the lower z-index value...
There's a mysterious whitespace along the right of my site in firefox (on both PC and Mac, latest versions) and I can't for the life of me figure out what's causing it.
This is what it looks like -
I've been searching the CSS for ages now trying to figure out if it's some margin or padding issue but I can't find anything.
Also, if I remove the div ID 'slider3' the issue seems to disappear, yet I can't figure out how this div is causing the whitespace, since it has no CSS applied to it - it's simply a container.
Here's my site http://www.simplerweb.co.uk
Here's some relevant code so the answer is useful for people later on.
<div class="fullw">
<div class="sliderleft"></div>
<div class="sliderright"></div>
<div id="slider3">
<div class="quote">
<div class="centmid">
<h1 class="fronth">Hello</h1>
<h2 class="frontp">Welcome to Simpler Web</h2>
<h2 class="frontp2">We're an Edinburgh based Web<br> Design Agency</h2>
</div><!-- end div centmid -->
</div> <!-- end div quotes1 -->
<div class="quote2">
<div class="centmid">
<h2 class="frontb">We make wonderful, cross platform <br> accessible Websites </h2>
</div> <!-- end div centmid -->
</div> <!-- end div quotes2 -->
<div class="quote3">
<div class="centmid">
<h2 class="frontc">We can translate your ideas into reality </h2>
</div> <!-- end div centmid -->
</div><!-- end div quotes3 -->
</div> <!-- #slider3 -->
</div>
CSS
/* The following styles are essential to the slider's functionality */
.plusslider {
overflow: hidden;
position: relative;
padding-top: 140px; /* The height / width of the slider should never be set via the CSS. The padding increases the slider box-model while keeping it dynamic */
}
.plusslider-container { position: relative; }
/* Slides must have a set width - even though they may be dynamic. If no width is set on <img> slides, the default image size will be assumed */
div.child { width: 480px; }
.plusslider .child { float: left; }
/* PlusFader Specific (not needed with plustype:slider */
.plustype-fader .child { display: none; position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0; }
.plustype-fader .current { z-index: 5; }
/* End PlusFader Specific */
/* No-javascript fallback -- change "#slider" and "#slider2" identifiers as needed for your html */
#slider > * { display: none; }
#slider > *:first-child, #slider2 > *:first-child { display: block; }
/* End no-javascript fallback */
/* End essential styles*/
/* The following styles are not essential for slider functionality. They are specific to the example content.
It is important to note that the fading effect does not work correctly with non-image content unless that
content area has a solid background (either a background image or a background-color, but not transparent).
Slides to not have to be the same width or height, but if you'd like a consistent width and/or height, make sure to set that within the CSS! */
#slider .slide1 { padding-left: 40px; padding-right: 40px; margin-left: 0; margin-right: 0; }
#slider .slide1 { height: 210px; padding-top: 20px; padding-bottom: 20px; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0; }
.slide1 { height: 500px; padding: 20px 40px; }
.slide1 h2 { color: #fff; font-size: 20px; margin: 0 0 20px 0; text-align: left; }
.slide1 p { border-left: 3px solid #fff; color: #fff; padding: 0 0 0 10px; }
.quote, .quote2, .quote3 { height:400px; padding: 20px 0; width: 980px; width: 100%; position: relative; }
.quote { background-image: url(../images/weare.png); background-position: center; background-repeat: no-repeat; }
.quote2 { background-image: url(../images/headlogosandroid.png); background-position: center; background-repeat: no-repeat; }
.quote3 { background-image: url(../images/ideafront.png); background-position: center; background-repeat: no-repeat; }
.plusslider a img { border: none; } /* Prevent blue borders in IE (not only does it look ugly, but it messes up spacing which breaks the "slider" type */
.plusslider-pagination { position: absolute; left: 0; bottom: 0; }
.plusslider-pagination li { float: left; list-style: none; margin-left: 5px; }
#slider3 {margin: 0; padding: 0;}
You have (in FF) exactly 17px extra width that is exactly the width of the browser scrollbar.
Your starting (initial) loading black screen (that animates) leaves a glitch of 17px:
cause it's animation maintains the DOM width that equals the screen width without the right scrollbar (100% screen width).
After the page is fully loaded and the scrollbar is added to the page, it actually adds the extra 17px (to the 100%) width that were maintained by the Loading animation.
Hope I put you in the right direction.
By the way, try to add:
html {
overflow-y: scroll;
}
and - if still needed - adjust the loading element width as I mentioned before.
Add this:
body{
overflow-x: hidden;
}
Problem solved. (temporarily)
So where is the problem?
It is at your <div> with the classes plusslider slider3 plustype-slider. You are constantly setting an incorrect width to it. You have to subtract the scrollbar width.
You can also try to do this: Padding: 0px(or whatever) 17px; and margin: 0px(or whatever) -17px; now your whitespace at the sides are gone.