We're building a site with ExpressionEngine. We are running a SQL query to gather up all member IDs for a specific member group. After that, we are using EE tags to get data from a custom member field for each member ID.
The ID and field data need to stay paired, as we will be populating a drop-down so that the ID is the value and the field data is the text, so we are currently putting them into a JS array as key/value pairs. The call is as follows:
var array= [
{exp:query sql="SELECT * FROM exp_members WHERE group_id = 5"}
{exp:member:custom_profile_data
member_id="{member_id}"}
{if company != ''}
{{member_id}:"{company}"},
{/if}
{/exp:member:custom_profile_data}
{/exp:query}
};
This gives us the output:
var array = [
{1:"name01"},
{2:"name02"},
{3:"name01"},
{4:"name03"}
];
Now, our problem. We need to remove objects based on duplicate field data (values) only, so the above array would look like this:
var array = [
{1:"name01"},
{2:"name02"},
{4:"name03"}
];
None of these IDs (keys) will ever be the same, but the field data (values) can be. So we want to keep the first KV pair that comes through with a unique value, but remove any subsequent dupes of that value - despite the fact that they will not be true "duplicate values" due to a different ID (key).
Keeping in mind that the KV pairs are all dynamic, is there any possible way to do this via JS so we can create a new array for the cleaned data to pass to the drop-down?
You could handle the duplications by modifying your MySQL query. (In my example, my custom field ID was 1.)
var myArray = [];
{exp:query sql="SELECT MIN(m.member_id) AS co_member_id, d.m_field_id_1 AS company FROM exp_members m INNER JOIN exp_member_data d ON m.member_id = d.member_id WHERE d.m_field_id_1 != '' AND m.group_id > 0 GROUP BY d.m_field_id_1;"}
myArray.push({{co_member_id}: "{company}"});
{/exp:query}
This query would use the first (in the ordinal sense) member_id found; you could also change the MIN to MAX and get the last.
This will give you a clean output in your source, without the need for any additional JS processing. I'd also recommend changing the names of the variables you're outputting as to not conflict in EE's parsing.
I would do it like...
function removeDups(arry){
var tmp = {}, retainIdx=[], newArry=[];
arry.forEach(function(obj, idx){
var val = obj[Object.keys(obj)[0]];
if(val && !tmp[val]){
retainIdx.push(idx);
tmp[val] = true;
}
});
retainIdx.forEach(function(i){
newArry.push(arry[i]);
});
return newArry;
};
Related
I am trying to loop through a dictionary of customers and save energy usage data, but for some customers when I try to change the values in their usage dictionary it will also change a completely different customer's value. I have a nested dictionary with customer utility information, the top-level key being a unique internal ID.
I stripped my code down to a single loop, looping through the top-level keys and setting the same month's usage for all customers in the dictionary to be the value of the iterator. After that, as shown in the code sample below, I log the values for three customers. After that, I increment only one of those customer's usage, and log the values again. The console shows that two over the customer's have dictionaries that are tied together somehow, but I can't figure out why or how to solve this. I can't discern any pattern in the keys of the linked customers, either.
Structure of the nested dictionary:
CustDict =
{"N0100000XXXXXX" =
{"name" = "XXXX"},
{"address" = "XXXX"},
{"meter_read_dates" =
{"2021-05-13" =
{"usage" = "XXXX"}
}
}
}
Stripped down code I used to demonstrate what is happening as simply as possible (real ID values):
Logger.log(custDict["N01000009700816"]["meter_read_dates"]["2021-05-13"]["usage"])
Logger.log(custDict["N01000000419887"]["meter_read_dates"]["2021-05-13"]["usage"])
Logger.log(custDict["N01000012580668"]["meter_read_dates"]["2021-05-13"]["usage"])
custDict["N01000009700816"]["meter_read_dates"]["2021-05-13"]["usage"] =
custDict["N01000009700816"]["meter_read_dates"]["2021-05-13"]["usage"] + 1
Logger.log(custDict["N01000009700816"]["meter_read_dates"]["2021-05-13"]["usage"])
Logger.log(custDict["N01000000419887"]["meter_read_dates"]["2021-05-13"]["usage"])
Logger.log(custDict["N01000012580668"]["meter_read_dates"]["2021-05-13"]["usage"])
Console Output:
11:54:56 AM Info 346.0
11:54:56 AM Info 346.0
11:54:56 AM Info 322.0
11:54:56 AM Info 347.0
11:54:56 AM Info 347.0
11:54:56 AM Info 322.0
Code used to create the CustDict dictionary:
stmtCR = conn.prepareStatement('SELECT cust_id, utility_account, cycle_id, read_cycle FROM customers')
results = stmtCR.executeQuery()
resultsMetaData = results.getMetaData()
numCols = resultsMetaData.getColumnCount();
results.last();
numRows = results.getRow();
i = 0
results.first()
var custDict = {}
while (i < numRows)
{
custDict[results.getString(1)] = {}
custDict[results.getString(1)]["id"] = results.getString(1)
custDict[results.getString(1)]["utility_account"] = results.getString(2)
custDict[results.getString(1)]["cycle_id"] = results.getString(3)
custDict[results.getString(1)]["read_cycle"] = results.getString(4)
results.next()
i++;
}
for (i = 0; i < Object.keys(custDict).length; i++)
{
tempCust = custDict[Object.keys(custDict)[i]]
tempCycleId = tempCust["cycle_id"]
tempReadCycle = tempCust["read_cycle"]
tempCust["meter_read_dates"] = cycleIdShdDict[tempCycleId][tempReadCycle]
custDict[Object.keys(custDict)[i]] = tempCust
}
cycleIdShdDict is a seperate dictionary that contains a set of dates associated with each cycle_id and read_cycle
I suspect the problem is that Object.keys(custDict) is returning the keys in a different order at different places in the for loop. So you're getting the object from one key, and then assigning it to a different key.
There's no need to assign back to custDict[Object.keys(custDict)[i]] since you're modifying the object in place, not a copy.
But instead of looping through the keys, loop through the values and modify them.
Object.values(custDict).forEach(tempCust => {
let tempCycleId = tempCust["cycle_id"];
let tempReadCycle = tempCust["read_cycle"];
tempCust["meter_read_dates"] = cycleIdShdDict[tempCycleId][tempReadCycle];
});
I am looping through a collection of blog posts to firstly push the username and ID of the blog author to a new array of arrays, and then secondly, count the number of blogs from each author. The code below achieves this; however, in the new array, the username and author ID are no longer separate items in the array, but seem to be concatenated into a single string. I need to retain them as separate items as I need to use both separately; how can I amend the result to achieve this?
var countAuthors = [];
blogAuthors = await Blog.find().populate('authors');
blogAuthors.forEach(function(blogAuthor){
countAuthors.push([blogAuthor.author.username, blogAuthor.author.id]);
})
console.log(countAuthors);
// Outputs as separate array items, as expected:
// [ 'author1', 5d7eed028c298b424b3fb5f1 ],
// [ 'author2', 5dd8aa254d74b30017dbfdd3 ],
var result = {};
countAuthors.forEach(function(x) {
result[x] = (result[x] || 0) + 1;
});
console.log(result);
// Username and author ID become a single string and cannot be accessed as separate array items
// 'author1,5d7eed028c298b424b3fb5f1': 15,
// 'author2,5dd8aa254d74b30017dbfdd3': 2,
Update:
Maybe I can explain a bit further WHY on what to do this. What I am aiming for is a table which displays the blog author's name alongside the number of blogs they have written. However, I also want the author name to link to their profile page, which requires the blogAuthor.author.id to do so. Hence, I need to still be able to access the author username and ID separately after executing the count. Thanks
You could use String.split().
For example:
let result = 'author1,5d7eed028c298b424b3fb5f1'.split(',')
would set result to:
['author1' , '5d7eed028c298b424b3fb5f1']
You can then access them individually like:
result[1] //'5d7eed028c298b424b3fb5f1'
Your issue is that you weren't splitting the x up in the foreach callback, and so the whole array was being converted to a string and being used as the key when inserting into the results object.
You can use array destructuring to split the author name and blog id, and use them to optionally adding a new entry to the result object, and then update that result.
countAuthors = [
['author1', 'bookId1'],
['author2', 'bookId2'],
['author1', 'bookId3'],
['author1', 'bookId4'],
['author2', 'bookId5']
]
var result = {};
countAuthors.forEach(([author, id]) => {
if (result[author] === undefined) {
result[author] = {count: 0, blogIds: []};
}
result[author].count += 1;
result[author].blogIds.push(id);
});
console.log(result);
I already try with no success to sort by sequence a dict of records by jquery I don't know where sorted again by name.
I ask the community on git but nobody answer me, I'm trying to sort by odoo sequence. using modules web_widget_x2many_2d_matrix, and sale_order_variant_mgmt
I modify python code, and if I debug the list of records the sort is the intended, but when the javascript code is loaded, it sorted by name and cant debug where the problem is
#api.onchange('product_tmpl_id')
def _onchange_product_tmpl_id(self):
self.variant_line_ids = [(6, 0, [])]
template = self.product_tmpl_id
context = self.env.context
record = self.env[context['active_model']].browse(context['active_id'])
if context['active_model'] == 'sale.order.line' or context['active_model'] == 'sale.order.line_group': #TODO check this modify for lentex group_sale_lines module
sale_order = record.order_id
else:
sale_order = record
num_attrs = len(template.attribute_line_ids)
if not template or not num_attrs:
return
line_x = template.attribute_line_ids[0]
line_y = False if num_attrs == 1 else template.attribute_line_ids[1]
lines = []
for value_x in line_x.value_ids.sorted(key=lambda r: r.sequence):
for value_y in line_y and line_y.value_ids.sorted(key=lambda r: r.sequence) or [False]: #I modify this and in python the sort is the intended, but not in JS
# Filter the corresponding product for that values
values = value_x
if value_y:
values += value_y
product = template.product_variant_ids.filtered(lambda x: not(values - x.attribute_value_ids))[:1]
order_line = sale_order.order_line.filtered(lambda x: x.product_id == product)[:1]
lines.append((0, 0, {
'product_id': product,
'disabled': not bool(product),
'value_x': value_x,
'value_y': value_y,
'product_uom_qty': order_line.product_uom_qty,
}))
self.variant_line_ids = lines
I think the problem is here
// get x axis values in the correct order
get_x_axis_values: function()
{
return _.keys(this.by_x_axis); //I think here is where the order is defined
},
// get y axis values in the correct order
get_y_axis_values: function()
{
return _.keys(this.by_y_axis); //I think here is where the order is defined
},
It looks like your sorting the dictionary, but dictionaries don't have or maintain an order.
Create a temporary list to hold the key values in order based on the value then iterate through that list to handle the dictionary values in the desired order.
alternatively you could use an "OrderedDict" in python
from collections import OrderedDict
I've got objects 'ing' with a field named 'id' and another one called 'fObj' with a field named 'contain'.
By using ng-repeat i'd like to show only these 'ing' objects where ing.id is a part of fObj.contain
e.g.
ing=[{id: 1,field: value},{id:2, field: othervalue},{id:3, field: cat}];
fObj={field1: value1, field: value2, contain: ':1:3:'};
By having this contain value I'd like to show only ing's with id=1 and id=3
Yeah, I know there are two types of data (number and string) but even if i changed numbers to strings it still didn't work
I just dont't know how to make it works. It's probably some kind of custom filter, but I've tried couples and nothing happend.
I would be glad if you suggest me a solution.
Thanks
In your controller,
var ids = fObj.contain.split(':');
// the array for your ng-repeat
var displayIng = [];
// loop the objects, see if the id exists in the list of id's
// retrieved from the split
for(i = 0; i < ing.length; i++) {
if(ids.indexOf(ing.id.toString()) displayIng.push(ing[i]);
}
I would split the numbers out of fObj.contain; and use them as hashmap object keys for simple filtering of the array
var ing=[{id: 1},{id:2},{id:3}];
var fObj={contain: ':1:3:'};
var IDs = fObj.contain.split(':').reduce(function(a,c){
a[c]=true;
return a;
},{});
// produces {1:true,3:true}
var filtered = ing.filter(function(item){
return IDs[item.id];
});
console.log(filtered)
When I query a database table, I get back values "yes" or "no" for records that represent whether an item is present or not (the item is the column name). I want to create a string that represents the products that are available by name (rather than what I am doing now "kitchen table =" + kitchenTable;
I am thinking this can be solved (poorly) by a series of if statements setting variables to either the product name or to "" and then include all variables in the string
var kt;
if (kitchenTable == yes) kt = "kitchen table";
else kt = "";
if (kitchenCabinet == yes) kc = "kitchen cabinet";
else ka = "";
output = kt + ', ' + kc;
There are about 50 items that can be presented to the user, is there a more efficient way of accomplishing this task?? One option is to change how values are entered into the datbase table such that instead of yes, its the item name but this seems like a poorer way to resolve the issue
Of course you don't give all the details about how do you make query so that is an imaginary mockup of a function simulating query
var available = [];
var result = query("kitchen table");
result === "yes" && ( available.push("kitchen table") );
......
var output = available.join();
What you want is actually built into javascript itself.
I would say using an object literal will really simply your life in this situation by organizing your code and turning it into a more readable format.
I would also recommend turning your server data into true and false as this is a standardized way to communicated a Boolean and allows for the method below to work as it does:
// From server response
var results = {
kitchenCabinet: true,
kitchenTable: true
}
// Use this for your storage of all related items
var kitchenProps = {
kitchenCabinet: 'kitchen cabinet',
kitchenTable: 'kitchen table'
}
// Reuse this function for each time your need a new category (masterBathroomProps...)
function getItemDataIfExists(results, hashTable){
'use strict';
var output = 'Your total is: ';
for (var item in results) {
if (!results.hasOwnProperty(item)) return;
if (results[item]) output += 'A '+hashTable[item]+' ';
}
return output;
}
getItemDataIfExists(results, kitchenProps);
Explanation:
You loop through a result set of an object containing keys names and true false values. In the loop, if the keyname's value is true, then use that keyname to access the properties (in this case a string of your choice. The "key" here is that the key names in each object must line up.
Here is a live demo:
http://codepen.io/nicholasabrams/pen/JXXbYz?editors=0010