Develop Reference

Getting JSON data from snowflake stored procedure parameter and inserting it in target table

I have a requirement to receive JSON data in a Stored Proc parameter and insert the same in the snowflake target table (user_json_feedback). JSON Data has three key elements(User, EntityID, and Entity Type), whereas the target table has five columns (User, ID, Entity Type, Region, and Date). The region will have a default value of "NA," and the date will be the current date.
If the inserts are successful, it returns true; otherwise, it returns false.
I am struggling with the syntax and parsing issues here, as I am very new to writing procedures.
Here is what I have been trying to do, which is giving me errors obviously but serves the algorithm of my intent.
CREATE OR REPLACE SP_UPDATE_JSON_DATA (JSON_DATA VARIANT)
RETURNS BOOLEAN
LANGUAGE JAVASCRIPT
EXECUTE AS OWNER
AS
$$
//Declare variables
var REGION = 'NA'
var V_DATE = `select current_date;`;
var DATE_STMT= snowflake.createStatement({sqlText: V_DATE });
var curr_date = DATE_STMT.execute();
var src_json = JSON.parse(JSON_DATA);
var sql_command =
`INSERT INTO user_json_feedback (user,id,etype,region ,date)//
select src_json:USER,src_json:ENTITY_ID,src_json:ENTITY_TYPE,REGION,curr_date;`;
try {
snowflake.execute (
{sqlText: sql_command}
);
return "Succeeded."; // Return a success/error indicator.
}
catch (err) {
return "Failed: " + err; // Return a success/error indicator.
}
$$;
The function call with parameters will be like
call SP_UPDATE_JSON_DATA ('[{"USER":"XYZ","ENTITY_ID":"BMT0001","ENTITY_TYPE":"BMT"},{"USER":"ABC","ENTITY_ID":"BMT0002","ENTITY_TYPE":"BMT"}]');
Thanks in advance for the help!

theres a few things here.
Firstly the step to get current date. curr_date is a result set object. to extract the value and use it later, you need to read the first row with .next() then GetColumnValue to read the column content. to pass it later as a well formatted string you'll wanna convert with .toISOString().
Secondly the parsed json returns an array in this case so you'll need to iterate over the array to insert the individual records. As it's not known ahead of time if the variant will contain an array you're best checking if the parsed json is an array and handle it accordingly
Last tweak was altering the return type so you get the verbose feedback you're expecting from your return calls.
Updated code:
CREATE OR REPLACE TEMPORARY TABLE user_json_feedback
(
user VARCHAR(100)
,id VARCHAR(100)
,etype VARCHAR(100)
,region VARCHAR(100)
,date TIMESTAMP_NTZ
);
CREATE OR REPLACE TEMPORARY PROCEDURE SP_UPDATE_JSON_DATA(JSON_DATA VARIANT)
RETURNS STRING
LANGUAGE JAVASCRIPT
EXECUTE AS OWNER
AS
$$
//Declare variables
var REGION = 'NA'
var V_DATE = `select current_date;`;
var DATE_STMT= snowflake.createStatement({sqlText: V_DATE });
var DATE_STMT_RES = DATE_STMT.execute();
DATE_STMT_RES.next()
var curr_date = DATE_STMT_RES.getColumnValue(1).toISOString();
var src_json = JSON.parse(JSON_DATA);
try {
if (Array.isArray(src_json)){
for (key in src_json){
var sql_command =
`INSERT INTO user_json_feedback (user,id,etype,region,date)//
VALUES(:1,:2,:3,:4,:5)`;
snowflake.execute (
{
sqlText: sql_command,
binds: [src_json[key].USER,src_json[key].ENTITY_ID,src_json[key].ENTITY_TYPE,REGION,curr_date]
}
);
}
}
else {
var sql_command =
`INSERT INTO user_json_feedback (user,id,etype,region,date)//
VALUES(:1,:2,:3,:4,:5)`;
snowflake.execute (
{
sqlText: sql_command,
binds: [src_json.USER,src_json.ENTITY_ID,src_json.ENTITY_TYPE,REGION,curr_date]
}
);
}
return "Succeeded."; // Return a success/error indicator.
}
catch (err) {
return "Failed: " + err; // Return a success/error indicator.
}
$$;
--Need to cast variable string as variant.
--ARRAY example
call SP_UPDATE_JSON_DATA ('[{"USER":"XYZ","ENTITY_ID":"BMT0001","ENTITY_TYPE":"BMT"},{"USER":"ABC","ENTITY_ID":"BMT0002","ENTITY_TYPE":"BMT"}]'::VARIANT);
--Single object example
call SP_UPDATE_JSON_DATA ('{"USER":"JST","ENTITY_ID":"BMT0003","ENTITY_TYPE":"BMT"}'::VARIANT);
SELECT *
FROM user_json_feedback;
Result set:
While all this works, you may well be better served just inserting the whole variant into a table and relying on snowflake's significant semi-structured data querying capabilities. Certainly for large payloads you'll find much better performance from bulk loading to a variant column in a table then parsing in a view.

Populating table with textbox value from previous HTML page

I have some JS that stores the name and value of selected checkboxes on one page and then, on a button click, adds this data to a table on page 2.
This works, but now I am looking to do the same for a textbox containing a number. Specifically, I'm looking to take the value entered by the user and add this to a cell in the table. What would be the best way to approach this? Add to the existing function or create a separate on button click function specifically for the textbox value?
I have added a screenshot of the HTML table on page 2 along with where I would like the textbox value to go (highlighted with a red rectangle).
Here's what I have so far:
HTML for textbox (page 1):
<div class="selecttier">
<h1>5. Number of Clicks</h1>
<input id="numberofclickstextbox" name="numberofclicks" type="text" value="0" data-total="0" oninput="calculatetier()" />
</div>
JS on page 1:
$('#sales_order_form_button').click(function() {
let table_info = [];
$('input[type=checkbox]').each(
function(index, value) {
if($(this).is(':checked')) {
table_info.push(
{
name: $(this).attr('name'),
value: $(this).attr('value'),
}
);
}
});
let base64str=btoa(JSON.stringify(table_info));
window.location = "page2.html?table_data=" + base64str;
});
JS on page 2:
// Helper function
function getUrlParameter(name) {
name = name.replace(/[\[]/, '\\[').replace(/[\]]/, '\\]');
var regex = new RegExp('[\\?&]' + name + '=([^&#]*)');
var results = regex.exec(location.href);
return results === null ? '' : decodeURIComponent(results[1].replace(/\+/g, ' '));
};
// actual code
let table_data = getUrlParameter('table_data');
let data_from_page_1 = JSON.parse(atob(table_data));
for(let i = 0; i < data_from_page_1.length; i++){
let row = $("<tr></tr>");
let recordName = $("<td></td>").text(data_from_page_1[i].name);
let recordValue = $("<td></td>").text(data_from_page_1[i].value);
row.append(recordName, recordValue);
$('#output_table').append(row);
}
// code to sum CPC column
var sum1 = 0;
$("#output_table tr > td:nth-child(2)").each(
(_,el) => sum1 += Number($(el).text()) || 0
);
$("#sum1").text(sum1);
//datetime stamp
var dt = new Date();
document.getElementById("datetime").innerHTML = dt.toLocaleString();
Output HTML table (page 2):
<table id="output_table">
<tr>
<th>Name</th>
<th>Value</th>
<th>Number of Clicks</th>
</tr>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<th id="total" colspan="1">Total CPC:</th>
<td id="sum1"></td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>

As stated in the #Manu Varghese comment, the way to go would be using sessionStorage or localStorage.
First, let's differentiate both. According to the Stack Overflow question "HTML5 Local storage vs Session Storage", we have the following answer:
localStorage and sessionStorage both extend Storage. There is no difference between them except for the intended "non-persistence" of sessionStorage.
That is, the data stored in localStorage persists until explicitly deleted. Changes made are saved and available for all current and future visits to the site.
For sessionStorage, changes are only available per tab. Changes made are saved and available for the current page in that tab until it is closed. Once it is closed, the stored data is deleted.
Considering they are used the same way and you must to choose between what better fits your case, I will proceed using sessionStorage.
For that, in the first page you must use:
sessionStorage.setItem("key", "value")
You may set the item right when you perceives a change, like in the input 'blur' event.
and when you land in the second page (right when jQuery calls its start event), you will retrieve your data using:
sessionStorage.getItem("key")
Take in mind that localStorage/sessionStorage can support a limited amount of data. Even if that limit is way bigger than URL, most browsers will store only 2.5MB to 10MB per origin, according to the browser implementation (you may test by yourself in the link recommended in MDN (Mozilla Development Network), http://dev-test.nemikor.com/web-storage/support-test/).
Also, you may want to avoid storing sensitive data in the storages, due to some some discussions about security, which seems not to be a complaint here.
Implementation in the given case
Your code can be modified in three steps:
Change the way you save the data to use the storage
Creates a JSON of an object containing the array, instead the make the JSON using the array itself. Then you can add more fields.
Load the JSON object and its fields (the array and the number).
Step 1 - Changing to sessionStorage
Just now you have your Javascript on page 1 creating an array of data and stringifying that data to a JSON string.
If you want to use the storage rather than the URL for all the data, just change these lines of code from:
let base64str=btoa(JSON.stringify(table_info));
window.location = "page2.html?table_data=" + base64str;
to the code that will save the data into a (local/session)Storage:
let jsonStr=JSON.stringify(table_info); // converts to JSON string
sessionStorage.setItem("oldData", jsonStr); // save to storage
window.location = "page2.html"; // navigate to other page
Notice that the storage can receive any string, but only strings, then we can remove the btoa function, but we must keep the stringify.
Step 2 -- Adding more data to save
Now you have one JSON that is an array of items. But what do you want is to include one more field, parallel to this array. Of course, you can't include it in the array, as it is a different thing. So, what we must to do is to create a JSON object which has a number field AND the array field itself.
Your function to create the array is all ok, then we will use the same "table_data" as the array and include it to a new JSON object:
let table_data = []; // the array you have
$('input[type=checkbox]').each(
... rest of code ...
); // the function that creates the array (I abbreviated it here)
// Creates an object with an array and a number
let jsonObj = {
table_data: table_data,
number_of_clicks: theNumberYouHave/* your variable with the number here */
};
// This is the bit above with CHANGES into variable names
// Instead of "table_data", now we save "jsonObj"
let jsonStr=JSON.stringify(jsonObj); // converts the "jsonObj" to a JSON string
sessionStorage.setItem("oldData", jsonStr);
window.location = "page2.html";
Remember to change "theNumberYouHave" to whatever your variable with the number is called. The you will append the number as a field of the JSON object.
In other words, this simply will create an structure like that:
{
number_of_clicks: 5216,
table_data: [
{ name: "...", value: "..."},
{ name: "...", value: "..."},
{ name: "...", value: "..."},
...
]
}
See? Your table_data is still there, but with a new sibling (number_of_clicks) inside an object.
Step 3 -- Loading data from page 1
For now, you have these two lines of code in page 2 to read data from page 1:
let table_data = getUrlParameter('table_data');
let data_from_page_1 = JSON.parse(atob(table_data));
What do you need there, is to simply replace the getUrlParameter function to read from the storage, and remove the atob function to reflect the changes we made in page 1, this way:
let jsonObj = sessionStorage.getItem("oldData"); // reads the string
let data_from_page_1 = JSON.parse(jsonObj); // parse the JSON string
let table_data = data_from_page_1.table_data; // grab the table data
let number_of_clicks = data_from_page_1.number_of_clicks; // grab the number
Now you are free to use the variable "table_data" like you did, and to use the "number_of_clicks" in the way you want to use it. It is the number passed from page 1, then you may set it to your table cell.
You have it with the unique ID "sum1", the you may just:
$("#sum1").text(number_of_clicks);
And you are done!

I highly recommend localStorage and sessionStorage to be used, as per this and this
Page 1 code full source
$('#next_page_button').click(function(){
let table_info = [];
// Do for checkboxes
$('.campaignstrategy input[type=checkbox]').each(
function(index, value){
if($(this).is(':checked')){
table_info.push(
{
name: $(this).attr('name'),
value: $(this).attr('value'),
type: 'checkbox'
}
);
}
});
$('.campaignstrategy input[type=text]').each(
function(index, value){
table_info.push(
{
name: $(this).attr('name'),
value: $(this).attr('value'),
type: 'text'
}
);
});
let base64str=btoa(JSON.stringify(table_info));
window.location = "page2.html?table_data=" + base64str;
});
Page 2 Code full source
// Helper function
function getUrlParameter(name) {
name = name.replace(/[\[]/, '\\[').replace(/[\]]/, '\\]');
var regex = new RegExp('[\\?&]' + name + '=([^&#]*)');
var results = regex.exec(location.href);
return results === null ? '' : decodeURIComponent(results[1].replace(/\+/g, ' '));
};
// actual code
let table_data = getUrlParameter('table_data');
let data_from_page_1 = JSON.parse(atob(table_data));
// clear table
$('#output_table').html("");
// generator checboxes
for(let i=0;i<data_from_page_1.length;i++){
if(data_from_page_1[i].type == "checkbox"){
let row = $("<tr></tr>");
let recordName = $("<td></td>").text(data_from_page_1[i].name);
let recordValue = $("<td></td>").text(data_from_page_1[i].value);
let recordCount = $("<td></td>").text("");
row.append(recordName, recordValue, recordCount); // not used but needed
$('#output_table').append(row);
}
}
// generate textboxes
for(let i=0;i<data_from_page_1.length;i++){
if(data_from_page_1[i].type == "text"){
let row = $("<tr></tr>");
let recordName = $("<td></td>").text("");
let recordValue = $("<td></td>").text("");
let recordCount = $("<td></td>").text(data_from_page_1[i].value);
row.append(recordName, recordValue, recordCount);
$('#output_table').append(row);
}
}

ANSWER:
What would be the best way to approach this?
window.localStorage - stores data with no expiration date
window.sessionStorage - stores data for one session

JavaScript database correlation

I've been trying to 'correlate' between user picked answers and an object property name so that if the two matches then it will display what is inside.
My program is a recipe finder that gives back a recipe that consists of the ingredients the user picked.
my code currently looks like:
//property are the ingredients and the value are the recipes that contain those ingredients. The map is automatically generated
``var map = {
"pork" : [recipe1, recipe2, ...],
"beef" : [],
"chicken" :[],
}
//this gets the user pick from the dom
var cucumber = specificVegetable[7];
var lemon = specificFruits[0];
//Then this code finds the intersection of the recipe(recipes that use more than one ingredients)
function intersect(array1, array2)
{
return array1.filter(function(n) {
return array2.indexOf(n) != -1
});
}
var recipiesWithLemon = map["lemon"]; **// makes the lemon object is map**
var recipiesWithCucumber = map["cucumber"]; **// makes the cucumber object in map**
//Here is where I am stuck
function check(){
var both = intersect(recipiesWithLemon, recipiesWithCucumber);
if ( cucumber.checked && lemon.checked){
for (var stuff in map){
if(stuff="cucumber" && stuff="lemon"){
return both;
}
}
}
}
check();
so basically what I tried to do was I made my intersect and then if user pick is lemon and cucumber then look at the properties in the map object. if the name of the property equals to the exact string then return both. That was the plan but the code does not work and I'm not sure how to fix it.
My plan is to write code for every possible outcome the user may makes so I need to find the correlation between the user pick and the map which stores the recipe. I realize this is not the most effective way but I'm stumped on how to do it another way.
Thanks for the help.

Im using the open source project jinqJs to simplify the process.
I also changed your map to an array of JSON objects. If you must have the map object not as an array, let me know. I will change the sample code.
var map = [
{"pork" : ['recipe1', 'recipe2']},
{"beef" : ['recipe3', 'recipe4']},
{"peach" :['recipe5', 'recipe6']},
{"carrot" :['recipe7', 'recipe8']}
];
var selectedFruit = 'peach';
var selectedVeggie = 'carrot';
var selections = [selectedFruit, selectedVeggie];
var result = jinqJs().from(map).where(function(row){
for(var f in row) {
if (selections.indexOf(f) > -1)
return true;
}
return false;
}).select();
document.body.innerHTML += '<pre>' + JSON.stringify(result, null, 2) + '</pre><br><br>';
<script src="https://rawgit.com/fordth/jinqJs/master/jinqjs.js"></script>

JS and ExpressionEngine - Remove KV pairs by duplicate values only?

We're building a site with ExpressionEngine. We are running a SQL query to gather up all member IDs for a specific member group. After that, we are using EE tags to get data from a custom member field for each member ID.
The ID and field data need to stay paired, as we will be populating a drop-down so that the ID is the value and the field data is the text, so we are currently putting them into a JS array as key/value pairs. The call is as follows:
var array= [
{exp:query sql="SELECT * FROM exp_members WHERE group_id = 5"}
{exp:member:custom_profile_data
member_id="{member_id}"}
{if company != ''}
{{member_id}:"{company}"},
{/if}
{/exp:member:custom_profile_data}
{/exp:query}
};
This gives us the output:
var array = [
{1:"name01"},
{2:"name02"},
{3:"name01"},
{4:"name03"}
];
Now, our problem. We need to remove objects based on duplicate field data (values) only, so the above array would look like this:
var array = [
{1:"name01"},
{2:"name02"},
{4:"name03"}
];
None of these IDs (keys) will ever be the same, but the field data (values) can be. So we want to keep the first KV pair that comes through with a unique value, but remove any subsequent dupes of that value - despite the fact that they will not be true "duplicate values" due to a different ID (key).
Keeping in mind that the KV pairs are all dynamic, is there any possible way to do this via JS so we can create a new array for the cleaned data to pass to the drop-down?

You could handle the duplications by modifying your MySQL query. (In my example, my custom field ID was 1.)
var myArray = [];
{exp:query sql="SELECT MIN(m.member_id) AS co_member_id, d.m_field_id_1 AS company FROM exp_members m INNER JOIN exp_member_data d ON m.member_id = d.member_id WHERE d.m_field_id_1 != '' AND m.group_id > 0 GROUP BY d.m_field_id_1;"}
myArray.push({{co_member_id}: "{company}"});
{/exp:query}
This query would use the first (in the ordinal sense) member_id found; you could also change the MIN to MAX and get the last.
This will give you a clean output in your source, without the need for any additional JS processing. I'd also recommend changing the names of the variables you're outputting as to not conflict in EE's parsing.

I would do it like...
function removeDups(arry){
var tmp = {}, retainIdx=[], newArry=[];
arry.forEach(function(obj, idx){
var val = obj[Object.keys(obj)[0]];
if(val && !tmp[val]){
retainIdx.push(idx);
tmp[val] = true;
}
});
retainIdx.forEach(function(i){
newArry.push(arry[i]);
});
return newArry;
};

In Firebase when using push() How do I pull the unique ID

I'm attempting to add/remove entries from a Firebase database. I want to list them in a table to be added/modified/removed (front end) but I need a way to uniquely identify each entry in order to modify/remove. Firebase adds a unique identifier by default when using push(), but I didn't see anything referencing how to select this unique identifier in the API documentation. Can this even be done? Should I be using set() instead so I'm creating the unique ID?
I've put this quick example together using their tutorial:
<div id='messagesDiv'></div>
<input type='text' class="td-field" id='nameInput' placeholder='Name'>
<input type='text' class="td-field" id='messageInput' placeholder='Message'>
<input type='text' class="td-field" id='categoryInput' placeholder='Category'>
<input type='text' class="td-field" id='enabledInput' placeholder='Enabled'>
<input type='text' class="td-field" id='approvedInput' placeholder='Approved'>
<input type='Button' class="td-field" id='Submit' Value="Revove" onclick="msgRef.remove()">
<script>
var myDataRef = new Firebase('https://unique.firebase.com/');
$('.td-field').keypress(function (e) {
if (e.keyCode == 13) {
var name = $('#nameInput').val();
var text = $('#messageInput').val();
var category = $('#categoryInput').val();
var enabled = $('#enabledInput').val();
var approved = $('#approvedInput').val();
myDataRef.push({name: name, text: text, category: category, enabled: enabled, approved: approved });
$('#messageInput').val('');
}
});
myDataRef.on('child_added', function(snapshot) {
var message = snapshot.val();
displayChatMessage(message.name, message.text, message.category, message.enabled, message.approved);
});
function displayChatMessage(name, text, category, enabled, approved, ) {
$('<div/>').text(text).prepend($('<em/>').text(name+' : '+category +' : '+enabled +' : '+approved+ ' : ' )).appendTo($('#messagesDiv'));
$('#messagesDiv')[0].scrollTop = $('#messagesDiv')[0].scrollHeight;
};
</script>
Now lets assume I have three rows of data:
fred : 1 : 1 : 1 : test message 1
fred : 1 : 1 : 1 : test message 2
fred : 1 : 1 : 1 : test message 3
How do I go about uniquely identifying row 2?
in the Firebase Database they look like this:
-DatabaseName
-IuxeSuSiNy6xiahCXa0
approved: "1"
category: "1"
enabled: "1"
name: "Fred"
text: "test message 1"
-IuxeTjwWOhV0lyEP5hf
approved: "1"
category: "1"
enabled: "1"
name: "Fred"
text: "test message 2"
-IuxeUWgBMTH4Xk9QADM
approved: "1"
category: "1"
enabled: "1"
name: "Fred"
text: "test message 3"

To anybody finding this question & using Firebase 3+, the way you get auto generated object unique ids after push is by using the key property (not method) on the promise snapshot:
firebase
.ref('item')
.push({...})
.then((snap) => {
const key = snap.key
})
Read more about it in the Firebase docs.
As a side note, those that consider generating their own unique ID should think twice about it. It may have security and performance implications. If you're not sure about it, use Firebase's ID. It contains a timestamp and has some neat security features out of the box.
More about it here:
The unique key generated by push() are ordered by the current time, so the resulting list of items will be chronologically sorted. The keys are also designed to be unguessable (they contain 72 random bits of entropy).

To get the "name" of any snapshot (in this case, the ID created by push()) just call name() like this:
var name = snapshot.name();
If you want to get the name that has been auto-generated by push(), you can just call name() on the returned reference, like so:
var newRef = myDataRef.push(...);
var newID = newRef.name();
NOTE:
snapshot.name() has been deprecated. See other answers.

snapshot.name() has been deprecated. use key instead. The key property on any DataSnapshot (except for one which represents the root of a Firebase) will return the key name of the location that generated it. In your example:
myDataRef.on('child_added', function(snapshot) {
var message = snapshot.val();
var id = snapshot.key;
displayChatMessage(message.name, message.text, message.category, message.enabled, message.approved);
});

To get uniqueID after push() you must use this variant:
// Generate a reference to a new location and add some data using push()
var newPostRef = postsRef.push();
// Get the unique key generated by push()
var postId = newPostRef.key;
You generate a new Ref when you push() and using .key of this ref you can get uniqueID.

As #Rima pointed out, key() is the most straightforward way of getting the ID firebase assigned to your push().
If, however, you wish to cut-out the middle-man, Firebase released a gist with their ID generation code. It's simply a function of the current time, which is how they guarantee uniqueness, even w/o communicating w/ the server.
With that, you can use generateId(obj) and set(obj) to replicate the functionality of push()
Here's the ID function:
/**
* Fancy ID generator that creates 20-character string identifiers with the following properties:
*
* 1. They're based on timestamp so that they sort *after* any existing ids.
* 2. They contain 72-bits of random data after the timestamp so that IDs won't collide with other clients' IDs.
* 3. They sort *lexicographically* (so the timestamp is converted to characters that will sort properly).
* 4. They're monotonically increasing. Even if you generate more than one in the same timestamp, the
* latter ones will sort after the former ones. We do this by using the previous random bits
* but "incrementing" them by 1 (only in the case of a timestamp collision).
*/
generatePushID = (function() {
// Modeled after base64 web-safe chars, but ordered by ASCII.
var PUSH_CHARS = '-0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ_abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz';
// Timestamp of last push, used to prevent local collisions if you push twice in one ms.
var lastPushTime = 0;
// We generate 72-bits of randomness which get turned into 12 characters and appended to the
// timestamp to prevent collisions with other clients. We store the last characters we
// generated because in the event of a collision, we'll use those same characters except
// "incremented" by one.
var lastRandChars = [];
return function() {
var now = new Date().getTime();
var duplicateTime = (now === lastPushTime);
lastPushTime = now;
var timeStampChars = new Array(8);
for (var i = 7; i >= 0; i--) {
timeStampChars[i] = PUSH_CHARS.charAt(now % 64);
// NOTE: Can't use << here because javascript will convert to int and lose the upper bits.
now = Math.floor(now / 64);
}
if (now !== 0) throw new Error('We should have converted the entire timestamp.');
var id = timeStampChars.join('');
if (!duplicateTime) {
for (i = 0; i < 12; i++) {
lastRandChars[i] = Math.floor(Math.random() * 64);
}
} else {
// If the timestamp hasn't changed since last push, use the same random number, except incremented by 1.
for (i = 11; i >= 0 && lastRandChars[i] === 63; i--) {
lastRandChars[i] = 0;
}
lastRandChars[i]++;
}
for (i = 0; i < 12; i++) {
id += PUSH_CHARS.charAt(lastRandChars[i]);
}
if(id.length != 20) throw new Error('Length should be 20.');
return id;
};
})();

You can update record adding the ObjectID using a promise returned by .then() after the .push() with snapshot.key:
const ref = Firebase.database().ref(`/posts`);
ref.push({ title, categories, content, timestamp})
.then((snapshot) => {
ref.child(snapshot.key).update({"id": snapshot.key})
});

If you want to get the unique key generated by the firebase push() method while or after writing to the database without the need to make another call, here's how you do it:
var reference = firebaseDatabase.ref('your/reference').push()
var uniqueKey = reference.key
reference.set("helllooooo")
.then(() => {
console.log(uniqueKey)
// this uniqueKey will be the same key that was just add/saved to your database
// can check your local console and your database, you will see the same key in both firebase and your local console
})
.catch(err =>
console.log(err)
});
The push() method has a key property which provides the key that was just generated which you can use before, after, or while you write to the database.

Use push() to get a new reference and key to get the the unique id of the it.
var ref = FirebaseDatabase.instance.ref();
var newRef = ref.push(); // Get new key
print(newRef.key); // This is the new key i.e IqpDfbI8f7EXABCma1t
newRef.set({"Demo": "Data"}) // Will be set under the above key

How i did it like:
FirebaseDatabase mFirebaseDatabase = FirebaseDatabase.getInstance();
DatabaseReference ref = mFirebaseDatabase.getReference().child("users").child(uid);
String key = ref.push().getKey(); // this will fetch unique key in advance
ref.child(key).setValue(classObject);
Now you can retain key for further use..