Related
I am using Angular 13 and I have an array of objects like this:
[{
"name": "Operating System",
"checkedCount": 0,
"children": [{
"name": "Linux",
"value": "Redhat",
"checked": true
},
{
"name": "Windows",
"value": "Windows 10"
}
]
},
{
"name": "Software",
"checkedCount": 0,
"children": [{
"name": "Photoshop",
"value": "PS",
"checked": true
},
{
"name": "Dreamweaver",
"value": "DW"
},
{
"name": "Fireworks",
"value": "FW",
"checked": true
}
]
}
]
I would like to loop through the array, check if each object has a children array and it in turn has a checked property which is set to true, then I should update the checkedCount in the parent object. So, result should be like this:
[{
"name": "Operating System",
"checkedCount": 1,
"children": [{
"name": "Linux",
"value": "Redhat",
"checked": true
},
{
"name": "Windows",
"value": "Windows 10"
}
]
},
{
"name": "Software",
"checkedCount": 2,
"children": [{
"name": "Photoshop",
"value": "PS",
"checked": true
},
{
"name": "Dreamweaver",
"value": "DW"
},
{
"name": "Fireworks",
"value": "FW",
"checked": true
}
]
}
]
I tried to do it this way in angular, but this is in-efficient and results in an error saying this.allFilters[i].children[j] may be undefined. So, looking for an efficient manner to do this.
for(let j=0;i<this.allFilters[i].children.length; j++) {
if (Object.keys(this.allFilters[i].children[j]).length > 0) {
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(this.allFilters[i].children[j], 'checked')) {
if(this.allFilters[i].children[j].checked) {
this.allFilters[i].checkedCount++;
}
}
}
}
Use a nested for loop to check all the children. If checked is truthy, increment the count of the parent. You don't need to check if parent.children has any elements since if there are no elements the loop won't run anyways.
// minified data
const data = [{"name":"Operating System","checkedCount":0,"children":[{"name":"Linux","value":"Redhat","checked":!0},{"name":"Windows","value":"Windows 10"}]},{"name":"Software","checkedCount":0,"children":[{"name":"Photoshop","value":"PS","checked":!0},{"name":"Dreamweaver","value":"DW"},{"name":"Fireworks","value":"FW","checked":!0}]}];
for (const parent of data) {
for (const child of parent.children) {
if (child.checked) parent.checkedCount++;
}
}
console.log(data);
No need to complicate it like that, you just need to check checked property in children.
data.forEach((v) => {
v.children.forEach((child) => {
if (child.checked) {
v.checkedCount++;
}
});
});
Using filter + length on children array should do the job:
const data = [{"name":"Operating System","checkedCount":null,"children":[{"name":"Linux","value":"Redhat","checked":true},{"name":"Windows","value":"Windows 10"}]},{"name":"Software","checkedCount":null,"children":[{"name":"Photoshop","value":"PS","checked":true},{"name":"Dreamweaver","value":"DW"},{"name":"Fireworks","value":"FW","checked":true}]}];
data.forEach(itm => {
itm.checkedCount = itm.children?.filter(e => e.checked === true).length ?? 0;
});
console.log(input);
I would suggest going functional.
Using map
const children = arr.map(obj => obj.children);
const result = children.map((child, idx) => {
const checkedCount = child.filter(obj => obj.checked)?.length;
return {
...arr[idx],
checkedCount
};
});
console.log(result)
or using forEach
const result = [];
const children = arr.map(obj => obj.children);
children.forEach((child, idx) => {
const checkedCount = child.filter(obj => obj.checked)?.length;
result[idx] = {
...arr[idx],
checkedCount
};
});
console.log(result)
I have an array with objects, like the following.
b = {
"issues": [{
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "200",
"name": "Backlog"
}
}
}, {
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "202",
"name": "close"
}
}
}, {
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "201",
"name": "close"
}
}
}]
};
I want to count how many issues have status close, and how many have backlog. I'd like to save the count in a new array as follows.
a = [
{Name: 'Backlog', count: 1},
{Name: 'close', count: 2}
];
I have tried the following.
b.issues.forEach(function(i) {
var statusName = i.fields.status.name;
if (statusName in a.Name) {
a.count = +1;
} else {
a.push({
Name: statusName,
count: 1
});
}
});
That however doesn't seem to be working. How should I implement this?
This is a perfect opportunity to use Array#reduce. That function will take a function that is applied to all elements of the array in order and can be used to accumulate a value. We can use it to accumulate an object with the various counts in it.
To make things easy, we track the counts in an object as simply {name: count, otherName: otherCount}. For every element, we check if we already have an entry for name. If not, create one with count 0. Otherwise, increment the count. After the reduce, we can map the array of keys, stored as keys of the object, to be in the format described in the question. See below.
var b = {
"issues": [{
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "200",
"name": "Backlog"
}
}
}, {
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "202",
"name": "close"
}
}
}, {
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "201",
"name": "close"
}
}
}]
};
var counts = b.issues.reduce((p, c) => {
var name = c.fields.status.name;
if (!p.hasOwnProperty(name)) {
p[name] = 0;
}
p[name]++;
return p;
}, {});
console.log(counts);
var countsExtended = Object.keys(counts).map(k => {
return {name: k, count: counts[k]}; });
console.log(countsExtended);
.as-console-wrapper {
max-height: 100% !important;
}
Notes.
Array#reduce does not modify the original array.
You can easily modify the function passed to reduce to for example not distinguish between Backlog and backlog by changing
var name = c.fields.status.name;
into
var name = c.fields.status.name.toLowerCase();
for example. More advanced functionality can also easily be implemented.
Using ES6 Arrow functions you can do it with minimum syntax
var b = {
"issues": [{
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "200",
"name": "Backlog"
}
}
}, {
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "202",
"name": "close"
}
}
}, {
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "201",
"name": "close"
}
}
}]
};
var countOfBackLog = b.issues.filter(x => {
return x.fields.status.name === "Backlog"
}).length
var countOfClose = b.issues.filter(x => {
return x.fields.status.name === "close"
}).length
a =[{Name: 'Backlog', count : countOfBackLog}, {Name: 'close', count : countOfClose}]
More about arrow functions here
You can write like this. It is dynamic.
var a = {};
for(var key in b["issues"]){
if(!a.hasOwnProperty(b["issues"][key].fields.status.name)){
a[b["issues"][key].fields.status.name] = 1;
}else{
a[b["issues"][key].fields.status.name] = a[b["issues"][key].fields.status.name]+1;
}
}
var c = [];
for(var key1 in a){
c.push({
name : key1,
count : a[key1]
});
}
Something like this should do the trick. Simply iterate over your data, keep 2 counters with the number of each type of issue, and create the data format you want in the end. Try it live on jsfiddle.
var b = {
"issues": [{
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "200",
"name": "Backlog"
}
}
}, {
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "202",
"name": "close"
}
}
}, {
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "201",
"name": "close"
}
}
}]
};
var data = [];
for(var issue of b.issues){
var entryFound = false;
var tempObj = {
name: issue.fields.status.name,
count: 1
};
for(var item of data){
if(item.name === tempObj.name){
item.count++;
entryFound = true;
break;
}
}
if(!entryFound){
data.push(tempObj);
}
}
console.log(data);
I have this sample JSON object
var sample = [{
"label": "one",
"value": 1
}, {
"label": "two",
"value": 2
}, {
"label": "three",
"value": 3
}, {
"label": "four",
"value": 4
}, {
"label": "five",
"value": 5
}];
I want to change it some thing like this
var sample = [{
"label": "one",
"value": 1,
"newKeyValue": "one|1"
}, {
"label": "two",
"value": 2,
"newKeyValue": "two|2"
}, {
"label": "three",
"value": 3,
"newKeyValue": "three|3"
},
...
];
It should combine both key values and return new key value combining both.
JSON is coming dynamically key label and value are not static it can be anything. For example [{"name":"srinivas","lastname":"pai"}]
You can use map like this :
EDIT
For handling generic keys you can use
Object.keys(d)[0] for first key
Object.keys(d)[1] for second key
var sample = [
{
"label":"one",
"value":1
},
{
"label":"two",
"value":2
},
{
"label":"three",
"value":3
},
{
"label":"four",
"value":4
},
{
"label":"five",
"value":5
}
];
var data = sample.map(function(d){
return {label: Object.keys(d)[0], value: Object.keys(d)[1], newKeyValue: Object.keys(d)[0] +"|" + Object.keys(d)[1]}
})
console.log(data)
Hope this helps!
You can use Array#map(), Object.keys(), and Array#join().
In ES6, you can use Arrow functions.
sample = sample.map(obj => {
var keys = Object.keys(obj);
obj.newKeyValue = keys.map(key => obj[key]).join('|');
return obj;
});
var sample = [{
"label": "one",
"value": 1
}, {
"name": "two",
"age": 2
}, {
"five": "three",
"six": 3
}, {
"company": "four",
"organization": 4
}, {
"label": "five",
"value": 5
}];
sample = sample.map(function (x) {
var keys = Object.keys(x);
x.newKeyValue = keys.map(key => x[key]).join('|');
return x;
});
console.log(sample);
document.body.innerHTML = '<pre>' + JSON.stringify(sample, 0, 4) + '</pre>';
In ES5, you can use the same code with anonymous functions
sample = sample.map(function (obj) {
var keys = Object.keys(obj);
obj.newKeyValue = keys.map(function (key) {
return obj[key]
}).join('|');
return obj;
});
Limitations due to dynamic keys:
The order of the keys in object cannot be maintained
This will join all the available keys in the object (in case if you just want to join fewer)
var sample = [
{
"label":"one",
"value":1
},
{
"label":"two",
"value":2,
"optionalValue":2
},
{
"label":"three",
"value":3,
"remarks":"free text"
},
{
"label":"four",
"value":4
},
{
"label":"five",
"value":5
}
];
for (var key in sample) {
var newValue = [];
for (var piece in sample[key]){
newValue.push(sample[key][piece])
}
sample[key]["newKeyValue"] = newValue.join('|');
}
$('pre').html(JSON.stringify(sample,null,4));
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<pre></pre>
You can use Array.prototype.forEach() for in situ changes.
The forEach() method executes a provided function once per array element.
Edit: with dynamic keys, stored in an array, because of the order.
var sample = [{ "label": "one", "value": 1 }, { "label": "two", "value": 2 }, { "label": "three", "value": 3 }, { "label": "four", "value": 4 }, { "label": "five", "value": 5 }];
sample.forEach(function (a) {
a.newKeyValue = ['label', 'value'].map(function (k) { return a[k]; }).join('|');
});
document.write('<pre>' + JSON.stringify(sample, 0, 4) + '</pre>');
If more element are their then use $.extend
var sample = [
{
"label":"one",
"value":1
},
{
"label":"two",
"value":2
},
{
"label":"three",
"value":3
},
{
"label":"four",
"value":4
},
{
"label":"five",
"value":5
}
];
$(sample).each(function(i,item){
var keyes = Object.keys(item);
sample[i] = $.extend(item,{newKeyValue: item[keyes[0]] +"|" +item[keyes[1]]});
});
console.log(sample)
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
$.extend also helpful when you are having more objects already and you want to merge both
eg.
var base = {
"label":"one",
"value":1
}
and you want to add more objects
var extra = {
"new1":"value1",
"new2":"value2",
"new3":"value3",
"new4":"value4",
}
then it will be done by
$.extend(base,extra);
Output:
{
"label":"one",
"value":1,
"new1":"value1",
"new2":"value2",
"new3":"value3",
"new4":"value4",
}
var sample = [{"name":"srinivas","lastname":"pai"}];
sample.map(function(item) {
item.newKeyValue = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(item).map(function(d) {return item[d];}).join("|");
})
console.log(sample);
http://jsfiddle.net/rw0z9e2j/
var sports = [{
"id": 1,
"name": "baseball"
}, {
"id": 2,
"name": "Football"
}];
var playersData = [{
"sport_id": 2,
"id": "nv12",
"name": "James"
}, {
"sport_id": 2,
"id": "nv11",
"name": "Jean"
}];
var arr = [],
tempObj = {};
$.each(sports, function (i, obj) {
var sport_id = obj.id;
$.each(playersData, function (i, obj) {
if (sport_id == obj.sport_id) {
tempObj = {
"sport_id": obj.sport_id,
"id": obj.id,
"name": obj.name
};
arr.push(tempObj);
}
});
obj.players = arr;
});
console.log(sports);
I try to build an array of players and put them within sports group according to sport_id but above logic has failed. It didn't group properly, the player who's in sport_id = 1 should go to sport which its id = 1 but why it didn't?
what's wrong with above loop there?
I suppose this is what you want:
var sports = [{
"id": 1,
"name": "baseball"
}, {
"id": 2,
"name": "Football"
}];
var playersData = [{
"sport_id": 2,
"id": "nv12",
"name": "James"
}, {
"sport_id": 2,
"id": "nv11",
"name": "Jean"
}];
sports.forEach(function (a) {
var arr = [];
playersData.forEach(function (b) {
if (a.id == b.sport_id) {
arr.push(b);
}
});
a.players = arr;
});
document.write('<pre>' + JSON.stringify(sports, 0, 4) + '</pre>');
You're declaring your temp vars outside of your loops, these should be scoped to your loops and thrown away after each operation.
var arr = [],
tempObj = {};
http://jsfiddle.net/samternent/rw0z9e2j/2/
You have to put it after push:
arr.push(tempObj);
obj.players = arr;
Actually you need this:
var sports = [{
"id": 1,
"name": "baseball"
}, {
"id": 2,
"name": "Football"
}];
var playersData = [{
"sport_id": 2,
"id": "nv12",
"name": "James"
}, {
"sport_id": 2,
"id": "nv11",
"name": "Jean"
}];
var arr = [];
$.each(sports, function (i, obj) {
$.each(playersData, function (i, player) {
if (obj.id === player.sport_id) {
var tempObj = {
"sport_id": player.sport_id,
"id": player.id,
"name": player.name
};
arr.push(tempObj);
obj.players = arr;
}
});
});
console.log(sports);
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
Hope you want to put inside the Sports group, but you are adding inside the player array, please notice, so please call
obj.sports = arr;
Hope it solve your problem .
This is my saved localstorage,
[{"industry_Id":1,"merchant_id":2}]
I want to filter below result, to get HP.
{
"industries": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "oil and gas",
"merchant": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "ABC",
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "DEF",
},
{
"id": 3,
"name": "GHJ",
}
]
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "IT",
"merchant": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "Apple",
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "HP",
},
{
"id": 3,
"name": "Google",
}
]
}
]
}
I thought of using multiple $.each but it have to iterate few times and it's quite redundant.
I would prefer using Javascript for loop, that way you can skip iterating over every object once required element is found.
Without jQuery (using for)
var i, j, merchant = null;
for(i = 0; i < data['industries'].length; i++){
if(data['industries'][i]['id'] == arg[0]['industry_Id']){
for(j = 0; j < data['industries'][i]['merchant'].length; j++){
if(data['industries'][i]['merchant'][j]['id'] == arg[0]['merchant_id']){
merchant = data['industries'][i]['merchant'][j];
break;
}
}
if(merchant !== null){ break; }
}
}
With jQuery (using $.each)
var merchant_found = null;
$.each(data['industries'], function(i, industry){
if(industry['id'] == arg[0]['industry_Id']){
$.each(industry['merchant'], function(i, merchant){
if(merchant['id'] == arg[0]['merchant_id']){
merchant_found = merchant;
}
return (!merchant_found);
});
}
return (!merchant_found);
});
var arg = [{"industry_Id":1,"merchant_id":2}];
var data = {
"industries": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "oil and gas",
"merchant": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "ABC",
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "DEF",
},
{
"id": 3,
"name": "GHJ",
}
]
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "IT",
"merchant": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "Apple",
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "HP",
},
{
"id": 3,
"name": "Google",
}
]
}
]
};
var i, j, merchant = null;
for(i = 0; i < data['industries'].length; i++){
if(data['industries'][i]['id'] == arg[0]['industry_Id']){
for(j = 0; j < data['industries'][i]['merchant'].length; j++){
if(data['industries'][i]['merchant'][j]['id'] == arg[0]['merchant_id']){
merchant = data['industries'][i]['merchant'][j];
break;
}
}
if(merchant !== null){ break; }
}
}
console.log(merchant);
document.writeln("<b>Without jQuery:</b><br>");
document.writeln((merchant !== null) ? "Found " + merchant['name'] : "Not found");
var merchant_found = null;
$.each(data['industries'], function(i, industry){
if(industry['id'] == arg[0]['industry_Id']){
$.each(industry['merchant'], function(i, merchant){
if(merchant['id'] == arg[0]['merchant_id']){
merchant_found = merchant;
}
return (!merchant_found);
});
}
return (!merchant_found);
});
console.log(merchant_found);
document.writeln("<br><br><b>With jQuery:</b><br>");
document.writeln((merchant_found) ? "Found " + merchant_found['name'] : "Not found");
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
selectors.map(function(selector) {
return data.industries.filter(function(industry) {
return industry.id == selector.industry_Id;
})[0].merchant.filter(function(merchant) {
return merchant.id == selector.merchant_id;
})[0].name;
});
// => DEF
If you want "HP", you want industry 2, not industry 1.
.filter(...)[0] is not really optimal. You could use .find(...), but that is not yet universally supported. Or you could use plain old JavaScript and write for loops instead to make it fast. Or you could use objects with ID keys instead of arrays to make lookups faster.
When it comes into a position where collection of data is what you're processing, I suggest you to take a look at underscore.js. It's not optimal choice for the best performance but it does make you code more readable and makes more sense especially when compared with loop.
Say data is a variable which stores your JSON data.
Try this:
// Given this selector criteria
var select = [{"industry_Id":1,"merchant_id":2}];
function filterByCriteria(criteria, data){
var match = [];
_.each(criteria, function(crit){
function matchIndustry(rec){ return rec.id===crit.industry_Id }
function matchMerchant(rec){ return rec.id===crit.merchant_id }
// Filter by industry id
var industry = _.first(_.where(data.industry, matchIndustry));
// Filter by merchant id
var merchant = _.where(industry.merchant, matchMerchant);
_.each(merchant, function addToMatchResult(m){
match.push(m.name);
});
});
return match;
}
var filteredData = filterByCriteria(select, data);
From snippet above, any merchants which match the search criteria will be taken to the match list. Is it more readable to you?
Do you even need numerical id's? Gets super easy when you don't.
/*
{
"industry": {
"oil and gas":{
"merchant": {
"ABC": {
"name": "ABC oil"
},
"DEF": {
"name": "DEF gas"
},
"GHJ" :{
"name": "GHJ oil and gas"
}
}
},
"IT": {
"merchant": {
"Apple" : {
"name": "Apple computers"
},
"HP": {
"name": "Hewlett Packard"
},
"Google": {
"name": "Google. Maw haw haw"
}
}
}
}
}
*/
var data = '{"industry": {"oil and gas":{"merchant": {"ABC": {"name": "ABC oil"},"DEF": {"name": "DEF gas"},"GHJ" :{"name": "GHJ oil and gas"}}},"IT": {"merchant": {"Apple" : {"name": "Apple computers"},"HP": {"name": "Hewlett Packard"},"Google": {"name": "Google. Maw haw haw"}}}}}';
data = JSON.parse(data);
var merchant = data.industry['IT'].merchant['HP'];
alert(merchant.name);
//console.log(merchant.name);