How can I define, that a javascript function is to be called, whenever another specific javascript function has been called and executed?
var UploadStatusController= {
var uploadedcount,
UpdateStatus: function (numberOfUploadedFiles) {
UploadStatusController.uploadedcount += numberOfUploadedFiles;
});
},
var DisplayController{
UpdateInfoBox: function () {
$('#Infobox').InnerHtml = UploadStatusController.uploadedcount;
});
}
I do not want to call my DisplayController from the UploadStatusController,
and I also do not want to pass my DisplayController into the UploadStatusController as a variable.
Instead, I am looking for a way to bind my function to calls on the other function in a way similar to binding it to a document-event.
var uploadStatusController = {};
(function () {
var subscribers = [];
var uploadedCount = 0;
uploadStatusController.updateStatus = function (numberOfUploadedFiles) {
uploadedCount += numberOfUploadedFiles;
// call subscribers
callSubscribers();
};
uploadStatusController.subscribe = function (fn) {
subscribers.push(fn);
};
function callSubscribers() {
for (var i = 0, len = subscribers.length; i < len; i++) {
subscribers[i].apply(this, [uploadedCount]);
}
};
}());
// subscribe to event from anywhere you need
uploadStatusController.subscribe(function (uploadedCount) {
console.log(uploadedCount);
});
Related
I'm trying to pass a variable from an addEventListener function to an onclick function. Thank you!
document.getElementById('rect').addEventListener('keyup', function() {
var index = 5;
}
asd.onclick = function() {
}
Here is the way
asd.onclick = function() {
var index = 5;
hey(index);
}
function hey (index) {
var recive = index;
console.log(index);
}
I am trying to return the array 'self.results' with all the arrays pushed in, which is after the self.yelpResults is completed. I want to use the returned array in another function. For now, self.parsedYelpArray is suppose to accept that array.
I am having trouble getting the self.results return all the arrays that are being pushed in. Instead, it asynchronously push the original empty array into the self.parsedYelpArray function.
How do I resolve this?
This is the code in my controller:
self.MapRouteArray = CompileMapArray.compileRoutes(data);
self.yelpResults = CompileYelpResults.compileYelp(self.MapRouteArray);
self.parsedYelpArray = ParsingYelpResults.parsingData(self.yelpResults);
And, these are the relevant services:
.service('CompileMapArray', function () {
var self = this;
self.MapRouteArray = [];
self.compileRoutes = function (data) {
for (var i = 0; i < data.response.route[0].leg[0].maneuver.length; i += 2) {
self.MapRouteArray.push(data.response.route[0].leg[0].maneuver[i].position.latitude + ',' + data.response.route[0].leg[0].maneuver[i].position.longitude);
}
return self.MapRouteArray;
};
})
.service('CompileYelpResults', function (YelpResource) {
var self = this;
self.results = [];
self.compileYelp = function (mapArray) {
for (var j = 0; j < mapArray.length; j++) {
YelpResource.getListings({term: self.yelpSearch, ll: mapArray[0]}, function (response) {
self.results.push(response.businesses);
console.log(self.results);
});
}
return self.results;
};
})
.service('ParsingYelpResults', function () {
var self = this;
self.parsingData = function (results) {
console.log(results);
};
});
You are trying to return from an asynchronous function; you'll always get unreliable results from that, you need to pass in a callback function that handles whatever operation you want at the end of your async... Like:
.service('CompileYelpResults', function (YelpResource) {
var self = this;
self.results = [];
self.compileYelp = function (mapArray, callbackFn) {
for (var j = 0; j < mapArray.length; j++) {
YelpResource.getListings({term: self.yelpSearch, ll: mapArray[0]}, function (response) {
self.results.push(response.businesses);
console.log(self.results);
});
}
callbackFn(self.results);
};
});
Then call the function with a callback function like so:
var parsed = CompileYelpResults.compileYelp(self.MapRouteArray, function(result) {
console.log(result);
});
This goes for all your asynchronous functions.
Relating to your comment the callback function you pass as second parameter to compileYelp takes the place of parsingData, so whatever processing you want to do with the results will be in the body of the callback function. It gives extra advantage in that you can use the results whichever way you like. For example.
var logged = CompileYelpResults.compileYelp(self.MapRouteArray, function(result) {
console.log(result);
});
var stringified = CompileYelpResults.compileYelp(self.MapRouteArray, function(result) {
JSON.stringify(result);
});
I have multiply functions which are using the same cycle code and i'm wondering is it possible to simplify the code by having one cycle function so i could execute the code just by calling wanted function names.
Now:
for(var i=0;i<all;i++){ someFunction(i) }
Need:
cycle(someFunction);
function cycle(name){
for(var i=0;i<all;i++){
name(i);
}
}
I tried to do this by using "window" and i get no error but the function is not executed.
var MyLines = new lineGroup();
MyLines.createLines(); // works
MyLines.addSpeed(); // doesn't work
var lineGroup = function(){
this.lAmount = 5,
this.lines = [],
this.createLines = function (){
for(var i=0,all=this.lAmount;i<all;i++){
this.lines[i] = new line();
}
},
this.addSpeed = function (){
// no error, but it's not executing addSpeed function
// if i write here a normal cycle like in createLines function
// it's working ok
this.linesCycle("addSpeed");
},
this.linesCycle = function(callFunction){
for(var i=0,all=this.lAmount;i<all;i++){
window['lineGroup.lines['+i+'].'+callFunction+'()'];
}
}
}
var line = function (){
this.addSpeed = function (){
console.log("works");
}
}
window['lineGroup.lines['+i+'].'+callFunction+'()'];
literally tries to access a property that starts with lineGroups.lines[0]. Such a property would only exist if you explicitly did window['lineGroups.lines[0]'] = ... which I'm sure you didn't.
There is no need to involve window at all. Just access the object's line property:
this.lines[i][callFunction]();
i get no error but the function is not executed.
Accessing a non-existing property doesn't generate errors. Example:
window[';dghfodstf0ap9sdufgpas9df']
This tries to access the property ;dghfodstf0ap9sdufgpas9df, but since it doesn't exist, this will result in undefined. Since nothing is done with the return value, no change can be observed.
Without a name space use:
window["functionName"](arguments);
SO wrap it up and use it thus:
cycle(someFunction);
function cycle(name){
for(var i=0;i<all;i++){
window[name](i);;
}
}
With a namespace, include that:
window["Namespace"]["myfunction"](i);
Note that this is likely a bit of overkill but using a function to make a class object (you can google the makeClass and why it is/could be useful) you can create instances of the object.
// makeClass - By Hubert Kauker (MIT Licensed)
// original by John Resig (MIT Licensed).
function makeClass() {
var isInternal;
return function (args) {
if (this instanceof arguments.callee) {
if (typeof this.init == "function") {
this.init.apply(this, isInternal ? args : arguments);
}
} else {
isInternal = true;
var instance = new arguments.callee(arguments);
isInternal = false;
return instance;
}
};
}
var line = function () {
this.addSpeed = function () {
console.log("works");
};
};
var LineGroup = makeClass();
LineGroup.prototype.init = function (lineNumber) {
this.lAmount = lineNumber?lineNumber:5,
this.lines = [],
this.createLines = function (mything) {
console.log(mything);
var i = 0;
for (; i < this.lAmount; i++) {
this.lines[i] = new line();
}
},
this.addSpeed = function () {
console.log("here");
this.linesCycle("addSpeed");
},
this.linesCycle = function (callFunction) {
console.log("called:" + callFunction);
var i = 0;
for (; i < this.lAmount; i++) {
this.lines[i][callFunction]();
}
};
};
var myLines = LineGroup();
myLines.createLines("createlines");
myLines.addSpeed();
//now add a new instance with 3 "lines"
var newLines = LineGroup(3);
newLines.createLines("createlines2")
console.log("addspeed is a:" + typeof newLines.addSpeed);
console.log("line count"+newLines.lAmount );
newLines.addSpeed();
I created an ObservablePropertyList which is supposed to execute a callback when a property changes. The implementation is:
function ObservablePropertyList(nameCallbackCollection) {
var propertyList = {};
for (var index in nameCallbackCollection) {
var private_value = {};
propertyList["get_" + index] = function () { return private_value; }
propertyList["set_" + index] = function (value) {
// Set the value
private_value = value;
// Invoke the callback
nameCallbackCollection[index](value);
}
}
return propertyList;
}
And here's a quick test demonstration:
var boundProperties = BoundPropertyList({
TheTime: function (value) {
$('#thetime').text(value);
},
TheDate: function (value) {
$('#thedate').text(value);
}
});
var number = 0;
setInterval(function () {
boundProperties.set_TheTime(new Date());
boundProperties.set_TheDate(number++);
}, 500);
For some reason though, the properties are not being assigned correctly or something. That is, calling set_TheTime for some reason executes the callback for set_TheDate, almost as though it were binding everything to only the last item in the list. I can't for the life of me figure out what I'm doing wrong.
When using loops like that you need to wrap it in an enclosure
function ObservablePropertyList(nameCallbackCollection) {
var propertyList = {};
for (var index in nameCallbackCollection) {
(function(target){
var private_value = {};
propertyList["get_" + index] = function () { return private_value; }
propertyList["set_" + index] = function (value) {
// Set the value
private_value = value;
// Invoke the callback
target(value);
}
})(nameCallbackCollection[index]);
}
return propertyList;
}
You need to create a closure in order for each iteration of the for loop to have its own private_variable object. Otherwise, each iteration just overwrites the previous (since private_variable is hoisted to the top of its scope). I'd set it up like this:
var ObservablePropertyList = (function () {
"use strict";
var handleAccess = function (propList, key, callback) {
var privValue = {};
propList["get_" + key] = function () {
return privValue;
};
propList["set_" + key] = function (value) {
// Set the value
privValue = value;
// Invoke the callback
callback(value);
};
};
return function (coll) {
var propertyList = {}, index;
for (index in coll) {
handleAccess(propertyList, index, coll[index]);
}
return propertyList;
};
}());
var boundProperties = ObservablePropertyList({
TheTime: function (value) {
$('#thetime').text(value);
},
TheDate: function (value) {
$('#thedate').text(value);
}
}), number = 0;
setInterval(function () {
boundProperties.set_TheTime(new Date());
boundProperties.set_TheDate(number++);
}, 500);
DEMO: http://jsfiddle.net/PXHDT/
This question already has answers here:
Closed 10 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
JavaScript closures and variable scope
Assign click handlers in for loop
I have this script:
var MyClass = {
MyArray: new Array(0, 1, 2, 3, 4),
MyFunc1: function() {
var i = 0;
for (i = MyClass.MyArray.length - 1; i>=0; i--) {
var cen = document.getElementById("cen_" + i); // It is an img element
cen.src = "col.png";
cen.className = "cen_act";
cen.onclick = function() { MyClass.MyFunc1(i); };
} else {
cen.src = "no.png";
cen.className = "cen";
cen.onclick = null;
}
}
},
MyFunc2: function(id) {
alert(id);
}
}
My problem is that, at this line :cen.onclick = function() { MyClass.MyFunc1(i); }; the argument sent to MyFunc2 is always -1. The MyFunc1 function should create four images, each one with an onclick event. When you click on each image, the MyFunc2 function should show the corresponding i value. It looks like the i value is not "saved" for each event and image element created, but only its "pointer".
Thanks!
You should be familiar with the concept of JavaScript closures to understand why this happens. If you are, then you should remember that every instance of the
function() { MyClass.MyFunc1(i); };
function closure contains i's value of -1 (since it is the final value of this variable after the entire loop finishes executing.) To avoid this, you might either use bind:
cen.onclick = (function(i) { MyClass.MyFunc1(i); }).bind(null, i);
or use an explicitly created closure with the proper i value.
It's a normal case and misunderstand of closures, see this thread and you may get some clue, the simply way to fix this problem is to wrap your for loop body with an Immediate Invoked Function Expression
MyFunc1: function() {
var i = 0;
for (i = MyClass.MyArray.length - 1; i>=0; i--) {
(function(i) {
var cen = document.getElementById("cen_" + i); // An img element
cen.src = "col.png";
cen.className = "cen_act";
cen.onclick = function() { MyClass.MyFunc2(i); };
} else {
cen.src = "no.png";
cen.className = "cen";
cen.onclick = null;
}
}(i));
}
}
You are capturing a variable that changes inside the loop, so you always get the last value of i.
You can easily fix that by creating a closure:
MyFunc1: function() {
var i = 0;
for (i = MyClass.MyArray.length - 1; i>=0; i--) {
(function(i) {
var cen = document.getElementById("cen_" + i); // An img element
cen.src = "col.png";
cen.className = "cen_act";
cen.onclick = function() { MyClass.MyFunc2(i); };
} else {
cen.src = "no.png";
cen.className = "cen";
cen.onclick = null;
}
})(i);
}
},