Getting th ChildNodes from an object variable - javascript

I've ran into a small snag with my code - below is my code:
var actionsAllowed = $(packet).find('actionsAllowed');
This returns to me the following in the firebug console:
Object[actionsAllowed]
Clicking "actionsAllowed" takes me into the packet and to the correct section, where I see the two listed actions.
I can expand the object and eventually see the following:
Object[actions]
0
actions
remove
remove()
attributes
[]
baseURI
"http://localhost:9000/testget#"
childElementCount
2
childNodes
NodeList[ActionOne, ActionTwo]
0
ActionOne
1
ActionTwo
length
2
item
item()
iterator
iterator()
__proto__
NodeListPrototype { item=item(), iterator=iterator()}
So under the NodeList I see the correct actions.
The issue I am having is that I don't know how to get those actions out of there and listed or even just have them available as separate variables.
My attempt at getting then logging each child:
function getActionsAllowed() {
var children = actionsAllowed.childNodes;
for (var i = 0; i < children.length; i++) {
console.log(children);
}
}
Problem is, ".childNodes" keeps returning as "undefined".
Is there another, better way to do this? Or is this correct but I've made a mistake?
Thank you.
Kind Regards,
Gary Shergill
EDIT:
working code for just one result:
var currentState = $(packet).find('currentState').text();
var actionsBanned = $(packet).find('actionsBanned').text();
EDIT 2:
Updated code to:
$(packet).find('actionsAllowed').each(function () {
var children = this.childNodes;
for (var i = 0; i < children.length; i++) {
var action = children[i].nodeName
console.log(action);
}
});
This works =) It logs each action one by one, so it's working. Just a matter of choosing how to change the console.log() to something more useful (need to define each one seperately...).
Will create a new thread if I have trouble and link it from here.
(my related thread: Returning Arrays and ChildNodes)

You can always extract the DOM nodes from the jQuery object using toArray or get.
var actionsAllowed = $(packet).find('actionsAllowed').get();
But that's generally not necessary since the jQuery object itself implements an extensive API to manipulate the nodes.
E.g. looping over the nodes
$(packet).find('actionsAllowed').each(function () {
//looping over childnodes
$(this).children().each(function () {
console.log($(this).text());
});
});
If you just want to children of actionsAllowed nodes directly, you can also do:
$(packet).find('actionsAllowed > *').each(function () {
console.log($(this).text());
});

Related

protractor and for loops

I have a question concerning below code for test in Protractor.
Namely as you can see firstly I find list of labels and then I check its number(three). Then I have a first loop where I compare each label with value from my table. Here I use i <table.length and then it works correctly.
In the second loop I use labels.count() which is equal to three because i checked it earlier but it doesnt work at all. Protractor goes through this loop no matter what the output of the check is and the test finishes as PASSED.
Can anyone tell me why i <table.length condition in the loop works and i<labels.count doesn't?
//labels list
var labels = element.all(by.xpath("//form[#name='form']//label"));
//test start
describe('angularjs homepage', function() {
it('test1', function() {
browser.get('http://www.way2automation.com/angularjs-protractor/registeration/#/login');
//shows 3
labels.count().then(function(text){
console.log( text);
});
var table = ["Usern1ame","Password","Username *"];
//first loop -> this one works if there is a difference between 'table' and element from 'label' list
for (var i = 0; i <table.length; i++) {
expect(labels.get(i).getText()).toEqual(table[i]);
}
//this one doesn't -> if there is a difference between 'table' and 'label'
//list nothing happens, no errors, test passes
for (var i = 0; i <labels.count(); i++) {
expect(labels.get(i).getText()).toEqual(table[i]);
}
});
});
In your example, labels.count() is a promise and you cannot use it directly. To get the value of count, you need to resolve the promise first. Look at below code,
labels.count().then(function(labelCount){
for (var i = 0; i <labelCount; i++) {
expect(labels.get(i).getText()).toEqual(table[i]);
}
})

JavaScript .children HTML collection length issues when looping

I'm attempting to loop through an HTMLCollection produced from JavaScript's .children property using the following code:
var articles = data.children;
var newsGrid = document.getElementById('js-news__grid');
for (var i = 0; i < articles.length; i++) {
articles[i].classList.add('loading');
newsGrid.appendChild(articles[i]);
};
The data variable is a fragment of a successful XHR. When I run the loop, it only appends the first child and the loop ends, and when running console.log(articles); before the loop, it shows 2 HTML elements (like it should) but only has a length of 1. If I remove the loop and run console.log(articles); it shows the 2 HTML elements like before, BUT it now has a length of 2.
I've left out my XHR code for the sake of simplicity and due to the fact that the HTMLCollection that is produced from data.children looks correct. Here are the log messages:
[article.news__item, article.news__item]
0: article.news__item
1: article.news__item
length: 2
__proto__: HTMLCollection
[article.news__item, article.news__item]
0: article.news__item
length: 1
__proto__: HTMLCollection
The problem is .children is a live collection, which will get updated as you move each child out of the container.
In your case, there are 2 children for data so articles.length is 2 when the loop is started, but after the first iteration you have relocated the first child which means the articles object is now contains only 1 element and i is 2 now the loop condition i < articles.length fails.
So one easy solution is to use a reverse loop
var articles = data.children;
var newsGrid = document.getElementById('js-news__grid');
for (var i = articles.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
articles[i].classList.add('loading');
newsGrid.appendChild(articles[i]);
};
Another solution will be is to convert articles to a normal array
var articles = [].slice.call(data.children);
Another approach as suggested by RobG is
var articles = data.children;
var newsGrid = document.getElementById('js-news__grid');
while (articles.length) {
articles[0].classList.add('loading');
newsGrid.appendChild(articles[0]);
};

Get all files for all .uploadedFiles

Im looking for a javascript/jquery (doesn't matter which way) to collect all the files i've uploaded.
I have the following code, where .afbeelding is the class for a couple of file input fields
var geuploadeAfbeeldingen = $('.afbeeldingen').files;
for (var i = 0; i < geuploadeAfbeeldingen.length; i++) {
}
This somehow doesnt seem to work. When i try document.getElementsByClassName it also doesn't work. The funny thing however is, that document.getElementById seem to work on one input field
Any ideas?
This should do what you want
var files = [],
geuploadeAfbeeldingen = $('.afbeeldingen').each(function(){
for (var i = 0; i < this.files.length; i++){
files.push(this.files[i]);
}
});
You end up with an array (files) that holds each file you have selected through the input elements..
Demo at http://jsfiddle.net/gaby/GJW7Y/1/
If you only want the filenames then change
files.push(this.files[i]);
with
files.push(this.files[i].name);
Try this way :
var geuploadeAfbeeldingen = $('.afbeeldingen');
for (var i = 0; i < geuploadeAfbeeldingen.length; i++) {
alert(geuploadeAfbeeldingen[i].files[0].name);
}
This may help you.
Edit :
$('.afbeeldingen').files is not work and document.getElementById().files is worked because first one return JQuery object( array of objects) and second one return DOM object.The jQuery object (created by the $ method) is a wrapper around a DOM element or a set of DOM elements. The normal properties and methods are not available with JQuery object.
You need to loop through each input element and return the files property.
Something like this is probably the shortest way, using map to iterate through an array:
var geuploadeAfbeeldingen = $('.afbeeldingen').map(function(k, v) { return v.files[0]; }).get();

delete specific xml node Javascript

My xml file is like:
it contains different 'object' nodes and in different objects there are different parameters one is deleted parameter.
I want to delete the all 'object' nodes that contains the deleted parameter 1.
This is the code that deletes the node object which has a parameter node deleted =1:
x=xmlDoc.documentElement;
for(var count=0; count<5;count++){
var y=x.getElementsByTagName("deleted")[count]; //Find that nodes arent
if(y.textContent == "1") {
var z=y.parentNode; //delete the node from the parent.
x.removeChild(z);
Xml2String1= new XMLSerializer().serializeToString(x);
}
}
Your loop is incorrect:
for(var x1=0; x1<5;x1++){
var y=x.getElementsByTagName("deleted")[x1];
Your loop runs for 5 iterations without regard for the number of <deleted> elements are found. Each time through the loop you search again and get a new NodeList/HTMLCollection of the remaining <deleted> elements, but your loop counter is incremented regardless.
Try this instead:
var deletedNodesList = x.getElementsByTagName("deleted");
var nodesToDelete = [];
for (var index = 0; index < deletedNodes.length ; index += 1)
{
var node = deletedNodes[index];
if (node.textContent == "1")
{
nodesToDelete.push( node.parentNode ); //delete the node from the parent
}
}
nodesToDelete.forEach( function() { x.removeChild(this); } );
Note that, per the documentation on MDN, the NodeList is a live collection, so don't modify it while you are processing it.
PS.
I second raam86's recommendation to use sane (meaningful) variable names. Meaningful variable names make it easier to understand the code, which makes it easier to write correct code and to resolve problems in incorrect code.

Sorting Divs in jQuery by Custom Sort Order

I'm trying to re-sort the child elements of the tag input by comparing
their category attribute to the category order in the Javascript
variable category_sort_order. Then I need to remove divs whose category attribute
does not appear in category_sort_order.
The expected result should be:
any
product1
product2
download
The code:
<div id="input">
<div category="download">download</div>
<div category="video">video1</div>
<div category="video">video2</div>
<div category="product">product1</div>
<div category="any">any</div>
<div category="product">product2</div>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript">
var category_sort_order = ['any', 'product', 'download'];
</script>
I really don't even know where to begin with this task but if you could please provide any assistance whatsoever I would be extremely grateful.
I wrote a jQuery plugin to do this kind of thing that can be easily adapted for your use case.
The original plugin is here
Here's a revamp for you question
(function($) {
$.fn.reOrder = function(array) {
return this.each(function() {
if (array) {
for(var i=0; i < array.length; i++)
array[i] = $('div[category="' + array[i] + '"]');
$(this).empty();
for(var i=0; i < array.length; i++)
$(this).append(array[i]);
}
});
}
})(jQuery);
and use like so
var category_sort_order = ['any', 'product', 'download'];
$('#input').reOrder(category_sort_order);
This happens to get the right order for the products this time as product1 appears before product2 in the original list, but it could be changed easily to sort categories first before putting into the array and appending to the DOM. Also, if using this for a number of elements, it could be improved by appending all elements in the array in one go instead of iterating over the array and appending one at a time. This would probably be a good case for DocumentFragments.
Just note,
Since there is jQuery 1.3.2 sorting is simple without any plugin like:
$('#input div').sort(CustomSort).appendTo('#input');
function CustomSort( a ,b ){
//your custom sort function returning -1 or 1
//where a , b are $('#input div') elements
}
This will sort all div that are childs of element with id="input" .
Here is how to do it. I used this SO question as a reference.
I tested this code and it works properly for your example:
$(document).ready(function() {
var categories = new Array();
var content = new Array();
//Get Divs
$('#input > [category]').each(function(i) {
//Add to local array
categories[i] = $(this).attr('category');
content[i] = $(this).html();
});
$('#input').empty();
//Sort Divs
var category_sort_order = ['any', 'product', 'download'];
for(i = 0; i < category_sort_order.length; i++) {
//Grab all divs in this category and add them back to the form
for(j = 0; j < categories.length; j++) {
if(categories[j] == category_sort_order[i]) {
$('#input').append('<div category="' +
category_sort_order[i] + '">'
+ content[j] + '</div>');
}
};
}
});
How it works
First of all, this code requires the JQuery library. If you're not currently using it, I highly recommend it.
The code starts by getting all the child divs of the input div that contain a category attribute. Then it saves their html content and their category to two separate arrays (but in the same location.
Next it clears out all the divs under the input div.
Finally, it goes through your categories in the order you specify in the array and appends the matching child divs in the correct order.
The For loop section
#eyelidlessness does a good job of explaining for loops, but I'll also take a whack at it. in the context of this code.
The first line:
for(i = 0; i < category_sort_order.length; i++) {
Means that the code which follows (everything within the curly brackets { code }) will be repeated a number of times. Though the format looks archaic (and sorta is) it says:
Create a number variable called i and set it equal to zero
If that variable is less than the number of items in the category_sort_order array, then do whats in the brackets
When the brackets finish, add one to the variable i (i++ means add one)
Then it repeats step two and three until i is finally bigger than the number of categories in that array.
A.K.A whatever is in the brackets will be run once for every category.
Moving on... for each category, another loop is called. This one:
for(j = 0; j < categories.length; j++) {
loops through all of the categories of the divs that we just deleted from the screen.
Within this loop, the if statement checks if any of the divs from the screen match the current category. If so, they are appending, if not the loop continues searching till it goes through every div.
Appending (or prepending) the DOM nodes again will actually sort them in the order you want.
Using jQuery, you just have to select them in the order you want and append (or prepend) them to their container again.
$(['any', 'product', 'video'])
.map(function(index, category)
{
return $('[category='+category+']');
})
.prependTo('#input');
Sorry, missed that you wanted to remove nodes not in your category list. Here is the corrected version:
// Create a jQuery from our array of category names,
// it won't be usable in the DOM but still some
// jQuery methods can be used
var divs = $(['any', 'product', 'video'])
// Replace each category name in our array by the
// actual DOM nodes selected using the attribute selector
// syntax of jQuery.
.map(function(index, category)
{
// Here we need to do .get() to return an array of DOM nodes
return $('[category='+category+']').get();
});
// Remove everything in #input and replace them by our DOM nodes.
$('#input').empty().append(divs);
// The trick here is that DOM nodes are selected
// in the order we want them in the end.
// So when we append them again to the document,
// they will be appended in the order we want.
I thought this was a really interesting problem, here is an easy, but not incredibly performant sorting solution that I came up with.
You can view the test page on jsbin here: http://jsbin.com/ocuta
function compare(x, y, context){
if($.inArray(x, context) > $.inArray(y, context)) return 1;
}
function dom_sort(selector, order_list) {
$items = $(selector);
var dirty = false;
for(var i = 0; i < ($items.length - 1); i++) {
if (compare($items.eq(i).attr('category'), $items.eq(i+1).attr('category'), order_list)) {
dirty = true;
$items.eq(i).before($items.eq(i+1).remove());
}
}
if (dirty) setTimeout(function(){ dom_sort(selector, order_list); }, 0);
};
dom_sort('#input div[category]', category_sort_order);
Note that the setTimeout might not be necessary, but it just feels safer. Your call.
You could probably clean up some performance by storing a reference to the parent and just getting children each time, instead of re-running the selector. I was going for simplicity though. You have to call the selector each time, because the order changes in a sort, and I'm not storing a reference to the parent anywhere.
It's seems fairly direct to use the sort method for this one:
var category_sort_order = ['any', 'product', 'download'];
// select your categories
$('#input > div')
// filter the selection down to wanted items
.filter(function(){
// get the categories index in the sort order list ("weight")
var w = $.inArray( $(this).attr('category'), category_sort_order );
// in the sort order list?
if ( w > -1 ) {
// this item should be sorted, we'll store it's sorting index, and keep it
$( this ).data( 'sortindex', w );
return true;
}
else {
// remove the item from the DOM and the selection
$( this ).remove();
return false;
}
})
// sort the remainder of the items
.sort(function(a, b){
// use the previously defined values to compare who goes first
return $( a ).data( 'sortindex' ) -
$( b ).data( 'sortindex' );
})
// reappend the selection into it's parent node to "apply" it
.appendTo( '#input' );
If you happen to be using an old version of jQuery (1.2) that doesn't have the sort method, you can add it with this:
jQuery.fn.sort = Array.prototype.sort;

Categories

Resources