There are some demos here:
http://paulirish.com/work/gordon/demos/
I downloaded blue.html as well as blue.swf on my local pc. But opening it I can't make it work.
Why ?
If you're using it on your local PC using file:// URL's, I'll bet a beer it's not working due to browser security restrictions. You should be getting warnings in Firefox's error console if that's the case.
You'd then need to test it on a web server, or set up a local web server accessible through http://localhost.
It may be that you are trying to play an incompatible .swf file. According to its gitHub page, the player can not render any .swfs over version 2.
A SWF Tag support table is on Github here,
http://wiki.github.com/tobeytailor/gordon/swf-tag-support-table/
Related
I am creating 2 HTML files that will be stored an an iPhone locally and accessed through a WebView.
I am wondering if it is possible to set localStorage in one file, and get the results of the storage from the other file.
I know that localStorage is accessible from files on the same domain, however, it appears that you can not get the value from a different local file?
I have also tried running this in Safari on the desktop with local files and the same issue occurs.
When you are opening the files locally, i.e. using the file:// protocol, as of now the browsers can not determine what is "same domain" so every file is considered a separate domain. Thus you can not use localStorage when you're opening the files.
Here is some more information on the problem in FireFox: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507361 . Personally I couldn't find much about Safari on this topic.
You can also look over this: Javascript/HTML Storage Options Under File Protocol (file://) . It might be helpful in your situation.
At this time, local files rendered via WKWebView on iOS 10 share access to the "same domain" with respect to localStorage. Unclear whether this is by design or a bug, however.
I have a website hosted in ISS (can be other) that loads when it's called on localhost but not from extern :) like: http://:8081/Website.html.
The verification whether the website is called from localhost it's on the client in a js script that I can’t modify as it’s encrypted.
So I was thinking at two options:
Develop an ASP application that has a remote desktop connection to the machine that host the website (not some many example on how to).
Maybe configure the IIS configuration (didn't found how)
I'm out of ideas
Do you have any other solution or can you point on how can I do one of the above?
I have tried the WinForm solution from here: https://www.codeproject.com/kb/cs/remotedesktop_csharpnet.aspx and it doesn't work. And I prefer a website.
Updates:
The only working solution that I have for now is to configure a Remote Desktop Services (Web Access) as I hosted the application on Server 2008 R2. Then I only shared the browser that has the localhost page as default page
The javascript files are all minified and encrypted, meaning that if I search localhost as a word in all the files, nothing shows up. So fixing the client will be hard.
Is it possible to create a new Site Binding on IIS and access the site using the binding hostname? This requires your network DNS to register the hostname to the IP Address.
I assume you are dealing with encrypted(???) javascript that is hardcoded to display DOM only if it is loaded from localhost.
If by encrypted you mean minified you should still be able to find reference to "localhost" and modify javascript in minified version. If it is really encrypted by a wrapper of third party javascript library then I would suggest you to rewrite javascript. I mean how can there be any quality code in javascript code that is hardcoded to load only from localhost?
Fix the client and stop exploring other solutions like remote desktop connection. None of them are practical and sustainable solutions.
I think you need to use WebRTC, but it's supported for Chrome and Firefox. It allows two users to communicate directly, browser to browser using the RTCPeerConnection API.
I have encountered this problem of JavaScript not running from local files when testing a website.
I am in great despair and need your help.
I have linked the JS correctly and everything, but it's just not working.
All settings are correctly enabled in Chrome.
Thanks!
Any problem caused by web browsers treating local files different to network files is best solved by installing a web server (there are many free options) on your development machine (optionally inside a VM) and testing through that.
This deals with many different issues include ones related to cross-origin security and relative URIs.
I'm writing an asp.net project. When trying to fix a bug, I updated one of my javascript files and then deployed the new version on my server's IIS 6.0. I can see that the new javascript file has been updated on the physical folder of the website.
However, when verifying the bug from my local machine I found that it's not fixed. After some investigation, I realized that it's because the javascript file received by my browser is not the latest version.
I deleted IE's caches and the problem still exists. Then I tried to download the javascript directly from my website by using the url like:
http://myserver.mydomain.com/mywebsite/scripts/myscript.js
and found out the downloaded javascript file is of the old version.
Then I realized this is probably caused by a cache on the server side. I tried to set the server's IIS: on my site's "Output Caching" option, I unchecked "Enable cache" and "Enable kernel cache"
:
Also I added rules for .js and .css file:
After taking all these actions, I updated my javascript file on the server, restarted IIS and tried to download it from my local machine again.However, the javascript I downloaded is still not the latest version.
So my question is, what shall I do to make sure the the browser can immediately get the latest version of the javascript file on my server's disk? Thanks!
I use the old trick of js and css versioning, for example if I create a new js file I call:
new_1.0.0.js
Then, if for some reason I change, I will change the name manually to:
new_1.0.1.js
Also change all the parts where I Referencing. With this, your browser should always bring you the latest standalone version of the settings you have in the IIS. At least in my different jobs where I used II6 or II7 have applied and it has worked.
I found the some strange <script/> tags on a site:
<script src="chrome-extension://lifbcibllhkdhoafpjfnlhfpfgnpldfl/document_iterator.js"></script>
<script src="chrome-extension://lifbcibllhkdhoafpjfnlhfpfgnpldfl/find_proxy.js"></script>
...
I haven't been able to find much information on this, but I highly doubt this is actually related to Google Chrome since this site in particular is still using <table>s for layout, and the source in question was retrieved with curl not a graphical web browser.
So,
What on earth is this?
What is chrome-extension://
Why is it using lifbcibllhkdhoafpjfnlhfpfgnpldfl as a directory name
Why is it pretending to be valid URL to a javascript file?
Why would I need find_proxy or document_iterator
Solved. As far as I know...
chrixian was right, It seems that only on this and a few select other pages, someone had re-saved them from Chrome's source-view with the Skype extension installed.
Thanks everyone for all your help, +1's for all! enjoy!
That is actually Skype Click to Call chrome extension.
Manage and view it using this link
chrome://extensions/?id=lifbcibllhkdhoafpjfnlhfpfgnpldfl
If you are using cURL to get the page, you're getting the HTML as it exists on the server--so I think a safe assumption would be: the author of the page initially saved the page from Chrome, he had an extension installed that inserted these script tages and lastly he didn't remove the script tags for one reason or another before putting the page on the server.
This is added by chrome as the page loads, to inject the extension's Javascript code into the page, so it can access the HTML document.
The Skype extension causes it by inserting all kinds of junk in webpages that you visit.
Do you have the Skype browser extension installed for Chrome?
Just disable the extension.
Chrome, like Firefox, provides developers with an easy API to extend the functionality of the web browser without needing to actually download and build the browser to do so.
They also provide a robust delivery system. In Google's case, it's the Google Chrome Web Store.
Extensions are installed locally on your computer, and use long strings as directory names to reduce the risk of collisions with another extension. In other words, if you and I both named our extensions "mycoolextension", then there would be a problem if a person tried to install your extension and my extension. The long string helps prevent collisions such as this.
The chrome-extension:// protocol is used by the browser to make requests to these local resources. Chrome extensions are developed using HTML5, JavaScript, and CSS, along with an API exposed to allow the local JavaScript to perform actions it would not normally be able to do on the Internet.
When you see these in the Chrome developer tools, it's just the extension doing it's thing, whatever that may be.
If you're seeing these, then you likely installed some extensions from the Chrome Web Store. To view them, go to the Tools menu and select "Extensions". This will show you a list of all installed Chrome extensions and apps.
To learn more about extension development, see the Getting Started Tutorial.
Also, as someone else mentioned, you're using the Skype Call Extension. However, an app using that directory name doesn't appear in the first page of the search results. It might be worth doing some more research to make sure you got that extension from a legitimate source, whether that be Skype or the Chrome Web Store.
If you're seeing it in Chrome developer tools for every request you make, it means it has access to all your websites, which could be benign, like if they're just making phone numbers clickable, or it could be malicious, if it's scraping your bank account info and shipping it off to some third party server. :)
It's a Chrome extension, and chrome-extension:// is a URL for extensions to address their contents via Javascript.
lifbcibllhkdhoafpjfnlhfpfgnpldfl is the unique identifier for the extension. I can't find it with a search, but apparently it might be Skype.
It's not pretending... it is a valid URL. The Javascript file is located in the extension. If you were to look on your harddrive you'd probably find that very file in the extensions folder.
The functions its calling probably are some sort of detection used by the extension to see if it needs to enable itself.
See this for some additional information:
Checking if user has a certain extension installed