Develop Reference

Getting error: Test webhook error: 400 when trying to send a test event to a webhook endpoint

I am attempting to send a test webhook as instructed in this tutorial.
But when I go to do it I get the error seen in the first link, and below:
Test webhook error: 400
Here is my index.ts code & functions I have deployed to firebase functions.
import * as functions from 'firebase-functions';
​
​
// const functions = require('firebase-functions');
const stripe = require('stripe')(functions.config().keys.webhooks);
const admin = require('firebase-admin');
​
admin.initializeApp();
const endpointSecret = functions.config().keys.signing;
​
exports.events = functions.https.onRequest((request, response) => {
​
let sig = request.headers["stripe-signature"];
​
try {
let event = stripe.webhooks.constructEvent(request.rawBody, sig, endpointSecret); // Validate the request
return admin.database().ref('/events').push(event) // Add the event to the database
.then((snapshot: { ref: { toString: () => any; }; }) => {
// Return a successful response to acknowledge the event was processed successfully
return response.json({ received: true, ref: snapshot.ref.toString() });
})
.catch((err: any) => {
console.error(err) // Catch any errors saving to the database
return response.status(500).end();
});
}
catch (err) {
return response.status(400).end(); // Signing signature failure, return an error 400
}
});
​
exports.exampleDatabaseTrigger = functions.database.ref('/events/{eventId}').onCreate((snapshot, context) => {
return console.log({
eventId: context.params.eventId,
data: snapshot.val()
});
});
How do I fix this and successfully run the test?
My current thinking is that the problem may have something to do with:
How I wrote this line: snapshot: { ref: { toString: () => any; };
Update:
From my testing, this does not appear to be the case.

I don't believe that the 'test webhook' properly signs them; you should use Stripe CLI for this instead.

Cloud Function to export new documents from Firestore to GCP bucket

I am trying to write a cloud function to export only the new documents getting added to my 'reviews' sub-collection. The trigger for this cloud function is: Cloud Firestore. However, my cloud function deployment fails through the console. Could someone please help me understand what's wrong with my cloud function?
Error message:
Deployment failure:
Build failed: /workspace/index.js:26
}
^
SyntaxError: missing ) after argument list
at new Script (vm.js:83:7)
at checkScriptSyntax (internal/bootstrap/node.js:620:5)
at startup (internal/bootstrap/node.js:280:11)
at bootstrapNodeJSCore (internal/bootstrap/node.js:623:3); Error ID: d984e68f
Cloud function code:
const firestore = require('#google-cloud/firestore');
const client = new firestore.v1.FirestoreAdminClient();
const bucket = 'gs://bucket_name'
exports.scheduledFirestoreBackup = (event, context) => {
const databaseName = client.databasePath(
// process.env.GCLOUD_PROJECT,
"fs124",
'(default)'
);
return client
.exportDocuments({
name: databaseName,
outputUriPrefix: bucket,
collectionIds: ['reviews'],
})
.onSnapshot()
.then(snap => {
snap.forEach(doc => {
const response = doc.data();
console.log(doc.data());
return response;
}
});
Console snippet:

The message you are getting, SyntaxError: missing ) after argument list is pretty clear. You are missing the closing curly bracket} and parenthesis) of then(). It should look something like this:
const firestore = require('#google-cloud/firestore');
const client = new firestore.v1.FirestoreAdminClient();
const bucket = 'gs://bucket_name'
exports.scheduledFirestoreBackup = (event, context) => {
const databaseName = client.databasePath(
// process.env.GCLOUD_PROJECT,
"fs124",
'(default)'
);
return client
.exportDocuments({
name: databaseName,
outputUriPrefix: bucket,
collectionIds: ['reviews'],
})
.onSnapshot()
.then(snap => {
snap.forEach(doc => {
const response = doc.data();
console.log(doc.data());
return response;
});
});
};

Cloudinary Signed Uploads with Widget

Documentation is extremely frustrating.
I'm using the upload widget to try to allow users to upload multiple pictures for their profile. I can't use unsigned uploads because of the potential for abuse.
I would much rather upload the file through the upload widget instead of through the server as it seems like it should be so simple
I've pieced together what I think should work but it is still saying: Upload preset must be whitelisted for unsigned uploads
Server:
// grab a current UNIX timestamp
const millisecondsToSeconds = 1000;
const timestamp = Math.round(Date.now() / millisecondsToSeconds);
// generate the signature using the current timestmap and any other desired Cloudinary params
const signature = cloudinaryV2.utils.api_sign_request({ timestamp }, CLOUDINARY_SECRET_KEY);
// craft a signature payload to send to the client (timestamp and signature required)
return signature;
also tried
return {
signature,
timestamp,
};
also tried
const signature = cloudinaryV2.utils.api_sign_request(
data.params_to_sign,
CLOUDINARY_SECRET_KEY,
);
Client:
const generateSignature = async (callback: Function, params_to_sign: object): Promise<void> => {
try {
const signature = await generateSignatureCF({ slug: 'xxxx' });
// also tried { slug: 'xxxx', params_to_sign }
callback(signature);
} catch (err) {
console.log(err);
}
};
cloudinary.openUploadWidget(
{
cloudName: 'xxx',
uploadPreset: 'xxxx',
sources: ['local', 'url', 'facebook', 'dropbox', 'google_photos'],
folder: 'xxxx',
apiKey: ENV.CLOUDINARY_PUBLIC_KEY,
uploadSignature: generateSignature,
},
function(error, result) {
console.log(error);
},
);

Let's all take a moment to point out how horrible Cloudinary's documentation is. It's easily the worst i've ever seen. Nightmare fuel.
Now that i've got that off my chest... I really needed to be able to do this and I spent way too long banging my head against walls for what should be extremely simple. Here it is...
Server (Node.js)
You'll need an endpoint that returns a signature-timestamp pair to the frontend:
import cloudinary from 'cloudinary'
export async function createImageUpload() {
const timestamp = new Date().getTime()
const signature = await cloudinary.utils.api_sign_request(
{
timestamp,
},
process.env.CLOUDINARY_SECRET
)
return { timestamp, signature }
}
Client (Browser)
The client makes a request to the server for a signature-timestamp pair and then uses that to upload a file. The file used in the example should come from an <input type='file'/> change event etc.
const CLOUD_NAME = process.env.CLOUDINARY_CLOUD_NAME
const API_KEY = process.env.CLOUDINARY_API_KEY
async function uploadImage(file) {
const { signature, timestamp } = await api.post('/image-upload')
const form = new FormData()
form.append('file', file)
const res = await fetch(
`https://api.cloudinary.com/v1_1/${CLOUD_NAME}/image/upload?api_key=${API_KEY}&timestamp=${timestamp}&signature=${signature}`,
{
method: 'POST',
body: form,
}
)
const data = await res.json()
return data.secure_url
}
That's it. That's all it takes. If only Cloudinary had this in their docs.

Man. I hate my life. I finally figured it out. It literally took me beautifying the upload widget js to understand that the return of the function should be a string instead of an object even though the docs make it seem otherwise.
Here is how to implement a signed upload with a Firebase Cloud Function
import * as functions from 'firebase-functions';
import cloudinary from 'cloudinary';
const CLOUDINARY_SECRET_KEY = functions.config().cloudinary.key;
const cloudinaryV2 = cloudinary.v2;
module.exports.main = functions.https.onCall(async (data, context: CallableContext) => {
// Checking that the user is authenticated.
if (!context.auth) {
// Throwing an HttpsError so that the client gets the error details.
throw new functions.https.HttpsError(
'failed-precondition',
'The function must be called while authenticated.',
);
}
try {
return cloudinaryV2.utils.api_sign_request(data.params_to_sign, CLOUDINARY_SECRET_KEY);
} catch (error) {
throw new functions.https.HttpsError('failed-precondition', error.message);
}
});
// CLIENT
const uploadWidget = () => {
const generateSignature = async (callback: Function, params_to_sign: object): Promise<void> => {
try {
const signature = await generateImageUploadSignatureCF({ params_to_sign });
callback(signature.data);
} catch (err) {
console.log(err);
}
};
cloudinary.openUploadWidget(
{
cloudName: 'xxxxxx',
uploadSignature: generateSignature,
apiKey: ENV.CLOUDINARY_PUBLIC_KEY,
},
function(error, result) {
console.log(error);
},
);
};

Node.js: Awaiting a Require

I'm new the Node.js and I've been working with a sample project by a third party provider and I'm trying to use Azure Key Vault to store configuration values.
I'm having trouble getting a process to wait before executing the rest. I'll try to detail as much as I know.
The sample project has a file named agent.js which is the start page/file. On line 16 (agent_config = require('./config/config.js')[process.env.LP_ACCOUNT][process.env.LP_USER]) it calls a config file with values. I'm trying to set these value using Key Vault. I've tried many combinations of calling functions, and even implementing async / await but the value for agent_config always contains a [Promise] object and not the data returned by Key Vault.
If I'm right, this is because the Key Vault itself uses async / await too and the config file returns before the Key Vault values are returned.
How can Key Vault be added/implemented in a situation like this?
Here's what I've tried:
First updated agent.js to
let agent_config = {};
try {
agent_config = require('./config/config.js')['123']['accountName'];
} catch (ex) {
log.warn(`[agent.js] Error loading config: ${ex}`)
}
console.log(agent_config);
Test 1
./config/config.js
const KeyVault = require('azure-keyvault');
const msRestAzure = require('ms-rest-azure');
const KEY_VAULT_URI = 'https://' + '{my vault}' + '.vault.azure.net/' || process.env['KEY_VAULT_URI'];
function getValue(secretName, secretVersion) {
msRestAzure.loginWithAppServiceMSI({ resource: 'https://vault.azure.net' }).then((credentials) => {
const client = new KeyVault.KeyVaultClient(credentials);
client.getSecret(KEY_VAULT_URI, secretName, secretVersion).then(
function (response) {
return response.Value;
});
});
}
module.exports = {
'123': {
'accountName': {
accountId: getValue('mySecretName', '')
}
}
};
Results
{ accountsId: undefined }
Test 2
Made getValue an async function and wrapped it around another function (tried without the wrapping and didn't work either)
./config/config.js
const KeyVault = require('azure-keyvault');
const msRestAzure = require('ms-rest-azure');
const KEY_VAULT_URI = 'https://' + '{my vault}' + '.vault.azure.net/' || process.env['KEY_VAULT_URI'];
async function getValue(secretName, secretVersion) {
msRestAzure.loginWithAppServiceMSI({ resource: 'https://vault.azure.net' }).then((credentials) => {
const client = new KeyVault.KeyVaultClient(credentials);
client.getSecret(KEY_VAULT_URI, secretName, secretVersion).then(
function (response) {
return response.Value;
});
});
}
async function config() {
module.exports = {
'123': {
'accountName': {
accountId: await getValue('mySecretName', '')
}
}
};
}
config();
Results
{}
Test 3
Made getValue an async function and wrapped it around another function (tried without the wrapping and didn't work either)
./config/config.js
const KeyVault = require('azure-keyvault');
const msRestAzure = require('ms-rest-azure');
const KEY_VAULT_URI = 'https://' + '{my vault}' + '.vault.azure.net/' || process.env['KEY_VAULT_URI'];
async function getValue(secretName, secretVersion) {
return msRestAzure.loginWithAppServiceMSI({ resource: 'https://vault.azure.net' })
.then((credentials) => {
const client = new KeyVault.KeyVaultClient(credentials);
return client.getSecret(KEY_VAULT_URI, secretName, secretVersion).then(
function (response) {
return response.Value;
});
});
}
module.exports = {
'123': {
'accountName': {
accountId: getValue('mySecretName', '')
}
}
};
config();
Results
{ accountId: { <pending> } }
Other
I've tried many others ways like module.exports = async (value) =< {...} (found through other questions/solutions without success.
I'm starting to think I need to do some "waiting" on agent.js but I haven't found good info on this.
Any help would be great!

One issue is that your getValue function is not returning anything as your returns need to be explicit.
(and without the promise being returned, there's nothing to await on)
async function getValue(secretName, secretVersion) {
return msRestAzure.loginWithAppServiceMSI({ resource: 'https://vault.azure.net' })
.then((credentials) => {
const client = new KeyVault.KeyVaultClient(credentials);
return client.getSecret(KEY_VAULT_URI, secretName, secretVersion).then(
function (response) {
return response.Value;
});
});
}
You could also get away with less explicit returns using arrow functions..
const getValue = async (secretName, secretVersion) =>
msRestAzure.loginWithAppServiceMSI({ resource: 'https://vault.azure.net' })
.then(credentials => {
const client = new KeyVault.KeyVaultClient(credentials);
return client.getSecret(KEY_VAULT_URI, secretName, secretVersion)
.then(response => response.Value);
});
Introducing the Azure Key Vault read, which is async, means your whole config read is async. There' nothing you can do to get around that. This will mean that the code that uses the config will need to handle it appropriately. You start by exporting an async function that will return the config..
async function getConfig() {
return {
'123': {
'accountName': {
accountId: await getValue('mySecretName', '')
}
}
};
}
module.exports = getConfig;
In your agent code you call that function. This will mean that your agent code will need to be wrapped in a function too, so maybe something like this..
const Bot = require('./bot/bot.js');
const getConfig = require('./config/config.js');
getConfig().then(agentConfig => {
const agent = new Bot(agentConfig);
agent.on(Bot.const.CONNECTED, data => {
log.info(`[agent.js] CONNECTED ${JSON.stringify(data)}`);
});
});

The package azure-keyvault has been deprecated in favor of the new packages to deal with Keyvault keys, secrets and certificates separately. For your scenario, you can use the new #azure/keyvault-secrets package to talk to Key Vault and the new #azure/identity package to create the credential.
const { SecretClient } = require("#azure/keyvault-secrets");
const { DefaultAzureCredential } = require("#azure/identity");
async function getValue(secretName, secretVersion) {
const credential = new DefaultAzureCredential();
const client = new SecretClient(KEY_VAULT_URI, credential);
const secret = await client.getSecret(secretName);
return secret.value;
}
The DefaultAzureCredential assumes that you have set the below env variables
AZURE_TENANT_ID: The tenant ID in Azure Active Directory
AZURE_CLIENT_ID: The application (client) ID registered in the AAD tenant
AZURE_CLIENT_SECRET: The client secret for the registered application
To try other credentials, see the readme for #azure/identity
If you are moving from the older azure-keyvault package, checkout the migration guide to understand the major changes

By using ledger nano s, I wanna sign a transaction and send it

I'm trying to send ethereum transaction that sends ERC20 tokens to someone with Ledger Nano S through Node.JS but I'm not able to successfully sign and send this transaction.
First of all, I signed the transaction through the method, signTransaction, of ledgerhq API and then after signing it, I sended it to the main net by using sendSignedTransaction. When I execute below code, Ledger receives request and shows details of a transaction. However, after pressing Ledger's confirm button, the console returns error 'Returned error: Invalid signature: Crypto error (Invalid EC signature)'.
import AppEth from "#ledgerhq/hw-app-eth";
import TransportU2F from "#ledgerhq/hw-transport-u2f";
import TransportNodeHid from "#ledgerhq/hw-transport-node-hid";
import EthereumTx from "ethereumjs-tx"
const Web3 = require('web3');
import { addHexPrefix, bufferToHex, toBuffer } from 'ethereumjs-util';
const web3 = new Web3(new Web3.providers.HttpProvider('http://localhost:8545'));
var destAddresses = ['0xa6acFa18468786473269Dc1521fd4ff40F6481D9'];
var amount = 1000000000000;
var i=0;
var contract = new web3.eth.Contract([token contract ABI... ], '0x74a...');
const data1 = contract.methods.transfer(destAddresses[0], amount).encodeABI();
const exParams = {
gasLimit: 6e6,
gasPrice: 3e9,
from: '0x1A...',
data : data1,
to: '0x74a...',
value: '0x00',
nonce: "0x0",
chainId: 1,
v: "0x01",
r: "0x00",
s: "0x00"
}
async function makeSign(txParams) {
const tx = new EthereumTx(txParams);
const txHex = tx.serialize().toString("hex");
const signedTransaction = '0x' + txHex;
let transport;
try {
transport = await TransportNodeHid.create();
let eth2 = new AppEth(transport);
const result = await eth2.signTransaction("m/44'/60'/0'/0", txHex).then(result => {
web3.eth.sendSignedTransaction('0x' + txHex)
.then(res => {
console.log(res);
}).catch(err => {
console.log('sendSignedTransaction');
console.log(err);
});
}).catch(err => {
console.log('signTransaction');
console.log(err);
});
txParams.r = `0x${result.r, 'hex'}`;
txParams.s = `0x${result.s, 'hex'}`;
txParams.v = `0x${result.v, 'hex'}`;
return result;
} catch (e) {
console.log(e);
}
}
makeSign(exParams).then(function () {
console.log("Promise Resolved2");
}.catch(function () {
console.log("Promise Rejected2");
});
When I only use signTransaction function, I can confirm the transaction in the ledger device and return txhash on the console. However, ultimately I want to broadcast a transaction to the main net. Could you please give me any idea? I want any feedback. Also, if there are any examples of creating and broadcasting a raw transaction by using the ledger, notice me please.

Your code already sends the transaction to the network. However, just awaiting the "send" promise only gives you the transaction hash, not the receipt. You need to treat it as an event emitter and wait for the 'confirmation' event.
const serializedTx = tx.serialize();
web3.eth.sendSignedTransaction(serializedTx.toString('hex'))
.once('transactionHash', hash => console.log('Tx hash', hash))
.on('confirmation', (confNumber, receipt) => {
console.log(`Confirmation #${confNumber}`, receipt);
})
.on('error', console.error);
To send it to mainnet as you mention, you can either run a local geth node on port 8545 and use your code unchanged, or point web3 at infura or similar.